Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-020745-27 | EudraCT Number |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness of two dosing regimens of fostamatinib compared to placebo, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who are taking methotrexate and have had an inadequate response to a single TNF-alpha antagonist. The study will last for approximately six months.
Sub-study:
Full title: Optional Genetic Research
Date: 18 June 2010
Version: 1
Objectives: To collect and store, with appropriate consent ,DNA samples for future exploratory research into genes/genetic variation that may influence response (ie, absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion, safety, tolerability and efficacy) to fostamatinib disodium and/or methotrexate; and/or susceptibility to, progression of and prognosis of RA
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dosing Regimen A | Experimental | Oral Treatment |
|
| Dosing Regimen B | Experimental | Oral Treatment |
|
| Dosing Regimen C | Placebo Comparator | Oral Treatment |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| fostamatinib | Drug | fostamatinib 100 mg twice daily |
| |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Proportion of Patients Achieving ACR20 at Week 24, Comparison Between Fostamatinib and Placebo | ACR20: American College of Rheumatology 20% response criteria, based on count of swollen and tender joints (out of 28 joints), blood test measures of inflammation (such as C-Reactive Protein) and the physician and patient's own assessments of disease activity, pain and physical function. BID = twice daily, DMARD = disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug, PO = orally, QD = once daily. | 24 weeks |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Proportion of Patients Achieving ACR20 at Week 1, Comparison Between Fostamatinib and Placebo | ACR20: American College of Rheumatology 20% response criteria, based on count of swollen and tender joints (out of 28 joints), blood test measures of inflammation (such as C-Reactive Protein) and the physician and patient's own assessments of disease activity, pain and physical function. BID = twice daily, DMARD = disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug, PO = orally, QD = once daily. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Neil MacKillop, MD PhD | AstraZeneca | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Research Site | Anniston | Alabama | United States | |||
| Research Site |
Not provided
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Related Info | View source |
| Related Info | View source |
Not provided
A total of 315 patients failed screening.
A total of 638 patients were enrolled: 105, 108 & 110 were randomised to Groups A, B & C respectively (105, 108 & 109 received at least 1 dose of investigational product).
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | FOSTA 100 MG BID PO | Dosing Group A |
| FG001 | FOSTA 100 MG BID (4 WKS) THEN 150 MG QD PO | Dosing Group B |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| fostamatinib |
| Drug |
fostamatinib 100 mg twice daily/150 mg once daily |
|
| placebo | Drug | Placebo twice daily |
|
| 1 week |
| Proportion of Patients Achieving ACR50 at Week 24, Comparison Between Fostamatinib and Placebo | ACR50: American College of Rheumatology 50% response criteria, based on count of swollen and tender joints (out of 28 joints), blood test measures of inflammation (such as C-Reactive Protein) and the physician and patient's own assessments of disease activity, pain and physical function. BID = twice daily, DMARD = disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug, PO = orally, QD = once daily. | 24 weeks |
| Proportion of Patients Achieving ACR70 at Week 24, Comparison Between Fostamatinib and Placebo | ACR70: American College of Rheumatology 70% response criteria, based on count of swollen and tender joints (out of 28 joints), blood test measures of inflammation (such as C-Reactive Protein) and the physician and patient's own assessments of disease activity, pain and physical function. BID = twice daily, DMARD = disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug, PO = orally, QD = once daily. | 24 weeks |
| ACRn - Comparison Between Fostamatinib and Placebo at Week 24 | ACRn: American College of Rheumatology index of RA improvement, based on smallest percentage improvement in the count of swollen joints (out of 28 joints), count of tender joints (out of 28 joints), or in blood test measures of inflammation (such as C-Reactive Protein) or the physician or patient's own assessments of disease activity, pain and physical function. Scores are reported as a percentage improvement on a scale of -100 to +100, with larger values representing a better clinical outcome. Mean refers to change at Week 24. BID = twice daily, DMARD = disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug, PO = orally, QD = once a day. | Baseline and 24 weeks |
| Proportion of Patients Achieving DAS28-CRP <2.6 at Week 24, Comparison Between Fostamatinib and Placebo | DAS28-CRP: Disease Activity Score based on a count of swollen and tender joints (out of 28 joints), blood test measures of inflammation (CRP) and the patients' own assessment. Scores can take any positive value with a lower value indicating a better clinical condition. A DAS28-CRP score of <2.6 is indicative of remission of RA symptoms. BID = twice daily, CRP = C-reactive protein, DMARD = disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug, OR = odds ratio, PO = orally, QD = once daily. | 24 weeks |
| Proportion of Patients Achieving DAS28-CRP <=3.2 at Week 12, Comparison Between Fostamatinib and Placebo | DAS28-CRP: Disease Activity Score based on a count of swollen and tender joints (out of 28 joints), blood test measures of inflammation (CRP) and the patients' own assessment. Scores can take any positive value with a lower value indicating a better clinical condition. A DAS28-CRP score of <=3.2 indicates low disease activity. BID = twice daily, CRP = C-reactive protein, DMARD = disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug, OR = odds ratio, PO = orally, QD = once daily. | 12 weeks |
| Proportion of Patients Achieving DAS28-CRP EULAR Response at Week 24, Comparison Between Fostamatinib and Placebo | Change from baseline in DAS28-CRP at Week 24 was categorised using the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria. BID = twice daily, CRP = C-reactive protein, DAS28 = Disease Activity Score based on a 28-joint count, DMARD = disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug, OR = odds ratio, PO = orally, QD = once a day. | 24 weeks |
| Proportion of Patients With a HAQ-DI Response at Week 24 - Comparison Between Fostamatinib and Placebo | HAQ-DI: Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index, a measure of physical function. The HAQ-DI score is calculated by summing the category scores from 8 sub-categories (ie, scores for patient ability in dressing and grooming, rising, eating, walking, hygeine, reach, grip and common daily activities) and dividing by the number of categories completed. The HAQ-DI score takes values between 0 and 3, with a higher score indicating greater disability. A HAQ-DI response is a reduction from baseline in HAQ-DI greater than or equal to the minimally important difference (0.22). BID = twice daily, DMARD = disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug, OR = odds ratio, PO = orally, QD = once a day. | 24 weeks |
| Change From Baseline to Week 24 in mTSS Score, Comparison Between Fostamatinib and Placebo | mTSS: modified total sharp score, a measure of structural progression based upon X-rays. Hand and foot joints are scored for eroisions and joint space narrowing and the results summed to give a value between 0 and 488. A higher value represents more serious progression of the disease. After disregarding ineligible records, patients with 2 or more non-missing values had missing data imputed via linear extrapolation/interpolation methods. Patients with only 1 result were excluded from the analysis. ANCOVA = Analysis of covariance, BID = twice daily, IP = investigational product, PO = orally, QD = once a day. | Baseline and 24 weeks |
| SF-36 - Comparison of the Change in PCS From Baseline Between Fostamatinib and Placebo at Week 24 | SF-36: 36 item short form health survey, as a measure of health-related quality of life. Scores for 8 sub-domains (Physical Functioning, Role-Physical, Bodily Pain, General Health, Vitality, Social Function, Role-Emotional and Mental Health) are derived and normalised to a scale of 0 to 100. The physical and mental component scores (PCS and MCS) are derived by multiplying each of these 8 scores by a constant, summing them and standardising against a population with a mean of 50, standard deviation of 10. A higher score represents a better quality of life. Mean changes from baseline score are presented as increases from baseline (defined as post-baseline minus baseline); larger changes indicate a better clinical condition. Mean refers to change in scores at Week 24. ANCOVA = analysis of covariance, BID = twice daily, DMARD = disease modifying antirheumatic drugs, PO = orally, QD = once daily | Baseline and 24 weeks |
| SF-36 - Comparison of the Change in MCS From Baseline Between Fostamatinib and Placebo at Week 24 | SF-36: 36 item short form health survey, as a measure of health-related quality of life. The SF-36 scores for 8 sub-domains (Physical Functioning, Role-Physical, Bodily Pain, General Health, Vitality, Social Function, Role-Emotional and Mental Health) are derived and normalised to a scale of 0 to 100. The physical and mental component scores (PCS and MCS) are derived by multiplying each of these 8 scores by a constant, summing them and standardising against a population with a mean of 50, standard deviation of 10. A higher score represents a better quality of life. Mean changes from baseline score are presented as increases from baseline (defined as post-baseline minus baseline); larger changes indicate a better clinical condition. Mean refers to change in score at Week 24. ANCOVA = analysis of covariance, BID = twice daily, DMARD = disease modifying antirheumatic drugs, PO = orally, QD = once daily. | Baseline and 24 weeks |
| Huntsville |
| Alabama |
| United States |
| Research Site | Tuscaloosa | Alabama | United States |
| Research Site | Mesa | Arizona | United States |
| Research Site | Scottsdale | Arizona | United States |
| Research Site | Hot Springs | Arkansas | United States |
| Research Site | Glendale | California | United States |
| Research Site | La Jolla | California | United States |
| Research Site | Long Beach | California | United States |
| Research Site | Palo Alto | California | United States |
| Research Site | Santa Maria | California | United States |
| Research Site | Torrance | California | United States |
| Research Site | Tustin | California | United States |
| Research Site | Upland | California | United States |
| Research Site | Colorado Springs | Colorado | United States |
| Research Site | Bridgeport | Connecticut | United States |
| Research Site | Trumbull | Connecticut | United States |
| Research Site | Lewes | Delaware | United States |
| Research Site | Brandon | Florida | United States |
| Research Site | Jacksonville | Florida | United States |
| Research Site | Ocala | Florida | United States |
| Research Site | Orlando | Florida | United States |
| Research Site | Tampa | Florida | United States |
| Research Site | Venice | Florida | United States |
| Research Site | Zephyrhills | Florida | United States |
| Research Site | Atlanta | Georgia | United States |
| Research Site | Canton | Georgia | United States |
| Research Site | Idaho Falls | Idaho | United States |
| Research Site | Decatur | Illinois | United States |
| Research Site | Cedar Rapids | Iowa | United States |
| Research Site | Bowling Green | Kentucky | United States |
| Research Site | Elizabethtown | Kentucky | United States |
| Research Site | Crofton | Maryland | United States |
| Research Site | Fall River | Massachusetts | United States |
| Research Site | Worcester | Massachusetts | United States |
| Research Site | Lansing | Michigan | United States |
| Research Site | Flowood | Mississippi | United States |
| Research Site | Florissant | Missouri | United States |
| Research Site | Richmond Heights | Missouri | United States |
| Research Site | Las Cruces | New Mexico | United States |
| Research Site | Albany | New York | United States |
| Research Site | Brooklyn | New York | United States |
| Research Site | Olean | New York | United States |
| Research Site | Rochester | New York | United States |
| Research Site | Roslyn | New York | United States |
| Research Site | Smithtown | New York | United States |
| Research Site | Charlotte | North Carolina | United States |
| Research Site | Durham | North Carolina | United States |
| Research Site | Greensboro | North Carolina | United States |
| Research Site | Dayton | Ohio | United States |
| Research Site | Mayfield Village | Ohio | United States |
| Research Site | Lake Oswego | Oregon | United States |
| Research Site | Duncansville | Pennsylvania | United States |
| Research Site | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | United States |
| Research Site | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania | United States |
| Research Site | West Reading | Pennsylvania | United States |
| Research Site | Charleston | South Carolina | United States |
| Research Site | Greenville | South Carolina | United States |
| Research Site | Hixson | Tennessee | United States |
| Research Site | Memphis | Tennessee | United States |
| Research Site | Nashville | Tennessee | United States |
| Research Site | Amarillo | Texas | United States |
| Research Site | Austin | Texas | United States |
| Research Site | Dallas | Texas | United States |
| Research Site | Houston | Texas | United States |
| Research Site | San Antonio | Texas | United States |
| Research Site | Tacoma | Washington | United States |
| Research Site | Buenos Aires | Buenos Aires F.D. | Argentina |
| Research Site | Córdoba | CRD | Argentina |
| Research Site | Rosario | Santa Fe Province | Argentina |
| Research Site | San Miguel de Tucumán | TUC | Argentina |
| Research Site | Buenos Aires | Argentina |
| Research Site | Ciudad de Buenos Aires | Argentina |
| Research Site | Quilmes | Argentina |
| Research Site | Rosario | Argentina |
| Research Site | San Juan | Argentina |
| Research Site | San Miguel de Tucumán | Argentina |
| Research Site | Brussels | Belgium | Belgium |
| Research Site | Ghent | Belgium | Belgium |
| Research Site | Liège | Belgium | Belgium |
| Research Site | Yvoir | Belgium |
| Research Site | Porto Alegre | Brasil | Brazil |
| Research Site | Goiânia | Goiás | Brazil |
| Research Site | Curitiba | Paraná | Brazil |
| Research Site | São Paulo | São Paulo | Brazil |
| Research Site | St. John's | Newfoundland and Labrador | Canada |
| Research Site | Mississauga | Ontario | Canada |
| Research Site | Toronto | Ontario | Canada |
| Research Site | Pointe-Claire | Quebec | Canada |
| Research Site | Rimouski | Quebec | Canada |
| Research Site | Bruntál | Czechia |
| Research Site | České Budějovice | Czechia |
| Research Site | Hlučín | Czechia |
| Research Site | Ostrava-trebovice | Czechia |
| Research Site | Prague | Czechia |
| Research Site | Zlín | Czechia |
| Research Site | Orléans | France |
| Research Site | Hamburg | Free and Hanseatic City of Hamburg | Germany |
| Research Site | Aachen | North Rhine-Westphalia | Germany |
| Research Site | Leipzig | Saxony | Germany |
| Research Site | Erlangen | Germany |
| Research Site | Frankfurt | Germany |
| Research Site | Hamburg | Germany |
| Research Site | Heidelberg | Germany |
| Research Site | München | Germany |
| Research Site | Budapest | Hungary |
| Research Site | Ashkelon | Israel |
| Research Site | Haifa | Israel |
| Research Site | Kfar Saba | Israel |
| Research Site | Ramat Gan | Israel |
| Research Site | Tel Litwinsky | Israel |
| Research Site | Iesi | AN | Italy |
| Research Site | Ferrara | FE | Italy |
| Research Site | Chihuahua City | Chihuahua | Mexico |
| Research Site | Obrergon | Sonora | Mexico |
| Research Site | DF | Mexico |
| Research Site | Monterrey | Mexico |
| Research Site | Saltillo | Mexico |
| Research Site | Lisbon | Portugal |
| Research Site | Porto | Portugal |
| Research Site | Cape Town | South Africa |
| Research Site | Pretoria | South Africa |
| Research Site | Stellenbosch | South Africa |
| Research Site | Barcelona | Spain |
| Research Site | Reading | Berkshire | United Kingdom |
| Research Site | Warrington | Cheshire | United Kingdom |
| Research Site | Maidstone | Kent | United Kingdom |
| Research Site | Eastbourne | Sussex | United Kingdom |
| Research Site | Cambridge | United Kingdom |
| Research Site | Christchurch | United Kingdom |
| Research Site | Ipswich | United Kingdom |
| Research Site | London | United Kingdom |
| Research Site | Metropolitan Borough of Wirral | United Kingdom |
| Research Site | Nottingham | United Kingdom |
| Research Site | Westcliff-on-the Sea | United Kingdom |
| FG002 |
| PLACEBO PO |
Dosing Group C |
| Randomised But Did Not Receive Treatment |
|
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | FOSTA 100 MG BID PO | Dosing Group A |
| BG001 | FOSTA 100 MG BID (4 WKS) THEN 150 MG QD PO | Dosing Group B |
| BG002 | PLACEBO PO | Dosing Group C |
| BG003 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Number | Participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Proportion of Patients Achieving ACR20 at Week 24, Comparison Between Fostamatinib and Placebo | ACR20: American College of Rheumatology 20% response criteria, based on count of swollen and tender joints (out of 28 joints), blood test measures of inflammation (such as C-Reactive Protein) and the physician and patient's own assessments of disease activity, pain and physical function. BID = twice daily, DMARD = disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug, PO = orally, QD = once daily. | The full analysis set includes those patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product. Patients were analysed by randomised treatment in accordance with the intention to treat principle. | Posted | Number | Percentage of responders | 24 weeks |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Proportion of Patients Achieving ACR20 at Week 1, Comparison Between Fostamatinib and Placebo | ACR20: American College of Rheumatology 20% response criteria, based on count of swollen and tender joints (out of 28 joints), blood test measures of inflammation (such as C-Reactive Protein) and the physician and patient's own assessments of disease activity, pain and physical function. BID = twice daily, DMARD = disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug, PO = orally, QD = once daily. | The full analysis set includes those patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product. Patients were analysed by randomised treatment in accordance with the intention to treat principle. | Posted | Number | Percentage of responders | 1 week |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Proportion of Patients Achieving ACR50 at Week 24, Comparison Between Fostamatinib and Placebo | ACR50: American College of Rheumatology 50% response criteria, based on count of swollen and tender joints (out of 28 joints), blood test measures of inflammation (such as C-Reactive Protein) and the physician and patient's own assessments of disease activity, pain and physical function. BID = twice daily, DMARD = disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug, PO = orally, QD = once daily. | The full analysis set includes those patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product. Patients were analysed by randomised treatment in accordance with the intention to treat principle. | Posted | Number | Percentage of responders | 24 weeks |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Proportion of Patients Achieving ACR70 at Week 24, Comparison Between Fostamatinib and Placebo | ACR70: American College of Rheumatology 70% response criteria, based on count of swollen and tender joints (out of 28 joints), blood test measures of inflammation (such as C-Reactive Protein) and the physician and patient's own assessments of disease activity, pain and physical function. BID = twice daily, DMARD = disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug, PO = orally, QD = once daily. | The full analysis set includes those patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product. Patients were analysed by randomised treatment in accordance with the intention to treat principle. | Posted | Number | Percentage of responders | 24 weeks |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | ACRn - Comparison Between Fostamatinib and Placebo at Week 24 | ACRn: American College of Rheumatology index of RA improvement, based on smallest percentage improvement in the count of swollen joints (out of 28 joints), count of tender joints (out of 28 joints), or in blood test measures of inflammation (such as C-Reactive Protein) or the physician or patient's own assessments of disease activity, pain and physical function. Scores are reported as a percentage improvement on a scale of -100 to +100, with larger values representing a better clinical outcome. Mean refers to change at Week 24. BID = twice daily, DMARD = disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug, PO = orally, QD = once a day. | The full analysis set includes those patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product. Patients were analysed by randomised treatment in accordance with the intention to treat principle. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Percentage improvement from baseline | Baseline and 24 weeks |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Proportion of Patients Achieving DAS28-CRP <2.6 at Week 24, Comparison Between Fostamatinib and Placebo | DAS28-CRP: Disease Activity Score based on a count of swollen and tender joints (out of 28 joints), blood test measures of inflammation (CRP) and the patients' own assessment. Scores can take any positive value with a lower value indicating a better clinical condition. A DAS28-CRP score of <2.6 is indicative of remission of RA symptoms. BID = twice daily, CRP = C-reactive protein, DMARD = disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug, OR = odds ratio, PO = orally, QD = once daily. | The full analysis set includes those patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product. Patients were analysed by randomised treatment in accordance with the intention to treat principle. | Posted | Number | Percentage of responders | 24 weeks |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Proportion of Patients Achieving DAS28-CRP <=3.2 at Week 12, Comparison Between Fostamatinib and Placebo | DAS28-CRP: Disease Activity Score based on a count of swollen and tender joints (out of 28 joints), blood test measures of inflammation (CRP) and the patients' own assessment. Scores can take any positive value with a lower value indicating a better clinical condition. A DAS28-CRP score of <=3.2 indicates low disease activity. BID = twice daily, CRP = C-reactive protein, DMARD = disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug, OR = odds ratio, PO = orally, QD = once daily. | The full analysis set includes those patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product. Patients were analysed by randomised treatment in accordance with the intention to treat principle. | Posted | Number | Percentage of responders | 12 weeks |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Proportion of Patients Achieving DAS28-CRP EULAR Response at Week 24, Comparison Between Fostamatinib and Placebo | Change from baseline in DAS28-CRP at Week 24 was categorised using the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria. BID = twice daily, CRP = C-reactive protein, DAS28 = Disease Activity Score based on a 28-joint count, DMARD = disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug, OR = odds ratio, PO = orally, QD = once a day. | The full analysis set includes those patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product. Patients were analysed by randomised treatment in accordance with the intention to treat principle. | Posted | Number | Percentage of responders | 24 weeks |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Proportion of Patients With a HAQ-DI Response at Week 24 - Comparison Between Fostamatinib and Placebo | HAQ-DI: Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index, a measure of physical function. The HAQ-DI score is calculated by summing the category scores from 8 sub-categories (ie, scores for patient ability in dressing and grooming, rising, eating, walking, hygeine, reach, grip and common daily activities) and dividing by the number of categories completed. The HAQ-DI score takes values between 0 and 3, with a higher score indicating greater disability. A HAQ-DI response is a reduction from baseline in HAQ-DI greater than or equal to the minimally important difference (0.22). BID = twice daily, DMARD = disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug, OR = odds ratio, PO = orally, QD = once a day. | The full analysis set includes those patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product. Patients were analysed by randomised treatment in accordance with the intention to treat principle. | Posted | Number | Percentage of responders | 24 weeks |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline to Week 24 in mTSS Score, Comparison Between Fostamatinib and Placebo | mTSS: modified total sharp score, a measure of structural progression based upon X-rays. Hand and foot joints are scored for eroisions and joint space narrowing and the results summed to give a value between 0 and 488. A higher value represents more serious progression of the disease. After disregarding ineligible records, patients with 2 or more non-missing values had missing data imputed via linear extrapolation/interpolation methods. Patients with only 1 result were excluded from the analysis. ANCOVA = Analysis of covariance, BID = twice daily, IP = investigational product, PO = orally, QD = once a day. | The full analysis set includes patients who received at least 1 dose of IP. Patients were analysed by randomised treatment in accordance with the intention to treat principle. Measurements at 2 timepoints are required for a patient to be included in the analysis; therefore patients with only 1 result have been excluded from the analysis population. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Units on a scale | Baseline and 24 weeks |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | SF-36 - Comparison of the Change in PCS From Baseline Between Fostamatinib and Placebo at Week 24 | SF-36: 36 item short form health survey, as a measure of health-related quality of life. Scores for 8 sub-domains (Physical Functioning, Role-Physical, Bodily Pain, General Health, Vitality, Social Function, Role-Emotional and Mental Health) are derived and normalised to a scale of 0 to 100. The physical and mental component scores (PCS and MCS) are derived by multiplying each of these 8 scores by a constant, summing them and standardising against a population with a mean of 50, standard deviation of 10. A higher score represents a better quality of life. Mean changes from baseline score are presented as increases from baseline (defined as post-baseline minus baseline); larger changes indicate a better clinical condition. Mean refers to change in scores at Week 24. ANCOVA = analysis of covariance, BID = twice daily, DMARD = disease modifying antirheumatic drugs, PO = orally, QD = once daily | The full analysis set includes those patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product. Patients were analysed by randomised treatment in accordance with the intention to treat principle. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Units on a scale | Baseline and 24 weeks |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | SF-36 - Comparison of the Change in MCS From Baseline Between Fostamatinib and Placebo at Week 24 | SF-36: 36 item short form health survey, as a measure of health-related quality of life. The SF-36 scores for 8 sub-domains (Physical Functioning, Role-Physical, Bodily Pain, General Health, Vitality, Social Function, Role-Emotional and Mental Health) are derived and normalised to a scale of 0 to 100. The physical and mental component scores (PCS and MCS) are derived by multiplying each of these 8 scores by a constant, summing them and standardising against a population with a mean of 50, standard deviation of 10. A higher score represents a better quality of life. Mean changes from baseline score are presented as increases from baseline (defined as post-baseline minus baseline); larger changes indicate a better clinical condition. Mean refers to change in score at Week 24. ANCOVA = analysis of covariance, BID = twice daily, DMARD = disease modifying antirheumatic drugs, PO = orally, QD = once daily. | The full analysis set includes those patients who received at least 1 dose of investigational product. Patients were analysed by randomised treatment in accordance with the intention to treat principle. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Units on a scale | Baseline and 24 weeks |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | FOSTA 100 MG BID PO | Dosing Group A | 7 | 105 | 51 | 105 | ||
| EG001 | FOSTA 100 MG BID (4 WKS) THEN 150 MG QD PO | Dosing Group B | 7 | 108 | 49 | 108 | ||
| EG002 | PLACEBO PO | Dosing Group C | 6 | 109 | 46 | 109 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ANAEMIA | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA 15.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 15.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| ARTERIOSCLEROSIS CORONARY ARTERY | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 15.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| CARDIAC FAILURE CONGESTIVE | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 15.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| CARDIO-RESPIRATORY ARREST | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 15.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| CORONARY ARTERY OCCLUSION | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 15.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| CROHN'S DISEASE | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 15.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| DIARRHOEA | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 15.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| GASTRIC ULCER | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 15.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| GASTRITIS | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 15.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| VOMITING | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 15.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| NON-CARDIAC CHEST PAIN | General disorders | MedDRA 15.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| CHOLECYSTITIS | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA 15.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| DIVERTICULITIS | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 15.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| ESCHERICHIA URINARY TRACT INFECTION | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 15.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| GASTROENTERITIS | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 15.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| GASTROENTERITIS BACTERIAL | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 15.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| HERPES PHARYNGITIS | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 15.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| OROPHARYNGEAL CANDIDIASIS | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 15.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| DIABETES MELLITUS | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 15.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| HYPOKALAEMIA | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 15.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| HYPONATRAEMIA | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 15.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| RENAL CELL CARCINOMA | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 15.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| SYNCOPE | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 15.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| TRANSIENT GLOBAL AMNESIA | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 15.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DIARRHOEA | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 15.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| FLATULENCE | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 15.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| NAUSEA | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 15.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| VOMITING | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 15.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| FATIGUE | General disorders | MedDRA 15.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| NASOPHARYNGITIS | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 15.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| UPPER RESPIRATORY TRACT INFECTION | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 15.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| ARTHRALGIA | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 15.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 15.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| DIZZINESS | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 15.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| HEADACHE | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 15.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| HYPERTENSION | Vascular disorders | MedDRA 15.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dave Goldstraw | AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals | +44 (0)1625 512415 | dave.goldstraw@astrazeneca.com |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001172 | Arthritis, Rheumatoid |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001168 | Arthritis |
| D007592 | Joint Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D012216 | Rheumatic Diseases |
| D003240 | Connective Tissue Diseases |
| D017437 | Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases |
| D001327 | Autoimmune Diseases |
| D007154 | Immune System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C523665 | fostamatinib |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Male |
|
| Black or African American |
|
| Asian |
|
| American Indian or Alaska Native |
|
| Indian or Pakistani |
|
| Other |
|
| Non-responder imputation has been applied following premature withdrawal, or increased dose of methotrexate or any DMARD initiation, or for 8 weeks following receipt of any parenteral steroids, or for patients with no post baseline data. | Mantel Haenszel | Treatment difference in proportion of responders at Week 24 with a Mantel-Haenszel approach stratified by pooled country. | 0.168 | Week 24 | Weighted difference in proportion | 0.07 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.03 | 0.18 | No | Superiority or Other |
|
|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Participants |
|
|
|
Dosing Group C
|
|
|
Dosing Group C |
|
|
|
| OG002 | PLACEBO PO | Dosing Group C |
|
|
|
| OG002 | PLACEBO PO | Dosing Group C |
|
|
|