Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of Juvederm(R) Ultra XC Injectable Gel for lip augmentation
All subjects were randomized to either the treatment group, Juvederm(R) Ultra XC Injectable Gel, or to the control group (no treatment). At month 3, subjects in the control group crossed over to the treatment group.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment | Experimental | Juvederm(R) Ultra XC Injectable Gel |
|
| Control | Experimental | No treatment for 3 months followed by Juvederm(R) Ultra XC Injectable Gel at Month 3. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| hyaluronic acid gel | Device | Dosage per Investigator's discretion to obtain lip treatment gel; 1 touch-up treatment is allowed 14 to 30 days after initial treatment. Repeat treatment occurs at month 12. Subjects in the control group start with treatment at month 3. Maximum total volume per subject is 4.8 mL for initial and touch-up treatment combined. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Subjects With ≥1-Point Improvement on the Investigator Assessed 5-point Lip Fullness Scale 2 (LFS2) | Overall lip fullness is assessed by the blinded Evaluating Investigator compared to baseline using the 5-point LFS2. Scores range from 1=minimal improvement to 5=very marked improvement. | Baseline, Month 3 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Subjects With ≥1-Point Improvement on the Perioral Line (POL) Severity Scale | Subject's upper lip perioral lines are assessed compared to baseline using the 4-point validated POL Severity Scale. Scores range from 0=None (best) to 3=Severe (worst). | Baseline, Month 3 |
| Percentage of Oral Commissures With ≥1-Point Improvement on the Oral Commissures Severity (OCS) Scale |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nashville | Tennessee | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 26618456 | Background | Dayan S, Bruce S, Kilmer S, Dover JS, Downie JB, Taylor SC, Skorupa A, Murphy DK. Safety and Effectiveness of the Hyaluronic Acid Filler, HYC-24L, for Lip and Perioral Augmentation. Dermatol Surg. 2015 Dec;41 Suppl 1:S293-301. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000000540. |
Not provided
Not provided
The modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population is presented and includes all treated subjects.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Treatment | Juvederm(R) Ultra XC Injectable Gel |
| FG001 | Control | No treatment for 3 months followed by Juvederm(R) Ultra XC Injectable Gel at Month 3. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Treatment | Juvederm(R) Ultra XC Injectable Gel |
| BG001 | Control | No treatment for 3 months followed by Juvederm(R) Ultra XC Injectable Gel at Month 3. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Percentage of Subjects With ≥1-Point Improvement on the Investigator Assessed 5-point Lip Fullness Scale 2 (LFS2) | Overall lip fullness is assessed by the blinded Evaluating Investigator compared to baseline using the 5-point LFS2. Scores range from 1=minimal improvement to 5=very marked improvement. | Modified Intent-to-Treat: all treated subjects with data at the designated time point | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | Percentage of Subjects | Baseline, Month 3 |
|
Not provided
208 subjects includes subjects who received initial treatment in both groups (157 in the treatment group and 51 in the control group).
114 subjects includes subjects who had repeat treatment from both treatment groups.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Onset Prior to Repeat Treatment | Juvederm(R) Ultra XC Injectable Gel |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Development Hip Dysplasia | Congenital, familial and genetic disorders | MedDRA version 18.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Injection Site Mass | General disorders | MedDRA version 18.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Allergan Inc., | Allergan, Inc | clinicaltrials@allergan.com |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
Subject's right and left oral commissures are assessed compared to baseline using the validated OCS Scale. Scores range from 0=none (best) to 3=severe (worst). |
| Baseline, Month 3 |
| Percentage of Subjects Achieving Their Personal Treatment Goal of Overall Lip Fullness | Subjects assessed their personal treatment goal of overall lip fullness as 'achieved' or 'not achieved.' | Baseline, Month 3 |
| Duration Effect of Treatment on Lip Fullness | Duration of treatment effect on lip fullness is assessed by the blinded Evaluating Investigator as ≥1-point Improvement from baseline in overall lip fullness of the eligible lip at each visit. | Month 1, Month 3, Month 6, Month 7.5, Month 9, Month 10.5, Month 12 |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Subjects With ≥1-Point Improvement on the Perioral Line (POL) Severity Scale | Subject's upper lip perioral lines are assessed compared to baseline using the 4-point validated POL Severity Scale. Scores range from 0=None (best) to 3=Severe (worst). | Subjects treated for POL at the designated time points | Posted | Number | Percentage of Subjects | Baseline, Month 3 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Oral Commissures With ≥1-Point Improvement on the Oral Commissures Severity (OCS) Scale | Subject's right and left oral commissures are assessed compared to baseline using the validated OCS Scale. Scores range from 0=none (best) to 3=severe (worst). | Subjects treated for OCS at the designated time points | Posted | Number | Percentage of Oral Commissures | Baseline, Month 3 | Oral Commissures | Oral Commissures |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Subjects Achieving Their Personal Treatment Goal of Overall Lip Fullness | Subjects assessed their personal treatment goal of overall lip fullness as 'achieved' or 'not achieved.' | Treated subjects in the Treatment group | Posted | Number | Percentage of Subjects | Baseline, Month 3 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Duration Effect of Treatment on Lip Fullness | Duration of treatment effect on lip fullness is assessed by the blinded Evaluating Investigator as ≥1-point Improvement from baseline in overall lip fullness of the eligible lip at each visit. | Modified Intent-to-Treat: all treated subjects with data at the designated time point | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | % of Pts Retaining ≥1-point Improvement | Month 1, Month 3, Month 6, Month 7.5, Month 9, Month 10.5, Month 12 |
|
|
|
| 4 |
| 208 |
| 63 |
| 208 |
| EG001 | Onset After Repeat Treatment | Juvederm(R) Ultra XC Injectable Gel | 2 | 114 | 28 | 114 |
| Drug Hypersensitivity | Immune system disorders | MedDRA version 18.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Diabetes Mellitus | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA version 18.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Angioedema | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA version 18.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Squamous Cell Carcinoma | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA version 18.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Premature Baby | Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions | MedDRA version 18.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Injection Site Induration | General disorders | MedDRA version 18.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Injection Site Pain | General disorders | MedDRA version 18.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
A disclosure restriction on the PI is that the sponsor can review results communications prior to public release and can embargo communications regarding trial results for a period that is less than or equal to 90 days from the time submitted to the sponsor for review. The sponsor cannot require changes to the communication and cannot extend the embargo.
| Month 6 (N=99, 35) |
|
| Month 7.5 (N=89, 29) |
|
| Month 9 (N=75, 24) |
|
| Month 10.5 (N=69, 19) |
|
| Month 12 (N=51, 8) |
|