Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-017462-23 | EudraCT Number | ||
| CRUK/08/009 | Other Grant/Funding Number | CR-UK |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Cancer Research UK | OTHER |
| Amgen | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
REGIME is comparing two treatments, with Darbepoetin Alpha (DA) and Filgrastim (Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor, G-CSF), to the standard treatment for Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS).
After giving Informed Consent patients will undergo a number of tests to confirm eligibility. Once eligibility is confirmed patients will be randomly assigned to one of the three treatments group: A: Darbepoetin Alpha (DA), B: Darbepoetin Alpha and Filgrastim (DA+G-CSF), C: Blood transfusion only. Patients will be required to attend the clinic once a month for 24 weeks. After 24 weeks if a patient has reacted favorably to the treatment they may continue on the treatment regime up to 52 weeks. After week 24 all patients will be required to attend the clinic twice more, at week 36 and 52.
Patients will be followed for a further 5 years to record loss of response, transformation to Acute Myeloid Leukaemia and/or Refractory Anemia with Excess Blasts and death.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Darbepoetin Alfa | Active Comparator |
| |
| G-CSF | Active Comparator |
| |
| Best Supportive Care | Active Comparator | Red cell transfusion support to achieve a predicted post-transfusion haemoglobin of 11.0 to 12.0 g/dl at a quantity and frequency such that the minimum haemoglobin is never below 8.0 g/dl |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Darbepoetin alpha | Drug | Aranesp 500 mcg vials once every 2 weeks. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Quality of Life - To compare the Quality of Life of low risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) patients randomised to receive prolonged treatment with DA alone, DA with G-CSF or best supportive care alone | To compare the Quality of Life of low risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) patients randomised to receive prolonged treatment with DA alone, DA with G-CSF or best supportive care alone | weeks 0 |
| Haemoglobin response - To compare the haemoglobin response of low risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) patients randomised to receive prolonged treatment with DA alone, DA with G-CSF or best supportive care alone | To compare the haemoglobin response of low risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) patients randomised to receive prolonged treatment with DA alone, DA with G-CSF or best supportive care alone | week 0 |
| Quality of Life - To compare the Quality of Life of low risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) patients randomised to receive prolonged treatment with DA alone, DA with G-CSF or best supportive care alone | To compare the Quality of Life of low risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) patients randomised to receive prolonged treatment with DA alone, DA with G-CSF or best supportive care alone | weeks 12 |
| Quality of Life - To compare the Quality of Life of low risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) patients randomised to receive prolonged treatment with DA alone, DA with G-CSF or best supportive care alone | To compare the Quality of Life of low risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) patients randomised to receive prolonged treatment with DA alone, DA with G-CSF or best supportive care alone | weeks 24 |
| Quality of Life - To compare the Quality of Life of low risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) patients randomised to receive prolonged treatment with DA alone, DA with G-CSF or best supportive care alone |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Utility of prognostic factor and predictive factor assessment | To assess the utility of prognostic factor and predictive factor assessment, in particular against the predictive model proposed by Hellstrom-Lindberg. | every week |
| Utility of prognostic factor and predictive factor assessment |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Males and females aged over 18 years, (no upper age limit)
ECOG performance status 0-2
Life expectancy more than 6 months
A confirmed diagnosis of MDS - WHO type:
IPSS low or Int-1, but with BM blasts less than 5%
A haemoglobin concentration of less than 10g/dl and/or red cell transfusion dependence
Able to understand the implications of participation in the Trial and give written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Samir G Agrawal, MRCP FRCPath PhD | Barts and The London NHS Trust | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Birmingham Cancer Research UK Clinical Trial Unit | Birmingham | B15 2TT | United Kingdom | |||
| St Bartholomew's Hospital |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Filgrastim | Drug | 300 mcg vials twice a week, 3-4 days apart |
|
|
| Blood Red Cell Transfusion | Procedure | Red cell transfusion support to achieve a predicted post-transfusion haemoglobin of 11.0 to 12.0 g/dl at a quantity and frequency such that the minimum haemoglobin is never below 8.0 g/dl or such that the patient is never excessively symptomatic, according to local transfusion guidelines/policy. |
|
|
To compare the Quality of Life of low risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) patients randomised to receive prolonged treatment with DA alone, DA with G-CSF or best supportive care alone |
| weeks 36 |
| Quality of Life - To compare the Quality of Life of low risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) patients randomised to receive prolonged treatment with DA alone, DA with G-CSF or best supportive care alone | To compare the Quality of Life of low risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) patients randomised to receive prolonged treatment with DA alone, DA with G-CSF or best supportive care alone | weeks 52 |
| Haemoglobine response - To compare the haemoglobin response of low risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) patients randomised to receive prolonged treatment with DA alone, DA with G-CSF or best supportive care alone | To compare the haemoglobin response of low risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) patients randomised to receive prolonged treatment with DA alone, DA with G-CSF or best supportive care alone | week 4 |
| Haemoglobine response - To compare the haemoglobin response of low risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) patients randomised to receive prolonged treatment with DA alone, DA with G-CSF or best supportive care alone | To compare the haemoglobin response of low risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) patients randomised to receive prolonged treatment with DA alone, DA with G-CSF or best supportive care alone | week 8 |
| Haemoglobine response - To compare the haemoglobin response of low risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) patients randomised to receive prolonged treatment with DA alone, DA with G-CSF or best supportive care alone | To compare the haemoglobin response of low risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) patients randomised to receive prolonged treatment with DA alone, DA with G-CSF or best supportive care alone | week 12 |
| Haemoglobine response - To compare the haemoglobin response of low risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) patients randomised to receive prolonged treatment with DA alone, DA with G-CSF or best supportive care alone | To compare the haemoglobin response of low risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) patients randomised to receive prolonged treatment with DA alone, DA with G-CSF or best supportive care alone | week 16 |
| Haemoglobine response - To compare the haemoglobin response of low risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) patients randomised to receive prolonged treatment with DA alone, DA with G-CSF or best supportive care alone | To compare the haemoglobin response of low risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) patients randomised to receive prolonged treatment with DA alone, DA with G-CSF or best supportive care alone | week 20 |
| Haemoglobine response - To compare the haemoglobin response of low risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) patients randomised to receive prolonged treatment with DA alone, DA with G-CSF or best supportive care alone | To compare the haemoglobin response of low risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) patients randomised to receive prolonged treatment with DA alone, DA with G-CSF or best supportive care alone | week 24 |
| Haemoglobine response - To compare the haemoglobin response of low risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) patients randomised to receive prolonged treatment with DA alone, DA with G-CSF or best supportive care alone | To compare the haemoglobin response of low risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) patients randomised to receive prolonged treatment with DA alone, DA with G-CSF or best supportive care alone | week 36 |
| Haemoglobine response - To compare the haemoglobin response of low risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) patients randomised to receive prolonged treatment with DA alone, DA with G-CSF or best supportive care alone | To compare the haemoglobin response of low risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) patients randomised to receive prolonged treatment with DA alone, DA with G-CSF or best supportive care alone | week 52 |
To assess the utility of prognostic factor and predictive factor assessment, in particular against the predictive model proposed by Hellstrom-Lindberg. |
| week 4 |
| Utility of prognostic factor and predictive factor assessment | To assess the utility of prognostic factor and predictive factor assessment, in particular against the predictive model proposed by Hellstrom-Lindberg. | week 8 |
| Utility of prognostic factor and predictive factor assessment | To assess the utility of prognostic factor and predictive factor assessment, in particular against the predictive model proposed by Hellstrom-Lindberg. | week 12 |
| Utility of prognostic factor and predictive factor assessment | To assess the utility of prognostic factor and predictive factor assessment, in particular against the predictive model proposed by Hellstrom-Lindberg. | week 16 |
| Utility of prognostic factor and predictive factor assessment | To assess the utility of prognostic factor and predictive factor assessment, in particular against the predictive model proposed by Hellstrom-Lindberg. | week 20 |
| Utility of prognostic factor and predictive factor assessment | To assess the utility of prognostic factor and predictive factor assessment, in particular against the predictive model proposed by Hellstrom-Lindberg. | week 24 |
| Utility of prognostic factor and predictive factor assessment | To assess the utility of prognostic factor and predictive factor assessment, in particular against the predictive model proposed by Hellstrom-Lindberg. | week 36 |
| Utility of prognostic factor and predictive factor assessment | To assess the utility of prognostic factor and predictive factor assessment, in particular against the predictive model proposed by Hellstrom-Lindberg. | week 52 |
| London |
| EC1A 7BE |
| United Kingdom |
| CECM Institute of Cancer | London | EC1M 6BQ | United Kingdom |
| King's College Hospital Haematoloy Laboratory | London | SE5 9RS | United Kingdom |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009190 | Myelodysplastic Syndromes |
| D018450 | Disease Progression |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001855 | Bone Marrow Diseases |
| D006402 | Hematologic Diseases |
| D006425 | Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases |
| D020969 | Disease Attributes |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000068256 | Darbepoetin alfa |
| D000069585 | Filgrastim |
| D017707 | Erythrocyte Transfusion |
| D001803 | Blood Transfusion |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004921 | Erythropoietin |
| D003115 | Colony-Stimulating Factors |
| D006023 | Glycoproteins |
| D006001 | Glycoconjugates |
| D002241 | Carbohydrates |
| D011506 | Proteins |
| D000602 | Amino Acids, Peptides, and Proteins |
| D016179 | Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor |
| D016298 | Hematopoietic Cell Growth Factors |
| D016207 | Cytokines |
| D036341 | Intercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins |
| D010455 | Peptides |
| D001685 | Biological Factors |
| D016913 | Blood Component Transfusion |
| D001691 | Biological Therapy |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
Not provided
Not provided