Early Weightbearing and Mobilization Versus Non-Weightbearing and Immobilization After ORIF of Unstable Ankle Fractures: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Early Weightbearing and Mobilization Versus Non-Weightbearing and Immobilization After ORIF of Unstable Ankle Fractures: a Randomized Controlled Trial
The primary objective of the investigators randomized controlled trial is to determine if early protected weightbearing and ankle range of motion after surgical treatment (open reduction internal fixation - ORIF) for ankle fractures improves the rate of return to work and functional outcome compared to postoperative ankle immobilization in a non-weightbearing cast.
This is a randomized controlled trial comparing early weightbearing and mobilization VS immobilization and non-weightbearing after initial treatment of unstable ankle fractures.
The primary objective of our randomized control trial is to determine if early protected weightbearing and ankle range of motion post open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) for unstable ankle fractures improves the rate of return to work and functional outcome compared to postoperative ankle immobilization in a non-weightbearing cast.
Our secondary objective is to determine the rate of adverse events (wound healing, infection, hardware failure) with early weightbearing and ROM comparable to rates with traditional post-op ankle immobilization.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
richard.jenkinson@sunnybrook.ca416-480-6100 ext. 7052
hans.kreder@sunnybrook.ca416-480-6100 ext. 6816
Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada
richard.jenkinson@sunnybrook.ca416-480-6100 ext. 7052
hans.kreder@sunnybrook.ca416-480-6100 ext. 6816
niloofar.dehghan@utoronto.ca416-997-8735
mckeem@smh.ca416-864-5880