Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Telemedicine has been widely used in managing patients with neurologic disorders or mental illness. Telemedicine is defined as the use of medical information exchanged from one site to another via electronic communications for the health and education of the patient or healthcare provider and for the purpose of improving patient care. According to our knowledge, it has not been used to manage cardiac patients who need postoperative care after discharge from hospitals.
The use of telemedicine has the potential to reduce the cost of unnecessary travel by assessing the patient's postoperative status prior to making decisions as to whether or not a face-to-face consultation is necessary.
In this pilot study we will compare the accuracy of surgeons' decisions during follow-up visits via video-teleconference (V-Visit) to surgeons' decisions during traditional face-to-face follow-up visits (FTF-Visits). Both the V-Visit and the FTF-Visit will take place at the Houston Michael E DeBakey VA Medical Center on the same day. We will also ask both patients and providers to complete short questionnaires after each V-Visit regarding their acceptability of using telemedicine for these post-operative follow-up visits.
Information collected as part of this pilot study will be used to design a future full randomized controlled trial (RCT) on the use of telemedicine in evaluating post-operative cardiac surgical patients.
The specific aims are:
We plan to conduct this pilot study at the Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center (MEDVAMC) in Houston, Texas, along with satellite CBOC facilities in Lufkin and Conroe. Once the accuracy, acceptability, and feasibility of the use of video conferencing (VC) in the postoperative care for cardiac surgical patients are established, we will submit a full proposal to conduct a two-arm RCT in future.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arm 1 - All study participants | Experimental | Evaluate video clinic visit prior to Face-to-Face usual care visit |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evaluate video clinic visit prior to Face-to-Face usual care visit | Other | Evaluate video clinic visit prior to Face-to-Face usual care visit |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (FTF Decision on Patient Disposition vs. V-visit Decision on Patient Disposition) | Using CVT software and desktop webcams on the VA private network, "Virtual" CVT visits were conducted immediately prior to usual care of Face-to-Face (FTF) postoperative visits. Two independent surgeons reviewed the CVT recordings and made recommendations on patient dispositions. Accuracy was assessed by comparing the 2 reviewers' CVT decisions to the FTF decision. | 1 month |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Acceptability | Acceptability was assessed using a the Demeris 17-item Likert-scale questionnaire. Scale from 1 to 5 (1 = strongly disagree; 5 = strongly agree). | 1 month |
| Feasibility | 1 month |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and/or Cardiac valvular operations
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Danny Chu, MD | Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX | Houston | Texas | 77030 | United States |
All participants were assigned to both the intervention (post-surgical evaluation by video-teleconference) and control (face-to-face visit) groups.
Patients were recruited after coronary artery bypass or cardiac valvular surgery.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Arm 1 - Evaluate Video Clinic Visit Prior to Face-to-Face Usua | Evaluate video clinic visit prior to Face-to-Face usual care visit |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Arm 1 - Evaluate Video Clinic Visit | Evaluate video clinic visit prior to Face-to-Face usual care visit |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Accuracy (FTF Decision on Patient Disposition vs. V-visit Decision on Patient Disposition) | Using CVT software and desktop webcams on the VA private network, "Virtual" CVT visits were conducted immediately prior to usual care of Face-to-Face (FTF) postoperative visits. Two independent surgeons reviewed the CVT recordings and made recommendations on patient dispositions. Accuracy was assessed by comparing the 2 reviewers' CVT decisions to the FTF decision. | Posted | Number | percentage of agreement | 1 month |
|
|
1 year
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Arm 1 - Evaluate Video Conferencing | Evaluate virtual video conference follow-up clinic visit Evaluative process: Evaluative process using video conferencing |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donna Smith/Project Coordinator | Houston VA HSR&D | (713)440-4423 | Donna.Smithd19d7@va.gov |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003324 | Coronary Artery Disease |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003327 | Coronary Disease |
| D017202 | Myocardial Ischemia |
| D006331 | Heart Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Number | participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
| Secondary | Acceptability | Acceptability was assessed using a the Demeris 17-item Likert-scale questionnaire. Scale from 1 to 5 (1 = strongly disagree; 5 = strongly agree). | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | 1 month |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Feasibility | Data for this outcome are no longer available. | Posted | 1 month |
|
|
| 0 |
| 24 |
| 0 |
| 24 |
| EG001 | Arm 2 | Face-to-face follow up for subjects (control) | 0 | 24 | 0 | 24 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| D001161 |
| Arteriosclerosis |
| D001157 | Arterial Occlusive Diseases |
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |