Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This trial is a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study to compare GSK1358820 (Botulinum Toxin Type A, also known as "OnabotulinumtoxinA" or "Botox") with placebo on the efficacy and safety of treatment in poststroke subjects with focal wrist, finger and in some cases, thumb spasticity. Approximately 168 subjects will be enrolled. Subjects will receive a single treatment session of intramuscular GSK1358820 (Botulinum Toxin Type A, also known as "OnabotulinumtoxinA" or "Botox") '200U or 240U (if thumb spasticity is present)' or placebo in a randomization ratio of 1:1. The subjects will be observed until 12 weeks post injection. Outcome measures include changes from baseline at every post injection visit as measured on the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), Disability Assessment Scale (DAS) and Global Assessment Scale. The primary efficacy endpoint is the change from baseline at week 6 for wrist flexor muscle tone as measured on the Modified Ashworth Scale. Safety parameters will also be measured including adverse events, vital signs (pulse and blood pressure) and clinical laboratory tests (haematology, serum chemistry and urinanalysis).
The primary objective of this study is to confirm the superior efficacy of a single treatment session with GSK1358820 (Botulinum Toxin Type A, aslo known as "OnabotulinumtoxinA" or "Botox") '200U or 240U (if thumb spasticity is present)' over placebo in subjects with post-stroke upper limb spasticity of both wrist and fingers flexors as measured on the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS).
This trial is a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel group study comparing GSK1358820 (Botulinum Toxin Type A, also known as "OnabotulinumtoxinA" or "Botox") to placebo for the treatment of subjects with focal wrist, finger and in some cases, thumb spasticity post-stroke. Approximately 168 subjects will be enrolled. Subjects will receive a single treatment session with intramuscular injections of GSK1358820 (Botulinum Toxin Type A, also known as "OnabotulinumtoxinA" or "Botox") '200U or 240U (if thumb spasticity is present)' or placebo in a randomization ration of 1:1. The subjects will be observed until 12 weeks post injection.
Each completed subject will attend 7 clinic visits. The maximum study duration is 13 weeks per subject. The study includes a 1 week pretreatment period, during which the screening visit (visit 1) is to take place. Only one upper limb (meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria) will be evaluated and treated in the study. Subjects will receive a single intramuscular treatment with either investigated drug or placebo at day 0 (visit 2). There will be five post-injection follow-up visits at weeks 1, 4, 6, 8 and 12 (visits 3 to 7). Week 6 (visit 5) is designated as the primary visit for determining efficacy.
The primary endpoint is the change from baseline at week 6 for wrist flexor muscle tone as measured on the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS). The secondary endpoints include The secondary endpoints include the area under curve (AUC) for the MAS wrist score change from baseline, change from baseline for wrist/finger/thumb flexor muscle tone as measured on MAS, Disability Assessment Scale and Global Assessment Scale. The safety measures include adverse events, clinical laboratory tests and pulse, blood pressure.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| placebo | Placebo Comparator | Sodium chloride |
|
| GSK1358820(Botulinum Toxin Type A) | Experimental | GSK1358820 (Botulinum Toxin Type A, also known as "OnabotulinumtoxinA" or "Botox") |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSK1358820(Botulinum toxin type A) | Drug | GSK1358820 (Botulinum Toxin Type A, also known as "OnabotulinumtoxinA" or "Botox") |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline at Week 6 for Wrist Flexor Muscle Tone as Measured on the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) | The investigator, physiotherapist, or occupational therapist extended the participant's wrist as quickly as possible to grade flexor muscle tone. The MAS wrist score was calculated by using the 6-point MAS (0, 1, 1+ [regarded as 1.5], 2, 3, and 4; 0=no increase in muscle tone; 4=affected part[s] rigid in flexion/extension). Change from Baseline at Week 6 was calculated as the value at Week 6 minus the value at Baseline. | Baseline (Day 0) and Week 6 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Area Under the Curve (AUC) for the Change From Baseline at Weeks 6 and 12 for MAS Wrist Score | The MAS wrist score was assessed by using the 6-point MAS (0, 1, 1+ [regarded as 1.5], 2, 3, and 4; 0=no increase in muscle tone; 4=affected part[s] rigid in flexion/extension). Mean change from Baseline for the MAS wrist score was calculated as the value at Week 6 and Week 12 minus the value at Baseline. In a graph plotting time points on the horizontal axis (HA) and changes from Baseline on the vertical axis, the area surrounded by the MAS wrist score change curve and the HA was calculated and used as a summary index (AUC) for assessment of the MAS wrist score. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Subjects eligible for enrolment in the study must meet all of the following criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Subjects meeting any of the following criteria must not be enrolled in the study:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| GSK Clinical Trials | GlaxoSmithKline | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSK Investigational Site | Guangzhou | Guangdong | China | |||
| GSK Investigational Site |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Placebo | Matching placebo 4 milliliters (mL) was injected into the wrist and finger muscles. 0.8 mL was injected into the thumb muscles if thumb spasticity was present during the 12-week study (once at Week 0). |
| FG001 | BTX 200 U |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| placebo | Drug | placebo |
|
| Baseline (Day 0), Week 6, and Week 12 |
| Change From Baseline at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12 for Wrist Flexor Muscle Tone as Measured on the MAS | The investigator, physiotherapist, or occupational therapist extended the participant's wrist as quickly as possible to grade flexor muscle tone. The MAS wrist score was calculated by using the 6-point MAS (0, 1, 1+ [regarded as 1.5], 2, 3, and 4; 0=no increase in muscle tone; 4=affected part[s] rigid in flexion/extension). Change from Baseline at the indicated time points was calculated as the value at the indicated time points minus the value at Baseline. | Baseline (Day 0) and Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12 |
| Number of Participants Classified as Wrist Treatment Responders at All Post-injection Visits | Wrist treatment responders were defined as participants with a decrease in wrist flexor muscle tone of at least one point on the MAS. The MAS wrist score was calculated by using the 6-point MAS (0, 1, 1+ [regarded as 1.5], 2, 3, and 4; 0=no increase in muscle tone; 4=affected part[s] rigid in flexion/extension). | Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12 |
| Change From Baseline at Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12 for Finger Flexor Muscle Tone as Measured on the MAS | The investigator, physiotherapist, or occupational therapist extended the participant's finger as quickly as possible to grade the flexor muscle tone. The MAS finger score was calculated by using the 6-point MAS (0, 1, 1+ [regarded as 1.5], 2, 3, and 4; 0=no increase in muscle tone; 4=affected part[s] rigid in flexion/extension). Change from Baseline at the indicated time points was calculated as the value at Week 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12 minus the value at Baseline. | Baseline (Day 0) and Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12 |
| Change From Baseline at Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8 and 12 for Thumb Flexor Muscle Tone as Measured on the MAS | The investigator, physotherapist, or occupational therapist extended the participant's thumb as quickly as possible to grade the flexor muscle tone. The MAS thumb score was calculated by using the 6-point MAS (0, 1, 1+ [regarded as 1.5], 2, 3, and 4; 0=no increase in muscle tone; 4=affected part[s] rigid in flexion/extension). Change from Baseline at the indicated time points was calculated as the value at Week 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12 minus the value at Baseline. | Baseline (Day 0) and Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12 |
| Change From Baseline at Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12 for Principal Measure as Assessed on the Disability Assessment Scale (DAS) | The investigator assessed 4 areas of disability, hygiene, pain, dressing, and limb posture, using the 4-point DAS (0=No functional disability to 3=Severe disability). Prior to the first dose, the investigator, in consultation with the participant, selected 1functional disability item (which had to have a score of 2 or greater as measured on the DAS, indicating moderate to severe disability) from the 4 areas of disability and assessed it as a principal measure. Change from Baseline at the indicated time points was calculated as the value at Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12 minus the value at Baseline. | Baseline (Day 0) and Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12 |
| Global Assessment Scale (GAS) Score as Evaluated by the Physician at the Indicated Time Points | The physician used the GAS to assess response to treatment at each visit after injection. The assessor was the same throughout the study period. GAS scores were assessed by using the 9-point GAS (-4, -3, -2, -1, -0, +1, +2, +3, +4; -4=very marked worsenig, -0=unchanged, +4=very marked improvement) at the indicated time points. | Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12 |
| GAS Score as Evaluated by the Care Giver or the Participants at the Indicated Time Points | The care giver or participants used the GAS to assess response to treatment at each visit after injection. The assessor was the same throughout the study period. GAS scores were assessed by using the 9-point GAS (-4, -3, -2, -1, -0, +1, +2, +3, +4; -4=very marked worsening, -0=unchanged, +4=very marked improvement) at the indicated time point. | Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12 |
| Haerbin |
| Heilongjiang |
| 150001 |
| China |
| GSK Investigational Site | Wuhan | Hubei | 430060 | China |
| GSK Investigational Site | Nanjing | Jiangsu | 210029 | China |
| GSK Investigational Site | Suzhou | Jiangsu | 215004 | China |
| GSK Investigational Site | Shenyang | Liaoning | 110001 | China |
| GSK Investigational Site | Chengdu | Sichuan | 610041 | China |
| GSK Investigational Site | Beijing | 100050 | China |
| GSK Investigational Site | Beijing | 100068 | China |
| GSK Investigational Site | Beijing | 100730 | China |
| GSK Investigational Site | Hangzhou | 310016 | China |
| GSK Investigational Site | Shanghai | 200025 | China |
| GSK Investigational Site | Shanghai | 200040 | China |
Botulinum Toxin Type A (BTX or GSK1358820) 200 Units (U) (4 mL) was injected into the wrist and finger muscles. 40 U (0.8 mL) was injected into the thumb muscles if thumb spasticity was present during the 12-week study (once at Week 0).
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Placebo | Matching placebo 4 milliliters (mL) was injected into the wrist and finger muscles. 0.8 mL was injected into the thumb muscles if thumb spasticity was present during the 12-week study (once at Week 0). |
| BG001 | BTX 200 U | Botulinum Toxin Type A (BTX or GSK1358820) 200 Units (U) (4 mL) was injected into the wrist and finger muscles. 40 U (0.8 mL) was injected into the thumb muscles if thumb spasticity was present during the 12-week study (once at Week 0). |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | Years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Number | Participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Change From Baseline at Week 6 for Wrist Flexor Muscle Tone as Measured on the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) | The investigator, physiotherapist, or occupational therapist extended the participant's wrist as quickly as possible to grade flexor muscle tone. The MAS wrist score was calculated by using the 6-point MAS (0, 1, 1+ [regarded as 1.5], 2, 3, and 4; 0=no increase in muscle tone; 4=affected part[s] rigid in flexion/extension). Change from Baseline at Week 6 was calculated as the value at Week 6 minus the value at Baseline. | Full Analysis Set (FAS) Population: all randomized and treated participants. The missing data imputation method was used for analysis. For each participant, missing data points were replaced by the mean of the non-missing scores from both treatment groups for that variable at the specific visit. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | scores on a scale | Baseline (Day 0) and Week 6 |
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Area Under the Curve (AUC) for the Change From Baseline at Weeks 6 and 12 for MAS Wrist Score | The MAS wrist score was assessed by using the 6-point MAS (0, 1, 1+ [regarded as 1.5], 2, 3, and 4; 0=no increase in muscle tone; 4=affected part[s] rigid in flexion/extension). Mean change from Baseline for the MAS wrist score was calculated as the value at Week 6 and Week 12 minus the value at Baseline. In a graph plotting time points on the horizontal axis (HA) and changes from Baseline on the vertical axis, the area surrounded by the MAS wrist score change curve and the HA was calculated and used as a summary index (AUC) for assessment of the MAS wrist score. | FAS Population. The missing data imputation method was used for analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | scores on a scale | Baseline (Day 0), Week 6, and Week 12 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline at Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12 for Wrist Flexor Muscle Tone as Measured on the MAS | The investigator, physiotherapist, or occupational therapist extended the participant's wrist as quickly as possible to grade flexor muscle tone. The MAS wrist score was calculated by using the 6-point MAS (0, 1, 1+ [regarded as 1.5], 2, 3, and 4; 0=no increase in muscle tone; 4=affected part[s] rigid in flexion/extension). Change from Baseline at the indicated time points was calculated as the value at the indicated time points minus the value at Baseline. | FAS Population. The missing data imputation method was used for analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | scores on a scale | Baseline (Day 0) and Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants Classified as Wrist Treatment Responders at All Post-injection Visits | Wrist treatment responders were defined as participants with a decrease in wrist flexor muscle tone of at least one point on the MAS. The MAS wrist score was calculated by using the 6-point MAS (0, 1, 1+ [regarded as 1.5], 2, 3, and 4; 0=no increase in muscle tone; 4=affected part[s] rigid in flexion/extension). | FAS Population. The missing data imputation method was used for analysis. | Posted | Number | participants | Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline at Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12 for Finger Flexor Muscle Tone as Measured on the MAS | The investigator, physiotherapist, or occupational therapist extended the participant's finger as quickly as possible to grade the flexor muscle tone. The MAS finger score was calculated by using the 6-point MAS (0, 1, 1+ [regarded as 1.5], 2, 3, and 4; 0=no increase in muscle tone; 4=affected part[s] rigid in flexion/extension). Change from Baseline at the indicated time points was calculated as the value at Week 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12 minus the value at Baseline. | FAS Population. The missing data imputation method was used for analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | scores on a scale | Baseline (Day 0) and Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline at Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8 and 12 for Thumb Flexor Muscle Tone as Measured on the MAS | The investigator, physotherapist, or occupational therapist extended the participant's thumb as quickly as possible to grade the flexor muscle tone. The MAS thumb score was calculated by using the 6-point MAS (0, 1, 1+ [regarded as 1.5], 2, 3, and 4; 0=no increase in muscle tone; 4=affected part[s] rigid in flexion/extension). Change from Baseline at the indicated time points was calculated as the value at Week 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12 minus the value at Baseline. | FAS Population. Only participants with thumb spasticity who received injection in the thumb muscles were evaluated. The missing data imputation method was used for analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | scores on a scale | Baseline (Day 0) and Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline at Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12 for Principal Measure as Assessed on the Disability Assessment Scale (DAS) | The investigator assessed 4 areas of disability, hygiene, pain, dressing, and limb posture, using the 4-point DAS (0=No functional disability to 3=Severe disability). Prior to the first dose, the investigator, in consultation with the participant, selected 1functional disability item (which had to have a score of 2 or greater as measured on the DAS, indicating moderate to severe disability) from the 4 areas of disability and assessed it as a principal measure. Change from Baseline at the indicated time points was calculated as the value at Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12 minus the value at Baseline. | FAS Population. The missing data imputation method was used for analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | scores on a scale | Baseline (Day 0) and Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Global Assessment Scale (GAS) Score as Evaluated by the Physician at the Indicated Time Points | The physician used the GAS to assess response to treatment at each visit after injection. The assessor was the same throughout the study period. GAS scores were assessed by using the 9-point GAS (-4, -3, -2, -1, -0, +1, +2, +3, +4; -4=very marked worsenig, -0=unchanged, +4=very marked improvement) at the indicated time points. | FAS Population. The missing data imputation method was used for analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | scores on a scale | Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | GAS Score as Evaluated by the Care Giver or the Participants at the Indicated Time Points | The care giver or participants used the GAS to assess response to treatment at each visit after injection. The assessor was the same throughout the study period. GAS scores were assessed by using the 9-point GAS (-4, -3, -2, -1, -0, +1, +2, +3, +4; -4=very marked worsening, -0=unchanged, +4=very marked improvement) at the indicated time point. | FAS Population. The missing data imputation method was used for analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | scores on a scale | Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12 |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Placebo | Matching placebo 4 milliliters (mL) was injected into the wrist and finger muscles. 0.8 mL was injected into the thumb muscles if thumb spasticity was present during the 12-week study (once at Week 0). | 1 | 83 | 21 | 83 | ||
| EG001 | BTX 200 U | Botulinum Toxin Type A (BTX or GSK1358820) 200 Units (U) (4 mL) was injected into the wrist and finger muscles. 40 U (0.8 mL) was injected into the thumb muscles if thumb spasticity was present during the 12-week study (once at Week 0). | 2 | 87 | 16 | 87 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cerebral infarction | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Convulsion | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Wound | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blood bilirubin increased | Investigations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Blood urea increased | Investigations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gamma-glutamyltransferase increased | Investigations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Lipids abnormal | Investigations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Platelet count decreased | Investigations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Alanine aminotransferase increased | Investigations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Blood cholesterol increased | Investigations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Blood glucose increased | Investigations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Blood potassium increased | Investigations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Blood triglycerides increased | Investigations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Liver function test abnormal | Investigations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Platelet count abnormal | Investigations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urine analysis abnormal | Investigations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hyperlipidemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Electrolyte imbalance | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypokalemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hyperglycemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Epilepsy | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Upper respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Varicella | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Erysipelas | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nasopharyngitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pneumonia | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Muscular weakness | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pain in extremity | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diarrhea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fall | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Head injury | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bruxism | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rash | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Thrombocytopenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Angina pectoris | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vertigo | Ear and labyrinth disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pyrexia | General disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypersensitivity | Immune system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Renal failure | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
GSK agreements may vary with individual investigators, but will not prohibit any investigator from publishing. GSK supports the publication of results from all centers of a multi-center trial but requests that reports based on single-site data not precede the primary publication of the entire clinical trial.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSK Response Center | GlaxoSmithKline | 866-435-7343 |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020521 | Stroke |
| D009128 | Muscle Spasticity |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002561 | Cerebrovascular Disorders |
| D001927 | Brain Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
| D009135 | Muscular Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D009122 | Muscle Hypertonia |
| D020879 | Neuromuscular Manifestations |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D019274 | Botulinum Toxins, Type A |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001905 | Botulinum Toxins |
| D008666 | Metalloendopeptidases |
| D010450 | Endopeptidases |
| D010447 | Peptide Hydrolases |
| D006867 | Hydrolases |
| D004798 | Enzymes |
| D045762 | Enzymes and Coenzymes |
| D045726 | Metalloproteases |
| D001426 | Bacterial Proteins |
| D011506 | Proteins |
| D000602 | Amino Acids, Peptides, and Proteins |
| D001427 | Bacterial Toxins |
| D014118 | Toxins, Biological |
| D001685 | Biological Factors |
Not provided
Not provided
| Male |
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
| Units |
|---|
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Units |
|---|
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
|
|