Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 28431754DIA3015 | Other Identifier | Janssen Research & Development, LLC |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of canagliflozin compared with sitagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who are receiving treatment with metformin and sulphonylurea and have inadequate glycemic (blood sugar) control.
Canagliflozin is a drug that is being tested to see if it may be useful in treating patients diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This is a randomized (study drug assigned by chance), double-blind (neither the patient or the study doctor will know the name of the assigned treatment), multicenter study to determine the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of canagliflozin 300 mg compared to sitagliptin 100 mg (an antihyperglycemic drug) in patients with T2DM who are not achieving an adequate response from current antihyperglycemic therapy with metformin and sulphonylurea to control their diabetes. Approximately 720 patients with T2DM who are receiving combination therapy with metformin and sulphonylurea will receive the addition of once-daily treatment with canagliflozin 300 mg or sitagliptin 100 mg capsules for 52 weeks. Patients will participate in the study for approximately 59 to 72 weeks. During treatment, patients will be monitored for safety by review of adverse events, results from laboratory tests, 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs), vital signs measurements, body weight, physical examinations, and self monitored blood glucose (SMBG) measurements. The primary outcome measure in the study is the effect of canagliflozin compared to sitagliptin on hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) after 52 weeks of treatment. Study drug will be taken orally (by mouth) once daily before the first meal each day unless otherwise specified. Patients will take single-blind placebo for 2 weeks before randomization. After randomization, patients in the study will take double-blind canagliflozin 300 mg or matching sitagliptin 100 mg for 52 weeks.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Canagliflozin 300 mg | Experimental | Each patient will receive 300 mg of canagliflozin once daily for 52 weeks with protocol-specified doses of metformin and sulphonylurea |
|
| Sitagliptin 100 mg | Active Comparator | Each patient will receive 100 mg of sitagliptin once daily for 52 weeks with protocol-specified doses of metformin and sulphonylurea |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sitagliptin 100 mg | Drug | One 100 mg capsule once daily for 52 weeks with protocol-specified doses of metformin and sulphonylurea |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 52 | The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in HbA1c from Baseline to Week 52 for each treatment group. The statistical analysis shows the treatment difference (ie, between canagliflozin and sitagliptin) in the LS mean change. | Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 52 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Patients With HbA1c <7% at Week 52 | The table below shows the percentage of patients with HbA1c <7% at Week 52 in each treatment group. The statistical analysis shows the treatment difference (ie, between canagliflozin and sitagliptin) in the percentage. | Week 52 |
| Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) From Baseline to Week 52 |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Janssen Research & Development, LLC C. Clinical Trial | Janssen Research & Development, LLC | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile | Alabama | United States | ||||
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 29313267 | Derived | Cai J, Delahanty LM, Akapame S, Slee A, Traina S. Impact of Canagliflozin Treatment on Health-Related Quality of Life among People with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Pooled Analysis of Patient-Reported Outcomes from Randomized Controlled Trials. Patient. 2018 Jun;11(3):341-352. doi: 10.1007/s40271-017-0290-4. | |
| 27977934 | Derived |
Not provided
Not provided
A total of 756 patients were randomly allocated to the 2 treatment arms in the study. 755 patients received at least 1 dose of study drug and were included in the modified intent-to-treat (mITT) analysis set and the safety analysis set.
This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of canagliflozin compared with sitaglitin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus with inadequate control, despite treatment with metformin and sulphonylureas. The study was conducted between 30 June 2010 and 09 March 2012 and recruited patients from 140 study centers located in 17 countries worldwide.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Canagliflozin 300 mg | Each patient received 300 mg of canagliflozin once a day for 52 weeks with protocol-specified doses of metformin and sulphonylurea. |
| FG001 | Sitagliptin 100 mg |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Canagliflozin 300 mg | Drug | One 300 mg capsule once daily for 52 weeks with protocol-specified doses of metformin and sulphonylurea |
|
| Metformin | Drug | Patients will continue to take background therapy with Metformin for T2DM at maximally or near-maximally effective protocol-specified doses for the duration of the study. |
|
| Sulphonylurea | Drug | Patients will continue to take background therapy with Sulphonylurea for T2DM at maximally or near-maximally effective protocol-specified doses for the duration of the study. |
|
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in FPG from Baseline to Week 52 for each treatment group. The statistical analysis shows the treatment difference (ie, between canagliflozin and sitagliptin) in the LS mean change. |
| Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 52 |
| Percent Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 52 | The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change in body weight from Baseline to Week 52 for each treatment group. The statistical analysis shows the treatment difference (ie, between canagliflozin and sitagliptin) in the LS mean percent change. | Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 52 |
| Change in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) From Baseline to Week 52 | The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in SBP from Baseline to Week 52 for each treatment group. The statistical analysis shows the treatment difference (ie, between canagliflozin and sitagliptin) in the LS mean change. | Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 52 |
| Percent Change in Triglycerides From Baseline to Week 52 | The table below shows the mean percent change in triglycerides from Baseline to Week 52 for each treatment group. The statistical analysis shows the treatment difference (ie, between canagliflozin and sitagliptin) in the LS mean change. | Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 52 |
| Percent Change in High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) From Baseline to Week 52 | The table below shows the mean percent change in HDL-C from Baseline to Week 52 for each treatment group. The statistical analysis shows the treatment difference (ie, between canagliflozin and sitagliptin) in the LS mean change. | Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 52 |
| Goodyear |
| Arizona |
| United States |
| Mesa | Arizona | United States |
| Escondido | California | United States |
| Fresno | California | United States |
| Greenbrae | California | United States |
| La Mesa | California | United States |
| Laguna Hills | California | United States |
| Lancaster | California | United States |
| Long Beach | California | United States |
| Los Angeles | California | United States |
| Norwalk | California | United States |
| Pismo Beach | California | United States |
| Roseville | California | United States |
| Spring Valley | California | United States |
| Walnut Creek | California | United States |
| Watsonville | California | United States |
| Denver | Colorado | United States |
| Northglenn | Colorado | United States |
| Milford | Connecticut | United States |
| Bradenton | Florida | United States |
| Cape Coral | Florida | United States |
| Clearwater | Florida | United States |
| Delray Beach | Florida | United States |
| Miami | Florida | United States |
| Pembroke Pines | Florida | United States |
| Tampa | Florida | United States |
| Atlanta | Georgia | United States |
| Lewiston | Idaho | United States |
| Chicago | Illinois | United States |
| O'Fallon | Illinois | United States |
| Springfield | Illinois | United States |
| Topeka | Kansas | United States |
| Bowling Green | Kentucky | United States |
| Lexington | Kentucky | United States |
| Madisonville | Kentucky | United States |
| Baton Rouge | Louisiana | United States |
| Mandeville | Louisiana | United States |
| Metairie | Louisiana | United States |
| Sunset | Louisiana | United States |
| Brockton | Massachusetts | United States |
| Saint Clair Shores | Michigan | United States |
| Southfield | Michigan | United States |
| Dakota Dunes | Nebraska | United States |
| Toms River | New Jersey | United States |
| Albuquerque | New Mexico | United States |
| West Seneca | New York | United States |
| Calabash | North Carolina | United States |
| Greensboro | North Carolina | United States |
| Moerhead City | North Carolina | United States |
| Morganton | North Carolina | United States |
| Cincinnati | Ohio | United States |
| Gallipolis | Ohio | United States |
| Marion | Ohio | United States |
| Mason | Ohio | United States |
| Toledo | Ohio | United States |
| Zanesville | Ohio | United States |
| Beaver | Pennsylvania | United States |
| Bensalem | Pennsylvania | United States |
| Norristown | Pennsylvania | United States |
| Perryopolis | Pennsylvania | United States |
| Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | United States |
| Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania | United States |
| Pottstown | Pennsylvania | United States |
| Greenville | South Carolina | United States |
| Spartanburg | South Carolina | United States |
| Johnson City | Tennessee | United States |
| Dallas | Texas | United States |
| Fort Worth | Texas | United States |
| Houston | Texas | United States |
| Killeen | Texas | United States |
| Richardson | Texas | United States |
| San Antonio | Texas | United States |
| Schertz | Texas | United States |
| Sugar Land | Texas | United States |
| Burke | Virginia | United States |
| Danville | Virginia | United States |
| Falls Church | Virginia | United States |
| Hampton | Virginia | United States |
| Henrico | Virginia | United States |
| Manassas | Virginia | United States |
| Norfolk | Virginia | United States |
| Richmond | Virginia | United States |
| Selah | Washington | United States |
| Tacoma | Washington | United States |
| Salzburg | Austria |
| Vienna | Austria |
| Hedersem (Aalst) | Belgium |
| Tremelo | Belgium |
| Belém | Brazil |
| Brasília | Brazil |
| Fortaleza | Brazil |
| Goiânia | Brazil |
| Marília | Brazil |
| Passo Fundo | Brazil |
| Porto Alegre | Brazil |
| Rio de Janeiro | Brazil |
| São Paulo | Brazil |
| Calgary | Alberta | Canada |
| Red Deer | Alberta | Canada |
| Vancouver | British Columbia | Canada |
| Halifax | Nova Scotia | Canada |
| Brampton | Ontario | Canada |
| Oshawa | Ontario | Canada |
| Toronto | Ontario | Canada |
| Charlottetown | Prince Edward Island | Canada |
| Sherbrooke | Quebec | Canada |
| Ville, Laint-Laurent | Quebec | Canada |
| Pointe-Claire | Canada |
| Toronto | Canada |
| Aalborg | Denmark |
| Ballerup Municipality | Denmark |
| Gentofte Municipality | Denmark |
| Vejle | Denmark |
| Vipperoed | Denmark |
| Bondy | France |
| Dijon | France |
| Marseille | France |
| Nantes | France |
| Narbonne | France |
| Paris | France |
| Pessac | France |
| Saint-Etienne | France |
| Berlin | Germany |
| Dresden | Germany |
| Eisenach | Germany |
| Großheirath | Germany |
| Meißen | Germany |
| Bangalore | India |
| Coimbatore | India |
| Hyderabad | India |
| Jaipur | India |
| Nagpur | India |
| Nashik | India |
| Pune | India |
| Beersheba | Israel |
| Jerusalem | Israel |
| Kfar Saba | Israel |
| Nazareth | Israel |
| Rishon LeZiyyon | Israel |
| Tel Aviv | Israel |
| Ipoh | Malaysia |
| Johor Bahru | Malaysia |
| Kelantan | Malaysia |
| Kuala Selangor | Malaysia |
| Breda | Netherlands |
| Eindhoven | Netherlands |
| Groningen | Netherlands |
| Leiderdorp | Netherlands |
| Rotterdam | Netherlands |
| Velp Gld | Netherlands |
| Zoetermeer | Netherlands |
| Christchurch | New Zealand |
| Dunedin | New Zealand |
| Rotorua | New Zealand |
| Tauranga | New Zealand |
| Wellington | New Zealand |
| Bialystok | Poland |
| Chrzanów | Poland |
| Gdansk | Poland |
| Kamieniec Ząbkowicki | Poland |
| Krakow | Poland |
| Lublin | Poland |
| Sobótka | Poland |
| Sopot | Poland |
| Torun | Poland |
| Wroclaw | Poland |
| Zabrze | Poland |
| Singapore | Singapore |
| Busan | South Korea |
| Daegu | South Korea |
| Jeonju | South Korea |
| Seongnam | South Korea |
| Seoul | South Korea |
| Dnipro | Ukraine |
| Ivano-Frankivsk | Ukraine |
| Kharkiv | Ukraine |
| Kiev | Ukraine |
| Odesa | Ukraine |
| Poltava | Ukraine |
| Sumy | Ukraine |
| Ternopil | Ukraine |
| Vinnitsa | Ukraine |
| Zaporizhzhya | Ukraine |
| Qiu R, Balis D, Xie J, Davies MJ, Desai M, Meininger G. Longer-term safety and tolerability of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes: a pooled analysis. Curr Med Res Opin. 2017 Mar;33(3):553-562. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2016.1271780. Epub 2017 Jan 4. |
| 27391951 | Derived | Schernthaner G, Lavalle-Gonzalez FJ, Davidson JA, Jodon H, Vijapurkar U, Qiu R, Canovatchel W. Canagliflozin provides greater attainment of both HbA1c and body weight reduction versus sitagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes. Postgrad Med. 2016 Nov;128(8):725-730. doi: 10.1080/00325481.2016.1210988. Epub 2016 Jul 26. |
| 26580237 | Derived | Watts NB, Bilezikian JP, Usiskin K, Edwards R, Desai M, Law G, Meininger G. Effects of Canagliflozin on Fracture Risk in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016 Jan;101(1):157-66. doi: 10.1210/jc.2015-3167. Epub 2015 Nov 18. |
| 26579834 | Derived | Lavalle-Gonzalez FJ, Eliaschewitz FG, Cerdas S, Chacon Mdel P, Tong C, Alba M. Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus from Latin America. Curr Med Res Opin. 2016;32(3):427-39. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2015.1121865. Epub 2016 Jan 14. |
| 25795432 | Derived | Bailey RA, Vijapurkar U, Meininger G, Rupnow MF, Blonde L. Diabetes-Related Composite Quality End Point Attainment: Canagliflozin Versus Sitagliptin Based on a Pooled Analysis of 2 Clinical Trials. Clin Ther. 2015 May 1;37(5):1045-54. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2015.02.020. Epub 2015 Mar 18. |
| 24585202 | Derived | Polidori D, Mari A, Ferrannini E. Canagliflozin, a sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor, improves model-based indices of beta cell function in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2014 May;57(5):891-901. doi: 10.1007/s00125-014-3196-x. Epub 2014 Mar 1. |
| 23564919 | Derived | Schernthaner G, Gross JL, Rosenstock J, Guarisco M, Fu M, Yee J, Kawaguchi M, Canovatchel W, Meininger G. Canagliflozin compared with sitagliptin for patients with type 2 diabetes who do not have adequate glycemic control with metformin plus sulfonylurea: a 52-week randomized trial. Diabetes Care. 2013 Sep;36(9):2508-15. doi: 10.2337/dc12-2491. Epub 2013 Apr 5. |
Each patient received 100 mg of sitagliptin once a day for 52 weeks with protocol-specified doses of metformin and sulphonylurea.
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Canagliflozin 300 mg | Each patient received 300 mg of canagliflozin once a day for 52 weeks with protocol-specified doses of metformin and sulphonylurea. |
| BG001 | Sitagliptin 100 mg | Each patient received 100 mg of sitagliptin once a day for 52 weeks with protocol-specified doses of metformin and sulphonylurea. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Region Treated | Number | participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 52 | The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in HbA1c from Baseline to Week 52 for each treatment group. The statistical analysis shows the treatment difference (ie, between canagliflozin and sitagliptin) in the LS mean change. | This analysis used the modified intent-to-treat analysis set (all patients who were randomly assigned to a treatment group and received at least 1 dose of study drug). The last-observation-carried-forward method was applied when the Week 52 values were missing. The table includes only patients with both baseline and post baseline values. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Percent | Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 52 |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Patients With HbA1c <7% at Week 52 | The table below shows the percentage of patients with HbA1c <7% at Week 52 in each treatment group. The statistical analysis shows the treatment difference (ie, between canagliflozin and sitagliptin) in the percentage. | This analysis used the modified intent-to-treat analysis set (all patients who were randomly assigned to a treatment group and received at least 1 dose of study drug). The last-observation-carried-forward method was applied when the Week 52 values were missing. The table includes only patients with both baseline and post baseline values. | Posted | Number | Percentage of patients | Week 52 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) From Baseline to Week 52 | The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in FPG from Baseline to Week 52 for each treatment group. The statistical analysis shows the treatment difference (ie, between canagliflozin and sitagliptin) in the LS mean change. | This analysis used the modified intent-to-treat analysis set (all patients who were randomly assigned to a treatment group and received at least 1 dose of study drug). The last-observation-carried-forward method was applied when the Week 52 values were missing. The table includes only patients with both baseline and post baseline values. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | mg/dL | Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 52 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percent Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 52 | The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change in body weight from Baseline to Week 52 for each treatment group. The statistical analysis shows the treatment difference (ie, between canagliflozin and sitagliptin) in the LS mean percent change. | This analysis used the modified intent-to-treat analysis set (all patients who were randomly assigned to a treatment group and received at least 1 dose of study drug). The last-observation-carried-forward method was applied when the Week 52 values were missing. The table includes only patients with both baseline and post baseline values. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Percent change | Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 52 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) From Baseline to Week 52 | The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in SBP from Baseline to Week 52 for each treatment group. The statistical analysis shows the treatment difference (ie, between canagliflozin and sitagliptin) in the LS mean change. | This analysis used the modified intent-to-treat analysis set (all patients who were randomly assigned to a treatment group and received at least 1 dose of study drug). The last-observation-carried-forward method was applied when the Week 52 values were missing. The table includes only patients with both baseline and post baseline values. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | mmHg | Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 52 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percent Change in Triglycerides From Baseline to Week 52 | The table below shows the mean percent change in triglycerides from Baseline to Week 52 for each treatment group. The statistical analysis shows the treatment difference (ie, between canagliflozin and sitagliptin) in the LS mean change. | This analysis used the modified intent-to-treat analysis set (all patients who were randomly assigned to a treatment group and received at least 1 dose of study drug). The last-observation-carried-forward method was applied when the Week 52 values were missing. The table includes only patients with both baseline and post baseline values. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Percent change | Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 52 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percent Change in High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) From Baseline to Week 52 | The table below shows the mean percent change in HDL-C from Baseline to Week 52 for each treatment group. The statistical analysis shows the treatment difference (ie, between canagliflozin and sitagliptin) in the LS mean change. | This analysis used the modified intent-to-treat analysis set (all patients who were randomly assigned to a treatment group and received at least 1 dose of study drug). The last-observation-carried-forward method was applied when the Week 52 values were missing. The table includes only patients with both baseline and post baseline values. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Percent change | Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 52 |
|
|
Adverse events were reported for the duration of the study; each patient participated in the study for approximately 52 weeks.
The total number of adverse events listed in the "Other (non-Serious) Adverse Events" table are based upon a cut-off of greater than or equal to 5 percent of patients experiencing the adverse event in any treatment arm.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Canagliflozin 300 mg | Each patient received 300 mg of canagliflozin once a day for 52 weeks with protocol-specified doses of metformin and sulphonylurea. | 24 | 377 | 157 | 377 | ||
| EG001 | Sitagliptin 100 mg | Each patient received 100 mg of sitagliptin once a day for 52 weeks with protocol-specified doses of metformin and sulphonylurea. | 21 | 378 | 159 | 378 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Angina unstable | Cardiac disorders | MEDDRA 14.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Arteriosclerosis coronary artery | Cardiac disorders | MEDDRA 14.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cardiac arrest | Cardiac disorders | MEDDRA 14.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Coronary artery disease | Cardiac disorders | MEDDRA 14.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ischaemic cardiomyopathy | Cardiac disorders | MEDDRA 14.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Myocardial infarction | Cardiac disorders | MEDDRA 14.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pancreatitis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MEDDRA 14.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Small intestinal obstruction | Gastrointestinal disorders | MEDDRA 14.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bile duct obstruction | Hepatobiliary disorders | MEDDRA 14.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cholelithiasis | Hepatobiliary disorders | MEDDRA 14.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gallbladder oedema | Hepatobiliary disorders | MEDDRA 14.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bronchopneumonia | Infections and infestations | MEDDRA 14.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Leptospirosis | Infections and infestations | MEDDRA 14.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pneumonia | Infections and infestations | MEDDRA 14.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pneumonia bacterial | Infections and infestations | MEDDRA 14.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pyelonephritis chronic | Infections and infestations | MEDDRA 14.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Arthropod bite | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MEDDRA 14.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Contusion | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MEDDRA 14.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hand fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MEDDRA 14.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hip fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MEDDRA 14.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Incisional hernia, obstructive | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MEDDRA 14.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Lower limb fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MEDDRA 14.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Meniscus lesion | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MEDDRA 14.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Splenic rupture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MEDDRA 14.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Tendon rupture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MEDDRA 14.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Toxicity to various agents | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MEDDRA 14.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Wound | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MEDDRA 14.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Obesity | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MEDDRA 14.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Lumbar spinal stenosis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MEDDRA 14.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Osteoarthritis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MEDDRA 14.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cervix carcinoma | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MEDDRA 14.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Lung neoplasm malignant | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MEDDRA 14.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Oropharyngeal cancer stage unspecified | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MEDDRA 14.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Uterine leiomyoma | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MEDDRA 14.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cerebrovascular accident | Nervous system disorders | MEDDRA 14.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cervical cord compression | Nervous system disorders | MEDDRA 14.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Convulsion | Nervous system disorders | MEDDRA 14.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Transient ischaemic attack | Nervous system disorders | MEDDRA 14.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Suicide attempt | Psychiatric disorders | MEDDRA 14.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Renal colic | Renal and urinary disorders | MEDDRA 14.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vaginal haemorrhage | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MEDDRA 14.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Respiratory arrest | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MEDDRA 14.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Leukocytoclastic vasculitis | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MEDDRA 14.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Arterial thrombosis limb | Vascular disorders | MEDDRA 14.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Arteriosclerosis | Vascular disorders | MEDDRA 14.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MEDDRA 14.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Influenza | Infections and infestations | MEDDRA 14.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nasopharyngitis | Infections and infestations | MEDDRA 14.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Upper respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MEDDRA 14.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | MEDDRA 14.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypoglycaemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MEDDRA 14.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MEDDRA 14.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
A copy of the manuscript must be provided to the sponsor for review at least 60 days before submission for publication or presentation. If requested in writing, such publication will be withheld for up to an additional 60 days.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vice President, Franchise Medical Leader, Cardiovascular & Metabolism Franchise | Janssen Research & Development, LLC | 1-800-526-7736 |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003924 | Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003920 | Diabetes Mellitus |
| D044882 | Glucose Metabolism Disorders |
| D008659 | Metabolic Diseases |
| D009750 | Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases |
| D004700 | Endocrine System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000068900 | Sitagliptin Phosphate |
| D000068896 | Canagliflozin |
| D008687 | Metformin |
| D013453 | Sulfonylurea Compounds |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014230 | Triazoles |
| D001393 | Azoles |
| D006573 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring |
| D006571 | Heterocyclic Compounds |
| D011719 | Pyrazines |
| D013876 | Thiophenes |
| D013457 | Sulfur Compounds |
| D009930 | Organic Chemicals |
| D005960 | Glucosides |
| D006027 | Glycosides |
| D002241 | Carbohydrates |
| D001645 | Biguanides |
| D006146 | Guanidines |
| D000578 | Amidines |
| D014508 | Urea |
| D000577 | Amides |
| D013450 | Sulfones |
Not provided
Not provided
| >=65 years |
|
| Male |
|
| BELGIUM |
|
| BRAZIL |
|
| CANADA |
|
| DENMARK |
|
| FRANCE |
|
| GERMANY |
|
| INDIA |
|
| ISRAEL |
|
| MALAYSIA |
|
| NETHERLANDS |
|
| NEW ZEALAND |
|
| POLAND |
|
| SINGAPORE |
|
| SOUTH KOREA |
|
| UKRAINE |
|
| UNITED STATES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|