Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008-005966-29 | EudraCT Number |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose is to compare solifenacin and oxybutynin with an inactive tablet and assess any potential effects on mental ability.
All subjects will receive each intervention during the course of the study. Subjects will complete a 21-day washout period between treatment periods and following last treatment period.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Solifenacin | Experimental | Participants received 21 days of treatment with 5 mg solifenacin, in tablet form once a day. |
|
| Oxybutynin | Active Comparator | Participants received 21 days of treatment with 10 mg oxybutynin (1 x 5 mg twice daily) in capsule form. |
|
| Placebo | Placebo Comparator | Participants received 21 days of treatment with placebo. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solifenacin | Drug | tablet |
|
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in Cognitive Function Composite Score - Power of Attention | Cognitive effects were assessed at the end of each treatment period using a computerized assessment system at time points close to the predicted time to attain maximum plasma concentration (Tmax) for solifenacin (6 hours) and oxybutynin (2 hours). Power of attention is calculated from the sum of three cognitive function speed tests: Simple Reaction Time, Choice Reaction Time and the Speed of Detections in Digit Vigilance task. A low score reflects a fast reaction time and a high intensity of concentration. A positive change from baseline reflects impairment compared to the baseline assessment. | Assessed at each treatment period baseline visit (the day prior to the first dose of each treatment; Days -1, 42, 84) and at the end of each treatment period (Days 21, 63 and 105). At each visit, tests were performed at 2 and 6 hours post-dose. |
| Change From Baseline in Cognitive Function Composite Score - Continuity of Attention | Cognitive effects were assessed using a computerized assessment system at time points close to the predicted time of maximum plasma concentration for solifenacin and oxybutynin. For continuity of attention, the number of correct responses (out of 50) for choice reaction time was added to the total number of targets correctly identified (out of 45) digit vigilance minus the number of false alarms (total score of -45 to 95). A high score reflects someone able to keep his/her mind on a single task for a prolonged period. A negative change from baseline reflects impairment compared to baseline. | Assessed at each treatment period baseline visit (the day prior to the first dose of each treatment; Days -1, 42, 84) and at the end of each treatment period (Days 21, 63 and 105). At each visit, tests were performed at 2 and 6 hours post-dose. |
| Change From Baseline in Cognitive Function Composite Score - Quality of Working Memory | Cognitive effects were assessed at the end of each treatment period using a computerized assessment system at time points close to the predicted time to attain maximum plasma concentration (Tmax) for solifenacin (6 hours) and oxybutynin (2 hours). Quality of working memory is calculated from the sum of two cognitive function sensitivity tests: Numeric Working Memory Sensitivity and Spatial Working Memory Sensitivity, and ranges from -2 to 2. A higher score reflects a good working memory and a negative change from baseline reflects impairment compared to the baseline assessment. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in Postural Stability Test | The postural stability test measures the ability to stand upright without moving, and was assessed at the end of each treatment period using a computerized assessment system at time points close to the predicted time to attain maximum plasma concentration for solifenacin and oxybutynin. Using apparatus modeled on the Wright Ataxia-meter, a cord from the meter is attached to the patient who is required to stand as still as possible with feet apart and eyes closed for 1 minute. The amount of sway is expressed as the total angular movement, summed regardless of sign, in the antero-posterior plane and calibrated in units of one-third degree of angle of sway. Wright (1971) described a range of 20-30 units as a normal range for adults with eyes wide open, increasing by 50 to 100% with eyes shut. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Use Central Contact | Astellas Pharma Europe Ltd. | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blackpool | Lancashire | FY2 0JH | United Kingdom | |||
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5130616 | Background | Wright BM. A simple mechanical ataxia-meter. J Physiol. 1971 Oct;218 Suppl:27P-28P. No abstract available. | |
| 23332882 | Derived | Wagg A, Dale M, Tretter R, Stow B, Compion G. Randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled, double-blind crossover study investigating the effect of solifenacin and oxybutynin in elderly people with mild cognitive impairment: the SENIOR study. Eur Urol. 2013 Jul;64(1):74-81. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.01.002. Epub 2013 Jan 11. |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Link to Prescribing Information | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Solifenacin / Oxybutynin / Placebo | Participants received 21 days of each treatment in the following order: 5 mg solifenacin, 10 mg oxybutynin, placebo. There was a 21-day washout period between each treatment period. |
| FG001 | Solifenacin / Placebo / Oxybutynin | Participants received 21 days of each treatment in the following order: 5 mg solifenacin, placebo, 10 mg oxybutynin. There was a 21-day washout period between each treatment period. |
| FG002 | Oxybutynin / Placebo / Solifenacin | Participants received 21 days of each treatment in the following order: 10 mg oxybutynin, placebo, 5 mg solifenacin. There was a 21-day washout period between each treatment period. |
| FG003 | Oxybutynin / Solifenacin / Placebo | Participants received 21 days of each treatment in the following order: 10 mg oxybutynin, 5 mg solifenacin, placebo. There was a 21-day washout period between each treatment period. |
| FG004 | Placebo / Solifenacin / Oxybutynin | Participants received 21 days of each treatment in the following order: placebo, 5 mg solifenacin, 10 mg oxybutynin. There was a 21-day washout period between each treatment period. |
| FG005 | Placebo / Oxybutynin / Solifenacin | Participants received 21 days of each treatment in the following order: placebo, 10 mg oxybutynin, 5 mg solifenacin. There was a 21-day washout period between each treatment period. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Solifenacin / Oxybutynin / Placebo | Participants received 21 days of each treatment in the following order: 5 mg solifenacin, 10 mg oxybutynin, placebo. There was a 21-day washout period between each treatment period. |
| BG001 | Solifenacin / Placebo / Oxybutynin |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Change From Baseline in Cognitive Function Composite Score - Power of Attention | Cognitive effects were assessed at the end of each treatment period using a computerized assessment system at time points close to the predicted time to attain maximum plasma concentration (Tmax) for solifenacin (6 hours) and oxybutynin (2 hours). Power of attention is calculated from the sum of three cognitive function speed tests: Simple Reaction Time, Choice Reaction Time and the Speed of Detections in Digit Vigilance task. A low score reflects a fast reaction time and a high intensity of concentration. A positive change from baseline reflects impairment compared to the baseline assessment. | The number of participants analyzed represents the Safety Analysis Subset 1 (SAF1), consisting of all randomized patients who took at least one dose of the study medication and who completed the cognitive function tests for at least two treatment periods. The number of participants per arm is consistent for all categories / rows of the data table. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | msec | Assessed at each treatment period baseline visit (the day prior to the first dose of each treatment; Days -1, 42, 84) and at the end of each treatment period (Days 21, 63 and 105). At each visit, tests were performed at 2 and 6 hours post-dose. |
Treatment emergent adverse events were collected by treatment period from first administration of the study/comparative drug until within 7 days of taking the last dose.
A treatment period consists of about 21 treatment days with a follow-up of either about 21 washout days prior to start of next treatment period or a follow-up of 7 days for the last treatment period.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Solifenacin | Participants received 21 days of treatment with 5 mg solifenacin, in tablet form once a day. |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vitreous detachment | Eye disorders | MedDRA (12.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry mouth | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (12.1) | Systematic Assessment |
Company makes no warranties or representations of any kind as to the posting, expressed or implied, including warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose, and shall not be liable for any damages.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Associate Medical Director Urology | Astellas Pharma Europe Ltd. | clinicaltrials@us.astellas.com |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000069464 | Solifenacin Succinate |
| C005419 | oxybutynin |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011812 | Quinuclidines |
| D006572 | Heterocyclic Compounds, Bridged-Ring |
| D006571 | Heterocyclic Compounds |
| D044005 | Tetrahydroisoquinolines |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Oxybutynin |
| Drug |
capsule |
|
| Placebo | Drug | tablet |
|
| Assessed at each treatment period baseline visit (the day prior to the first dose of each treatment; Days -1, 42, 84) and at the end of each treatment period (Days 21, 63 and 105). At each visit, tests were performed at 2 and 6 hours post-dose. |
| Change From Baseline in Cognitive Function Composite Score - Quality of Episodic Secondary Memory | Cognitive effects were assessed at the end of each treatment period using a computerized assessment system at time points close to the predicted time of maximum plasma concentration for solifenacin and oxybutynin. Quality of episodic secondary memory is calculated from the sum of 4 tests: Immediate and delayed word recall, and word and picture recognition, and ranges from -200 to 400. A high score reflects a good ability to store, hold and retrieve information of an episodic nature (i.e. an event or a name) and a negative change from baseline reflects impairment compared to baseline. | Assessed at each treatment period baseline visit (the day prior to the first dose of each treatment; Days -1, 42, 84) and at the end of each treatment period (Days 21, 63 and 105). At each visit, tests were performed at 2 and 6 hours post-dose. |
| Change From Baseline in Cognitive Function Composite Score - Speed of Memory | Cognitive effects were assessed at the end of each treatment period using a computerized assessment system at time points close to the predicted time to attain maximum plasma concentration for solifenacin and oxybutynin. Speed of Memory was calculated from the sum of 4 cognitive function speed tests: numeric and spatial working memory and word and picture recognition. A low score reflects that a person is able to recall a name, a face or any other item fast from the episodic secondary memory; a positive change from baseline reflects impairment compared to baseline. | Assessed at each treatment period baseline visit (the day prior to the first dose of each treatment; Days -1, 42, 84) and at the end of each treatment period (Days 21, 63 and 105). At each visit, tests were performed at 2 and 6 hours post-dose. |
| Assessed at each treatment period baseline visit (the day prior to the first dose of each treatment; Days -1, 42, 84) and at the end of each treatment period (Days 21, 63 and 105). At each visit, tests were performed at 2 and 6 hours post-dose. |
| Manchester |
| Lancashire |
| M50 2GY |
| United Kingdom |
| Bradford | Yorkshire | BD3 0DQ | United Kingdom |
| Withdrawal by Subject |
|
Participants received 21 days of each treatment in the following order: 5 mg solifenacin, placebo, 10 mg oxybutynin. There was a 21-day washout period between each treatment period. |
| BG002 | Oxybutynin / Placebo / Solifenacin | Participants received 21 days of each treatment in the following order: 10 mg oxybutynin, placebo, 5 mg solifenacin. There was a 21-day washout period between each treatment period. |
| BG003 | Oxybutynin / Solifenacin / Placebo | Participants received 21 days of each treatment in the following order: 10 mg oxybutynin, 5 mg solifenacin, placebo. There was a 21-day washout period between each treatment period. |
| BG004 | Placebo / Solifenacin / Oxybutynin | Participants received 21 days of each treatment in the following order: placebo, 5 mg solifenacin, 10 mg oxybutynin. There was a 21-day washout period between each treatment period. |
| BG005 | Placebo / Oxybutynin / Solifenacin | Participants received 21 days of each treatment in the following order: placebo, 10 mg oxybutynin, 5 mg solifenacin. There was a 21-day washout period between each treatment period. |
| BG006 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Number | participants |
|
| Stockholm criteria for mild cognitive impairment | The Stockholm criteria for identification of mild cognitive impairment are:
| Number | participants |
|
| Total Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) Score | The mini-mental state examination (MMSE) provides measures of orientation, registration (immediate memory), short-term memory (but not long-term memory) and language functioning. The investigator reads a series of questions aloud clearly and slowly to the patient and scores each incorrect answer with "0" and each correct answer with "1", for a maximum score of 30. | Mean | Standard Deviation | scores on a scale |
|
| Total Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) Score | The short-form geriatric depression scale (GDS) was developed as a basic screening measure for depression in older adults. It is a 15-point questionnaire in which the patient is required to answer 'yes' or 'no'. The GDS responses were translated into a binary scale on which "1" was indicative of depression and "0" was not; the total score ranges from 0 to 15. A score of > 5 points is considered suggestive of depression. Scores of > 10 points are almost always indicative of depression. | Mean | Standard Deviation | scores on a scale |
|
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| OG000 | Solifenacin | Participants received 21 days of treatment with 5 mg solifenacin, in tablet form once a day. |
| OG001 | Oxybutynin | Participants received 21 days of treatment with 10 mg oxybutynin (1 x 5 mg twice daily) in capsule form. |
| OG002 | Placebo | Participants received 21 days of treatment with placebo. |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Postural Stability Test | The postural stability test measures the ability to stand upright without moving, and was assessed at the end of each treatment period using a computerized assessment system at time points close to the predicted time to attain maximum plasma concentration for solifenacin and oxybutynin. Using apparatus modeled on the Wright Ataxia-meter, a cord from the meter is attached to the patient who is required to stand as still as possible with feet apart and eyes closed for 1 minute. The amount of sway is expressed as the total angular movement, summed regardless of sign, in the antero-posterior plane and calibrated in units of one-third degree of angle of sway. Wright (1971) described a range of 20-30 units as a normal range for adults with eyes wide open, increasing by 50 to 100% with eyes shut. | The number of participants analyzed represents the Safety Analysis Subset 1 (SAF1), consisting of all randomized patients who took at least one dose of the study medication and who completed the cognitive function tests for at least two treatment periods. The number of participants per arm is consistent for all categories / rows of the data table. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | 1/3 degree of angle of sway | Assessed at each treatment period baseline visit (the day prior to the first dose of each treatment; Days -1, 42, 84) and at the end of each treatment period (Days 21, 63 and 105). At each visit, tests were performed at 2 and 6 hours post-dose. |
|
|
|
|
| Primary | Change From Baseline in Cognitive Function Composite Score - Continuity of Attention | Cognitive effects were assessed using a computerized assessment system at time points close to the predicted time of maximum plasma concentration for solifenacin and oxybutynin. For continuity of attention, the number of correct responses (out of 50) for choice reaction time was added to the total number of targets correctly identified (out of 45) digit vigilance minus the number of false alarms (total score of -45 to 95). A high score reflects someone able to keep his/her mind on a single task for a prolonged period. A negative change from baseline reflects impairment compared to baseline. | The number of participants analyzed represents the Safety Analysis Subset 1 (SAF1), consisting of all randomized patients who took at least one dose of the study medication and who completed the cognitive function tests for at least two treatment periods. The number of participants per arm is consistent for all categories / rows of the data table. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Scores on a scale | Assessed at each treatment period baseline visit (the day prior to the first dose of each treatment; Days -1, 42, 84) and at the end of each treatment period (Days 21, 63 and 105). At each visit, tests were performed at 2 and 6 hours post-dose. |
|
|
|
|
| Primary | Change From Baseline in Cognitive Function Composite Score - Quality of Working Memory | Cognitive effects were assessed at the end of each treatment period using a computerized assessment system at time points close to the predicted time to attain maximum plasma concentration (Tmax) for solifenacin (6 hours) and oxybutynin (2 hours). Quality of working memory is calculated from the sum of two cognitive function sensitivity tests: Numeric Working Memory Sensitivity and Spatial Working Memory Sensitivity, and ranges from -2 to 2. A higher score reflects a good working memory and a negative change from baseline reflects impairment compared to the baseline assessment. | The number of participants analyzed represents the Safety Analysis Subset 1 (SAF1), consisting of all randomized patients who took at least one dose of the study medication and who completed the cognitive function tests for at least two treatment periods. The number of participants per arm is consistent for all categories / rows of the data table. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Scores on a scale | Assessed at each treatment period baseline visit (the day prior to the first dose of each treatment; Days -1, 42, 84) and at the end of each treatment period (Days 21, 63 and 105). At each visit, tests were performed at 2 and 6 hours post-dose. |
|
|
|
|
| Primary | Change From Baseline in Cognitive Function Composite Score - Quality of Episodic Secondary Memory | Cognitive effects were assessed at the end of each treatment period using a computerized assessment system at time points close to the predicted time of maximum plasma concentration for solifenacin and oxybutynin. Quality of episodic secondary memory is calculated from the sum of 4 tests: Immediate and delayed word recall, and word and picture recognition, and ranges from -200 to 400. A high score reflects a good ability to store, hold and retrieve information of an episodic nature (i.e. an event or a name) and a negative change from baseline reflects impairment compared to baseline. | The number of participants analyzed represents the Safety Analysis Subset 1 (SAF1), consisting of all randomized patients who took at least one dose of the study medication and who completed the cognitive function tests for at least two treatment periods. The number of participants per arm is consistent for all categories / rows of the data table. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Scores on a scale | Assessed at each treatment period baseline visit (the day prior to the first dose of each treatment; Days -1, 42, 84) and at the end of each treatment period (Days 21, 63 and 105). At each visit, tests were performed at 2 and 6 hours post-dose. |
|
|
|
|
| Primary | Change From Baseline in Cognitive Function Composite Score - Speed of Memory | Cognitive effects were assessed at the end of each treatment period using a computerized assessment system at time points close to the predicted time to attain maximum plasma concentration for solifenacin and oxybutynin. Speed of Memory was calculated from the sum of 4 cognitive function speed tests: numeric and spatial working memory and word and picture recognition. A low score reflects that a person is able to recall a name, a face or any other item fast from the episodic secondary memory; a positive change from baseline reflects impairment compared to baseline. | The number of participants analyzed represents the Safety Analysis Subset 1 (SAF1), consisting of all randomized patients who took at least one dose of the study medication and who completed the cognitive function tests for at least two treatment periods. The number of participants per arm is consistent for all categories / rows of the data table. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | msec | Assessed at each treatment period baseline visit (the day prior to the first dose of each treatment; Days -1, 42, 84) and at the end of each treatment period (Days 21, 63 and 105). At each visit, tests were performed at 2 and 6 hours post-dose. |
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
| 23 |
| 5 |
| 23 |
| EG001 | Oxybutynin | Participants received 21 days of treatment with 10 mg oxybutynin (1 x 5 mg twice daily) in capsule form. | 1 | 25 | 14 | 25 |
| EG002 | Placebo | Participants received 21 days of treatment with placebo. | 0 | 22 | 6 | 22 |
| Gastrointestinal disorders | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (12.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Dyspepsia | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (12.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Oropharyngeal pain | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (12.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pain in extremity | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (12.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Balance disorder | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (12.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Micturition disorder | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA (12.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pruritus | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (12.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
Institute and/or Principal Investigator may not publish trial data generated at their specific study site without prior written approval of the Sponsor.
| D007546 | Isoquinolines |
| D006574 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 2-Ring |
| D000072471 | Heterocyclic Compounds, Fused-Ring |
|
| Baseline at 6 hours [Solifenacin Tmax] |
|
| Change from Baseline at 6 hours |
|
|
Comparison of oxybutynin versus placebo change from Baseline at 2 hours The null hypothesis was that the mean change from baseline was the same in both treatments. |
| ANCOVA |
The analysis was performed using an ANCOVA model with fixed effect for treatment, period, subjects as a random effect and baseline as a covariate. |
| 0.6753 |
| Least Square Mean Difference |
| 1.846 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -7.020 |
| 10.713 |
| No |
| Superiority or Other |
|
| Baseline at 6 hours [Solifenacin Tmax] |
|
| Change from Baseline at 6 hours |
|
|
Comparison of oxybutynin versus placebo change from Baseline at 2 hours The null hypothesis was that the mean change from baseline was the same in both treatments. |
| ANCOVA |
The analysis was performed using an ANCOVA model with fixed effect for treatment, period, subjects as a random effect and baseline as a covariate. |
| 0.2348 |
| Least Square Mean Difference |
| -0.792 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -2.122 |
| 0.538 |
| No |
| Superiority or Other |
|
| Baseline at 6 hours [Solifenacin Tmax] |
|
| Change from Baseline at 6 hours |
|
|
Comparison of oxybutynin versus placebo change from Baseline at 2 hours The null hypothesis was that the mean change from baseline was the same in both treatments. |
| ANCOVA |
The analysis was performed using an ANCOVA model with fixed effect for treatment, period, subjects as a random effect and baseline as a covariate. |
| 0.5361 |
| Least Square Mean Difference |
| -0.046 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -0.194 |
| 0.103 |
| No |
| Superiority or Other |
| Change from Baseline at 2 hours |
|
| Baseline at 6 hours [Solifenacin Tmax] |
|
| Change from Baseline at 6 hours |
|
|
Comparison of oxybutynin versus placebo change from Baseline at 2 hours The null hypothesis was that the mean change from baseline was the same in both treatments. |
| ANCOVA |
The analysis was performed using an ANCOVA model with fixed effect for treatment, period, subjects as a random effect and baseline as a covariate. |
| 0.8670 |
| Least Square Mean Difference |
| -1.457 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -18.976 |
| 16.062 |
| No |
| Superiority or Other |
|
| Baseline at 6 hours [Solifenacin Tmax] |
|
| Change from Baseline at 6 hours |
|
|
Comparison of oxybutynin versus placebo change from Baseline at 2 hours The null hypothesis was that the mean change from baseline was the same in both treatments. |
| ANCOVA |
The analysis was performed using an ANCOVA model with fixed effect for treatment, period, subjects as a random effect and baseline as a covariate. |
| 0.3526 |
| Least Square Mean Difference |
| 157.783 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -182.015 |
| 497.581 |
| No |
| Superiority or Other |