Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The aim of the present study is to assess the effectiveness of acupuncture using Yamamoto's method for the treatment of ANLBP using the following outcomes:pain,functional capacity,quality of life and number of 50 mg sodium diclofenac pills taken per day.
A randomized, controlled, double-blind, prospective trial is being conducted involving 80 patients with low-back pain defined as pain and discomfort localised bellow the costal margin and above the inferior gluteal folds, for a period of less than 30 days and unrelated to any specific etiological factors. Patients are being recruited from the university hospital of the Federal University of Sao Paul (UNIFESP)and exams were carried out by a rheumatologist. The patients are randomly assigned to either intervention group (IG) and are submitted to five acupuncture sessions or placebo group (PG) and are submitted to five non-penetrating acupuncture sessions. Both groups are recommended to take 50 mg of sodium diclofenac every eight hours for lumbar pain, if needed and record the number of pills on a standardized form.
The patients are instructed not to use other medications or therapies for low-back pain during the study.The IG are submitted to acupuncture by a physician acupuncturist with eight years experience in the technique. Five acupuncture session are performed at baseline, D3, D7, D14 and D21. Specific needles for scalp acupuncture and tubes that guide these needles, called mandrels are unpacked in front of the patient. The stainless steel needles: 0.20 x 13 mm, sterilized and disposable.Sessions last 20 minutes. The patient remain seated, using a hat with a central orifice exposing the area to receive the needles. The hat has a wide brim to keep the patient blinded for the procedures. The needle penetrates the skin at an approximately 15º angle and a depth of 0.3 to 0.5 cm. The PG are submitted to five placebo acupuncture session performed by the same acupuncturist with same material and hat, but penetration did not occur and only the mandrel came into contact with the skin. All patients are blind to which procedure they are receiving. The basic points D, H and I and kidney, bladder and liver points of Yamamoto's method are used as standard treatment to ANLBP for the both groups.
Evaluations: The IG and PG are evaluated six times between baseline and Day 28 immediately before and after each acupuncture session. Outcome measures are recorded by a single assessor blinded to group allocation.
D0: baseline; D3: three days after baseline; D7: seven days after baseline; D14: fourteen days after baseline; D21: twenty-one days after baseline and D28: twenty-eight days after baseline.
Losses: Participants absent from more than three acupuncture sessions and evaluations are considered losses.
Placebo credibility: At the end of the study, participants are asked about which group they believed they belonged.
Sample size: To achieve an improvement in VAS pain of 2.0 point, with a significance of 0.05, and a power of 0.90, a minimum of 40 patients per group is necessary as a previous compensation for the possible 20% loss at follow-up.
Statistics: An intention-to-treat analysis are performed, using the last-observation-carried-forward method. A level of significance of p < 0.05 (2-tailed tests) are accepted for the trial. For normally distributed data, the variables are analysed using repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA). The analysis are performed between groups (acupuncture versus non-penetrating acupuncture; between subjects factors) and over the time (baseline, 3, 7, 14, 21 and 28 days; within subjects factors). Categorical data measured over time are analysed using repeated-measures analyses of variance (ANOVA) for categorical data. A 95% confidence interval (95% CI) are used. The Student's t-test are used to compare numerical variables with normal distribution at one time and the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test are used to determine differences in rates of improvement between the two groups. The Kappa index are used to determine agreement on the LIKERT assessment between patient and assessor. All tests are performed using SPSS version 15.0 and MINITAB 14.0
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention Group | Active Comparator | Patients receive 5 sessions of real acupuncture. The technique of acupuncture used in this study is Yamamoto New Scalp Acupuncture called YNSA. |
|
| Non-penetrating acupuncture | Placebo Comparator | The placebo group (PG) are submitted to five non-penetrating acupuncture sessions using YNSA. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acupuncture | Other | The intervention group (IG) are submitted to five acupuncture sessions using Yamamoto New Scalp Acupuncture(YNSA) |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Pain Assessed on a 10-point Numeric Pain Scale | The primary outcome is a visual analog pain scale (VAS), graded in centimeters from 0 to 10 (0=no pain; 10=worst imaginable pain), measured before (VAS 1) and after (VAS 2) the acupuncture session. | days 0, 3, 7, 14, 21 and 28 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RM) | Secondary outcomes includes the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RM) for the assessment of functional capacity, with 24 items on low-back pain: higher scores denote poorer functional capacity. 0: better functional capacity 24: poorer functional capacity Range of score: the highest is 24 (poorer functional capacity) and lowest scores is 0 (better functional capacity). |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Jamil Natour, MD,PhD | Federal University of São Paulo | Study Chair |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tatiana Hasegawa | São Paulo | São Paulo | 04011-060 | Brazil | ||
| Tatiana Hasegawa |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19942724 | Background | Inoue M, Hojo T, Nakajima M, Kitakoji H, Itoi M. Comparison of the effectiveness of acupuncture treatment and local anaesthetic injection for low back pain: a randomised controlled clinical trial. Acupunct Med. 2009 Dec;27(4):174-7. doi: 10.1136/aim.2009.001164. | |
| 24316509 | Derived | Hasegawa TM, Baptista AS, de Souza MC, Yoshizumi AM, Natour J. Acupuncture for acute non-specific low back pain: a randomised, controlled, double-blind, placebo trial. Acupunct Med. 2014 Apr;32(2):109-15. doi: 10.1136/acupmed-2013-010333. Epub 2013 Dec 6. |
Not provided
Not provided
80 patients were randomized during the study.
100 patients were recruited from the university hospital of the Federal University of São Paul (UNIFESP), from November 2009 to June 2010.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Acupuncture | The technique of acupuncture used in this study is Yamamoto New Scalp Acupuncture called YNSA. |
| FG001 | Placebo Group | Patients were submitted to five non-penetrating acupuncture sessions in the placebo group (PG). |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Acupuncture | The technique of acupuncture used in this study is Yamamoto New Scalp Acupuncture called YNSA. |
| BG001 | Placebo Group | Patients were submitted to five non-penetrating acupuncture sessions in the placebo group (PG). |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Pain Assessed on a 10-point Numeric Pain Scale | The primary outcome is a visual analog pain scale (VAS), graded in centimeters from 0 to 10 (0=no pain; 10=worst imaginable pain), measured before (VAS 1) and after (VAS 2) the acupuncture session. | Intention to treat analysis (ITT) | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | cm | days 0, 3, 7, 14, 21 and 28 | cm | Participants |
|
Non-serious adverse events were collected during de follow-up (28 days).
80 patients were evaluated in the end of the study and non-serious adverse events were observed.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Acupuncture | The technique of acupuncture used in this study is Yamamoto New Scalp Acupuncture called YNSA. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tatiana Molinas Hasegawa | Federal University of São Paulo | 55 115576 4239 | tatianamolinas@hotmail.com |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D017116 | Low Back Pain |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001416 | Back Pain |
| D010146 | Pain |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D015670 | Acupuncture Therapy |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000529 | Complementary Therapies |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Non-penetrating acupuncture | Other | The placebo group (PG) are submitted to five non-penetrating acupuncture sessions using YNSA. |
|
|
| days 0, 3, 7, 14, 21 and 28 |
| Quality of Life Assessed on the SF-36 | Questionnaire Short-form-36 is a widely used generic health status questionnaire, validated for Portuguese with eight components and each components with scores from 0 to 100: higher scores denote greater quality of life. | Days 0, 3, 7, 14, 21 and 28 |
| Likert Improvement Assessment Scale | Likert improvement assessment scale is based on the patient's opinion (LIKERT P) and assessor's opinion (LIKERT A), categorized in 1=MB (much better), 2=SB (slightly better), 3=NC (no change), 4=SW (slightly worse) and 5=MW (much worse). This scale was was applied to each day of assessment. The numbers in the category titles represent the different days. | Days 0, 3, 7, 14 and 21 |
| Number of Anti-inflammatory Tablets Taken | Number of 50 mg sodium diclofenac pills taken per day | Days 3,7,14,21 and 28 |
| São Paulo |
| São Paulo |
| 04011060 |
| Brazil |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Participants |
|
| Age Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RM) | Secondary outcomes includes the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RM) for the assessment of functional capacity, with 24 items on low-back pain: higher scores denote poorer functional capacity. 0: better functional capacity 24: poorer functional capacity Range of score: the highest is 24 (poorer functional capacity) and lowest scores is 0 (better functional capacity). | Intention to treat analysis (ITT) | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | scores on a scale | days 0, 3, 7, 14, 21 and 28 | scores on a scale | Participants |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Quality of Life Assessed on the SF-36 | Questionnaire Short-form-36 is a widely used generic health status questionnaire, validated for Portuguese with eight components and each components with scores from 0 to 100: higher scores denote greater quality of life. | Intention to treat analysis (ITT) | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | scores on a scale | Days 0, 3, 7, 14, 21 and 28 | scale | Participants |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Likert Improvement Assessment Scale | Likert improvement assessment scale is based on the patient's opinion (LIKERT P) and assessor's opinion (LIKERT A), categorized in 1=MB (much better), 2=SB (slightly better), 3=NC (no change), 4=SW (slightly worse) and 5=MW (much worse). This scale was was applied to each day of assessment. The numbers in the category titles represent the different days. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | scores on a scale | Days 0, 3, 7, 14 and 21 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Anti-inflammatory Tablets Taken | Number of 50 mg sodium diclofenac pills taken per day | Intention to treat (ITT) | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | number of pills/day | Days 3,7,14,21 and 28 |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 40 |
| 0 |
| 40 |
| EG001 | Placebo Group | Patients were submitted to five non-penetrating acupuncture sessions in the placebo group (PG). | 0 | 40 | 0 | 40 |
Not provided
Not provided
| D013568 |
| Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| Day 7 |
|
| Day14 |
|
| Day 21 |
|
| Day 28 |
|
| Day 7 Functional Capacity |
|
| Day 14 Functional Capacity |
|
| Day 21 Functional Capacity |
|
| Day 28 Functional Capacity |
|
| Day 0 limitation in physical aspects |
|
| Day 3 limitation in physical aspects |
|
| Day 7 limitation in physical aspects |
|
| Day 14 limitation in physical aspects |
|
| Day 21 limitation in physical aspects |
|
| Day 28 limitation in physical aspects |
|
| Day 0 Pain |
|
| Day 3 Pain |
|
| Day 7 Pain |
|
| Day 14 Pain |
|
| Day 21 Pain |
|
| Day 28 Pain |
|
| Day 0 General Health State |
|
| Day 3 General Health State |
|
| Day 7 General Health State |
|
| Day 14 General Health State |
|
| Day 21 General Health State |
|
| Day 28 General Health State |
|
| Day 0 Vitality |
|
| Day 3 Vitality |
|
| Day 7 Vitality |
|
| Day 14 Vitality |
|
| Day 21 Vitality |
|
| Day 28 Vitality |
|
| Day 0 Social Aspects |
|
| Day 3 Social Aspects |
|
| Day 7 Social Aspects |
|
| Day 14 Social Aspects |
|
| Day 21 Social Aspects |
|
| Day 28 Social Aspects |
|
| Day 0 Emotional Aspects |
|
| Day 3 Emotional Aspects |
|
| Day 7 Emotional Aspects |
|
| Day 14 Emotional Aspects |
|
| Day 21 Emotional Aspects |
|
| Day 28 Emotional Aspects |
|
| Day 0 Mental Health |
|
| Day 3 Mental Health |
|
| Day 7 Mental Health |
|
| Day 14 Mental Health |
|
| Day 21 Mental Health |
|
| Day 28 Mental Health |
|
| Likert 3 P |
|
| Likert 3 A |
|
| Likert 7 P |
|
| Likert 7 A |
|
| Likert 14 P |
|
| Likert 14 A |
|
| Likert 21 P |
|
| Likert 21 A |
|
| Day 14 |
|
| Day 21 |
|
| Day 28 |
|