Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| TRX4018 | Other Identifier | Tolerx |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
DEFEND-2 is a Phase 3 confirmatory study for the Phase 3 DEFEND-1 study. The study objective is to find out if an 8-day series of otelixizumab infusions leads to greater improvement in insulin secretion as compared with placebo. Insulin secretion will be assessed using mixed meal-stimulated C-peptide.
Subjects will be assigned to receive either otelixizumab or placebo at a ratio of 2:1 (2/3 otelixizumab, 1/3 placebo). These study agents will be administered as an addition to insulin, diet, and other standard of care treatments.
The following visits are required:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| otelixizumab | Experimental | otelixizumab |
|
| placebo | Placebo Comparator | placebo |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Otelixizumab | Biological | infusion |
|
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in 2 Hour Mixed Meal-stimulated C-peptide Area Under Curve (AUC) (Normalized for 120-minute Time Interval) at Month 12 | C-peptide is a protein that shows how much insulin the body is producing. For 3 days before the mixed meal tolerance test participants were asked to eat a balanced diet. The test was performed only when the finger-stick blood glucose level was above 70 mg per deciliter (mg/dL) and no higher than 200 mg/dL. Mixed meal-stimulated C-peptide AUC was the area under the C-peptide/time curve from time 0 to 120-minutes, calculated using the trapezoidal rule. This AUC was normalized for time interval by dividing it by 120-minutes (the number of minutes over which it was determined), and was adjusted by inclusion of Baseline C-peptide AUC as a covariate in the analysis. Baseline was defined at Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the value at Month 12 from the Baseline value. | Baseline (Day 1) and Month 12 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in 2 Hour Mixed Meal-stimulated C-peptide AUC (Normalized for 120-minute Time Interval) at Week 12 and 6 Months | C-peptide is a protein that shows how much insulin the body is producing. For 3 days before the mixed meal tolerance test participants were asked to eat a balanced diet. The test was performed only when the finger-stick blood glucose level was above 70 mg/dL and no higher than 200 mg/dL. Mixed meal-stimulated C-peptide AUC was the area under the C-peptide/time curve from time 0 to 120-minutes, calculated using the trapezoidal rule. This AUC was normalized for time interval by dividing it by 120-minutes (the number of minutes over which it was determined), and was adjusted by inclusion of Baseline C-peptide AUC as a covariate in the analysis. Baseline was defined at Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post Baseline value from the Baseline value. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
•Other, significant medical conditions based on the study doctor's evaluation
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| GSK Clinical Trials | GlaxoSmithKline | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSK Investigational Site | Roma | 00155 | Italy |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 15972866 | Background | Keymeulen B, Vandemeulebroucke E, Ziegler AG, Mathieu C, Kaufman L, Hale G, Gorus F, Goldman M, Walter M, Candon S, Schandene L, Crenier L, De Block C, Seigneurin JM, De Pauw P, Pierard D, Weets I, Rebello P, Bird P, Berrie E, Frewin M, Waldmann H, Bach JF, Pipeleers D, Chatenoud L. Insulin needs after CD3-antibody therapy in new-onset type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2005 Jun 23;352(25):2598-608. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa043980. | |
| 20225393 |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Website containing information regarding the DEFEND-2 trial | View source |
| ID | Type | URL | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
| 115494 | Clinical Study Report | View IPD |
Patient-level data for this study will be made available through www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com following the timelines and process described on this site.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
A total of 179 participants (125 adults and 54 adolescents) were randomized in this study and included in safety and intent-to-treat (ITT) population.
This study was conducted across 73 centers in 10 countries (Belgium, Canada, Germany, Denmark, Spain, Finland, United Kingdom, Italy, Sweden, and United States of America) from 17 May 2010 to 09 March 2012.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Placebo | Eligible participants received Placebo matching otelixizumab 3.1 milligrams (mg) as intravenous (IV) infusion, with each infusion given over a 30-minute period. Participants received a series of 8 infusions, 1 infusion per day over 8 consecutive days. |
| FG001 | Otelixizumab | Eligible participants received otelixizumab 3.1 mg as IV infusion, with each infusion given over a 30-minute period. Participants received a series of 8 infusions, 1 infusion per day over 8 consecutive days. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Placebo | Eligible participants received Placebo matching otelixizumab 3.1 mg as IV infusion, with each infusion given over a 30-minute period. Participants received a series of 8 infusions, 1 infusion per day over 8 consecutive days. |
| BG001 | Otelixizumab |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Change From Baseline in 2 Hour Mixed Meal-stimulated C-peptide Area Under Curve (AUC) (Normalized for 120-minute Time Interval) at Month 12 | C-peptide is a protein that shows how much insulin the body is producing. For 3 days before the mixed meal tolerance test participants were asked to eat a balanced diet. The test was performed only when the finger-stick blood glucose level was above 70 mg per deciliter (mg/dL) and no higher than 200 mg/dL. Mixed meal-stimulated C-peptide AUC was the area under the C-peptide/time curve from time 0 to 120-minutes, calculated using the trapezoidal rule. This AUC was normalized for time interval by dividing it by 120-minutes (the number of minutes over which it was determined), and was adjusted by inclusion of Baseline C-peptide AUC as a covariate in the analysis. Baseline was defined at Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the value at Month 12 from the Baseline value. | ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug. Only those participants available at the indicated time points were analyzed. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | nanomoles per liter | Baseline (Day 1) and Month 12 |
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) were collected from dosing Days 1 to 8 and until study withdrawal.
Safety population consisted of all participants for whom there was evidence that they received any part of at least 1 infusion of study drug.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Placebo | Eligible participants received Placebo matching otelixizumab 3.1 mg as IV infusion, with each infusion given over a 30-minute period. Participants received a series of 8 infusions, 1 infusion per day over 8 consecutive days. |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hyperglycaemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 11.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 11.1 | Systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSK Response Center | GlaxoSmithKline | 866-435-7343 |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003922 | Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003920 | Diabetes Mellitus |
| D044882 | Glucose Metabolism Disorders |
| D008659 | Metabolic Diseases |
| D009750 | Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C550701 | otelixizumab |
| D000911 | Antibodies, Monoclonal |
| D016853 | Muromonab-CD3 |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000906 | Antibodies |
| D007136 | Immunoglobulins |
| D007162 | Immunoproteins |
| D001798 | Blood Proteins |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Placebo | Biological | Infusion |
|
| Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12, Month 6 |
| Change From Baseline in Stimulated C-Peptide Mean AUC at Week 12, Month 6, 12 and 18 | C-peptide is a protein that shows how much insulin the body is producing. For 3 days before the mixed meal tolerance test participants were asked to eat a balanced diet. The test was performed only when the finger-stick blood glucose level was above 70 mg/dL and no higher than 200 mg/dL. Mixed meal-stimulated C-peptide AUC was the area under the C-peptide/time curve from time 0 to 120-minutes, calculated using the trapezoidal rule. This AUC was normalized for time interval by dividing it by 120-minutes (the number of minutes over which it was determined), and was adjusted by inclusion of Baseline C-peptide AUC as a covariate in the analysis. Baseline was defined at Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post Baseline value from the Baseline value. | Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12, Month 6, 12, 18 |
| Number of Participants With Responder Status | A participant was considered a responder when, at the given time point, the participant had: glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) less than or equal to 6.5 percent and mean daily insulin use less than 0.5 international unit per kilogram per day (IU/kg/day) over 7 consecutive days during the 2 weeks preceding the visit. | Month 3, 6 and 12 |
| Change From Baseline in Mean Daily Insulin Use Over 7 Consecutive Days During the 2 Weeks Prior to the Assessment | Mean daily insulin use over 7 consecutive days during the 2 weeks preceding each key visit was calculated as the mean of the values of amount of insulin used per day on each of the 7 consecutive days. Baseline was defined at Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post Baseline value from the Baseline value. | Baseline (Day 1) and Month 3, 6, 12 |
| Change From Baseline in HbA1c Levels Over 7 Consecutive Days During the 2 Weeks Prior to the Assessment | HbA1c level was recorded at Baseline, Month 3, 6 and 12. Baseline was defined at Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post Baseline value from the Baseline value. | Baseline (Day 1) and Month 3, 6, 12 |
| Average Number of Severe Hypoglycemic Events and Documented Symptomatic Hypoglycemic Events From Baseline to Month 12 | Severe hypoglycemia was considered as an event that required assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or other resuscitative actions. These episodes may be associated with sufficient neuroglycopenia to induce seizure or coma. Plasma glucose measurements may not be available during such an event, but neurological recovery attributable to the restoration of plasma glucose to normal is considered sufficient evidence that the event was induced by a low plasma glucose concentration. Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia was considered as an event during which typical symptoms of hypoglycemia are accompanied by a measured plasma glucose concentration less than or equal to 70 mg/dL and it was collected in (1) eCRF using two forms - for single event and for mutiple events, and (2) the IVRS system. The numbers of participant-reported hypoglycemic events per participant of severe hypoglycemia and documented symptomatic hypoglycemia have been reported. | Baseline (Day 1) and Month 12 |
| Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Severe Hypoglycemic Events and Documented Symptomatic Hypoglycemic Events at Month 12 | Severe hypoglycemia was considered as an event that required assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or other resuscitative actions. These episodes may be associated with sufficient neuroglycopenia to induce seizure or coma. Plasma glucose measurements may not be available during such an event, but neurological recovery attributable to the restoration of plasma glucose to normal is considered sufficient evidence that the event was induced by a low plasma glucose concentration. Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia was considered as an event during which typical symptoms of hypoglycemia are accompanied by a measured plasma glucose concentration less than or equal to 70 mg/dL and it was collected in (1) eCRF using two forms - for single event and for mutiple events, and (2) the IVRS system. The percentage of participant with incidence of severe hypoglycemia and documented symptomatic hypoglycemia have been reported. | Baseline (Day 1) and Month 12 |
| Composite Rank Sum: HbA1c and Exogenous Insulin Use at 6 and 12 Months | O'Brien mean rank analyses was performed on a two-part composite of the Baseline-adjusted HbA1c level and the Baseline-adjusted mean total daily insulin use per kg body weight in the otelixizumab group compared with the placebo group at Months 6 and 12. Baseline adjustment was used to reduce the potential impact of imbalances in Baseline levels between treatment groups on the treatment comparisons at later time points. For the O'Brien mean rank analysis at a particular time point, adjusted HbA1c values (for both treatment groups together) and adjusted mean daily insulin use values was ranked from smallest to largest. For each participant, the HbA1c and insulin use ranks were added together, producing a composite rank. A treatment comparison test was then performed on the composite ranks. If otelixizumab treatment was effective on this composite endpoint, then the mean of the ranks sum in the otelixizumab group was smaller than the mean of the ranks sum in the placebo group. | Month 6 and 12 |
| Composite Rank Sum: C-Peptide AUC, HbA1c and Exogenous Insulin Use at 6 and 12 Months | O'Brien analyses was performed on a three-part composite of HbA1c level, C-peptide AUC, and mean daily insulin use in the otelixizumab group compared with the placebo group at Months 6 and 12. The three variables was adjusted for Baseline values. Baseline adjustment was used to reduce the potential impact of imbalances in Baseline levels between treatment groups on the treatment comparisons at later time points. HbA1c and insulin use was ranked from smallest to largest, and C-peptide AUC was ranked from largest to smallest. If otelixizumab treatment was effective on the composite endpoint, then the mean of the ranks sum in the otelixizumab group was smaller than the mean of the ranks sum in the placebo group. | Month 6 and 12 |
| Background |
| Keymeulen B, Walter M, Mathieu C, Kaufman L, Gorus F, Hilbrands R, Vandemeulebroucke E, Van de Velde U, Crenier L, De Block C, Candon S, Waldmann H, Ziegler AG, Chatenoud L, Pipeleers D. Four-year metabolic outcome of a randomised controlled CD3-antibody trial in recent-onset type 1 diabetic patients depends on their age and baseline residual beta cell mass. Diabetologia. 2010 Apr;53(4):614-23. doi: 10.1007/s00125-009-1644-9. Epub 2010 Jan 14. |
| 19111162 | Background | You S, Candon S, Kuhn C, Bach JF, Chatenoud L. CD3 antibodies as unique tools to restore self-tolerance in established autoimmunity their mode of action and clinical application in type 1 diabetes. Adv Immunol. 2008;100:13-37. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2776(08)00802-X. No abstract available. |
For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register |
| 115494 | Annotated Case Report Form | View IPD | For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register |
| 115494 | Statistical Analysis Plan | View IPD | For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register |
| 115494 | Informed Consent Form | View IPD | For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register |
| 115494 | Dataset Specification | View IPD | For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register |
| 115494 | Study Protocol | View IPD | For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register |
| 115494 | Individual Participant Data Set | View IPD | For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register |
| Lost to Follow-up |
|
| Adverse Event |
|
| Withdrew for another reason not covered |
|
| Participant/legal representative request |
|
Eligible participants received otelixizumab 3.1 mg as IV infusion, with each infusion given over a 30-minute period. Participants received a series of 8 infusions, 1 infusion per day over 8 consecutive days. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Placebo | Eligible participants received Placebo matching otelixizumab 3.1 mg as IV infusion, with each infusion given over a 30-minute period. Participants received a series of 8 infusions, 1 infusion per day over 8 consecutive days. |
| OG001 | Otelixizumab | Eligible participants received otelixizumab 3.1 mg as IV infusion, with each infusion given over a 30-minute period. Participants received a series of 8 infusions, 1 infusion per day over 8 consecutive days. |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in 2 Hour Mixed Meal-stimulated C-peptide AUC (Normalized for 120-minute Time Interval) at Week 12 and 6 Months | C-peptide is a protein that shows how much insulin the body is producing. For 3 days before the mixed meal tolerance test participants were asked to eat a balanced diet. The test was performed only when the finger-stick blood glucose level was above 70 mg/dL and no higher than 200 mg/dL. Mixed meal-stimulated C-peptide AUC was the area under the C-peptide/time curve from time 0 to 120-minutes, calculated using the trapezoidal rule. This AUC was normalized for time interval by dividing it by 120-minutes (the number of minutes over which it was determined), and was adjusted by inclusion of Baseline C-peptide AUC as a covariate in the analysis. Baseline was defined at Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post Baseline value from the Baseline value. | ITT population. Only those participants available at the indicated time points were analyzed. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | nanomoles per liter | Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12, Month 6 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Stimulated C-Peptide Mean AUC at Week 12, Month 6, 12 and 18 | C-peptide is a protein that shows how much insulin the body is producing. For 3 days before the mixed meal tolerance test participants were asked to eat a balanced diet. The test was performed only when the finger-stick blood glucose level was above 70 mg/dL and no higher than 200 mg/dL. Mixed meal-stimulated C-peptide AUC was the area under the C-peptide/time curve from time 0 to 120-minutes, calculated using the trapezoidal rule. This AUC was normalized for time interval by dividing it by 120-minutes (the number of minutes over which it was determined), and was adjusted by inclusion of Baseline C-peptide AUC as a covariate in the analysis. Baseline was defined at Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post Baseline value from the Baseline value. | ITT population. Only those participants available at the indicated time points were analyzed. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | nanomoles per liter | Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12, Month 6, 12, 18 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Responder Status | A participant was considered a responder when, at the given time point, the participant had: glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) less than or equal to 6.5 percent and mean daily insulin use less than 0.5 international unit per kilogram per day (IU/kg/day) over 7 consecutive days during the 2 weeks preceding the visit. | ITT population. Only those participants available at the indicated time points were analyzed. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Month 3, 6 and 12 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Mean Daily Insulin Use Over 7 Consecutive Days During the 2 Weeks Prior to the Assessment | Mean daily insulin use over 7 consecutive days during the 2 weeks preceding each key visit was calculated as the mean of the values of amount of insulin used per day on each of the 7 consecutive days. Baseline was defined at Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post Baseline value from the Baseline value. | ITT population. Only those participants available at the indicated time points were analyzed. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | International unit per kilogram (IU/kg) | Baseline (Day 1) and Month 3, 6, 12 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in HbA1c Levels Over 7 Consecutive Days During the 2 Weeks Prior to the Assessment | HbA1c level was recorded at Baseline, Month 3, 6 and 12. Baseline was defined at Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post Baseline value from the Baseline value. | ITT population. Only those participants available at the indicated time points were analyzed. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Percentage of HbA1c | Baseline (Day 1) and Month 3, 6, 12 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Average Number of Severe Hypoglycemic Events and Documented Symptomatic Hypoglycemic Events From Baseline to Month 12 | Severe hypoglycemia was considered as an event that required assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or other resuscitative actions. These episodes may be associated with sufficient neuroglycopenia to induce seizure or coma. Plasma glucose measurements may not be available during such an event, but neurological recovery attributable to the restoration of plasma glucose to normal is considered sufficient evidence that the event was induced by a low plasma glucose concentration. Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia was considered as an event during which typical symptoms of hypoglycemia are accompanied by a measured plasma glucose concentration less than or equal to 70 mg/dL and it was collected in (1) eCRF using two forms - for single event and for mutiple events, and (2) the IVRS system. The numbers of participant-reported hypoglycemic events per participant of severe hypoglycemia and documented symptomatic hypoglycemia have been reported. | ITT population. | Posted | Number | Events | Baseline (Day 1) and Month 12 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Change From Baseline in Severe Hypoglycemic Events and Documented Symptomatic Hypoglycemic Events at Month 12 | Severe hypoglycemia was considered as an event that required assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or other resuscitative actions. These episodes may be associated with sufficient neuroglycopenia to induce seizure or coma. Plasma glucose measurements may not be available during such an event, but neurological recovery attributable to the restoration of plasma glucose to normal is considered sufficient evidence that the event was induced by a low plasma glucose concentration. Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia was considered as an event during which typical symptoms of hypoglycemia are accompanied by a measured plasma glucose concentration less than or equal to 70 mg/dL and it was collected in (1) eCRF using two forms - for single event and for mutiple events, and (2) the IVRS system. The percentage of participant with incidence of severe hypoglycemia and documented symptomatic hypoglycemia have been reported. | ITT population. | Posted | Number | Percentage of participants | Baseline (Day 1) and Month 12 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Composite Rank Sum: HbA1c and Exogenous Insulin Use at 6 and 12 Months | O'Brien mean rank analyses was performed on a two-part composite of the Baseline-adjusted HbA1c level and the Baseline-adjusted mean total daily insulin use per kg body weight in the otelixizumab group compared with the placebo group at Months 6 and 12. Baseline adjustment was used to reduce the potential impact of imbalances in Baseline levels between treatment groups on the treatment comparisons at later time points. For the O'Brien mean rank analysis at a particular time point, adjusted HbA1c values (for both treatment groups together) and adjusted mean daily insulin use values was ranked from smallest to largest. For each participant, the HbA1c and insulin use ranks were added together, producing a composite rank. A treatment comparison test was then performed on the composite ranks. If otelixizumab treatment was effective on this composite endpoint, then the mean of the ranks sum in the otelixizumab group was smaller than the mean of the ranks sum in the placebo group. | ITT population. Only those participants available at the indicated time points were analyzed. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Rank | Month 6 and 12 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Composite Rank Sum: C-Peptide AUC, HbA1c and Exogenous Insulin Use at 6 and 12 Months | O'Brien analyses was performed on a three-part composite of HbA1c level, C-peptide AUC, and mean daily insulin use in the otelixizumab group compared with the placebo group at Months 6 and 12. The three variables was adjusted for Baseline values. Baseline adjustment was used to reduce the potential impact of imbalances in Baseline levels between treatment groups on the treatment comparisons at later time points. HbA1c and insulin use was ranked from smallest to largest, and C-peptide AUC was ranked from largest to smallest. If otelixizumab treatment was effective on the composite endpoint, then the mean of the ranks sum in the otelixizumab group was smaller than the mean of the ranks sum in the placebo group. | ITT population. Only those participants available at the indicated time points were analyzed. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Rank | Month 6 and 12 |
|
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 61 |
| 4 |
| 61 |
| 50 |
| 61 |
| EG001 | Otelixizumab | Eligible participants received otelixizumab 3.1 mg as IV infusion, with each infusion given over a 30-minute period. Participants received a series of 8 infusions, 1 infusion per day over 8 consecutive days. | 0 | 118 | 11 | 118 | 108 | 118 |
| Diabetic ketoacidosis | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 11.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hypoglycaemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 11.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Convulsion | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 11.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 11.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Loss of consciousness | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 11.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Cytokine release syndrome | Immune system disorders | MedDRA 11.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Malignant melanoma in situ | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 11.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Thyroid cancer | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 11.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Atrial septal defect | Congenital, familial and genetic disorders | MedDRA 11.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 11.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Malaise | General disorders | MedDRA 11.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Overdose | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 11.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Scoliosis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 11.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pregnancy induced hypertension | Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions | MedDRA 11.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Major depression | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 11.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Dyspnoea | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 11.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Urticaria | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA 11.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Suicidal ideation | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 11.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 11.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Nasopharyngitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 11.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Upper respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 11.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Sinusitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 11.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Influenza | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 11.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pharyngitis streptococcal | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 11.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 11.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 11.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 11.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 11.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 11.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Abdominal pain upper | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 11.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Fatigue | General disorders | MedDRA 11.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pyrexia | General disorders | MedDRA 11.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Chills | General disorders | MedDRA 11.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Malaise | General disorders | MedDRA 11.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Infusion site erythema | General disorders | MedDRA 11.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Myalgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 11.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Back pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 11.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Arthralgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 11.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Musculoskeletal pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 11.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Neck pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 11.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pain in extremity | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 11.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Oropharyngeal pain | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 11.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Cough | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 11.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Nasal congestion | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 11.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hypoglycaemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 11.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Lymphadenopathy | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA 11.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
GSK agreements may vary with individual investigators, but will not prohibit any investigator from publishing. GSK supports the publication of results from all centers of a multi-center trial but requests that reports based on single-site data not precede the primary publication of the entire clinical trial.
| D004700 | Endocrine System Diseases |
| D001327 | Autoimmune Diseases |
| D007154 | Immune System Diseases |
| D011506 |
| Proteins |
| D000602 | Amino Acids, Peptides, and Proteins |
| D012712 | Serum Globulins |
| D005916 | Globulins |
| D058846 | Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived |
| D007074 | Immunoglobulin G |
| D007132 | Immunoglobulin Isotypes |
| Month 6 |
|
|
Month 6 |
| Repeated Measures Mixed Effects Model |
| 0.191 |
| Mean Difference (Net) |
| -0.06 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -0.15 |
| 0.03 |
Estimated treatment group difference, adjusted for age, region and Baseline C-peptide AUC. Confidence Interval, not adjusted for multiple comparisons. |
| Superiority or Other |
| Month 6 |
|
|
| Month 12 |
|
|
| Month 18 |
|
|
| Month 6 |
|
|
| Month 12 |
|
|
Month 6 |
| GEE Model |
| 0.912 |
| Odds Ratio (OR) |
| 0.95 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| 0.37 |
| 2.42 |
Estimated treatment group difference, adjusted for age, region and Baseline HbA1c/Insulin Use Response. Confidence Interval, not adjusted for multiple comparisons. |
| Superiority or Other |
| Month 12 | GEE Model | 0.412 | Odds Ratio (OR) | 1.56 | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.54 | 4.52 | Estimated treatment group difference, adjusted for age, region and Baseline HbA1c/Insulin Use Response. Confidence Interval, not adjusted for multiple comparisons. | Superiority or Other |
| Month 6 |
|
|
| Month 12 |
|
|
Month 6 |
| Repeated Measures Mixed Effects Model |
| 0.210 |
| Mean Difference (Net) |
| -0.04 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -0.11 |
| 0.02 |
Estimated treatment group difference, adjusted for age, region and Baseline Mean Daily Insulin Use. Confidence Interval, not adjusted for multiple comparisons. |
| Superiority or Other |
| Month 12 | Repeated Measures Mixed Effects Model | 0.402 | Mean Difference (Net) | 0.04 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.05 | 0.13 | Estimated treatment group difference, adjusted for age, region and Baseline Mean Daily Insulin Use. Confidence Interval, not adjusted for multiple comparisons. | Superiority or Other |
| Month 6 |
|
|
| Month 12 |
|
|
Month 6 |
| Repeated Measures Mixed Effects Model |
| 0.987 |
| Mean Difference (Net) |
| -0.00 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -0.46 |
| 0.45 |
Estimated treatment group difference, adjusted for age, region and baseline HbA1c. Confidence Interval, not adjusted for multiple comparisons. |
| Superiority or Other |
| Month 12 | Repeated Measures Mixed Effects Model | 0.572 | Mean Difference (Net) | 0.13 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.33 | 0.59 | Estimated treatment group difference, adjusted for age, region and baseline HbA1c. Confidence Interval, not adjusted for multiple comparisons. | Superiority or Other |
| Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia from eCRF |
|
| Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia from eCRF |
|
| Month 12 |
|
|
| 0.452 |
| Superiority or Other |
| Month 12 |
|
|
| 0.373 |
| Superiority or Other |