Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Insufficient enrollment
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a randomized study designed to compare long-term treatment outcomes in pediatric patients with refractory seizures treated with VNS (Vagus Nerve Stimulation) Therapy versus anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs). Seizure reduction, quality of life measures, and side effect profiles will be evaluated. The results of this study will provide controlled comparative data to better guide physicians in determining the best overall treatment strategy for patients with seizures who have failed initial AED therapy.
This was a randomized, parallel group, multi-center study. Screening Visit (visit 1) Subjects, parents, and the investigator signed and dated the informed consent after which subject eligibility was checked. Eligible subjects were entered in the baseline period.
Baseline Period (between visits 1 and 2) Eligible subjects entered an 8-week baseline period during which a seizure count was done. During this period, subjects and caregivers were contacted on a regular basis to ensure up to date information collection.
At the end of the baseline period, subjects who continued to be eligible were stratified based on previous therapy history (Early: previously treated with 2 to 5 AEDs versus Non-early: previously treated with >5 AEDs). Within each stratification, the investigator randomized each subject to receive one of the 2 treatments (VNS Therapy treatment or AED treatment) at the end of visit 2 using a randomization schedule provided by an independent third party (Synergos).
Implantation/AED Treatment Initiation (visit 3) For subjects randomized to the AED arm, a new AED treatment was initiated and gradually increased to an effective dose in accordance with the investigator's discretion and the manufacturer's suggested guidelines.
Subjects randomized to the VNS treatment arm were implanted with the VNS Therapy System and allowed adequate surgical recovery according to usual clinical practice before initiation of treatment. A delay of 2 weeks between the end of the baseline period and surgery was authorized to allow practical organization of the implantation. Extension of this period was approved in advance by the Study Director or his delegate.
Treatment Ramp-up (between visits 3 and 4) This ramp-up period for both AEDs and VNS may have taken up to 9 weeks, ending at visit 4. Additional visits were scheduled outside of the study protocol to adequately accommodate Treatment Ramp-up as needed. Initiation of treatments as well as the ramp-up schedule was documented in the Case Report Forms.
Study Treatment Period The Study Treatment Period was 12 months (52 weeks) following visit 3 and including Treatment Ramp-up. Because this study was designed to compare the natural course of treatment, changes in the study AED dose (for the AED group) or VNS stimulation parameters (for the VNS Therapy group) were allowed as clinically indicated during the Study Treatment Period. The protocol allowed approximately a 10% increase in baseline AED to allow for an increase in growth of the patient in the VNS arm.
Study End At the end of the study, subjects in the AED group who had not had significant improvement after all study assessments were completed were offered a VNS device implantation. Subjects in the VNS arm who had not had adequate improvement were evaluated for AED treatment.
Number of Subjects: Approximately 400 subjects were to be randomized at a 1:1 ratio to either AED or VNS treatment strata. Strata were to be according the AED treatment history (Early subjects were previously treated and failed treatment with 2 to 5 AEDs, Non-early subjects were treated and failed treatment with >5 AEDs). At least 15 study sites were to enroll subjects. Initially, only United Kingdom (UK) sites were to be selected. During the course of the trial, an extension was used to add non-UK centers.
A total of 151 subjects underwent screening prior to enrollment. Eight failed screening, and 143 went on to be randomized. Of those randomized, 8 subjects (4 in each of the treatment groups) were not treated. One patient in the VNS arm was explanted prior to initiation of device stimulation, so they were excluded. Therefore, 134 subjects were treated (ITT population): 65 were implanted with the VNS system and 69 were treated with AED. Nineteen investigational sites in the UK, Austria, Belgium, Germany, and Sweden participated in this study and enrolled subjects.
Study Duration: The maximum study follow-up was approximately 14 months from enrollment to study exit. The study was terminated due to insufficient enrollment prior to reaching the 400 subjects as specified in the protocol. After 4.5 years of enrollment, the Sponsor terminated enrollment and followed the remaining subjects out to the 52 week follow-up visit.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) Therapy | Experimental | Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) Therapy is delivered by an implantable device similar to a pacemaker that sends mild stimulation to the left vagus nerve to help improve seizure control. |
|
| Anti-Epileptic Drug (AED) | Experimental | This arm will supply a comparison between VNS and new AEDs which is necessary to determine an overall treatment regimen for the 30% to 40% of patients who fail to respond to 2 AEDs. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) Therapy | Device | Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) Therapy is delivered by an implantable device similar to a pacemaker that sends mild stimulation to the left vagus nerve to help improve seizure control. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Proportion of Responders After 1 Year of Follow-up (ITT-population) | Responders are subjects who had no new AEDs added or significant dose changes in baseline AEDs within 1 year of follow-up, along with a reduction in the percentage change in seizure frequency from baseline to the 2-month period prior to the 1-year follow-up of at least 50%. | 52 weeks post baseline |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Mean Percent Change in Hague Seizure Severity Scale Score (ITT Population) | The Hague Seizure Severity Assessment (Carpay et al. 1996) is a scale completed by the patient and/or caregiver to assess the severity and post-ictal recovery of seizures. A reduction in the HSSA score reflects less seizure severity experienced. | 52 weeks post baseline |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Mark Bunker, PharmD | Cyberonics, Inc. | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medical University of Vienna - Vienna General Hospital (AKH) | Vienna | Austria | ||||
| ULB- Hospital Erasme |
Subjects were randomized to VNS or AED treatment groups at a 1:1 ratio after being stratified according to their number of previous AED treatments. Of 143 randomized 8 subjects were not treated. One subject (VNS arm) was explanted before device stimulation & excluded. Therefore, 134 [actual] subjects were treated (ITT group): 65 (VNS), 69 (AED).
Subjects selected for participation in this clinical investigation were chosen from the investigator's general subject population or were referred by a physician who knew the subject well. They were selected for inclusion after consideration of the indications and contraindications of the device. Subjects were outpatients or inpatients.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) - ITT Population | Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) Therapy |
| FG001 | Anti-Epileptic Drug (AED) - ITT Population | Anti-epileptic drug therapy |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline [Visits 1 & 2] |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Anti-Epileptic Drug (AED) | Drug | Subject has tried at least 2 appropriate AEDs tested to tolerance or to blood levels at upper end of the target range of which at least 2 had been tolerated at normal doses. |
|
| Wellcome Quality of Life Assessment (Questionnaire A) in Epilepsy (ITT Population) | Calculate changes in the Wellcome Quality of Life Assessment (Parker et al. 1999) (Questionnaire A) for patients in both treatment arms (AED and VNS) at 52 weeks after randomization compared to baseline. The higher the quality of life score the better the quality of life experienced. An analysis of variance (ANOVA) model will be used to adjust for baseline variables (including QoL score) when comparing the two treatment groups. A two-sample t-test will be used for simple comparison QoL change from baseline. Total range for this scale is a minimum score of 81 to a maximum score of 336. There are no applicable subscales. | 52 weeks post baseline |
| Hague Restriction in Childhood Epilepsy Scale (Questionnaire B) (ITT Population) | Calculate changes in the Hague Restriction in Childhood Epilepsy scale (Carpay et al. 1997) (Questionnaire B) for patients in both treatment arms (AED and VNS) at 52 weeks after randomization compared to baseline. The higher the quality of life score the better the quality of life experienced. An analysis of variance (ANOVA) model will be used to adjust for baseline variables (including QoL score) when comparing the two treatment groups. A two-sample t-test will be used for simple comparison QoL change from baseline. Total range for this scale is a minimum score of 10 to a maximum score of 40. There are no applicable subscales. | 52 weeks post baseline |
| Mean Percent Change in Seizure Frequency (ITT Population) | The mean percent change in seizure frequency for the VNS and AED treatment groups at 52 weeks post baseline. Both AED and VNS treatment groups were stratified according to the patients' number of previous AED treatments ("early group" had 2 to 5 AEDs tested to tolerance or to blood levels at upper end of target range; "non-early group" had more than 5 AEDs tested to tolerance or to blood levels at upper end of target range). Seizure frequency was calculated based on number of patient/caregiver reported seizures at 52-week post baseline (percentage change in seizure frequency from baseline to the 2-month period prior to the 1-year follow-up of at least 50%). All seizures were counted. The safety population consists of 66 VNS implanted patients and the AED safety population includes 69 patients who are randomized to the AED arm. Please note one patient in the VNS safety population who was implanted but never received stimulation was excluded from the ITT population. | 52 weeks post baseline |
| Number of Subjects With Any Non-Serious Adverse Events by System Organ Class and Preferred Term (Safety Population) | To compare the safety of Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) treatment using the VNS Therapy device to anti-epileptic drug (AED) therapy in treating patients with seizures. The safety population consists of 66 VNS implanted patients and the AED safety population includes 69 patients who are randomized to the AED arm. Please note one patient in the VNS safety population who was implanted but never received stimulation was excluded from the ITT population. | 0-52 weeks |
| Number of Subjects With Any Serious Adverse Events by System Organ Class & Preferred Term (Safety Population) | To compare the safety of Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) treatment using the VNS Therapy device to anti-epileptic drug (AED) therapy in treating patients with seizures. The safety population consists of 66 VNS implanted patients and the AED safety population includes 69 patients who are randomized to the AED arm. Please note one patient in the VNS safety population who was implanted but never received stimulation was excluded from the ITT population. | 0-52 weeks |
| Brussels |
| Belgium |
| Kinderklinik der Justus-Liebig Universität | Giessen | Germany |
| University Children's Hospital | Lübeck | Germany |
| University Hospital Lund | Lund | Sweden |
| Astrid Lindgrens Barnsjukhus Karolinska | Stockholm | Sweden |
| Uppsala University Hospital | Uppsala | Sweden |
| Birmingham Children's Hospital | Birmingham | United Kingdom |
| Royal Hospital for Sick Children | Bristol | United Kingdom |
| Addenbrookes Hospital | Cambridge | United Kingdom |
| Ninewells Hospital & Medical School | Dundee | United Kingdom |
| Leeds General Infirmary | Leeds | United Kingdom |
| Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children | London | United Kingdom |
| King's College Hospital | London | United Kingdom |
| Royal Manchester Children's Hospital | Manchester | United Kingdom |
| Sir James Spence Institute - Royal Victoria Infirmary | Newcastle | United Kingdom |
| Queens's Medical Centre Nottingham | Nottingham | United Kingdom |
| Sheffield Children's Hospital | Sheffield | United Kingdom |
| Southampton Hospital | Southampton | United Kingdom |
| Actual Patients Treated |
|
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
| Treatment Phase (VNS/AED) [Visits 3-10] |
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) Therapy - ITT Population | Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) Therapy is delivered by an implantable device similar to a pacemaker that sends mild stimulation to the left vagus nerve to help improve seizure control. The intent-to-treat (ITT) population, defined as all subjects in VNS Therapy arm implanted with the VNS Therapy System (and the device had been turned on), and the Non-VNS arm, defined as all subjects who took at least 1 dose of study AED. |
| BG001 | Anti-Epileptic Drug (AED) - ITT Population | This arm will supply a comparison between VNS and new AEDs which is necessary to determine an overall treatment regimen for the 30% to 40% of patients who fail to respond to 2 AEDs. The intent-to-treat (ITT) population, defined as all subjects in VNS Therapy arm implanted with the VNS Therapy System (and the device had been turned on), and the Non-VNS arm, defined as all subjects who took at least 1 dose of study AED. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Age at Enrollment (Years) | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| ||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Treatment Group; VNS (n=65), AED (n=69), Total (n=134) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||
| Number of Failed Medications | Median | Full Range | Number of failed medications |
| |||||||||||||||
| Age at Epilepsy Onset (years) | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Proportion of Responders After 1 Year of Follow-up (ITT-population) | Responders are subjects who had no new AEDs added or significant dose changes in baseline AEDs within 1 year of follow-up, along with a reduction in the percentage change in seizure frequency from baseline to the 2-month period prior to the 1-year follow-up of at least 50%. | Subjects were stratified based on AED therapy history (Early: treated with 2 to 5 AEDs versus Non-early: treated with >5 AEDs). | Posted | Number | percentage of responders | 52 weeks post baseline |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Mean Percent Change in Hague Seizure Severity Scale Score (ITT Population) | The Hague Seizure Severity Assessment (Carpay et al. 1996) is a scale completed by the patient and/or caregiver to assess the severity and post-ictal recovery of seizures. A reduction in the HSSA score reflects less seizure severity experienced. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Percent Change | 52 weeks post baseline |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Wellcome Quality of Life Assessment (Questionnaire A) in Epilepsy (ITT Population) | Calculate changes in the Wellcome Quality of Life Assessment (Parker et al. 1999) (Questionnaire A) for patients in both treatment arms (AED and VNS) at 52 weeks after randomization compared to baseline. The higher the quality of life score the better the quality of life experienced. An analysis of variance (ANOVA) model will be used to adjust for baseline variables (including QoL score) when comparing the two treatment groups. A two-sample t-test will be used for simple comparison QoL change from baseline. Total range for this scale is a minimum score of 81 to a maximum score of 336. There are no applicable subscales. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Scores on a Scale | 52 weeks post baseline |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Hague Restriction in Childhood Epilepsy Scale (Questionnaire B) (ITT Population) | Calculate changes in the Hague Restriction in Childhood Epilepsy scale (Carpay et al. 1997) (Questionnaire B) for patients in both treatment arms (AED and VNS) at 52 weeks after randomization compared to baseline. The higher the quality of life score the better the quality of life experienced. An analysis of variance (ANOVA) model will be used to adjust for baseline variables (including QoL score) when comparing the two treatment groups. A two-sample t-test will be used for simple comparison QoL change from baseline. Total range for this scale is a minimum score of 10 to a maximum score of 40. There are no applicable subscales. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Scores on a Scale | 52 weeks post baseline |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Mean Percent Change in Seizure Frequency (ITT Population) | The mean percent change in seizure frequency for the VNS and AED treatment groups at 52 weeks post baseline. Both AED and VNS treatment groups were stratified according to the patients' number of previous AED treatments ("early group" had 2 to 5 AEDs tested to tolerance or to blood levels at upper end of target range; "non-early group" had more than 5 AEDs tested to tolerance or to blood levels at upper end of target range). Seizure frequency was calculated based on number of patient/caregiver reported seizures at 52-week post baseline (percentage change in seizure frequency from baseline to the 2-month period prior to the 1-year follow-up of at least 50%). All seizures were counted. The safety population consists of 66 VNS implanted patients and the AED safety population includes 69 patients who are randomized to the AED arm. Please note one patient in the VNS safety population who was implanted but never received stimulation was excluded from the ITT population. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Percent Change | 52 weeks post baseline |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Subjects With Any Non-Serious Adverse Events by System Organ Class and Preferred Term (Safety Population) | To compare the safety of Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) treatment using the VNS Therapy device to anti-epileptic drug (AED) therapy in treating patients with seizures. The safety population consists of 66 VNS implanted patients and the AED safety population includes 69 patients who are randomized to the AED arm. Please note one patient in the VNS safety population who was implanted but never received stimulation was excluded from the ITT population. | Number of participants with any definite related Adverse Event by body system and preferred term, Safety Population. NOTE: Number of participants analyzed in VNS arm includes one explant not from ITT population, but from safety population. | Posted | Number | Participants | 0-52 weeks |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Subjects With Any Serious Adverse Events by System Organ Class & Preferred Term (Safety Population) | To compare the safety of Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) treatment using the VNS Therapy device to anti-epileptic drug (AED) therapy in treating patients with seizures. The safety population consists of 66 VNS implanted patients and the AED safety population includes 69 patients who are randomized to the AED arm. Please note one patient in the VNS safety population who was implanted but never received stimulation was excluded from the ITT population. | Posted | Number | participants | 0-52 weeks |
|
|
0-52 Weeks (1-Year)
The safety population consists of 66 VNS implanted patients and the AED safety population includes 69 patients who are randomized to the AED arm.
Please note one patient in the VNS safety population who was implanted but never received stimulation was excluded from the ITT population.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) Therapy - Safety Population | Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) Therapy is delivered by an implantable device similar to a pacemaker that sends mild stimulation to the left vagus nerve to help improve seizure control. All subjects were considered evaluable for tolerability and safety after implantation of the VNS Therapy System. NOTE: Number of participants analyzed in VNS safety population includes one patient explanted that did not receive stimulation and was therefore excluded from ITT population. | 5 | 66 | 20 | 66 | ||
| EG001 | Anti-Epileptic Drug (AED) - Safety Population | This arm will supply a comparison between VNS and new AEDs which is necessary to determine an overall treatment regimen for the 30% to 40% of patients who fail to respond to 2 AEDs. All subjects were considered evaluable for tolerability and safety after initiation of adjunctive AED treatment. | 10 | 69 | 25 | 69 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tonsilitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 14.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fall | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 14.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Convulsion | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 14.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rash | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA 14.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Adenoidectomy | Surgical and medical procedures | MedDRA 14.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Upper respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 14.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Wound infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 14.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 14.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Injury | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 14.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Somnolence | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 14.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Status epilepticus | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 14.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Stevens Johnson Syndrome | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA 14.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hospitalization | Surgical and medical procedures | MedDRA 14.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Investigation | Surgical and medical procedures | MedDRA 14.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Medical device removal | Surgical and medical procedures | MedDRA 14.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Surgery | Surgical and medical procedures | MedDRA 14.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Tonsillectomy | Surgical and medical procedures | MedDRA 14.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neutropenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA 14.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| External ear disorder | Ear and labyrinth disorders | MedDRA 14.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vision blurred | Eye disorders | MedDRA 14.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdonimal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 14.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Constipation | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 14.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 14.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fatigue | General disorders | MedDRA 14.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Localised oedema | General disorders | MedDRA 14.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Medical device pain | General disorders | MedDRA 14.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Influenza | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 14.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Viral infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 14.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Wound infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 14.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fall | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 14.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Thermal burn | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 14.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Wrist fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 14.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Weight decreased | Investigations | MedDRA 14.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Decreased appetite | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 14.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Muscle spasms | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 14.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Neck pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 14.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Convulsion | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 14.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 14.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dysarthia | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 14.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Grand mal convulsion | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 14.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 14.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Myoclonus | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 14.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Psychomotor hyperactivity | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 14.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Sedation | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 14.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Somnolence | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 14.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Speech disorder | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 14.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abnormal behavior | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 14.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Breath holding | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 14.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Depressed mood | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 14.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Insomnia | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 14.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Sleep disorder | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 14.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Suicidal ideation | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 14.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Asthma | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 14.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cough | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 14.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dysphonia | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 14.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Stridor | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 14.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Throat irritation | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 14.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Alopecia | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA 14.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rash pruritic | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA 14.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Skin nodule | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA 14.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
Study was terminated due to low enrollment.
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Bunker, PharmD, Sr. Director, Global Medical Affairs | Cyberonics, Inc. | 281-228-7223 | Mark.Bunker@cyberonics.com |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004827 | Epilepsy |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001927 | Brain Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D055536 | Vagus Nerve Stimulation |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
| D000927 | Anticonvulsants |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004599 | Electric Stimulation Therapy |
| D002491 | Central Nervous System Agents |
| D045506 | Therapeutic Uses |
| D020228 | Pharmacologic Actions |
| D020164 | Chemical Actions and Uses |
Not provided
Not provided
| Male |
|
| 95 |
| No |
| Superiority or Other |
| Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | 0.168 | 95 | No | Superiority or Other |
| Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | 0.620 | 95 | No | Superiority or Other |
|
|
|
| OG003 | Anti-Epileptic Drug (AED) - Non-Early Group | Patients who were treated with >5 AEDs prior to study entry who were randomized to AED Group. |
|
|
|
| OG003 | Anti-Epileptic Drug (AED) - Non-Early Group | Patients who were treated with >5 AEDs prior to study entry who were randomized to AED Group. |
|
|
|
| OG002 |
| Anti-Epileptic Drug (AED) Early |
Patients who were treated with 2-5 AEDs prior to study entry who were randomized to AED Group. |
| OG003 | Anti-Epileptic Drug (AED) Non-Early | Patients who were treated with >5 AEDs prior to study entry who were randomized to AED Group. |
|
|
|
| Units |
|---|
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|