Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of surgical procedure involving ActiGait - implantable drop foot stimulator.
Stroke is the third leading cause of death in the United States and other developed countries and a major source of disability. Prognosis for regaining the ability to walk is good, with 64% of those initially dependent in walking regaining independence by 3 months. However, many gait abnormalities persist. A conservative estimate suggests that 20% of stroke survivors have a drop foot. Drop foot following stroke is caused by paresis of the ankle dorsiflexor muscles. It prevents the patient from effectively swinging the leg during walking, causing an abnormal gait characterized by hip hitching and circumduction and toe catch. Walking speed in people with drop foot is often significantly reduced and the risk of stumbling or falling is high. The conventional treatment for drop foot is an ankle-foot orthosis (AFO). While AFOs are appropriate for many patients, in certain patient groups AFOs have significant limitations (e.g. in patients with strong spasticity, suffering from pronounced inversion, suffering from volume changes in the lower extremity, etc). An alternative way of treating drop foot is by means of functional electrical stimulation. Clinical studies evaluating the effectiveness of drop foot stimulation suggest that it provides many benefits to patients, such as an improved confidence in walking, increased walking speed and endurance, less effort during walking and reduced spasticity. Implantable systems such as ActiGait are considered therapeutic alternatives specifically for those patients for whom conventional treatments have failed. ActiGait system consists of an external module (antenna and control module), a foot switch transmitting to the external module and an implanted assembly (receiver, pulse train generator, electrodes). The objective of this study is to obtain additional evidence on safety of ActiGait implantation procedure and on its efficacy. The study will enrol 5 subjects that will be implanted and followed for 12 weeks. Efficacy outcomes will be assessed at the baseline and during two follow-up visits (week 6 and 12). Subjects will be asked to walk with and without their preferred walking at the baseline and with and without stimulation at follow-up visits.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| ActiGait | Experimental | Receiving ActiGait - implantable drop foot stimulator |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ActiGait | Device | ActiGait - implantable drop foot stimulator |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Distance Walked in 6 Minutes | The test assesses distance walked over 6 minutes as a sub-maximal test of aerobic capacity (endurance). At baseline this test was done with subject's conventional walking aid. At 6 and 12 weeks post-implantation this was done with and without stimulation. | Baseline, 6 and 12 weeks post-implantation |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Walking Speed During 10 Meter Gait Test | The test assesses walking speed in meters per second over a short duration. At baseline this test was done with subject's conventional walking aid. At 6 and 12 weeks post-implantation this was done with and without stimulation. | Baseline, 6 and 12 weeks post-implantation |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| David Liebetanz, MD | Medical University Georg-August-University Goettingen, Germany | Principal Investigator |
| Veit Rhode, MD | Medical University Georg-August-University Goettingen, Germany | Principal Investigator |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | ActiGait - Implantable Drop Foot Stimulator | Subjects came with conventional walking aid and then received ActiGait implant |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | ActiGait - Implantable Drop Foot Stimulator | Subjects came with conventional walking aid and then received ActiGait implant |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Distance Walked in 6 Minutes | The test assesses distance walked over 6 minutes as a sub-maximal test of aerobic capacity (endurance). At baseline this test was done with subject's conventional walking aid. At 6 and 12 weeks post-implantation this was done with and without stimulation. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | m | Baseline, 6 and 12 weeks post-implantation |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | ActiGait - Implantable Drop Foot Stimulator | Subjects came with conventional walking aid and then received ActiGait implant |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Haematoma around implantation site and bleeding after stitches removal, requiring additional surgery | Surgical and medical procedures | Non-systematic Assessment |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Post-surgical lymphoedema around proximal incision | Surgical and medical procedures | Non-systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medical Affairs Manager | Otto Bock Healthcare Products GmbH | 004315233786733 | Milana.Mileusnic@ottobock.com |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020521 | Stroke |
| D006429 | Hemiplegia |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002561 | Cerebrovascular Disorders |
| D001927 | Brain Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) Score |
A semi-structured interview is conducted in order to identify subject's limitations with daily occupations of importance in categories self-care, productivtiy or leisure. The subject is then asked to rate the imporance of each of the occupations using a 10-point rating scale. Afterwards the subject chooses up to 5 of the most important occupations (problems) (basis for identifying intervention goals). The subject is asked to use a 10 point scale to rate level of performance and satisfaction with performance for each of the five identified problems. Average COPM performance score and satisfaction score are calculated. The scores range between 1 and 10, where 1 indicates poor performance and low satisfaction, respectively, while 10 indicates very good performance and high satisfaction. |
| Baseline,12 weeks post-implantation |
| Four Square Step Test (FSST) | It is a test of dynamic balance that clinically assesses the person's ability to step over objects forward, sideways, and backwards. The patient's time to perform the test is measured which shorter time representing better performance. At baseline this test was done with subject's conventional walking aid. At 12 weeks post-implantation it was done with and without stimulation. | Baseline, week 12 post-implantation |
| Nerve Conduction Velocity of the Peroneal Nerve | Measured: Nervus peroneus communis (CPN) and Nervus peroneus superficialis (SPN) | Baseline, week 12 post-implantation |
| Change in MRI of Affected Leg and Implant Post-implantation | MRI will be conducted to evaluate the impact of the implant on the common peroneal nerve (e.g. positioning of the nerve cuff along the nerve, path of the lead wire and the common peroneal nerve, estimation of the cross-sectional area of the common peroneal nerve compared to the pre-operative MRI recording, etc.). The outcome will be quantified by surgeon's judgement whether the final implant position is consistent with safe application of the ActiGait® implant as described in the manufacturer's surgical manual. Number of safe and successful implantations will be counted. | Week 2 post-implantation |
| Participants |
|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
|
| Secondary | Walking Speed During 10 Meter Gait Test | The test assesses walking speed in meters per second over a short duration. At baseline this test was done with subject's conventional walking aid. At 6 and 12 weeks post-implantation this was done with and without stimulation. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | m/s | Baseline, 6 and 12 weeks post-implantation |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) Score | A semi-structured interview is conducted in order to identify subject's limitations with daily occupations of importance in categories self-care, productivtiy or leisure. The subject is then asked to rate the imporance of each of the occupations using a 10-point rating scale. Afterwards the subject chooses up to 5 of the most important occupations (problems) (basis for identifying intervention goals). The subject is asked to use a 10 point scale to rate level of performance and satisfaction with performance for each of the five identified problems. Average COPM performance score and satisfaction score are calculated. The scores range between 1 and 10, where 1 indicates poor performance and low satisfaction, respectively, while 10 indicates very good performance and high satisfaction. | Two subjects were not available for the test. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline,12 weeks post-implantation |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Four Square Step Test (FSST) | It is a test of dynamic balance that clinically assesses the person's ability to step over objects forward, sideways, and backwards. The patient's time to perform the test is measured which shorter time representing better performance. At baseline this test was done with subject's conventional walking aid. At 12 weeks post-implantation it was done with and without stimulation. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | s | Baseline, week 12 post-implantation |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Nerve Conduction Velocity of the Peroneal Nerve | Measured: Nervus peroneus communis (CPN) and Nervus peroneus superficialis (SPN) | Two subjects were unavailable for the test. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | m/s | Baseline, week 12 post-implantation |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in MRI of Affected Leg and Implant Post-implantation | MRI will be conducted to evaluate the impact of the implant on the common peroneal nerve (e.g. positioning of the nerve cuff along the nerve, path of the lead wire and the common peroneal nerve, estimation of the cross-sectional area of the common peroneal nerve compared to the pre-operative MRI recording, etc.). The outcome will be quantified by surgeon's judgement whether the final implant position is consistent with safe application of the ActiGait® implant as described in the manufacturer's surgical manual. Number of safe and successful implantations will be counted. | Posted | Number | number of safe implantations | Week 2 post-implantation |
|
|
|
| 1 |
| 5 |
| 1 |
| 5 |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
| D010243 | Paralysis |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| 12 weeks post-implantation stimulation off |
|
| 12 weeks post-implantation stimulation on |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Satisfaction 12 weeks post-implantation |
|
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|
|
| 12 weeks post-implantation SPN |
|