Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Instituto Ciencias de la Salud, Junta de Comunidades de Castilla-La Mancha | UNKNOWN |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Objectives: To compare the benefits of structured occupational therapy intervention by a single geriatric therapist with the benefits of the conventional treatment model in the functional recovery of patients admitted to an acute geriatric unit.
Design: Non-pharmacological randomised clinical trial. Setting: Acute Geriatric Unit, Albacete, Spain. Participants: The trial included 400 patients admitted consecutively over 6 months to an acute geriatric unit for acute illness or exacerbation of a chronic medical condition. Participants were randomised to the occupational therapy intervention or conventional treatment model group; 198 patients received occupational therapy. All patients completed the study. The mean age was 83.5, and 56.8% were women.
Interventions: Needs assessment, iatrogenic prevention, retraining in basic and instrumental activities of daily living, assessment of need for technical aids, instruction for primary caregiver in patient mobilisation techniques, and structured social and occupational motivation as per protocol in three groups of patients (cardiopulmonary disease, stroke, and other conditions) 5 days a week, 30 to 45 minutes a day over the entire hospital stay.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Occupational therapy intervention (OTI) | Experimental | 198 subjects. The OTI schedule consisted of a daily 45-minute session, Monday through Friday, for the duration of hospitalisation. Activities were carried out in a structured manner and varied according to need and day of admission. On the first day, the patient's needs were analysed, including the need for iatrogenic prevention, retraining in basic and instrumental activities of daily living, technical aids, instruct the primary caregiver in patient mobilisation techniques, and social and occupational motivation. All OTI participants received an average of 5 sessions during hospitalisation. |
|
| Conventional treatment model group | No Intervention | 202 subjects. All subjects received medical treatment, nursing care, physical therapy, and social assistance in accordance with the usual practice of the geriatrics unit. |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Occupational therapy intervention | Other | Day 1: Physical, functional, cognitive, social, and emotional assessment. Need analysis for iatrogenic prevention, retraining in BADL and IADL, technical aids, instructions in patient mobilisation techniques, and for social and occupational motivation. Day 2 until discharge: 45-minute sessions. Cognitive stimulation and confusional syndrome prevention, instructions to the caregivers on how to prevent complications such as immobility, delirium, falls, urinary incontinence, or pressure sores, and patient stimulation, retraining in activities of daily living. Day of discharge: Instruction for caregivers on managing the patient's residual deficits, assessment for technical aids, recommendations for patient increased independence in ADL, and social and occupational activities. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Functional recovery | Recovery of 10 or more Barthel index points | The day of discharge from hospitalization (average 10 days) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Confusional status | Confusion Assessment Method | The day of discharge from hospitalization (average 10 days) |
| Death | The day of discharge from hospitalization (average 10 days) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete | Albacete | Albacete | 02006 | Spain |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17495480 | Result | Abizanda P, Navarro JL, Romero L, Leon M, Sanchez-Jurado PM, Dominguez L. Upper extremity function, an independent predictor of adverse events in hospitalized elderly. Gerontology. 2007;53(5):267-73. doi: 10.1159/000102541. Epub 2007 May 8. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Hospital stay | The day of discharge from hospitalization (average 10 days) |
| Upper limb function improvement | Touching either shoulder blade with the hand, picking up a full glass of water, unbuttoning a button, and cutting with a knife. Improvement was defined as the ability to perform more such functions at discharge compared with admission. | The day of discharge from hospitalization (average 10 days) |
| Improvement in gait pattern | Increase of one level on the Holden scale between admission and discharge | The day of discharge from hospitalization (average 10 days) |
| Residence change | Institutionalisation and residence change because of a new disability | The day of discharge from hospitalization (average 10 days) |