Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The aim of this randomized study was to compare the impact of two different radial arterial catheters - 20G and 22G - on the changes of diameter, blood flow and velocity of radial artery and ulnar artery after induction of anesthesia and after cannulation.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20 gauge group |
| ||
| 22 gauge group |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22 gauge catheter | Device | radial artery cannulation using 22 gauge catheter |
| |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Radial artery diameter and blood flow before and after cannulation | 30 min | |
| Ulnar artery diameter and blood flow before and after cannulation | 30 min |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| The differences of radial artery diameter and blood flow after cannulation between catheter gauge(20- and 22-G) | 30 min | |
| The differences of ulnar artery diameter and blood flow after cannulation between catheter gauge(20- and 22-G) | 30 min |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The patient(age >20) who are scheduled for elective surgery and need arterial
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yonsei University College of Medicine | Seoul | South Korea |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| 20 gauge catheter |
| Device |
radial artery cannulation using 20 gauge catheter |
|