Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| NURS175154 | Other Identifier | University of Delaware IRB |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| University of Delaware | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The first purpose of this study is to see how blood pressures taken at different sites, specifically the forearm, upper arm and heart vessels, are different. The second purpose is to see if body structures such as vessel size and depth, size of the arm, and amount of tissue in the arm influence differences in blood pressures taken at these sites. The third purpose is to develop a mathematical model of the waves generated by the arm arteries (brachial and radial) to predict differences in forearm and upper arm blood pressures. The results of the study may be used to design more accurate non-invasive blood pressure monitors for the forearm site.
Accurate blood pressure (BP) measurement is required to provide appropriate healthcare. Inaccurate BPs may lead to under and/or over-treatment of health conditions and medical diseases such as hypertension. Blood pressure (BP) measurement using automatic, non-invasive oscillometric monitors is common in clinics, physicians'offices and hospital settings. The brachial (upper arm) site is the gold standard for non-invasive BPs. However, in some situations, this site is inaccessible due to injury, surgery, dialysis shunts, intravenous devices, and lymphedema. When the upper arm is difficult to access or the available BP cuffs do not fit an individual's arm, the forearm site is often the preferable alternative. The increased incidence of obesity nationally also contributes to the heightened use of forearm BPs. Questions remain concerning the accuracy of forearm non-invasive BP measurements. Although most researchers report that upper arm and forearm readings are not interchangeable, size of differences vary for individuals and factors influencing differences in readings have not been thoroughly investigated.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| anatomical determinants of forearm and upper arm blood pressure differences | body mass index, upper arm circumference, biceps skin-fold measurement, forearm and upper arm vessel diameter, forearm and upper arm vessel depth | 6 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| blood pressure differences; quantitative model of waveform propagation and reflection able to predict differences between upper arm and forearm blood pressures | blood pressure at forearm, upper arm, aortic root radial artery tonometry to determine radial artery waveform and pressure measurements non-invasively | 6 months |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
patients undergoing non-emergent cardiac catheterization
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Kathleen A Schell, PhD | University of Delaware | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christiana Hospital | Newark | Delaware | 10718 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 16501139 | Background | Schell K, Lyons D, Bradley E, Bucher L, Seckel M, Wakai S, Carson E, Waterhouse J, Chichester M, Bartell D, Foraker T, Simpson EK. Clinical comparison of automatic, noninvasive measurements of blood pressure in the forearm and upper arm with the patient supine or with the head of the bed raised 45 degrees: a follow-up study. Am J Crit Care. 2006 Mar;15(2):196-205. | |
| 15840897 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Schell K, Bradley E, Bucher L, Seckel M, Lyons D, Wakai S, Bartell D, Carson E, Chichester M, Foraker T, Simpson K. Clinical comparison of automatic, noninvasive measurements of blood pressure in the forearm and upper arm. Am J Crit Care. 2005 May;14(3):232-41. |
| 20581399 | Background | Schell K, Morse K, Waterhouse JK. Forearm and upper-arm oscillometric blood pressure comparison in acutely ill adults. West J Nurs Res. 2010 Apr;32(3):322-40. doi: 10.1177/0193945909351887. |
| Background | Schell K, Waterhouse,JK. Comparison of forearm and upper arm automatic noninvasive blood pressures in college students. Internet Journal of Advanced Nursing Practice 2007, 9 (1): 10 pages |
| 17303983 | Background | Schell KA, Richards JG, Farquhar WB. The effects of anatomical structures on adult forearm and upper arm noninvasive blood pressures. Blood Press Monit. 2007 Feb;12(1):17-22. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0b013e3280858cd0. |
| Background | Rose WC, Johnson DA, Spaeth JR, Edwards J, Beris, AN. Computational and experimental investigation of arterial hemodynamics. Proc. 2008 Int. Mech. Eng. Conf. Exp. Boston: ASME, 2008; 1-8. |