Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10-M-0047 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Background:
- Previous studies have shown that people with certain types of brain damage may have particular problems paying attention and processing things that they see. Researchers are interested in comparing how people with brain damage and without brain damage process visual images.
Objectives:
- To better understand the areas of the brain involved in paying attention to things that are seen.
Eligibility:
- Individuals at least 18 years of age who either have had damage to one or both sides of specific parts of the brain (e.g., stroke, injury, certain neurosurgery procedures) or are healthy volunteers.
Design:
Attention is required for most, if not all, perceptual processes. There is a converging body of evidence from single-cell recording studies in monkeys and neuroimaging, behavioral, and clinical studies in humans showing that the processing of attended information is enhanced relative to the processing of unattended information.
What is the source of this attentional modulation? Because neuroimaging studies have demonstrated that multiple cortical regions are recruited during tasks involving selective attention, it has proven difficult thus far to determine the differential contributions of each region. A central goal of the proposed research is to characterize the contributions of prefrontal cortex and parietal cortex and test the hypothesis that these regions exert top-down modulatory influences over visual processing areas. Specifically, we wish to investigate the interaction between areas involved in attentional control and visual areas modulated by attention.
We propose to study patients with focal lesions and healthy volunteers while they perform tasks requiring attention. Subjects will participate, first, in a series of behavioral studies involving selective attention; the relative performance of different patient groups and neurologically healthy volunteers will be compared. Subjects will also be studied while performing similar tasks during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). We hypothesize that selective attention will be heavily impaired by lesions of key prefrontal (e.g., dorsolateral prefrontal cortex) and key parietal (e.g., superior parietal lobule) sites. We also expect that brain imaging data will show decreased activation in visual regions ipsilateral to the focal lesions in prefrontal and parietal cortex, thus providing evidence that prefrontal and parietal cortex are sources of top-down modulation. Although other research groups have compared the behavior of patients with various focal lesions or have performed fMRI studies of visual attention in neurologically normal patients, we are unaware of any concerted effort to perform fMRI in patients with focal lesions in order to functionally isolate the contributions of individual cortical regions that serve as critical nodes in the attentional network.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Neurologically normal healthy volunteers in good general health. | ||
| 2 | Patients with unilateral or bilateral focal lesions of prefrontal, parietal, occipital or temporal cortex, or amygdala. |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| MRI signal across the whole brain during the MRI scans | The MRI signal varies with cortical area and with the stimuli and tasks performed by the subjects. | Ongoing |
Not provided
Not provided
All Subjects
Patients:
Healthy volunteers:
1. Neurologically normal and in good general health.
EXCLUSION CRITERIA
Patients:
Healthy volunteers:
ADDITIONAL EXCLUSION CRITERIA FOR MRI SCAN:
Patients and Healthy volunteers:
Women who are pregnant and women of child-bearing potential who refuse to undergo a urine pregnancy test will be excluded from fMRI experiments.
Subjects who have contraindications to MRI scanning will be excluded from fMRI experiments but included in cognitive experiments. These contraindications include:
Conditions that preclude scanning, e.g., morbid obesity, claustrophobia.
ADDITIONAL EXCLUSION CRITERIA FOR TASKS INVOLVING COLOR DISCRIMINATION:
Patients and Healthy volunteers:
Subjects who are determined during screening or history and physical exam to be color-blind will be excluded from participating in certain tasks that involve color discrimination.
Not provided
Not provided
Healthy volunteers 18 years of age or older who are neurologically normal and in good general health. Patients 18 years of age or older with unilateral or bilateral focal lesions of prefrontal, parietal, occipital or temporal cortex, or amygdala.
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NIMH LBC Volunteer | Contact | (301) 827-5157 | nimhlbcvolunteer@mail.nih.gov | |
| Shruti A Japee, Ph.D. | Contact | (301) 402-3682 | japees@mail.nih.gov |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Shruti A Japee, Ph.D. | National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| National Institutes of Health Clinical Center | Recruiting | Bethesda | Maryland | 20892 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1614324 | Background | Bandettini PA, Wong EC, Hinks RS, Tikofsky RS, Hyde JS. Time course EPI of human brain function during task activation. Magn Reson Med. 1992 Jun;25(2):390-7. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910250220. | |
| 1948051 | Background | Belliveau JW, Kennedy DN Jr, McKinstry RC, Buchbinder BR, Weisskoff RM, Cohen MS, Vevea JM, Brady TJ, Rosen BR. Functional mapping of the human visual cortex by magnetic resonance imaging. Science. 1991 Nov 1;254(5032):716-9. doi: 10.1126/science.1948051. |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| NIH Clinical Center Detailed Web Page | View source |
Not provided
The protocol team has not had the opportunity to discuss whether or not IPD data will be shared.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| 3260686 | Background | Fox PT, Raichle ME, Mintun MA, Dence C. Nonoxidative glucose consumption during focal physiologic neural activity. Science. 1988 Jul 22;241(4864):462-4. doi: 10.1126/science.3260686. |
| 39389294 | Derived | Gilmore AW, Audrain S, Snow J, Gollomp E, Wilson JM, Agron AM, Hammoud DA, Butman JA, Martin A. Long-term retention of real-world experiences in a patient with profound amnesia. Neuropsychologia. 2024 Nov 5;204:109010. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2024.109010. Epub 2024 Oct 9. |
| 26826513 | Derived | Zhang H, Japee S, Nolan R, Chu C, Liu N, Ungerleider LG. Face-selective regions differ in their ability to classify facial expressions. Neuroimage. 2016 Apr 15;130:77-90. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.01.045. Epub 2016 Jan 28. |
| 26382006 | Derived | Hansen KA, Chu C, Dickinson A, Pye B, Weller JP, Ungerleider LG. Spatial selectivity in the temporoparietal junction, inferior frontal sulcus, and inferior parietal lobule. J Vis. 2015;15(13):15. doi: 10.1167/15.13.15. |