Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-011473-33 | EudraCT Number |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Recently, early biomarkers of renal interstitial fibrosis have been identified, amongst them de novo expression of vimentin by tubular epithelial cells, which is an intermediate filament, and the translocation of beta-catenin into their cytoplasm. These markers, when present, suggest that the epithelial cell undergoes a phenomenon well known as "epithelial to mesenchymal transition" (EMT) and could behaves like a myo-fibroblast. EMT is highly instrumental in several models of tissue fibrosis, including in the kidney. Actually, it has not only been demonstrated that these markers are detectable in the renal graft at an early time point post-transplant (i.e. as soon as three months), but also that the intensity of their expression correlates with the progression of interstitial fibrosis of the graft between 3 and 12 months
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Certican EMT+ | Experimental | Patients randomized to the Certican® treatment group started this treatment after randomization (which took place 3 to 4 months post-transplantation), preferably in the evening, otherwise the following morning. Patients in the Neoral® treatment group did not receive Certican®. |
|
| Certican EMT- | Experimental | Patients randomized to the Certican® treatment group started this treatment after randomization (which took place 3 to 4 months post-transplantation), preferably in the evening, otherwise the following morning. Patients in the Neoral® treatment group did not receive Certican®. |
|
| Neoral EMT+ | Active Comparator | Between transplantation and randomization, all patients have received Neoral®. Treatment had to be initiated within 24 hours post-transplantation in combination with Myfortic®. |
|
| Neoral EMT- | Active Comparator | Between transplantation and randomization, all patients have received Neoral®. Treatment had to be initiated within 24 hours post-transplantation in combination with Myfortic®. |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Certican® | Drug | Certican® was supplied to the participating centers by Novartis for the whole duration of the study in the form of tablets containing 0.75, 0.5 and 0.25 mg and packaged in blister packs. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Progression of Renal Graft Fibrosis (Primary Comparison - ITT Population | Progression of Interstitial Fibrosis/Tabular Atrophy (IF/TA) is the percentage (%) of participants with an increase >= 1 in IF/TA grade according to Banff (2005 - 2007)according to Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) profile and by treatment groups. Grade I (the better): mild interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (<25% of cortical area) Grade II : moderate interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (26-50% of cortical area) Grade III (the worse) : severe interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (>50% of cortical area) | Month 3 (M3) and Month 12 (M12) post transplantation |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Interstitial Fibrosis/Tabular Atrophy (IF/TA) | Incidence and severity of IF/TA according to 2005/2007 Banff classification system grades (grades l to lll). IF/TA grade was assessed during centralized reading according to the Banff 2005/2007 classification comprising grade I (<25%), grade II (25-50%) and grade III (>50% of lesions). | M3 and M12 post transplantation |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Randomization criteria:
Eligibility criteria (no later than 4 months post-transplantation:
Non-eligibility criteria (no later than 4 months post-transplantation):
Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Novartis Pharmaceuticals | Novartis Pharmaceuticals | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Novartis Investigative Site | Caen | Cedex | 14033 | France | ||
| Novartis Investigative Site |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 31530561 | Derived | Loupy A, Aubert O, Orandi BJ, Naesens M, Bouatou Y, Raynaud M, Divard G, Jackson AM, Viglietti D, Giral M, Kamar N, Thaunat O, Morelon E, Delahousse M, Kuypers D, Hertig A, Rondeau E, Bailly E, Eskandary F, Bohmig G, Gupta G, Glotz D, Legendre C, Montgomery RA, Stegall MD, Empana JP, Jouven X, Segev DL, Lefaucheur C. Prediction system for risk of allograft loss in patients receiving kidney transplants: international derivation and validation study. BMJ. 2019 Sep 17;366:l4923. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4923. |
Not provided
Not provided
EMT+: ≥ 10% tubular cells showing de novo expression of vimentin (or translocation of β catenin if inconclusive) into the cytoplasm EMT-: < 10% tubular cells showing de novo expression of vimentin (or translocation of β catenin if inconclusive) into the cytoplasm
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Certican EMT+ | Patients randomized to the Certican® treatment group started this treatment after randomization (which took place 3 to 4 months post-transplantation), preferably in the evening, otherwise the following morning. Patients in the Neoral® treatment group did not receive Certican®. |
| FG001 |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Neoral | Drug | Neoral® was also supplied to participating centers for the entire duration of the study in the form of soft capsules of 10 mg, 25 mg, 50 mg and 100 mg, and packaged in blister packs. |
|
|
| Myfortic | Drug | Myfortic ® was supplied to the participating centers for the duration of the study in the form of 180 and 360 mg gastro-resistant, film-coated tablets. Myfortic® treatment was provided to patients preoperatively or within 24 hours post-transplantation according to the practices of the center. The starting dose was generally 1,440 mg/day, in 2 daily oral fractions, administered at 12 hour intervals up to randomization. Depending on the practices of the center and for the first 6 weeks post-transplantation, a maximum daily dose of 2160 mg of Myfortic® could be administered. In the Neoral® group, the daily dose of 1440 mg was maintained throughout the study. In the Certican® group, the dose was halved (i.e. 720 mg/day) on introducing Certican® and maintained at 720 mg/day until the end of the study. An increase in the daily dose of Myfortic® (in the Certican® group) was not authorized unless this was a temporary increase that did not exceed a period of 14 consecutive days. |
|
| Simulect® | Drug | The administration of Simulect® was part of the standard immunosuppressant therapy. This induction therapy was provided to patients in the form of commercial ampoules each containing 20 mg. Simulect® was administered to each patient at the dose of 20 mg on D0 and D4 post-transplantation. |
|
|
| Corticosteroids | Drug | An intravenous steroid treatment could be administered peri or intraoperatively according to local practice at each center. Oral steroid treatment was quickly introduced (in the week following transplantation) at a daily dose of 20 mg and was then reduced and continued throughout the study at a minimum dose of 5 mg/day. |
|
| Change in Interstitial Fibrosis/Tabular Atrophy (IF/TA) Grade | Difference (M12 - M3) in IF/TA grade. IF/TA grade was assessed during centralized reading according to the Banff 2005/2007 classification comprising grade I (<25%), grade II (25-50%) and grade III (>50% of lesions). | M3 and M12 post transplantation |
| Risk Factors of IF/TA Progression | Composite factors regarding fibrosis progression at 12 months using a logistic regression model; the parameters initially considered concerned the demographic characteristics of both recipient and donor, transplantation characteristics, hypertension, diabetes, study treatments, immunosuppression, EMT, IF/TA, function at M3, the onset of acute rejection, the presence of anti-donor antibodies at M12, infections and BK virus viremia. Arteriolar hyaline thickening is thickening of the walls of arterioles by the deposition of homogeneous pink hyaline material. BPAR is biopsy proven acute rejection. TEM progression is the increase ≥ 1 of TEM score between Month 3 and Month 12 | M12 post transplantation |
| Change in Percentage of Interstitial Fibrosis (IF) by Numerical Quantification | Percentage of IF measured by numerical quantification. The IF percentage was transposed in grade according to the following rule: grade 0 for an IF % ≤5%, grade I for an IF % ranging from >5% to < 25%, grade II for an IF % ranging from 25 to 50%, grade III for an IF % >50%. Interstitial graft fibrosis has been identified as the primary cause of graft loss following death with a functional graft [3-5]. | M3 and M12 post transplantation |
| Number of Participants With Progression of Renal Fibrosis Using Numerical Quantification | Comparisons according to epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) profile and immunosuppressive treatment | M3 to M12 post transplantation |
| Number of Participants With Epithelial-mesenchymal Transition (EMT) Status | Incidence and severity of EMT status. EMT status was determined centrally using the graft biopsy taken at 3 months. The result was quickly obtained (within 7 to 15 days) and sent to the company in charge of randomization in order to allocate each patient to a treatment group and to provide the investigator with this information without confirming EMT status. | M3 and M12 post transplantation |
| Number of Participants With Epithelial-mesenchymal Transition (EMT) Score | Incidence and severity of EMT score. The intensity of EMT markers expression present and detectable in the renal graft at an early stage following transplantation is known as EMT score. EMT score 0 (the best): <1 EMT score 1 (the better): 1-10% of tubular atrophy EMT score 2: 10-25% of tubular atrophy EMT score 3: 25-50% of tubular atrophy EMT score 4 (the worst): >50% of tubular atrophy | M3 and M12 post transplantation |
| Change in EMT Score | Change (M12 - M3) in EMT Score. Progression in EMT score is defined as an increase by >=1 of EMT score from M3 to M12. EMT score 0 (the best): <1 EMT score 1 (the better) : 1-10% of tubular atrophy EMT score 2 : 10-25% of tubular atrophy EMT score 3 : 25-50% of tubular atrophy EMT score 4 (the worst): >50% of tubular atrophy | M3 and M12 post transplantation |
| Incidence (Number) of Subclinical Rejections and Borderline Lesions | Incidence of subclinical rejections and borderline lesions with regards to histological evidence of rejection with clinical findings. Subclinical rejections: rejection without clinical symptoms which is diagnosed by chance when a graft biopsy is performed. Clinically suspected BPAR: rejection suspected because of the presence of clinical symptoms (fever, pain, increase of creatinine) and then confirmed by the graft biopsy. Borderline lesions: suspicious for acute T-cell mediated rejection. This category is used when no intimal arteritis is present, but there are foci of tubulitis with minor interstitial infiltration or interstitial infiltration with mild tubulitis. | M3 |
| Change From Baseline (M3) in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) | eGFR was calculated according to the abbreviated Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Formula and creatinine clearance according to the Cockcroft-Gault formula (mL/min/1.73m²). LOCF = Last observation carried forward | M3 (baseline) to M12 post transplantation |
| Change in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) at M12 From Baseline (M3) - ANCOVA Model | The average patient renal function was evaluated on the basis of eGFR was calculated according to the abbreviated MDRD formula and creatinine clearance according to the Cockcroft-Gault formula (mL/min/1.73m²). | Baseline (M3), M12 |
| Change in Urine Protein/Creatinine Ratio (Without Imputation) | One of the factors associated with EMT progression between M3 and M12 according to univariate analysis (ITT biopsies M3 & M12). | Month 3 (baseline), Month 12 |
| Treatment Failures | A treatment failure is defined as biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR), a graft loss, a death or a loss to follow up. It was assessed between randomization and 6 and 12 months post-transplantation. | M6 and M12 post transplantation |
| Type of Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR) | A biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR) is defined as a biopsy graded IA, IB, IIA, IIB or III as per 2005/2007 Banff histological classification system. Biopsy graded IA: Significant interstitial infiltration (> 25% of parenchyma) and foci of moderate tubulitis (> 4 mononuclear cells/tubular cross section or group of 10 tubular cells). Biopsy grade IB: Significant interstitial infiltration (> 25% of parenchyma) and foci of severe tubulitis (> 10 mononuclear cells/tubular cross section or group of 10 tubular cells). Biopsy grade IIA: Mild to moderate intimal arteritis. Biopsy graded IIB: Severe intimal arteritis comprising > 25% of the lumenal area. Biopsy graded III: Transmural (full vessel wall thickness) arteritis and/or arterial fibrinoid change and necrosis of medial smooth muscle cells (with accompanying lymphocytic inflammation). | M6 and M12 post transplantation |
| Severity of BPAR | A biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR) is defined as a biopsy graded IA, IB, IIA, IIB or III as per 2005/2007 Banff histological classification system. Biopsy graded IA: Significant interstitial infiltration (> 25% of parenchyma) and foci of moderate tubulitis (> 4 mononuclear cells/tubular cross section or group of 10 tubular cells). Biopsy grade IB: Significant interstitial infiltration (> 25% of parenchyma) and foci of severe tubulitis (> 10 mononuclear cells/tubular cross section or group of 10 tubular cells). Biopsy grade IIA: Mild to moderate intimal arteritis. Biopsy graded IIB: Severe intimal arteritis comprising > 25% of the lumenal area. Biopsy graded III: Transmural (full vessel wall thickness) arteritis and/or arterial fibrinoid change and necrosis of medial smooth muscle cells (with accompanying lymphocytic inflammation). | M6 and M12 post transplantation |
| Incidence (Number) of BPAR | A biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR) is defined as a biopsy graded IA, IB, IIA, IIB or III as per 2005/2007 Banff histological classification system. | M6 and M12 post transplantation |
| Incidence (Number) of Participants With Graft Losses | If a participant underwent a graft nephrectomy, then the day of nephrectomy was considered as the day of graft loss. | M6 and M12 post transplantation |
| Angers |
| France |
| 49 033 |
| France |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Suresnes | France | 92150 | France |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Amiens Cedex1 | 80054 | France |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Bordeaux | 33076 | France |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Brest | 29200 | France |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Créteil | 94010 | France |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Grenoble | 38043 | France |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Le Kremlin-Bicêtre | 94275 | France |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Lille | 59037 | France |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Lyon | 69 437 | France |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Nice | 06602 | France |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Paris | 75015 | France |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Paris | 75475 | France |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Paris | 75970 | France |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Pierre-Bénite | 69495 | France |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Poitiers | 86000 | France |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Reims | 51092 | France |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Saint-Priest-en-Jarez | 42277 | France |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Strasbourg | 67091 | France |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Toulouse | 31054 | France |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Tours | 37044 | France |
| Novartis Investigative Site | Vandoeuvre Les Nancys | 54511 | France |
| Certican EMT- |
Patients randomized to the Certican® treatment group started this treatment after randomization (which took place 3 to 4 months post-transplantation), preferably in the evening, otherwise the following morning. Patients in the Neoral® treatment group did not receive Certican®. |
| FG002 | Neoral EMT+ | Between transplantation and randomization, all patients have received Neoral®. Treatment had to be initiated within 24 hours post-transplantation in combination with Myfortic®. |
| FG003 | Neoral EMT- | Between transplantation and randomization, all patients have received Neoral®. Treatment had to be initiated within 24 hours post-transplantation in combination with Myfortic®. |
| Exposed |
|
| Month 3 (M3) Biopsies |
|
| Month 12 (M12) Biopsies |
|
| M3 and M12 Biopsies |
|
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Certican EMT+ | Patients randomized to the Certican® treatment group started this treatment after randomization (which took place 3 to 4 months post-transplantation), preferably in the evening, otherwise the following morning. Patients in the Neoral® treatment group did not receive Certican®. |
| BG001 | Certican EMT- | Patients randomized to the Certican® treatment group started this treatment after randomization (which took place 3 to 4 months post-transplantation), preferably in the evening, otherwise the following morning. Patients in the Neoral® treatment group did not receive Certican®. |
| BG002 | Neoral EMT+ | Between transplantation and randomization, all patients have received Neoral®. Treatment had to be initiated within 24 hours post-transplantation in combination with Myfortic®. |
| BG003 | Neoral EMT- | Between transplantation and randomization, all patients have received Neoral®. Treatment had to be initiated within 24 hours post-transplantation in combination with Myfortic®. |
| BG004 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| BMI | Mean | Standard Deviation | kg/m^2 |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Number of Participants With Progression of Renal Graft Fibrosis (Primary Comparison - ITT Population | Progression of Interstitial Fibrosis/Tabular Atrophy (IF/TA) is the percentage (%) of participants with an increase >= 1 in IF/TA grade according to Banff (2005 - 2007)according to Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) profile and by treatment groups. Grade I (the better): mild interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (<25% of cortical area) Grade II : moderate interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (26-50% of cortical area) Grade III (the worse) : severe interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (>50% of cortical area) | ITT population: All patients randomized in the study who received at least one dose of the study treatment. Among the 194 participants in the ITT group, 58 patients in the EMT+ group completed the study providing a graft biopsy for analysis at M3 and M12. The primary comparison concerned only the Certican and the Neoral EMT+ groups. | Posted | Number | Participants | Month 3 (M3) and Month 12 (M12) post transplantation |
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Interstitial Fibrosis/Tabular Atrophy (IF/TA) | Incidence and severity of IF/TA according to 2005/2007 Banff classification system grades (grades l to lll). IF/TA grade was assessed during centralized reading according to the Banff 2005/2007 classification comprising grade I (<25%), grade II (25-50%) and grade III (>50% of lesions). | ITT population: All patients randomized in the study who received at least one dose of the study treatment. Among the 194 participants in the ITT group, 58 patients in the EMT+ group completed the study providing a graft biopsy for analysis at M3 and M12. | Posted | Number | Number of participants | M3 and M12 post transplantation |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change in Interstitial Fibrosis/Tabular Atrophy (IF/TA) Grade | Difference (M12 - M3) in IF/TA grade. IF/TA grade was assessed during centralized reading according to the Banff 2005/2007 classification comprising grade I (<25%), grade II (25-50%) and grade III (>50% of lesions). | ITT population: All patients randomized in the study who received at least one dose of the study treatment. Among the 194 participants in the ITT group, 58 patients in the EMT+ group completed the study providing a graft biopsy for analysis at M3 and M12. | Posted | Number | Number of Participants | M3 and M12 post transplantation |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Risk Factors of IF/TA Progression | Composite factors regarding fibrosis progression at 12 months using a logistic regression model; the parameters initially considered concerned the demographic characteristics of both recipient and donor, transplantation characteristics, hypertension, diabetes, study treatments, immunosuppression, EMT, IF/TA, function at M3, the onset of acute rejection, the presence of anti-donor antibodies at M12, infections and BK virus viremia. Arteriolar hyaline thickening is thickening of the walls of arterioles by the deposition of homogeneous pink hyaline material. BPAR is biopsy proven acute rejection. TEM progression is the increase ≥ 1 of TEM score between Month 3 and Month 12 | ITT population: All patients randomized in the study who received at least one dose of the study treatment. Among the 194 participants in the ITT group, 58 patients in the EMT+ group completed the study providing a graft biopsy for analysis at M3 and M12. | Posted | Number | Participants | M12 post transplantation |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change in Percentage of Interstitial Fibrosis (IF) by Numerical Quantification | Percentage of IF measured by numerical quantification. The IF percentage was transposed in grade according to the following rule: grade 0 for an IF % ≤5%, grade I for an IF % ranging from >5% to < 25%, grade II for an IF % ranging from 25 to 50%, grade III for an IF % >50%. Interstitial graft fibrosis has been identified as the primary cause of graft loss following death with a functional graft [3-5]. | ITT population: All patients randomized in the study who received at least one dose of the study treatment. Among the 194 participants in the ITT group, 58 patients in the EMT+ group completed the study providing a graft biopsy for analysis at M3 and M12. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Percentage of IF | M3 and M12 post transplantation |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Progression of Renal Fibrosis Using Numerical Quantification | Comparisons according to epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) profile and immunosuppressive treatment | ITT population: All patients randomized in the study who received at least one dose of the study treatment. Among the 194 participants in the ITT group, 58 patients in the EMT+ group completed the study providing a graft biopsy for analysis at M3 and M12. | Posted | Number | Participants | M3 to M12 post transplantation |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Epithelial-mesenchymal Transition (EMT) Status | Incidence and severity of EMT status. EMT status was determined centrally using the graft biopsy taken at 3 months. The result was quickly obtained (within 7 to 15 days) and sent to the company in charge of randomization in order to allocate each patient to a treatment group and to provide the investigator with this information without confirming EMT status. | ITT population: All patients randomized in the study who received at least one dose of the study treatment. Among the 194 participants in the ITT group, 58 patients in the EMT+ group completed the study providing a graft biopsy for analysis at M3 and M12. | Posted | Number | Participants | M3 and M12 post transplantation |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Epithelial-mesenchymal Transition (EMT) Score | Incidence and severity of EMT score. The intensity of EMT markers expression present and detectable in the renal graft at an early stage following transplantation is known as EMT score. EMT score 0 (the best): <1 EMT score 1 (the better): 1-10% of tubular atrophy EMT score 2: 10-25% of tubular atrophy EMT score 3: 25-50% of tubular atrophy EMT score 4 (the worst): >50% of tubular atrophy | ITT population: All patients randomized in the study who received at least one dose of the study treatment. Among the 194 participants in the ITT group, 58 patients in the EMT+ group completed the study providing a graft biopsy for analysis at M3 and M12. | Posted | Number | participants | M3 and M12 post transplantation |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change in EMT Score | Change (M12 - M3) in EMT Score. Progression in EMT score is defined as an increase by >=1 of EMT score from M3 to M12. EMT score 0 (the best): <1 EMT score 1 (the better) : 1-10% of tubular atrophy EMT score 2 : 10-25% of tubular atrophy EMT score 3 : 25-50% of tubular atrophy EMT score 4 (the worst): >50% of tubular atrophy | ITT population: All patients randomized in the study who received at least one dose of the study treatment. Among the 194 participants in the ITT group, 58 patients in the EMT+ group completed the study providing a graft biopsy for analysis at M3 and M12. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | scores on a scale | M3 and M12 post transplantation |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Incidence (Number) of Subclinical Rejections and Borderline Lesions | Incidence of subclinical rejections and borderline lesions with regards to histological evidence of rejection with clinical findings. Subclinical rejections: rejection without clinical symptoms which is diagnosed by chance when a graft biopsy is performed. Clinically suspected BPAR: rejection suspected because of the presence of clinical symptoms (fever, pain, increase of creatinine) and then confirmed by the graft biopsy. Borderline lesions: suspicious for acute T-cell mediated rejection. This category is used when no intimal arteritis is present, but there are foci of tubulitis with minor interstitial infiltration or interstitial infiltration with mild tubulitis. | ITT population: All patients randomized in the study who received at least one dose of the study treatment. | Posted | Number | Participants | M3 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline (M3) in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) | eGFR was calculated according to the abbreviated Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Formula and creatinine clearance according to the Cockcroft-Gault formula (mL/min/1.73m²). LOCF = Last observation carried forward | ITT population: All patients randomized in the study who received at least one dose of the study treatment. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | mL/min/1.73m^2 | M3 (baseline) to M12 post transplantation |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) at M12 From Baseline (M3) - ANCOVA Model | The average patient renal function was evaluated on the basis of eGFR was calculated according to the abbreviated MDRD formula and creatinine clearance according to the Cockcroft-Gault formula (mL/min/1.73m²). | ITT population: All patients randomized in the study who received at least one dose of the study treatment. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | mL/min/1.73m² | Baseline (M3), M12 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change in Urine Protein/Creatinine Ratio (Without Imputation) | One of the factors associated with EMT progression between M3 and M12 according to univariate analysis (ITT biopsies M3 & M12). | ITT population: All patients randomized in the study who received at least one dose of the study treatment. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | mg/mmol | Month 3 (baseline), Month 12 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Treatment Failures | A treatment failure is defined as biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR), a graft loss, a death or a loss to follow up. It was assessed between randomization and 6 and 12 months post-transplantation. | ITT population: All patients randomized in the study who received at least one dose of the study treatment. | Posted | Number | Number of Participants | M6 and M12 post transplantation |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Type of Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR) | A biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR) is defined as a biopsy graded IA, IB, IIA, IIB or III as per 2005/2007 Banff histological classification system. Biopsy graded IA: Significant interstitial infiltration (> 25% of parenchyma) and foci of moderate tubulitis (> 4 mononuclear cells/tubular cross section or group of 10 tubular cells). Biopsy grade IB: Significant interstitial infiltration (> 25% of parenchyma) and foci of severe tubulitis (> 10 mononuclear cells/tubular cross section or group of 10 tubular cells). Biopsy grade IIA: Mild to moderate intimal arteritis. Biopsy graded IIB: Severe intimal arteritis comprising > 25% of the lumenal area. Biopsy graded III: Transmural (full vessel wall thickness) arteritis and/or arterial fibrinoid change and necrosis of medial smooth muscle cells (with accompanying lymphocytic inflammation). | ITT population: All patients randomized in the study who received at least one dose of the study treatment. | Posted | Number | Participants | M6 and M12 post transplantation |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Severity of BPAR | A biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR) is defined as a biopsy graded IA, IB, IIA, IIB or III as per 2005/2007 Banff histological classification system. Biopsy graded IA: Significant interstitial infiltration (> 25% of parenchyma) and foci of moderate tubulitis (> 4 mononuclear cells/tubular cross section or group of 10 tubular cells). Biopsy grade IB: Significant interstitial infiltration (> 25% of parenchyma) and foci of severe tubulitis (> 10 mononuclear cells/tubular cross section or group of 10 tubular cells). Biopsy grade IIA: Mild to moderate intimal arteritis. Biopsy graded IIB: Severe intimal arteritis comprising > 25% of the lumenal area. Biopsy graded III: Transmural (full vessel wall thickness) arteritis and/or arterial fibrinoid change and necrosis of medial smooth muscle cells (with accompanying lymphocytic inflammation). | ITT population: All patients randomized in the study who received at least one dose of the study treatment. | Posted | Number | Participants | M6 and M12 post transplantation |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Incidence (Number) of BPAR | A biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR) is defined as a biopsy graded IA, IB, IIA, IIB or III as per 2005/2007 Banff histological classification system. | ITT population: All patients randomized in the study who received at least one dose of the study treatment. | Posted | Number | Number of participants | M6 and M12 post transplantation |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Incidence (Number) of Participants With Graft Losses | If a participant underwent a graft nephrectomy, then the day of nephrectomy was considered as the day of graft loss. | ITT population: All patients randomized in the study who received at least one dose of the study treatment. | Posted | Number | Participants | M6 and M12 post transplantation |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Neoral | Between transplantation and randomization, all patients have received Neoral®. Treatment had to be initiated within 24 hours post-transplantation in combination with Myfortic®. | 39 | 98 | 59 | 98 | ||
| EG001 | Certican | Patients randomized to the Certican® treatment group started this treatment after randomization (which took place 3 to 4 months post-transplantation), preferably in the evening, otherwise the following morning. Patients in the Neoral® treatment group did not receive Certican®. | 46 | 96 | 59 | 96 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agranulocytosis | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Anaemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Febrile neutropenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Leukopenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Neutropenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pancytopenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Acute coronary syndrome | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Aphthous stomatitis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Colitis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Colitis ulcerative | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dental necrosis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastritis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hernial eventration | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Oesophageal ulcer | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Periodontitis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Asthenia | General disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Chills | General disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| General physical health deterioration | General disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hyperthermia | General disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Oedema peripheral | General disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pain | General disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pyrexia | General disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Sudden death | General disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hepatitis | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Amyloidosis | Immune system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Kidney transplant rejection | Immune system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Transplant rejection | Immune system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal abscess | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bacillus infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bacterial pyelonephritis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bronchitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cytomegalovirus infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diarrhoea infectious | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Escherichia bacteraemia | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Escherichia infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Eye infection toxoplasmal | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastroenteritis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastroenteritis yersinia | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hepatic cyst infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Lung infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Orchitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pneumonia | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Polyomavirus-associated nephropathy | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pseudomonal sepsis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pyelonephritis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pyelonephritis acute | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Renal cyst infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Sinusitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Staphylococcal infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Transplant abscess | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Viral pharyngitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Accidental overdose | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Arteriovenous fistula site complication | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Arteriovenous fistula thrombosis | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Graft loss | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Head injury | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Overdose | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Post procedural haematuria | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Spinal fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Toxicity to various agents | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ureteric anastomosis complication | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vascular graft complication | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Blood creatinine increased | Investigations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Blood pressure increased | Investigations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Weight decreased | Investigations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diabetes mellitus inadequate control | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gout | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypercreatininaemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypoglycaemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Malnutrition | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fistula | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pain in extremity | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Multiple myeloma | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cerebrovascular accident | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Status epilepticus | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Syncope | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Depression | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Neurosis | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Glomerulonephritis | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Haematuria | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hydronephrosis | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Proteinuria | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Renal failure acute | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Renal tubular disorder | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Renal tubular necrosis | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vesicoureteric reflux | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Metrorrhagia | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Prostatitis | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cough | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dyspnoea | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Lung disorder | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pulmonary oedema | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Respiratory distress | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Capillaritis | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rash maculo-papular | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hip arthroplasty | Surgical and medical procedures | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Haematoma | Vascular disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Haemorrhage | Vascular disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Iliac artery stenosis | Vascular disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Orthostatic hypotension | Vascular disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Phlebitis | Vascular disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Subclavian artery stenosis | Vascular disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Venous thrombosis limb | Vascular disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anaemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Leukopenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Neutropenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Aphthous stomatitis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gingival hypertrophy | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Oedema peripheral | General disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bronchitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cytomegalovirus infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dyslipidaemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cough | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Acne | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rash | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypertension | Vascular disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
The terms and conditions of Novartis' agreements with its investigators may vary. However, Novartis does not prohibit any investigator from publishing. Any publications from a single-site are postponed until the publication of pooled data (i.e.,data from all sites) in clinical trial or disclosure of trial results in their entirety.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Study Director | Novartis Pharmaceuticals | 862-778-8300 | trialandresults.registries@novartis.com |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000068338 | Everolimus |
| D016572 | Cyclosporine |
| D009173 | Mycophenolic Acid |
| D000077552 | Basiliximab |
| D000305 | Adrenal Cortex Hormones |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020123 | Sirolimus |
| D018942 | Macrolides |
| D007783 | Lactones |
| D009930 | Organic Chemicals |
| D003524 | Cyclosporins |
| D010456 | Peptides, Cyclic |
| D047028 | Macrocyclic Compounds |
| D011083 | Polycyclic Compounds |
| D010455 | Peptides |
| D000602 | Amino Acids, Peptides, and Proteins |
| D002208 | Caproates |
| D000144 | Acids, Acyclic |
| D002264 | Carboxylic Acids |
| D005227 | Fatty Acids |
| D008055 | Lipids |
| D061067 | Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized |
| D000911 | Antibodies, Monoclonal |
| D000906 | Antibodies |
| D007136 | Immunoglobulins |
| D007162 | Immunoproteins |
| D001798 | Blood Proteins |
| D011506 | Proteins |
| D012712 | Serum Globulins |
| D005916 | Globulins |
| D006728 | Hormones |
| D006730 | Hormones, Hormone Substitutes, and Hormone Antagonists |
Not provided
Not provided
| Male |
|
Between transplantation and randomization, all patients have received Neoral®. Treatment had to be initiated within 24 hours post-transplantation in combination with Myfortic®. |
| OG003 | Neoral EMT- | Between transplantation and randomization, all patients have received Neoral®. Treatment had to be initiated within 24 hours post-transplantation in combination with Myfortic®. |
|
|
Between transplantation and randomization, all patients have received Neoral®. Treatment had to be initiated within 24 hours post-transplantation in combination with Myfortic®.
| OG003 | Neoral EMT- | Between transplantation and randomization, all patients have received Neoral®. Treatment had to be initiated within 24 hours post-transplantation in combination with Myfortic®. |
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
| OG002 | Neoral EMT+ | Between transplantation and randomization, all patients have received Neoral®. Treatment had to be initiated within 24 hours post-transplantation in combination with Myfortic®. |
| OG003 | Neoral EMT- | Between transplantation and randomization, all patients have received Neoral®. Treatment had to be initiated within 24 hours post-transplantation in combination with Myfortic®. |
|
|
| OG003 | Neoral EMT- | Between transplantation and randomization, all patients have received Neoral®. Treatment had to be initiated within 24 hours post-transplantation in combination with Myfortic®. |
|
|
| OG002 |
| Neoral EMT+ |
Between transplantation and randomization, all patients have received Neoral®. Treatment had to be initiated within 24 hours post-transplantation in combination with Myfortic®. |
| OG003 | Neoral EMT- | Between transplantation and randomization, all patients have received Neoral®. Treatment had to be initiated within 24 hours post-transplantation in combination with Myfortic®. |
|
|
| OG002 | Neoral EMT+ | Between transplantation and randomization, all patients have received Neoral®. Treatment had to be initiated within 24 hours post-transplantation in combination with Myfortic®. |
| OG003 | Neoral EMT- | Between transplantation and randomization, all patients have received Neoral®. Treatment had to be initiated within 24 hours post-transplantation in combination with Myfortic®. |
|
|
| Neoral EMT+ |
Between transplantation and randomization, all patients have received Neoral®. Treatment had to be initiated within 24 hours post-transplantation in combination with Myfortic®. |
| OG003 | Neoral EMT- | Between transplantation and randomization, all patients have received Neoral®. Treatment had to be initiated within 24 hours post-transplantation in combination with Myfortic®. |
|
|
|
|
|
| OG003 | Neoral EMT- | Between transplantation and randomization, all patients have received Neoral®. Treatment had to be initiated within 24 hours post-transplantation in combination with Myfortic®. |
|
|
| OG003 | Neoral EMT- | Between transplantation and randomization, all patients have received Neoral®. Treatment had to be initiated within 24 hours post-transplantation in combination with Myfortic®. |
|
|
| OG003 | Neoral EMT- | Between transplantation and randomization, all patients have received Neoral®. Treatment had to be initiated within 24 hours post-transplantation in combination with Myfortic®. |
|
|
| OG002 | Neoral EMT+ | Between transplantation and randomization, all patients have received Neoral®. Treatment had to be initiated within 24 hours post-transplantation in combination with Myfortic®. |
| OG003 | Neoral EMT- | Between transplantation and randomization, all patients have received Neoral®. Treatment had to be initiated within 24 hours post-transplantation in combination with Myfortic®. |
|
|
| OG002 | Neoral EMT+ | Between transplantation and randomization, all patients have received Neoral®. Treatment had to be initiated within 24 hours post-transplantation in combination with Myfortic®. |
| OG003 | Neoral EMT- | Between transplantation and randomization, all patients have received Neoral®. Treatment had to be initiated within 24 hours post-transplantation in combination with Myfortic®. |
|
|
| OG003 | Neoral EMT- | Between transplantation and randomization, all patients have received Neoral®. Treatment had to be initiated within 24 hours post-transplantation in combination with Myfortic®. |
|
|
| OG003 | Neoral EMT- | Between transplantation and randomization, all patients have received Neoral®. Treatment had to be initiated within 24 hours post-transplantation in combination with Myfortic®. |
|
|