Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation Versus Optimal Medical Treatment in Patients
Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation Versus Optimal Medical Treatment in Patients
The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and effectiveness of drug-eluting stent implantation compared to optimal medical treatment in patients with chronic total occlusion.
Prospective, two arms, randomized multi-center trial in Asian-pacific region. Following angiography, patients with chronic total occlusion (more than 3 months) have documented myocardial ischemia or symptoms of angina, and eligible for stenting without any exclusion criteria will be randomized 1:1 to: a) drug-eluting stent vs. b) optimal medical treatment. All patients will be followed for at least 3 year.
The subjects with chronic total occlusion but failed to random for any reason, they will be enrolled in registry group.
The random design was closed at the date of 22 July 2019 however already randomized subjects and subjects from registry design continue 10 years follow-up on IRIS-CTO registry.
Inclusion Criteria:
Clinical
Angiographic
CTO definition: TIMI flow 0 and estimated duration over 3 months The duration of the occlusion was determined by the interval from the last episode of acute coronary syndrome, or In patients without a history of acute coronary syndrome, from the first episode of effort angina consistent with the location of the occlusion
Exclusion Criteria: