Perforated Appendicitis With Delayed Presentation: Laparoscopic Appendectomy vs Expectant Management. A Randomized Clinical Trial (The PADLE Trial)
Perforated Appendicitis With Delayed Presentation: Laparoscopic Appendectomy vs Expectant Management. A Randomized Clinical Trial (The PADLE Trial)
There is no consensus among pediatric surgeons regarding the optimal treatment for children with complicated appendicitis with delayed diagnosis. With the development of broad-spectrum antibiotics, some surgeons have advocated expectant management for these children. However, there is little evidence to determine which children are most likely to benefit from this approach. Prior attempts to determine the effectiveness of expectant management for perforated appendicitis with delayed diagnosis often have not controlled for inherent differences in the clinical status of patients treated non-operatively vs. those treated with immediate appendectomy.
The ability of clinical practice guidelines to improve clinical practice and optimize resource utilization continues to be substantiated in the literature. To be effective, clinical practice guidelines must be developed from reliable and reproducible data.
This trial prospectively compares expectant management versus immediate laparoscopic or open appendectomy for perforated appendicitis in children with a delayed diagnosis. The primary outcome measure is length of hospital stay.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: