Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Different healing responses after treatment of bare metal stent restenosis with implantation of an everolimus-eluting Xience V stent (Abbott Vascular) versus use of a paclitaxel-eluting SeQuent Please balloon (BBraun): an optical coherence tomography study.
A prospective, single-centre, randomized clinical trial with clinical, angiographic and OCT follow-up at 9 months.
Background: The optimal treatment of bare metal stent restenosis (implantation of a drug-eluting stent, simple balloon dilatation, CABG) is still not defined. The most used option nowadays is the implantation of a drug-eluting stent (DES). However, this procedure implies application of a double metal layer in the vessel wall, which is linked to delayed healing. Furthermore there might be a higher risk of malapposition of both struts of the bare metal and the newly implanted drug-eluting stents. These phenomenon's might give rise to an increased risk of stent thrombosis in this patient population. Recently, drug-eluting balloons (DEB) were proposed as a new treatment strategy for bare metal stent restenosis. The initial results of this technique look promising.
Aim: To compare healing processes after treatment of BMS ISR with balloon dilatation using DEB versus implantation of DES.
Methods: 50 patients with BMS restenosis (SVG and bifurcation lesions will be excluded) will be randomized into two treatment groups: SeQuent Please drug-eluting balloon dilatation (group I) versus implantation of an everolimus-eluting Xience V stent (group II). At 9 months, a control angiography with OCT pullback of the treated segment is planned.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Active Comparator | SeQuent Please Drug-eluting balloon |
|
| 2 | Active Comparator | Xience V Drug-eluting stent |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sequent Please Paclitaxel eluting balloon | Device | Sequent Please Paclitaxel eluting balloon |
| |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Stent strut coverage and stent strut apposition(assessed with OCT) | 9 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Lumen Loss (in-stent) at 9 months In-segment Late Lumen Loss at 9 months Cumulative MACE rate at 9 months Stent thrombosis at all follow-ups Target vessel revascularisation (TVR) at 12 months Device success | 9 months, 12 months, yearly until 5 years |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Tom Adriaenssens, MD | UZ Leuven | Principal Investigator |
| Walter Desmet, MD, PhD | UZ Leuven | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University Hospitals Leuven | Leuven | 3000 | Belgium |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25138182 | Derived | Adriaenssens T, Dens J, Ughi G, Bennett J, Dubois C, Sinnaeve P, Wiyono S, Coosemans M, Belmans A, D'hooge J, Vrolix M, Desmet W. Optical coherence tomography study of healing characteristics of paclitaxel-eluting balloons vs. everolimus-eluting stents for in-stent restenosis: the SEDUCE (Safety and Efficacy of a Drug elUting balloon in Coronary artery rEstenosis) randomised clinical trial. EuroIntervention. 2014 Aug;10(4):439-48. doi: 10.4244/EIJV10I4A77. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Xience V everolimus eluting stent |
| Device |
Xience V everolimus eluting stent |
|