Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The investigation concerns a prospective, multicenter, single arm safety and performance study evaluating the Medtronic CoreValve system. Approximately 120 patients presenting with symptomatic aortic native valve stenosis necessitating valve replacement which are considered poor surgical candidates, with a high surgical risk, as attested to by both the surgeon and the cardiologist are recruited in the study.
Safety and performance will be evaluated at discharge and at 30 days post-procedure. Valve performance and placement will be followed up at 3 and 6 months post-procedure. Further long-term patient follow-up visits will be performed at 12, 24, 36 and 48 months post-procedure.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| CoreValve | Experimental |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medtronic CoreValve System | Device | Transcatheter Aortic Valve |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Composite Major Adverse Event (MAE) Free Rate | Percentage of subjects without a composite major adverse event (MAE) at 30 (+ 7) days post-procedure. MAE included all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, stroke, emergent cardiac re-intervention, cardiac tamponade, non-structural or structural valve dysfunction, cardiogenic shock, endocarditis, TIA, embolism, aortic dissection, access site vessel dissection, vessel perforation, acute vessel occlusion, major bleeding and major vascular injury. | 30 (+7) days post procedure |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Composite Technical Device Success | Composite technical success was defined as the percentage of subjects in whom success on all four technical measures of the "Device Functionality Assessment" was achieved and who were adjudicated as having no device failure or malfunction. The four measures of the ''Device Functionality Assessment'' were:
|
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Native aortic valve disease, defined as valve stenosis with an aortic valve area <1cm² (<0.6cm2/m2) as determined by echocardiographic measure,
≥ 75 years, or
Surgical risk calculated with logistic EuroSCORE ≥ 15 %, or
One or two (but not more than 2) of the following complicating factors:
Aortic valve annulus diameter is ≥ 20 mm and ≤ 27 mm as determined by echocardiographic measure,
Ascending aorta diameter £ 45 mm at the sino-tubular junction, and
Signed Informed Consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
Known hypersensitivity or contraindication to aspirin, heparin, ticlopidine, clopidogrel, Nitinol, or sensitivity to contrast media which cannot be adequately pre-medicated,
Any sepsis, including active endocarditis,
Recent myocardial infarction (< 30 days),
Percutaneous coronary or vascular intervention within 15 days prior to the study procedure, or scheduled during or within 30 days after the study procedure,
Any left ventricular or atrial thrombus diagnosed by echocardiography,
Uncontrolled atrial fibrillation (heart rate greater than 100 bpm),
Mitral or tricuspid valvular insufficiency ( > grade II),
Previous aortic valve replacement (mechanical valve OR stented bioprosthetic valve),
Any condition considered as contraindication for extracorporeal assistance,
Evolutive or recent CVA (cerebro vascular accident),
Poly arterial patients with either:
Bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy, or patient who will refuse blood transfusion,
Evolutive disease with life expectancy less than one year,
Creatinine clearance < 20 ml/min,
Pregnancy, and
Enrolled in another investigational study.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| E. Grube, Prof. Dr. | Helios Heart Center Siegburg, Germany | Principal Investigator |
| G. Schuler, Prof. Dr. | Herzzentrum Universitat Leipzig, Germany | Principal Investigator |
| R. Bonan, Dr. | Institut de Cardiologie de Montreal, Canada | Principal Investigator |
| J. Kovac, Dr. | Glenfield Hospital Leicester, UK | Principal Investigator |
| P. Serruys, Prof. Dr. | Erasmus MC Rotterdam, Netherlands | Principal Investigator |
| M. Labinaz, Dr. | University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Canada | Principal Investigator |
| P den Heijer, Dr. | Amphia Hospital Breda, Netherlands | Principal Investigator |
| M Mullen, Dr. | Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Trust London, UK | Principal Investigator |
| W. Tymchak, Dr. | University of Alberta Hospital, Canada | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Alberta Hospital | Edmonton | Canada | ||||
| Institut de Cardiologie de Montreal |
Not provided
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Related Info | View source |
Not provided
Of 126 subjects enrolled, 124 were implanted with the CoreValve aortic valve.
Nine sites from Western Europe and Canada enrolled 126 subjects between May 2006 and November 2008.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Overall Study | All enrolled subjects for whom the procedure of percutaneous implantation of the Medtronic CoreValve aortic valve prosthesis was started. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Was assessed during the procedure and completed once the procedure was conlcluded |
| Montreal |
| Canada |
| University of Ottawa Heart Institute | Ottawa | Canada |
| Herzzentrum Leipzig GmbH | Leipzig | Germany |
| HELIOS Heart Center Siegburg | Siegburg | Germany |
| Amphia Hospital | Breda | Netherlands |
| Erasmus MC | Rotterdam | Netherlands |
| Glenfield Hospital | Leicester | United Kingdom |
| Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Trust | London | United Kingdom |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
Overall study population was divided in high and moderate risk groups based on the risk of operative mortality. The risk classification was performed by 2 independent cardiovascular surgeons who were blinded to procedural details and outcomes but were provided with the baseline logistic EuroSCORE, baseline data and available source documentation.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | High Risk | Subjects with a high risk of operative mortality. |
| BG001 | Moderate Risk | Subjects with a moderate risk of operative mortality. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Region of Enrollment | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| EuroSCORE | Measure Description: EuroSCORE: European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation. Is a measure for predicted operative mortality for patients undergoing cardiac surgery. If a risk factor is present, a weight/number is assigned. The weights are added to give an approximate percent of predicted mortality. The resulting scores are provided on a scale ranging from 0% (no risk at all) to 100% (inoperable) . | Mean | Standard Deviation | Percent of predicted operative mortality |
| ||||||||||||||
| NYHA | New York Heart Association (NYHA): I) No limitation of physical activity. Ordinary physical activity does not cause undue fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea. II) Slight limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest. Ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea. III) Marked limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest. Less than ordinary activity causes fatigue, palpitation, or dyspnea. IV) Unable to carry on any physical activity without discomfort. Symptoms of heart failure at rest. If any physical activity is undertaken, discomfort increases. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Composite Major Adverse Event (MAE) Free Rate | Percentage of subjects without a composite major adverse event (MAE) at 30 (+ 7) days post-procedure. MAE included all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, stroke, emergent cardiac re-intervention, cardiac tamponade, non-structural or structural valve dysfunction, cardiogenic shock, endocarditis, TIA, embolism, aortic dissection, access site vessel dissection, vessel perforation, acute vessel occlusion, major bleeding and major vascular injury. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | Percentage of subjects | 30 (+7) days post procedure |
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Composite Technical Device Success | Composite technical success was defined as the percentage of subjects in whom success on all four technical measures of the "Device Functionality Assessment" was achieved and who were adjudicated as having no device failure or malfunction. The four measures of the ''Device Functionality Assessment'' were:
| For two patients in the moderate risk group the composite technical device success could not be calculated because not all measurements required were available. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | Percentage of subjects | Was assessed during the procedure and completed once the procedure was conlcluded |
|
Adverse events were reported from date of implantation till 4 years follow up
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | High Risk | Overall study population was divided in high and moderate risk groups based on the risk of operative mortality. The risk classification was performed by 2 independent cardiovascular surgeons who were blinded to procedural details and outcomes but were provided with the baseline logistic EuroSCORE, baseline data and available source documentation. | 47 | 72 | 68 | 72 | 64 | 72 |
| EG001 | Moderate Risk | Overall study population was divided in high and moderate risk groups based on the risk of operative mortality. The risk classification was performed by 2 independent cardiovascular surgeons who were blinded to procedural details and outcomes but were provided with the baseline logistic EuroSCORE, baseline data and available source documentation. | 20 | 54 | 46 | 54 | 47 | 54 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Cardiac disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Endocrine disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| General disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Systematic Assessment | Any other reported adverse events not assosiated with the use of the study device were collected without specyfying a specific adverse event term |
| |
| Infections and infestations | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Investigations | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Product Issues | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Surgical and medical procedures | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Vascular disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Cardiac disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Congenital, familial and genetic disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| General disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Infections and infestations | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Investigations | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Surgical and medical procedures | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Vascular disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| M. Hollander | Medtronic | +31620534428 | maarten.hollander@medtronic.com |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001024 | Aortic Valve Stenosis |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000082862 | Aortic Valve Disease |
| D006349 | Heart Valve Diseases |
| D006331 | Heart Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
| D014694 | Ventricular Outflow Obstruction |
Not provided
Not provided
| Male |
|
| Netherlands |
|
| United Kingdom |
|
| Germany |
|
| NYHA class II |
|
| NYHA class III |
|
| NYHA class IV |
|
All enrolled subjects for whom the procedure for percutaneous implantation of the Medtronic CoreValve aortic valve prosthesis was started. |
|
|