Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| H. Lundbeck A/S | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
To assess the efficacy of rasagiline 1 mg as a first add-on treatment to dopamine agonist therapy in early Parkinson Disease (PD) patients, , not optimally controlled on dopamine agonists as compared to placebo.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rasagiline 1 mg | Experimental | Participants took a 1 mg rasagiline tablet orally each day for 18 weeks. |
|
| Placebo | Placebo Comparator | Participants took a matching placebo tablet once daily for 18 weeks. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rasagiline | Drug | 1mg tablet daily for 18 weeks |
|
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline to Week 18 in the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Total Score for Parts I, II and III | The UPDRS was developed as a comprehensive tool to monitor the impact of Parkinson's Disease and the degree of disability caused. Version 3 of UPDRS contains four parts, three of which are totaled and reported in this outcome. Part I is a clinician's evaluation of mentation (mental activity or state of mind), cognition (ability to acquire knowledge), behaviour and mood. Part II is the participants' evaluation of the disease's impact on normal activities. Part III is a clinician's evaluation of motor function. Parts I, II, and III contain a total of 31 questions, which are each rated on a scale of 0 (normal or no disease effect) to 4 (maximum negative effect), for a total scale of 0-124. Negative change from baseline values indicate improvement. All site raters (medical doctor [MD], doctor of osteopathy [DO], nurse practitioner, or physician assistant) received training on how to complete the UPDRS. The same site rater completed the UPDRS at all visits. | Day 0 (baseline), Week 18 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline to Week 18 in the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Total Score for Part II - Activities of Daily Living | The UPDRS was developed as a comprehensive tool to monitor the impact of Parkinson's Disease and the degree of disability caused. UPDRS contains four parts, the second of which is reported in this outcome. Part II is the participants' evaluation of the disease's impact on normal activities. Part II contains a total of 13 questions, which are each rated on a scale of 0 (normal or no disease effect) to 4 (maximum negative effect), for a total scale of 0-52. Negative change from baseline values indicate improvement. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Azhar Choudhry, M.D. | Teva Neuroscience, Inc. | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Teva Investigational Site 34 | Phoenix | Arizona | United States | |||
| Teva Investigational Site 42 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Rasagiline 1 mg | Participants took a 1 mg rasagiline tablet orally each day for 18 weeks. |
| FG001 | Placebo | Participants took a matching placebo tablet once daily for 18 weeks. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Placebo | Drug | one tablet daily for 18 weeks |
|
| Day 0 (baseline), Week 18 |
| Change From Baseline to Week 18 in the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Total Score for Part III - Motor Function | The UPDRS was developed as a comprehensive tool to monitor the impact of Parkinson's Disease and the degree of disability caused. Version 3 of UPDRS contains four parts, the third of which is reported in this outcome. Part III is a clinician's evaluation of motor function. Part III contains 14 questions, which are each rated on a scale of 0 (normal or no disease effect) to 4 (maximum negative effect), for a total scale of 0-56. Negative change from baseline values indicate improvement. All site raters (medical doctor [MD], doctor of osteopathy [DO], nurse practitioner, or physician assistant) received training on how to complete the UPDRS. The same site rater completed the UPDRS at all visits | Day 0 (baseline), Week 18 |
| Clinical Global Improvement (CGI) Score at Week 18 As Assessed by the Site Rater | CGI is used by the site rater to rate participants total improvement during the study whether or not, in the investigators' judgment, it is due entirely to drug treatment. Specifically, site raters are asked to compare the participants condition at the beginning of the study to his/her condition at Week 18, how much has he/she changed? Answers are 0 (not assessed), 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), 3 (minimally improved), 4 (no change), 5 (minimally worse), 6 (much worse), 7(very much worse). Site raters can be the medical doctor [MD], doctor of osteopathy [DO], nurse practitioner, or physician assistant. | 18 weeks |
| Clinical Global Improvement (CGI) Score at Week 18 As Assessed by the Participant | CGI is used by the participant to rate his/her total improvement during the study. Specifically, participants are asked to compare their condition at the beginning of the study to his/her condition at Week 18, how much has he/she changed? Answers are 0 (not assessed), 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), 3 (minimally improved), 4 (no change), 5 (minimally worse), 6 (much worse), 7(very much worse). | 18 weeks |
| Illness Severity Score at Day 0 and Week 18 As Assessed by the Site Rater | Site raters were asked: Considering your total clinical experience with the particular population, how ill is the patient at this time? Answers were based on a 0-7 scale, with 0=not assessed, 1= normal, not at all ill, and 7= among the most extremely ill of patients. Site raters can be the medical doctor [MD], doctor of osteopathy [DO], nurse practitioner, or physician assistant. | Day 0 (baseline), Week 18 |
| Sun City |
| Arizona |
| United States |
| Teva Investigational Site 15 | Fountain Valley | California | United States |
| Teva Investigational Site 19 | Fresno | California | United States |
| Teva Investigational Site 36 | Fresno | California | United States |
| Teva Investigational Site 04 | La Jolla | California | United States |
| Teva Investigational Site 29 | Reseda | California | United States |
| Teva Investigational Site 69 | San Francisco | California | United States |
| Teva Investigational Site 02 | Sunnyvale | California | United States |
| Teva Investigational Site 43 | Ventura | California | United States |
| Teva Investigational Site 44 | Fairfield | Connecticut | United States |
| Teva Investigational Site 07 | Manchester | Connecticut | United States |
| Teva Investigational Site 25 | Newark | Delaware | United States |
| Teva Investigative Site 63 | Atlantis | Florida | United States |
| Teva Investigational Site 30 | Boca Raton | Florida | United States |
| Teva Investigational Site 13 | Clearwater | Florida | United States |
| Teva Investigational Site 70 | Sunrise | Florida | United States |
| Teva Investigational Site 41 | Tampa | Florida | United States |
| Teva Investigational Site 61 | Vero Beach | Florida | United States |
| Teva Investigational Site 01 | Decatur | Georgia | United States |
| Teva Investigational Site 58 | Boise | Idaho | United States |
| Teva Investigational Site 49 | Glenview | Illinois | United States |
| Teva Investigational Site 23 | Peoria | Illinois | United States |
| Teva Investigational Site 47 | Indianapolis | Indiana | United States |
| Teva Investigational Site 67 | Indianapolis | Indiana | United States |
| Teva Investigational Site 76 | Indianapolis | Indiana | United States |
| Teva Investigational Site 55 | Des Moines | Iowa | United States |
| Teva Investigational Site 17 | Lexington | Kentucky | United States |
| Teva Investigational Site 27 | Paducah | Kentucky | United States |
| Teva Investigational Site 56 | Scarborough | Maine | United States |
| Teva Investigational Site 62 | Elkridge | Maryland | United States |
| Teva Investigational Site 51 | Springfield | Massachusetts | United States |
| Teva Investigational Site 11 | Detroit | Michigan | United States |
| Teva Investigational Site 33 | West Bloomfield | Michigan | United States |
| Teva Investigational Site 39 | Golden Valley | Minnesota | United States |
| Teva Investigational Site 22 | St Louis | Missouri | United States |
| Teva Investigational Site 08 | Great Falls | Montana | United States |
| Teva Investigational Site 59 | Missoula | Montana | United States |
| Teva Investigational Site 60 | Las Vegas | Nevada | United States |
| Teva Investigational Site 14 | Somerset | New Jersey | United States |
| Teva Investigational Site 03 | Commack | New York | United States |
| Teva Investigational Site 38 | Plainview | New York | United States |
| Teva Investigational Site 05 | Asheville | North Carolina | United States |
| Teva Investigational Site 31 | Charlotte | North Carolina | United States |
| Teva Investigational Site 28 | Raleigh | North Carolina | United States |
| Teva Investigational Site 26 | Fargo | North Dakota | United States |
| Teva Investigational Site 35 | Cincinnati | Ohio | United States |
| Teva Investigational Site 68 | Cincinnati | Ohio | United States |
| Teva Investigational Site 64 | Tulsa | Oklahoma | United States |
| Teva Investigational Site 21 | Medford | Oregon | United States |
| Teva Investigational Site 40 | Portland | Oregon | United States |
| Teva Investigative Site 65 | Cordova | Tennessee | United States |
| Teva Investigational Site 71 | Brownwood | Texas | United States |
| Teva Investigational Site 18 | San Antonio | Texas | United States |
| Teva Investigational Site 32 | Temple | Texas | United States |
| Teva Investigational Site 09 | Richmond | Virginia | United States |
| Teva Investigational Site 46 | Virginia Beach | Virginia | United States |
| Teva Investigational Site 77 | Madison | Wisconsin | United States |
| Safety Population |
|
| Modified Intent-to-treat Pop |
|
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
Safety population
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Rasagiline 1 mg | Participants took a 1 mg rasagiline tablet orally each day for 18 weeks. |
| BG001 | Placebo | Participants took a matching placebo tablet once daily for 18 weeks. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Age, Customized | Number | participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Parkinson's Disease Duration | Years since first diagnosis. Data based on the modified intent to treat population of 159, 162 participants. | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Change From Baseline to Week 18 in the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Total Score for Parts I, II and III | The UPDRS was developed as a comprehensive tool to monitor the impact of Parkinson's Disease and the degree of disability caused. Version 3 of UPDRS contains four parts, three of which are totaled and reported in this outcome. Part I is a clinician's evaluation of mentation (mental activity or state of mind), cognition (ability to acquire knowledge), behaviour and mood. Part II is the participants' evaluation of the disease's impact on normal activities. Part III is a clinician's evaluation of motor function. Parts I, II, and III contain a total of 31 questions, which are each rated on a scale of 0 (normal or no disease effect) to 4 (maximum negative effect), for a total scale of 0-124. Negative change from baseline values indicate improvement. All site raters (medical doctor [MD], doctor of osteopathy [DO], nurse practitioner, or physician assistant) received training on how to complete the UPDRS. The same site rater completed the UPDRS at all visits. | Modified intent to treat population - all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug and had both a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment. Several participants had missing UPDRS items at baseline and during treatment; therefore the total UPDRS for these participants was set as missing. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | units on a scale | Day 0 (baseline), Week 18 |
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline to Week 18 in the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Total Score for Part II - Activities of Daily Living | The UPDRS was developed as a comprehensive tool to monitor the impact of Parkinson's Disease and the degree of disability caused. UPDRS contains four parts, the second of which is reported in this outcome. Part II is the participants' evaluation of the disease's impact on normal activities. Part II contains a total of 13 questions, which are each rated on a scale of 0 (normal or no disease effect) to 4 (maximum negative effect), for a total scale of 0-52. Negative change from baseline values indicate improvement. | Modified intent to treat population - all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug and had both a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment. Several participants had missing UPDRS items at baseline and during treatment for subscale II, and therefore that subscale was set as missing. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | units on a scale | Day 0 (baseline), Week 18 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline to Week 18 in the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Total Score for Part III - Motor Function | The UPDRS was developed as a comprehensive tool to monitor the impact of Parkinson's Disease and the degree of disability caused. Version 3 of UPDRS contains four parts, the third of which is reported in this outcome. Part III is a clinician's evaluation of motor function. Part III contains 14 questions, which are each rated on a scale of 0 (normal or no disease effect) to 4 (maximum negative effect), for a total scale of 0-56. Negative change from baseline values indicate improvement. All site raters (medical doctor [MD], doctor of osteopathy [DO], nurse practitioner, or physician assistant) received training on how to complete the UPDRS. The same site rater completed the UPDRS at all visits | Modified intent to treat population - all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug and had both a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline efficacy assessment. Several participants had missing UPDRS items at baseline and during treatment for subscale III, and therefore that subscale was set as missing. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | units on a scale | Day 0 (baseline), Week 18 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Clinical Global Improvement (CGI) Score at Week 18 As Assessed by the Site Rater | CGI is used by the site rater to rate participants total improvement during the study whether or not, in the investigators' judgment, it is due entirely to drug treatment. Specifically, site raters are asked to compare the participants condition at the beginning of the study to his/her condition at Week 18, how much has he/she changed? Answers are 0 (not assessed), 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), 3 (minimally improved), 4 (no change), 5 (minimally worse), 6 (much worse), 7(very much worse). Site raters can be the medical doctor [MD], doctor of osteopathy [DO], nurse practitioner, or physician assistant. | Modified intent to treat | Posted | Number | participants | 18 weeks |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Clinical Global Improvement (CGI) Score at Week 18 As Assessed by the Participant | CGI is used by the participant to rate his/her total improvement during the study. Specifically, participants are asked to compare their condition at the beginning of the study to his/her condition at Week 18, how much has he/she changed? Answers are 0 (not assessed), 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), 3 (minimally improved), 4 (no change), 5 (minimally worse), 6 (much worse), 7(very much worse). | Modified intent to treat | Posted | Number | participants | 18 weeks |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Illness Severity Score at Day 0 and Week 18 As Assessed by the Site Rater | Site raters were asked: Considering your total clinical experience with the particular population, how ill is the patient at this time? Answers were based on a 0-7 scale, with 0=not assessed, 1= normal, not at all ill, and 7= among the most extremely ill of patients. Site raters can be the medical doctor [MD], doctor of osteopathy [DO], nurse practitioner, or physician assistant. | Modified intent to treat | Posted | Number | participants | Day 0 (baseline), Week 18 |
|
|
Day 0 (post treatment) to Week 18
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Placebo | Participants took a matching placebo tablet once daily for 18 weeks. | 5 | 164 | 44 | 164 | ||
| EG001 | Rasagiline 1 mg | Participants took a 1 mg rasagiline tablet orally each day for 18 weeks. | 8 | 162 | 55 | 162 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MYOCARDIAL ISCHAEMIA | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA (12.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| CHOLECYSTITIS ACUTE | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA (12.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| CHOLELITHIASIS | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA (12.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| ANKLE FRACTURE | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (12.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| FRACTURED SACRUM | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (12.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| HUMERUS FRACTURE | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (12.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| INTERVERTEBRAL DISC DISORDER | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (12.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| LUMBAR SPINAL STENOSIS | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (12.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| SPONDYLOLISTHESIS | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (12.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| PARKINSON'S DISEASE | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (12.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| PRESYNCOPE | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (12.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| SYNCOPE | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (12.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| HAEMATURIA | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA (12.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| URINARY RETENTION | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA (12.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| DYSPNOEA | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (12.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| INTERVERTEBRAL DISC OPERATION | Surgical and medical procedures | MedDRA (12.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NAUSEA | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (12.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| OEDEMA PERIPHERAL | General disorders | MedDRA (12.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| FALL | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (12.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| DIZZINESS | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (12.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| HEADACHE | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (12.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| SOMNOLENCE | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (12.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| TREMOR | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (12.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
Sponsor has the right 60 days before submission for publication to review/provide comments. If the Sponsor's review shows that potentially patentable subject matter would be disclosed, publication or public disclosure shall be delayed for up to 90 additional days in order for the Sponsor, or Sponsor's designees, to file the necessary patent applications. Sponsor may remove information that is considered confidential and/or proprietary other than Study data and results.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Director, Clinical Research | Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products, R&D Inc. | 215-591-3000 | ustevatrials@tevapharm.com |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010300 | Parkinson Disease |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020734 | Parkinsonian Disorders |
| D001480 | Basal Ganglia Diseases |
| D001927 | Brain Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D009069 | Movement Disorders |
| D000080874 | Synucleinopathies |
| D019636 | Neurodegenerative Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C031967 | rasagiline |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| 65 to <75 years |
|
| >=75 years |
|
| Male |
|
| Not Hispanic or Latino |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| Asian |
|
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
|
| Black or African American |
|
| White |
|
| More than one race |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|