Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The Third Eye® Retroscope® is a device that can be inserted through the instrument channel of a standard colonoscope to provide an additional, retrograde (or backward) view that reveals areas behind folds and flexures in the colon, and might detect additional polyps that cannot be seen with the colonoscope alone.
Patients who participate as subjects in the study will undergo two complete colonoscopy procedures, a standard colonoscopy and a colonoscopy in which a Third Eye Retroscope is used along with the same colonoscope. Half of the patients will have the standard colonoscopy first followed by the Third Eye colonoscopy, and the other half will have the Third Eye procedure first.
Results from the two groups will be analyzed and compared to determine the effectiveness of the Third Eye Retroscope for detecting additional adenomas and other polyps compared with the standard colonoscope alone.
Colonoscopy is generally agreed to be the best method for detecting and removing pre-cancerous polyps, but some lesions can be missed, especially if they are located behind folds in the lining of the colon or behind flexures (sharp bends) in the colon.
The Third Eye® Retroscope® is a device that can be inserted through the instrument channel of a standard colonoscope to provide an additional, retrograde (or backward) view that reveals areas behind folds and flexures in the colon. Previous studies have shown the device to be effective for detecting additional polyps that could not have been seen with the colonoscope alone.
The purpose of this research is to compare the additional diagnostic yield obtained by using the Third Eye® Retroscope® vs. the diagnostic yield for the standard colonoscope alone in the context of a randomized, controlled study design.
Patients who are scheduled for colonoscopy will be recruited to the study and randomized to one of two groups. Each patient will undergo two "back-to-back" procedures.
Patients in Group A (study group) will undergo a standard colonoscopy followed immediately by a Third Eye colonoscopy.
Patients in Group B (control group) will undergo a Third Eye colonoscopy followed immediately by a standard colonoscopy.
Results from the two groups will be analyzed and compared to determine the effectiveness of the Third Eye Retroscope for detecting additional adenomas and other polyps compared with the standard colonoscope alone.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group A - COLO, then TER | Experimental | Complete examination with standard colonoscope ("COLO") followed by complete examination with Third Eye Retroscope ("TER") used in conjunction with standard colonoscope |
|
| Group B - TER, then COLO | Active Comparator | Complete examination with Third Eye Retroscope ("TER") used in conjunction with standard colonoscope, followed by complete examination with standard colonoscope ("COLO") alone |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Third Eye Retroscope | Device | Device used with colonoscope to provide second, retrograde view of the colon |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Detection Rates for Adenomas and for Total Polyps | Numbers of polyps and adenomas detected in first and second procedures for each group | Acute - subjects were followed for the duration of the procedures, an average of 40 minutes. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Times for Withdrawal Phase and for Complete Procedure | For all examinations with each method (SC or TEC), mean time for withdrawal phase and mean time for total procedure | Acute - subjects were followed for the duration of the procedures, an average of 40 minutes. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Peter D. Siersema, MD, PhD | UMC Utrecht | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Johns Hopkins Hospital | Baltimore | Maryland | 21231 | United States | ||
| Kansas City Veterans Administration Medical Center |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21067735 | Result | Leufkens AM, DeMarco DC, Rastogi A, Akerman PA, Azzouzi K, Rothstein RI, Vleggaar FP, Repici A, Rando G, Okolo PI, Dewit O, Ignjatovic A, Odstrcil E, East J, Deprez PH, Saunders BP, Kalloo AN, Creel B, Singh V, Lennon AM, Siersema PD; Third Eye Retroscope Randomized Clinical Evaluation [TERRACE] Study Group. Effect of a retrograde-viewing device on adenoma detection rate during colonoscopy: the TERRACE study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Mar;73(3):480-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.09.004. Epub 2010 Nov 10. | |
| 22807609 |
Not provided
Not provided
Aggregated, de-identified data to be published in peer-reviewed medical journal
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Group A - SC Followed by TEC | Standard colonoscopy (SC) followed by Third Eye colonoscopy (TEC) Third Eye colonoscopy: Examination of the colon with a Third Eye Retroscope used in combination with a colonoscope to provide second, retrograde view of the colon |
| FG001 | Group B - TEC Followed by SC | Third Eye colonoscopy (TEC) followed by standard colonoscopy (SC) Third Eye colonoscopy: Examination of the colon with a Third Eye Retroscope used in combination with a colonoscope to provide second, retrograde view of the colon |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Intention-to-treat population, i.e., those who were actually examined during the study
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Group A - SC Followed by TEC | Standard colonoscopy (SC) followed by Third Eye colonoscopy (TEC) Third Eye colonoscopy: Examination of the colon with a Third Eye Retroscope used in combination with a colonoscope to provide second, retrograde view of the colon |
| BG001 | Group B - TEC Followed by SC |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Detection Rates for Adenomas and for Total Polyps | Numbers of polyps and adenomas detected in first and second procedures for each group | Per-protocol population | Posted | Number | Polyps or adenomas detected | Acute - subjects were followed for the duration of the procedures, an average of 40 minutes. |
|
24-72 hours post-procedure
Assessed through follow-up telephone interview
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Group A - SC Followed by TEC | Standard colonoscopy (SC) followed by Third Eye colonoscopy (TEC) Third Eye colonoscopy: Examination of the colon with a Third Eye Retroscope used in combination with a colonoscope to provide second, retrograde view of the colon |
Not provided
Not provided
With mean subject age of 57.8 years, population was younger than in some studies, so polyp prevalence might be below average.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jack Higgins, MD - Chief Medical Officer | Avantis Medical Systems | 6508239216 | jhiggins@avantismedical.com |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D015179 | Colorectal Neoplasms |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D000236 | Adenoma |
| D011127 | Polyps |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007414 | Intestinal Neoplasms |
| D005770 | Gastrointestinal Neoplasms |
| D004067 | Digestive System Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Open Label
Not provided
| Kansas City |
| Missouri |
| 64128 |
| United States |
| Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center | Lebanon | New Hampshire | 03756 | United States |
| Bayside Endoscopy Center | Providence | Rhode Island | 02905 | United States |
| Baylor University Medical Center | Dallas | Texas | 75246 | United States |
| Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc | Brussels | B-1200 | Belgium |
| Istituto Clinico Humanitas | Milan | 20089 Rozzano | Italy |
| University Medical Center Utrecht | Utrecht | 3584 CX | Netherlands |
| St. Mark's Hospital | London | HA1 3UJ | United Kingdom |
| Result |
| Siersema PD, Rastogi A, Leufkens AM, Akerman PA, Azzouzi K, Rothstein RI, Vleggaar FP, Repici A, Rando G, Okolo PI, Dewit O, Ignjatovic A, Odstrcil E, East J, Deprez PH, Saunders BP, Kalloo AN, Creel B, Singh V, Lennon AM, DeMarco DC. Retrograde-viewing device improves adenoma detection rate in colonoscopies for surveillance and diagnostic workup. World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Jul 14;18(26):3400-8. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i26.3400. |
| Protocol Violation |
|
| Withdrawal by Subject |
|
| Inadequate bowel preparation |
|
| Inability to reach cecum |
|
| Technical error or malfunction |
|
Third Eye colonoscopy (TEC) followed by standard colonoscopy (SC) Third Eye colonoscopy: Examination of the colon with a Third Eye Retroscope used in combination with a colonoscope to provide second, retrograde view of the colon |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants in ITT population |
|
| Indication for colonoscopy procedure | Number | participants in ITT population |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Times for Withdrawal Phase and for Complete Procedure | For all examinations with each method (SC or TEC), mean time for withdrawal phase and mean time for total procedure | All subjects in study (i.e., Group A and Group B combined) | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Minutes | Acute - subjects were followed for the duration of the procedures, an average of 40 minutes. |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 184 |
| 0 |
| 184 |
| EG001 | Group B - TEC Followed by SC | Third Eye colonoscopy (TEC) followed by standard colonoscopy (SC) Third Eye colonoscopy: Examination of the colon with a Third Eye Retroscope used in combination with a colonoscope to provide second, retrograde view of the colon | 0 | 188 | 0 | 188 |
Not provided
Not provided
| D004066 | Digestive System Diseases |
| D005767 | Gastrointestinal Diseases |
| D003108 | Colonic Diseases |
| D007410 | Intestinal Diseases |
| D012002 | Rectal Diseases |
| D009375 | Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial |
| D009370 | Neoplasms by Histologic Type |
| D020763 | Pathological Conditions, Anatomical |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |