Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a phase III, randomized, controlled, open label study with two vaccine regimens. The study will assess the relative safety and immunogenicity of vaccine regimens comparing adjuvanted versus non-adjuvanted formulations of A(H1N1) inactivated influenza virus vaccine in subjects with Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 (HIV-1) Infection and to compare safety and immunogenicity data with a contemporaneously enrolled control group of age-comparable, healthy subjects.
Because certain individuals may be hypo-responsive to influenza vaccination, additional studies with high-risk groups are warranted in order to determine the optimal vaccine formulation and dosing schedule for prevention of novel H1N1 virus infection.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| HIV-1 Infected Subjects Receiving Vaccine with Adjuvant | Experimental | Each subject received two doses of vaccine with adjuvant (Focetria®), the first on Study Day 1, and the second on Study Day 22 |
|
| HIV-1 Infected Subjects Receiving Vaccine without Adjuvant | Experimental | Each subject received two doses of vaccine without adjuvant (Begrivac®), the first on Study Day 1, and the second on Study Day 22 |
|
| Healthy Subjects Receiving Vaccine with Adjuvant | Experimental | Each subject received two doses of vaccine with adjuvant (Focetria®), the first on Study Day 1, and the second on Study Day 22 |
|
| Healthy Subjects Receiving Vaccine without Adjuvant | Experimental | Each subject received two doses of vaccine without adjuvant (Begrivac®), the first on Study Day 1, and the second on Study Day 22 |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focetria® | Biological | 7.5 ug of HA antigen; adjuvanted; monovalent |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Geometric Mean HI Titer by Visit | Geometric mean hemagglutination inhibition (HI) titer = GMT | 13 months after vaccination (Day 1, Day 22, Day 43, Day 133, Day 223 and Day 403) |
| Percentage of Subjects Who Reached Seroprotection by Visit | The primary objective of this study is to determine the optimal influenza vaccination strategy in patients with HIV infection. The percentage of subjects that reached seroprotection in comparison to the pre-vaccination result are presented by visit. Seroprotection was defined as HI titer ≥40. | 13 Months after vaccination (Day 22, Day 43, Day 133, Day 223 and Day 403) |
| Difference in the Seroconversion Rates or Significant Increase by Visit (Vaccine With Adjuvant - Vaccine Without Adjuvant) | The primary objective of this study was to help determine the ideal strategy of vaccination against pandemic H1N1 influenza in subjects with invasive solid tumors/hematologic neoplasms. Comparisons were made by vaccine group using differences in the percentage of subjects with seroconversion/significant increase and were presented with 95% confidence intervals. | 13 Months after vaccination (Day 22, Day 43, Day 133, Day 223 and Day 403) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Geometric Mean Ratio by Visit | The primary objective of this study is to determine the optimal influenza vaccination strategy in patients with HIV infection. | 13 months after vaccination (Day 22/Day1, Day 43/Day 1, Day 43/Day 22, Day 133/Day 43, Day 223/Day 43 and Day 403/Day 223) |
| Ratio of Immunogenicity Data by Visit (Vaccine with Adjuvant:Vaccine Without Adjuvant) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
For HIV-1 Infected Subjects:
Adults between 18-60 years old (inclusive)
Any sex or ethnicity
Confirmed Diagnosis of HIV-1 infection
CD4+ cells count >200 per mm3 within 3 months prior to inclusion in the study
HIV-1 viral load below 200 copies/mL within 90 days prior to inclusion in the study
Childbearing potential women must be willing to use an acceptable contraceptive method. Acceptable contraceptive methods are defined as one or more of the following:
No changes in the antiviral therapy (including HAART) for the previous 4 weeks and/or change in the predicted antiviral therapy through study Day 43 (3 weeks after the second dose of the vaccine)
No use of immunomodulatory therapy, including cyclosporine, interleukins, interferons, or systemic glucocorticoids (including inhalatory) within 3 months before study inclusion
Subjects capable of respecting all the study procedures and available for all visits scheduled to the investigation site
Subjects capable of understanding the nature and risk of the study proposed and signing the consent form
The subjects may have other underlying diseases, such as, but not limited to, hypertension, diabetes, cardiac ischemic disease, or hypothyroidism, however their symptoms/signs must be currently under control with medical treatment according to the investigator's evaluation
For Healthy Adults:
Adults between 18-60 years old (inclusive)
Any sex and ethnicity
Subjects with good health as determined by medical history, physical evaluation, and investigator's clinical opinion
Childbearing potential women must be willing to use an acceptable contraceptive method. Acceptable contraceptive methods are defined as one or more of the following:
Subjects capable of respecting all the study procedures and available for all the visits scheduled at the investigation site
Subjects capable of understanding the nature and risk of the study proposed and signing the consent form
There will be NO blood sample collection of healthy volunteers viewing the determination of their serological status regarding the HIV virus.
Exclusion Criteria:
For HIV-1-Infected Subjects:
For Healthy Adults:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Centro Médico São Francisco | Curitiba | Paraná | Brazil | |||
| ICG - Instituto Centro de Genomas |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19745215 | Background | Clark TW, Pareek M, Hoschler K, Dillon H, Nicholson KG, Groth N, Stephenson I. Trial of 2009 influenza A (H1N1) monovalent MF59-adjuvanted vaccine. N Engl J Med. 2009 Dec 17;361(25):2424-35. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0907650. Epub 2009 Sep 10. | |
| 19423869 | Background | Novel Swine-Origin Influenza A (H1N1) Virus Investigation Team; Dawood FS, Jain S, Finelli L, Shaw MW, Lindstrom S, Garten RJ, Gubareva LV, Xu X, Bridges CB, Uyeki TM. Emergence of a novel swine-origin influenza A (H1N1) virus in humans. N Engl J Med. 2009 Jun 18;360(25):2605-15. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0903810. Epub 2009 May 7. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Begrivac® | Biological | 15 ug of HA antigen; non-adjuvanted; trivalent |
|
The primary objective of this study is to determine the optimal influenza vaccination strategy in patients with HIV infection. Comparisons were made by vaccine group using ratios of immunogenicity data and were presented with 95% confidence intervals. |
| 13 months after vaccination (Day 1, Day 22, Day 22/Day1, Day 43, Day 43/Day 1, Day 43/Day 22, Day 133, Day 133/Day 43, Day 223, Day 223/Day 43 and Day 403, Day 403/Day 223) |
| Percentage of Subjects Who Seroconverted or Had a Significant Increase in GMT by Visit | The primary objective of this study is to determine the optimal influenza vaccination strategy in patients with HIV infection. The percentage of subjects that reached seroconversion or had a significant increase in comparison to the pre-vaccination result were presented by visit. Seroconversion or a significant increase was defined as HI titer ≥40 in subjects with negative results at pre-vaccination (HI titer <10) or an increase of at least 4 times in HI titer for individuals with positive results at pre-vaccination (HI titer >10) at Day 22 and Day 43 in comparison to the pre-vaccination result. | 13 Months after vaccination (Day 22, Day 43, Day 133, Day 223 and Day 403) |
| Difference in Seroprotection Rates by Visit (Vaccine with Adjuvant - Vaccine without Adjuvant) | The primary objective of this study is to determine the optimal influenza vaccination strategy in patients with HIV infection. Comparisons were made by vaccine group using differences in the percentage of subjects with seroprotection and were presented with 95% confidence intervals. | 13 months after vaccination (Day 22, Day 43, Day 133, Day 223, Day 403) |
| São Paulo |
| São Paulo |
| Brazil |
| 19361304 | Background | Evison J, Farese S, Seitz M, Uehlinger DE, Furrer H, Muhlemann K. Randomized, double-blind comparative trial of subunit and virosomal influenza vaccines for immunocompromised patients. Clin Infect Dis. 2009 May 15;48(10):1402-12. doi: 10.1086/598193. |
| 11360221 | Background | Fine AD, Bridges CB, De Guzman AM, Glover L, Zeller B, Wong SJ, Baker I, Regnery H, Fukuda K. Influenza A among patients with human immunodeficiency virus: an outbreak of infection at a residential facility in New York City. Clin Infect Dis. 2001 Jun 15;32(12):1784-91. doi: 10.1086/320747. Epub 2001 May 16. |
| 19628174 | Background | Kunisaki KM, Janoff EN. Influenza in immunosuppressed populations: a review of infection frequency, morbidity, mortality, and vaccine responses. Lancet Infect Dis. 2009 Aug;9(8):493-504. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(09)70175-6. |
| 15929703 | Background | Ranieri R, Veronelli A, Santambrogio C, Pontiroli AE. Impact of influenza vaccine on response to vaccination with pneumococcal vaccine in HIV patients. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2005 May;21(5):407-9. doi: 10.1089/aid.2005.21.407. |
| 11125897 | Background | Sullivan PS, Hanson DL, Dworkin MS, Jones JL, Ward JW; Adult and Adolescent Spectrum of HIV Disease Investigators. Effect of influenza vaccination on disease progression among HIV-infected persons. AIDS. 2000 Dec 1;14(17):2781-5. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200012010-00018. |
| 10498559 | Background | Tasker SA, Treanor JJ, Paxton WB, Wallace MR. Efficacy of influenza vaccination in HIV-infected persons. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 1999 Sep 21;131(6):430-3. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-131-6-199909210-00006. |
| 15905732 | Background | Yamanaka H, Teruya K, Tanaka M, Kikuchi Y, Takahashi T, Kimura S, Oka S; HIV/Influenza Vaccine Study Team. Efficacy and immunologic responses to influenza vaccine in HIV-1-infected patients. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2005 Jun 1;39(2):167-73. |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000163 | Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome |
| D007239 | Infections |
| D014777 | Virus Diseases |
| D007251 | Influenza, Human |
| D015658 | HIV Infections |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000086982 | Blood-Borne Infections |
| D003141 | Communicable Diseases |
| D015229 | Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Viral |
| D012749 | Sexually Transmitted Diseases |
| D016180 | Lentivirus Infections |
| D012192 | Retroviridae Infections |
| D012327 | RNA Virus Infections |
| D012897 | Slow Virus Diseases |
| D000091662 | Genital Diseases |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |
| D007153 | Immunologic Deficiency Syndromes |
| D007154 | Immune System Diseases |
| D012141 | Respiratory Tract Infections |
| D009976 | Orthomyxoviridae Infections |
| D012140 | Respiratory Tract Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C558220 | focetria |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided