Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10-C-N026 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Background:
Objectives:
Eligibility:
Design:
Background:
The current approach to monitoring adverse symptom events in NCI-sponsored treatment trials is clinical staff reporting, using items from the Common Terminology Criteria for Averse Events (CTCAE). Of the 1,059 discrete items in the CTCAE, approximately 77 contain a subjective component sufficient enough to be amenable to patient self-reporting such as pain, fatigue, nausea,
and hair loss. There is general agreement that the patient, via a self-report, is the best source for reporting symptoms. Studies have shown that when compared to clinician reports, patients report earlier onset, greater severity, and longer duration of symptoms.
In September 2008, the NCI awarded a contract (N02-PC-85002-29; PI: Basch; Co-I: Hay) to support the development of an electronic-based and psychometrically robust patient-reported outcomes version of the symptom-related AEs listed in the CTCAE in an effort to improve the accuracy and precision of grading of this class of AEs. To achieve this goal, we will conduct cognitive interviews with 77 newly-developed PRO items that will subsequently be subjected to psychometric analysis, usability testing, and feasibility testing in a range of treatment settings among diverse groups of patients.
Objectives:
The overall goal of this proposed study is to evaluate patient comprehension of 77 newly developed PRO items in a range of treatment settings among diverse groups of cancer patients. The objectives are to evaluate: 1) patients understanding of the language and 2) the usability of the technology interface for collecting the PRO data of the PRO-CTCAE system.
Eligibility:
Patients will be eligible for the study if they are 1) aged 18 or older; 2) English-fluent; 3) undergoing chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy with curative or palliative intent; and 4) can provide informed consent.
Design:
We will conduct up to three rounds of cognitive interviews in 100 cancer patients at participating cancer centers including MSKCC, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Duke and M.D. Anderson. After completion of the first round of interviews, results will be analyzed for problematic items. Revised items will be reviewed in subsequent rounds as needed. The final PRO-CTCAE items will proceed to usability testing. Usability testing will comprise three main components: 1) observation of users interacting with the web-based assessment system coupled with think aloud protocols and extensive field notes; 2) user feedback using semi-structured interviews and short surveys; and 3) web analytics including tracking for different web pages, with clickstream analysis. Usability testing will be conducted with 60 clinical research staff and 60 patients.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluate patients understanding of measurement tool items | Patient report of symptom experience | Study completion |
| Evaluate the usability of the technology interface for collecting the PRO data of the PRO-CTCAE system | Patient report of technology usability | Study completion |
Not provided
Not provided
Note: Patients meeting the below inclusion criteria who are registered to the study should be assigned by the individual enrolling/registering institution to one of the three Patient Groups as defined in Section 5.1.
NOTE: A patient registered through an NCCCP site matching one of the previous six cohorts should be registered through that cohort. Only NCCCP patients NOT matching one of the previous six cohorts should be registered through this cohort.
NOTE: Required for patients enrolling in Groups A and B only; not required for Group C.
EXCLUSION CRITERIA:
- Clinically significant cognitive or memory impairment in the opinion of clinical or research staff.
Not provided
Not provided
Cancer patients receiving chemotherapy or radiation treatment.@@@
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Kathleen Castro, R.N. | National Cancer Institute (NCI) | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center | New York | New York | 10021 | United States | ||
| MD Anderson Cancer Center |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 16083375 | Background | Clark MA, Armstrong G, Bonacore L. Measuring sexual orientation and gender expression among middle-aged and older women in a cancer screening study. J Cancer Educ. 2005 Summer;20(2):108-12. doi: 10.1207/s15430154jce2002_12. | |
| 10148827 | Background | Diefenbach MA, Weinstein ND, O'Reilly J. Scales for assessing perceptions of health hazard susceptibility. Health Educ Res. 1993 Jun;8(2):181-92. doi: 10.1093/her/8.2.181. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Houston |
| Texas |
| 77030-4096 |
| United States |
| 11528344 | Background | Friedenreich CM, Courneya KS, Bryant HE. Relation between intensity of physical activity and breast cancer risk reduction. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001 Sep;33(9):1538-45. doi: 10.1097/00005768-200109000-00018. |
| 30515599 | Derived | Atkinson TM, Reeve BB, Dueck AC, Bennett AV, Mendoza TR, Rogak LJ, Basch E, Li Y. Application of a Bayesian graded response model to characterize areas of disagreement between clinician and patient grading of symptomatic adverse events. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2018 Dec 4;2(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s41687-018-0086-x. |
| 30012546 | Derived | Schoen MW, Basch E, Hudson LL, Chung AE, Mendoza TR, Mitchell SA, St Germain D, Baumgartner P, Sit L, Rogak LJ, Shouery M, Shalley E, Reeve BB, Fawzy MR, Bhavsar NA, Cleeland C, Schrag D, Dueck AC, Abernethy AP. Software for Administering the National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events: Usability Study. JMIR Hum Factors. 2018 Jul 16;5(3):e10070. doi: 10.2196/10070. |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D008223 | Lymphoma |
| D007938 | Leukemia |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009370 | Neoplasms by Histologic Type |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D008232 | Lymphoproliferative Disorders |
| D008206 | Lymphatic Diseases |
| D006425 | Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases |
| D007160 | Immunoproliferative Disorders |
| D007154 | Immune System Diseases |
| D006402 | Hematologic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided