Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| LifeCell | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to evaluate patient shoulder functional outcomes following rotator cuff repairs reinforced with a surgical mesh.
Conexa is a surgical mesh derived from porcine dermis and processed to produce an acellular dermal matrix. It is designed to perform as a surgical mesh for use as a soft tissue patch to reinforce soft tissue where weaknesses exist and for the surgical repair of damaged or ruptured soft tissue membranes. The purpose of this post-market clinical study is to collect safety and efficacy data when Conexa is used to repair torn tendons of the rotator cuff. Conexa will be used in accordance with its labeling for this clinical study.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conexa Reconstructive Tissue Matrix | Other | Conexa will be placed as a soft tissue reinforcement at the rotator cuff repair site |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conexa Reconstructive Tissue Matrix | Device | Conexa will be placed as a soft tissue reinforcement in primary open or mini-open rotator cuff repair procedures |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| American Shoulder and Elbow Score (ASES) | The ASES evaluation generally has a patient self-evaluation section and a physician assessment section. The patient self-evaluation section of the form contains visual analog scales for pain, instability, an activities of daily living (ADL) questionnaire. The physician assessment section includes an area to collect demographic information and assesses range of motion, specific physical signs, strength, and stability. A shoulder score can be derived from the visual analogue scale score for pain (50%) and the cumulative activities of daily living score (50%) (Richards, Bigliani, Gartsman, Iannotti, & Zuckerman, 1994). The ASES evaluation has a total of 100 points possible; with 100 being the best possible outcome, and 0 being the worst. | baseline, post-op months 3, 6, 12, and 24 |
| Adjusted Constant-Murley Score | The Constant-Murley Shoulder Score is a 100-point functional shoulder assessment tool in which higher scores reflect increased function. The subjective variables are pain (15 points) and function (Activities of Daily Living - sleep, work, recreation/sport) (20 points), for a total of 35 points. The objective variables are active range of motion (clinician assessment) (40 points) and strength (25 points), for a total of 65 points (Stiller & Uhl, 2005). | baseline, post-op months 6, 12, and 24 |
| Simple Shoulder Test (SST) | The Simple Shoulder Test (SST): a series of 12 "yes" or "no" questions the patient answers about the function of the involved shoulder; 2 questions relate to pain, 7 questions relate to function and 3 questions relate to range of motion. The answers to these questions (yes = 1, no = 0) provides a standardized way of recording the function of a shoulder before and after treatment (McClure & Michener, 2003). A score of 12 on the Simple Shoulder test represents the best possible outcome, while a score of 0 represents the worst possible outcome. | baseline, post-op months 3, 6, 12, and 24 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Rotator Cuff Re-tear Evaluation | Subjects will have MRI to assess healing of the repaired tendon at 6 and 12 months post-op. The rate of re-tear will be reported. Two different definitions of a re-tear were used for the analysis.
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Incidence of Complications, Including Infection | Complications were summarized by reporting adverse events of special interest. AEs of special interest were defined as any reported infection (incision, wound, surgical site), seroma, hematoma, inflammation (surgical site, wound), and re-tear. The re-tear rate reported in this section is the number reported via AE or surgical intervention (not the MRI results). The AEs of special interest were chosen because they are in alignment with the potential complications listed on the product insert. |
Inclusion Criteria:
The patient:
Exclusion Criteria:
The patient:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Joseph Iannotti, MD | Cleveland, OH | Study Director |
| John Sperling, MD | Rochester, MN | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Orthopaedic Clinical Association | Phoenix | Arizona | 85016 | United States | ||
| Rush University Medical Center |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Conexa | Rotator cuff repair using Conexa |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Conexa | Rotator cuff repair using Conexa |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | American Shoulder and Elbow Score (ASES) | The ASES evaluation generally has a patient self-evaluation section and a physician assessment section. The patient self-evaluation section of the form contains visual analog scales for pain, instability, an activities of daily living (ADL) questionnaire. The physician assessment section includes an area to collect demographic information and assesses range of motion, specific physical signs, strength, and stability. A shoulder score can be derived from the visual analogue scale score for pain (50%) and the cumulative activities of daily living score (50%) (Richards, Bigliani, Gartsman, Iannotti, & Zuckerman, 1994). The ASES evaluation has a total of 100 points possible; with 100 being the best possible outcome, and 0 being the worst. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | baseline, post-op months 3, 6, 12, and 24 |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Conexa | Rotator cuff repair using Conexa |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wound Infection | Infections and infestations | Subject underwent irrigation and debridement of the shoulder, was given antibiotics, and the SAE was resolved without sequelae. |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mild Rotator Cuff Syndrome | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manager of Clinical Operations | Tornier, Inc. | 952-426-7674 | serickson@tornier.com |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000070636 | Rotator Cuff Injuries |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012421 | Rupture |
| D014947 | Wounds and Injuries |
| D000070599 | Shoulder Injuries |
| D013708 | Tendon Injuries |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Post-op months 6 and 12 |
| Isometric Strength | baseline, post-op months 6, 12, and 24 |
| All time points |
| Chicago |
| Illinois |
| 60612 |
| United States |
| Duke University Medical Center | Durham | North Carolina | 27710 | United States |
| OrthoNeuro | New Albany | Ohio | 43054 | United States |
| Rotheman Institute | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | 19107 | United States |
| West Virginia University | Morgantown | West Virginia | 26506 | United States |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Number | participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Height | Mean | Standard Deviation | cm |
|
| Weight | Mean | Standard Deviation | kg |
|
| BMI | Mean | Standard Deviation | kg/m^2 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Rotator Cuff Re-tear Evaluation | Subjects will have MRI to assess healing of the repaired tendon at 6 and 12 months post-op. The rate of re-tear will be reported. Two different definitions of a re-tear were used for the analysis.
| Participants were analyzed at 6 and 12 months post-op. 2 participants not analyzed due to exclusion prior to 6 month post op visit. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Post-op months 6 and 12 |
|
|
|
| Other Pre-specified | Incidence of Complications, Including Infection | Complications were summarized by reporting adverse events of special interest. AEs of special interest were defined as any reported infection (incision, wound, surgical site), seroma, hematoma, inflammation (surgical site, wound), and re-tear. The re-tear rate reported in this section is the number reported via AE or surgical intervention (not the MRI results). The AEs of special interest were chosen because they are in alignment with the potential complications listed on the product insert. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | All time points |
|
|
|
| Primary | Adjusted Constant-Murley Score | The Constant-Murley Shoulder Score is a 100-point functional shoulder assessment tool in which higher scores reflect increased function. The subjective variables are pain (15 points) and function (Activities of Daily Living - sleep, work, recreation/sport) (20 points), for a total of 35 points. The objective variables are active range of motion (clinician assessment) (40 points) and strength (25 points), for a total of 65 points (Stiller & Uhl, 2005). | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | baseline, post-op months 6, 12, and 24 |
|
|
|
| Primary | Simple Shoulder Test (SST) | The Simple Shoulder Test (SST): a series of 12 "yes" or "no" questions the patient answers about the function of the involved shoulder; 2 questions relate to pain, 7 questions relate to function and 3 questions relate to range of motion. The answers to these questions (yes = 1, no = 0) provides a standardized way of recording the function of a shoulder before and after treatment (McClure & Michener, 2003). A score of 12 on the Simple Shoulder test represents the best possible outcome, while a score of 0 represents the worst possible outcome. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | baseline, post-op months 3, 6, 12, and 24 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Isometric Strength | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | newtons (N) | baseline, post-op months 6, 12, and 24 |
|
|
|
| 1 |
| 61 |
| 35 |
| 61 |
|
| Moderate Rotator Cuff Syndrome | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications |
|
| Mild Musculoskeletal Pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders |
|
| Mild Inflammation (surgical site, wound) | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders |
|
| Re-Tear | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders |
|
Not provided
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| 1 cm re-tear definition, 12 months |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| 24 Month Measurement |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| 12 Month Measurement |
|
| 24 Month Measurement |
|