Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Difficulty in patient recruitment
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Evaluate the INFUSE/MASTERGRAFT™ Delayed Healing Device as an alternative/replacement to autograft in the treatment of tibial delayed healing.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the INFUSE/MASTERGRAFT™ Delayed Healing Device as an alternative/replacement to autograft in the treatment of tibial delayed healing. A subject will be considered to have tibial delayed healing when he/she is at least six months from the date of the most recent surgical intervention and has shown no signs of radiographic healing for at least three months. Radiographic signs of healing for this study are defined as either the progressive disappearance of fracture lines or the development of cortical continuity [bridging bone] at the site. All prospective patients must require surgical treatment with rigid internal fixation [reamed IM nail or plate/screws] and bone grafting.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| INFUSE/MASTERGRAFT | Experimental | Patients received INFUSE/MASTERGRAFT granules with rigid internal fixation. |
|
| Autograft bone | Active Comparator | Patients received autograft bone with rigid internal fixation. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| INFUSE/MASTERGRAFT | Device | INFUSE® (rhBMP-2) on an absorbable collagen sponge (ACS) and MASTERGRAFT® granules with appropriate rigid internal fixation hardware (reamed IM nail or plate/screws) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Success | Overall success is reported as participants who met all of the following criteria: 1. radiographic union success; 2. success in weight bearing ability; 3. improvement in pain at the delayed healing site; 4. no serious adverse event classified as "implant-associated" or "implant/surgical procedure-associated" (device-related); 5.no additional surgical procedures classified as a failure. | 12 Months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Radiographic Union Success | Radiographic union success (a component of overall success) was defined as complete disappearance of fracture lines or the presence of bridging bone across the delayed healing site as observed on at least three of the four cortices (anterior, posterior, medial, and lateral), using plain films. If there was more than one delayed healing fracture line, all fracture lines must have been united in order to be considered a successful fracture union. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Denver Health | Denver | Colorado | 80204 | United States | ||
| Shrock Orthopedic Research |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | INFUSE/MASTERGRAFT | Patients received INFUSE/MASTERGRAFT granules with rigid internal fixation. |
| FG001 | Autograft Bone | Patients received autograft bone with rigid internal fixation. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Autograft bone | Procedure | Autogenous bone graft with appropriate rigid internal fixation hardware (reamed IM nail or plate/screws) |
|
|
| 12 months |
| Success in Weight Bearing Ability | Success in weight bearing ability (a component of overall success) was defined that subject was able to bear weight without severe pain on the affected limb. The subject was asked to stand, bearing full weight on the affected limb in a single-leg stance without ambulatory assistance for 10 seconds. If the subject was able to do so without severe pain, a positive (success) response was recorded. If the subject was either unable to stand on the affected limb in a single-leg stance or declined to do so because of limb weakness, poor balance, or severe leg pain, a negative (failure) response was documented. | 12 months |
| Success of Pain Status at the Delayed Healing Site | After walking five or six steps, subjects rated their intensity of pain/discomfort at the delayed healing site using a numerical rating scale from 0-10, with a score of 0 representing "no pain" and a score of 10 representing "pain as bad as it could be". Subjects who were unable or declined to walk because of severe leg pain were considered to have a score of 10. Success for pain at the delayed healing site was defined as at least a 2-point improvement in pain from the pre-operative score. Success of pain status at the delayed healing site was a component of overall success. | 12 months |
| Success in Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment (SMFA) | The SMFA is an assessment tool that measures a subject's overall function for a broad range of musculoskeletal injuries and disorders. The SMFA results were summarized into two components, the dysfunctional index and the bother index. Success for the SMFA assessment was defined as any improvement post-operatively as compared to the pre-operative condition. | 12 months |
| Success in Short Form 36-Item (SF-36) Health Survey | SF-36 was used to assess general health status. The SF-36 results were summarized into two components, a physical component summary (PCS) and a mental component summary (MCS). Success was defined as any improvement in a subject's SF-36 PCS post-operatively as compared to the pre-operative condition. | 12 months |
| Number of Subjects Having Additional Surgical Procedure Classified as a Treatment "Failure" | Subject who had a surgery after the original study treatment was classified as a treatment "failure" if the additional surgery or treatment occurred in the involved limb and affected the study treatment and/or its mechanism of action in relation to the diagnosis or condition of the subject that was the cause for having the original study treatment. | 12 months |
| Fort Lauderdale |
| Florida |
| 33316 |
| United States |
| University of Florida College of Medicine | Jacksonville | Florida | 32209 | United States |
| Orlando Health | Orlando | Florida | 32806 | United States |
| Fort Wayne Orthopaedics | Fort Wayne | Indiana | 46804 | United States |
| Methodist Hospital | Indianapolis | Indiana | 46202 | United States |
| Sinai Hospital of Baltimore | Baltimore | Maryland | 21215 | United States |
| William Beaumont Hospital | Royal Oak | Michigan | 48073 | United States |
| University of Missouri | Columbia | Missouri | 65201 | United States |
| St. Louis University Hospital | St Louis | Missouri | 63104 | United States |
| Lutheran Medical Center | Brooklyn | New York | 11220 | United States |
| Carolinas Medical Center | Charlotte | North Carolina | 28204 | United States |
| Ohio Health Research Center | Columbus | Ohio | 43215 | United States |
| University of Oklahoma | Oklahoma City | Oklahoma | 73104 | United States |
| Geisinger Clinic | Danville | Pennsylvania | 17822 | United States |
| Vanderbilt University Medical Center | Nashville | Tennessee | 37232 | United States |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | INFUSE/MASTERGRAFT | Patients received INFUSE/MASTERGRAFT granules with rigid internal fixation. |
| BG001 | Autograft Bone | Patients received autograft bone with rigid internal fixation. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Number | participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Height | Mean | Standard Deviation | Inches |
| |||||||||||||||
| Weight | Mean | Standard Deviation | lbs. |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Overall Success | Overall success is reported as participants who met all of the following criteria: 1. radiographic union success; 2. success in weight bearing ability; 3. improvement in pain at the delayed healing site; 4. no serious adverse event classified as "implant-associated" or "implant/surgical procedure-associated" (device-related); 5.no additional surgical procedures classified as a failure. | Ten investigational and 9 control subjects were evaluable for overall success while only 9 investigational and 8 control subjects completed the study at 12-month follow-up. Two subjects were classified as "failure" due to related serious adverse event or additional surgery before completion of the study. | Posted | Number | participants | 12 Months |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Radiographic Union Success | Radiographic union success (a component of overall success) was defined as complete disappearance of fracture lines or the presence of bridging bone across the delayed healing site as observed on at least three of the four cortices (anterior, posterior, medial, and lateral), using plain films. If there was more than one delayed healing fracture line, all fracture lines must have been united in order to be considered a successful fracture union. | Posted | Number | participants | 12 months |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Success in Weight Bearing Ability | Success in weight bearing ability (a component of overall success) was defined that subject was able to bear weight without severe pain on the affected limb. The subject was asked to stand, bearing full weight on the affected limb in a single-leg stance without ambulatory assistance for 10 seconds. If the subject was able to do so without severe pain, a positive (success) response was recorded. If the subject was either unable to stand on the affected limb in a single-leg stance or declined to do so because of limb weakness, poor balance, or severe leg pain, a negative (failure) response was documented. | Posted | Number | participants | 12 months |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Success of Pain Status at the Delayed Healing Site | After walking five or six steps, subjects rated their intensity of pain/discomfort at the delayed healing site using a numerical rating scale from 0-10, with a score of 0 representing "no pain" and a score of 10 representing "pain as bad as it could be". Subjects who were unable or declined to walk because of severe leg pain were considered to have a score of 10. Success for pain at the delayed healing site was defined as at least a 2-point improvement in pain from the pre-operative score. Success of pain status at the delayed healing site was a component of overall success. | Posted | Number | participants | 12 months |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Success in Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment (SMFA) | The SMFA is an assessment tool that measures a subject's overall function for a broad range of musculoskeletal injuries and disorders. The SMFA results were summarized into two components, the dysfunctional index and the bother index. Success for the SMFA assessment was defined as any improvement post-operatively as compared to the pre-operative condition. | Posted | Number | participants | 12 months |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Success in Short Form 36-Item (SF-36) Health Survey | SF-36 was used to assess general health status. The SF-36 results were summarized into two components, a physical component summary (PCS) and a mental component summary (MCS). Success was defined as any improvement in a subject's SF-36 PCS post-operatively as compared to the pre-operative condition. | Posted | Number | participants | 12 months |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Subjects Having Additional Surgical Procedure Classified as a Treatment "Failure" | Subject who had a surgery after the original study treatment was classified as a treatment "failure" if the additional surgery or treatment occurred in the involved limb and affected the study treatment and/or its mechanism of action in relation to the diagnosis or condition of the subject that was the cause for having the original study treatment. | Posted | Number | participants | 12 months |
|
|
All study periods
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | INFUSE/MASTERGRAFT | Patients received INFUSE/MASTERGRAFT granules with rigid internal fixation. | 5 | 11 | 7 | 11 | ||
| EG001 | Autograft Bone | Patients received autograft bone with rigid internal fixation. | 3 | 12 | 6 | 12 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acute myocardial infarction | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pericardial effusion | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cellulitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Postoperative wound infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Incision site pain | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Traumatic arthritis | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pseudarthrosis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Completed Suicide | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Menorrhagia | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pleural effusion | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constipation | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Device component issue | General disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Medical device complication | General disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Medical device discomfort | General disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Medical device pain | General disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Oedema | General disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Oedema peripheral | General disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pain | General disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pyrexia | General disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cellulitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Anaemia postoperative | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Incision site erythema | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Incision site pain | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nerve injury | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Procedural pain | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Wound dehiscence | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Haemoglobin decresed | Investigations | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Arthralgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bursitis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Joint swelling | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pain in extremity | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Complex regional pain syndrome | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypoaesthesia | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Neuropathy peripheral | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Paraesthesia | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Insomnia | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypoxia | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Oropharyngeal pain | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pruritus | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Haematoma | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
This trial was terminated due to difficulty in patient recruitment. Early termination led to a small number of subjects analyzed. Results should be interpreted with caution.
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clinical Department | Medtronic Spinal | 1800-876-3133 | 6068 | msbkclinicalresearch@medtronic.com |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D050723 | Fractures, Bone |
| D045745 | Scleroderma, Limited |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014947 | Wounds and Injuries |
| D012595 | Scleroderma, Systemic |
| D003240 | Connective Tissue Diseases |
| D017437 | Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases |
| D012871 | Skin Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| Male |
|
| Black |
|
| Asian |
|
| Hispanic |
|
| Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|