Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is an open-label, single-treatment study. All subjects will receive 12 months of oral contraceptive therapy with DR-103. Study participants will receive physical and gynecological exams, including Pap smear. During the study, all participants will be required to complete a diary.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| DR-103 | Experimental | Four 91-day cycles of the DR-103 regimen:
|
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DR-103 | Drug | One tablet daily. Four 91-day cycles of the DR-103 regimen: 42 days combination therapy of 20 mcg ethinyl estradiol (EE) /150 mcg levonorgestrel (LNG) followed by; 21 days combination therapy of 25 mcg EE/150 mcg LNG followed by; 21 days combination therapy of 30 mcg EE/150 mcg LNG followed by; 7 days of 10 mcg EE. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| All Users Pregnancy Rates Based on Pearl Index (PI) Analyses for 91-Day Cycles and Broken Out by Subpopulations Defined by Participant Weight | Contraceptive failure is measured by the pregnancy rate calculated using the Pearl Index (PI). PI used all pregnancies, as determined by a positive urine and/or serum pregnancy test, except those for which the date of conception was before starting DR-103 or > 7 days after stopping the combination EE/LNG treatment of DR-103. The estimated date of conception and gestational age of the fetus was determined by transvaginal or abdominal ultrasound. The PI is defined as number of contraceptive failures per 100 women-years of exposure: (100)*(total number of pregnancies)*(4)/(total number of 91-day cycles) | Day 1 up to year 1 |
| Typical-Use Pregnancy Rates Based on Pearl Index (PI) Analyses for 91-Day Cycles and Broken Out by Subpopulations Defined by Participant Weight | Contraceptive failure is measured by the pregnancy rate calculated using the Pearl Index (PI). PI used all pregnancies, as determined by a positive urine and/or serum pregnancy test, except those for which the date of conception was before starting DR-103 or > 7 days after stopping the combination EE/LNG treatment of DR-103. The estimated date of conception and gestational age of the fetus was determined by transvaginal or abdominal ultrasound. The PI is defined as number of contraceptive failures per 100 women-years of exposure: (100)*(total number of pregnancies)*(4)/(total number of 91-day cycles) | Day 1 up to year 1 |
| Compliant-Use Pregnancy Rates Based on Pearl Index (PI) Analyses for 91-Day Cycles and Broken Out by Subpopulations Defined by Participant Weight | Contraceptive failure is measured by the pregnancy rate calculated using the Pearl Index (PI). PI used all pregnancies, as determined by a positive urine and/or serum pregnancy test, except those for which the date of conception was before starting DR-103 or > 7 days after stopping the combination EE/LNG treatment of DR-103. The estimated date of conception and gestational age of the fetus was determined by transvaginal or abdominal ultrasound. The PI is defined as number of contraceptive failures per 100 women-years of exposure: (100)*(total number of pregnancies)*(4)/(total number of 91-day cycles) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| All Users Life-Table Estimates of Pregnancy Rates Based on 91-day Cycles and Broken Out by Subpopulations Defined by Participant Weight | A life table approach was used to estimate the cumulative pregnancy rate on a cycle-by-cycle basis for each of the four 91-day treatment cycles. | Day 1 up to year 1 |
| Compliant-Use Life-Table Estimates of Pregnancy Rates Based on 91-day Cycles and Broken Out by Subpopulations Defined by Participant Weight |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Montgomery | Alabama | 36116 | United States | ||
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18672111 | Result | Poindexter A, Reape KZ, Hait H. Efficacy and safety of a 28-day oral contraceptive with 7 days of low-dose estrogen in place of placebo. Contraception. 2008 Aug;78(2):113-9. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2008.04.001. Epub 2008 Jun 2. | |
| 24576794 | Derived | Portman DJ, Kaunitz AM, Howard B, Weiss H, Hsieh J, Ricciotti N. Efficacy and safety of an ascending-dose, extended-regimen levonorgestrel/ethinyl estradiol combined oral contraceptive. Contraception. 2014 Apr;89(4):299-306. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.01.013. Epub 2014 Jan 29. |
Not provided
Not provided
A total of 4,962 subjects were screened for participation in this study, and 3,597 took at least one dose of investigational product (Safety population).
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | DR-103 | Four 91-day cycles of the DR-103 regimen:
|
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
| Day 1 up to year 1 |
| All Users Pregnancy Rates Based on Pearl Index (PI) Analyses for 28-Day Cycle-Equivalents and Broken Out by Subpopulations Defined by Participant Weight | Contraceptive failure is measured by the pregnancy rate calculated using the Pearl Index (PI). PI used all pregnancies, as determined by a positive urine and/or serum pregnancy test, except those for which the date of conception was before starting DR-103 or > 7 days after stopping the combination EE/LNG treatment of DR-103. The estimated date of conception and gestational age of the fetus was determined by transvaginal or abdominal ultrasound. In order to compare the efficacy of extended treatment with DR-103 to conventional 28-day cyclic oral contraceptive treatment, the 91-day DR-103 treatment cycle was separated into three 28-day cycle-equivalents, derived from the 84-day active combination (EE/LNG) pill period of each 91-day extended cycle. The PI is defined as number of contraceptive failures per 100 women-years of exposure: (100)*(total number of pregnancies)*(13)/(total number of 28-day cycles) | Day 1 up to year 1 |
| Typical-Use Pregnancy Rates Based on Pearl Index (PI) Analyses for 28-Day Cycle-Equivalents and Broken Out by Subpopulations Defined by Participant Weight | Contraceptive failure is measured by the pregnancy rate calculated using the Pearl Index (PI). PI used all pregnancies, as determined by a positive urine and/or serum pregnancy test, except those for which the date of conception was before starting DR-103 or > 7 days after stopping the combination EE/LNG treatment of DR-103. The estimated date of conception and gestational age of the fetus was determined by transvaginal or abdominal ultrasound. In order to compare the efficacy of extended treatment with DR-103 to conventional 28-day cyclic oral contraceptive treatment, the 91-day DR-103 treatment cycle was separated into three 28-day cycle-equivalents, derived from the 84-day active combination (EE/LNG) pill period of each 91-day extended cycle. The PI is defined as number of contraceptive failures per 100 women-years of exposure: (100)*(total number of pregnancies)*(13)/(total number of 28-day cycles) | Day 1 up to year 1 |
| Compliant-Use Pregnancy Rates Based on Pearl Index (PI) Analyses for 28-Day Cycle-Equivalents and Broken Out by Subpopulations Defined by Participant Weight | Contraceptive failure is measured by the pregnancy rate calculated using the Pearl Index (PI). PI used all pregnancies, as determined by a positive urine and/or serum pregnancy test, except those for which the date of conception was before starting DR-103 or > 7 days after stopping the combination EE/LNG treatment of DR-103. The estimated date of conception and gestational age of the fetus was determined by transvaginal or abdominal ultrasound. In order to compare the efficacy of extended treatment with DR-103 to conventional 28-day cyclic oral contraceptive treatment, the 91-day DR-103 treatment cycle was separated into three 28-day cycle-equivalents, derived from the 84-day active combination (EE/LNG) pill period of each 91-day extended cycle. The PI is defined as number of contraceptive failures per 100 women-years of exposure: (100)*(total number of pregnancies)*(13)/(total number of 28-day cycles) | Day 1 up to year 1 |
| Summary of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events | The on-treatment time frame spanned the time during which study drug was administered until 3 weeks beyond the last study drug date. Relationship to study drug was assessed by the investigator. Serious AEs (SAEs) are those that resulted in death, were life-threatening, required or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly, or resulted in an important medical event that may have jeopardized the patient or required medical or surgical intervention. | Day 1 up to 13 months |
A life table approach was used to estimate the cumulative pregnancy rate on a cycle-by-cycle basis for each of the four 91-day treatment cycles. |
| Day 1 up to year 1 |
| Phoenix |
| Arizona |
| 85015 |
| United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Phoenix | Arizona | 85037 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Tucson | Arizona | 85741 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Little Rock | Arkansas | 72205 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Anaheim | California | 92801 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Irvine | California | 92618 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Los Angeles | California | 90033 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | National City | California | 91950 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | San Diego | California | 29103 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | San Diego | California | 92108 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | San Diego | California | 92123 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | San Francisco | California | 92103 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Torrance | California | 90502 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Colorado Springs | Colorado | 80909 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Pueblo | Colorado | 81001 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Washington D.C. | District of Columbia | 20036 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Clearwater | Florida | 33759 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Jacksonville | Florida | 32207 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Leesburg | Florida | 34748 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Miami | Florida | 33143 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Miami | Florida | 33186 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | New Port Richey | Florida | 34652 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Palm Beach | Florida | 33409 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | St. Petersburg | Florida | 33709 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Tampa | Florida | 33613 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | West Palm Beach | Florida | 33401 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Atlanta | Georgia | 30303 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Decatur | Georgia | 30034 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Roswell | Georgia | 30075 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Sandy Springs | Georgia | 30328 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Savannah | Georgia | 31406 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Meridian | Idaho | 83642 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Champaign | Illinois | 61820 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Wichita | Kansas | 67207 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Lexington | Kentucky | 40509 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Louisville | Kentucky | 40291 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Mount Sterling | Kentucky | 40353 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Baton Rouge | Louisiana | 70808 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Metairie | Louisiana | 70006 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Baltimore | Maryland | 21201 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Kansas City | Missouri | 64108 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | St Louis | Missouri | 63117 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Lincoln | Nebraska | 68510 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Las Vegas | Nevada | 89146 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Berlin | New Jersey | 08009 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Lawrenceville | New Jersey | 08648 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Moorestown | New Jersey | 08057 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | New Brunswick | New Jersey | 08901 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Albuquerque | New Mexico | 87102 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Port Jefferson | New York | 11777 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Rochester | New York | 14609 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Cary | North Carolina | 27518 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Charlotte | North Carolina | 28209 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | New Bern | North Carolina | 28562 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Raleigh | North Carolina | 27609 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Raleigh | North Carolina | 27612 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Salisbury | North Carolina | 28144 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Wilmington | North Carolina | 28401 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Winston-Salem | North Carolina | 27103 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Columbus | Ohio | 43210 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Columbus | Ohio | 43213 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Edmond | Oklahoma | 73013 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Oklahoma City | Oklahoma | 73112 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Eugene | Oregon | 97401 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Medford | Oregon | 97504 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | 19114 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania | 15206 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Charleston | South Carolina | 29425 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Columbia | South Carolina | 29201 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Goose Creek | South Carolina | 29445 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Greenville | South Carolina | 29605 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Greer | South Carolina | 29651 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Hilton Head Island | South Carolina | 29926 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Bristol | Tennessee | 37620 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Jackson | Tennessee | 38305 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Knoxville | Tennessee | 37920 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Memphis | Tennessee | 38120 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Nashville | Tennessee | 37203 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Austin | Texas | 78759 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Dallas | Texas | 75234 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Dallas | Texas | 75390 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Fort Worth | Texas | 76135 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Houston | Texas | 77054 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | San Antonio | Texas | 78229 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Waco | Texas | 76712 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Salt Lake City | Utah | 84107 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Arlington | Virginia | 22203 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Newport News | Virginia | 23602 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Norfolk | Virginia | 23502 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Norfolk | Virginia | 23507 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Richmond | Virginia | 23233 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Seattle | Washington | 98105 | United States |
| Teva Women's Health Research Investigational Site | Tacoma | Washington | 98405 | United States |
| Pregnancy Intent-to-Treat Population |
|
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
Safety population: participants who took at least one dose of intervention.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | DR-103 | Four 91-day cycles of the DR-103 regimen:
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Number | participants |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Height | Mean | Standard Deviation | inches |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Weight | Mean | Standard Deviation | pounds |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Body Mass Index | Mean | Standard Deviation | kg/m^2 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Systolic Blood Pressure | Mean | Standard Deviation | mmHg |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Diastolic Blood Pressure | Mean | Standard Deviation | mmHg |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Heart Rate | Mean | Standard Deviation | beats/minute |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Oral Contraceptive Use History | Number | participants |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Smoking Status | Number | participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | All Users Pregnancy Rates Based on Pearl Index (PI) Analyses for 91-Day Cycles and Broken Out by Subpopulations Defined by Participant Weight | Contraceptive failure is measured by the pregnancy rate calculated using the Pearl Index (PI). PI used all pregnancies, as determined by a positive urine and/or serum pregnancy test, except those for which the date of conception was before starting DR-103 or > 7 days after stopping the combination EE/LNG treatment of DR-103. The estimated date of conception and gestational age of the fetus was determined by transvaginal or abdominal ultrasound. The PI is defined as number of contraceptive failures per 100 women-years of exposure: (100)*(total number of pregnancies)*(4)/(total number of 91-day cycles) | Pregnancy Intent-to-Treat Population (PITT) of participants who were 18 to 35 years of age when study treatment started. The 'All Users' set included PITT participants who completed at least one 91-day cycle. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | pregnancies / 100 woman years exposure | Day 1 up to year 1 | Treatment cycles | Participants |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Typical-Use Pregnancy Rates Based on Pearl Index (PI) Analyses for 91-Day Cycles and Broken Out by Subpopulations Defined by Participant Weight | Contraceptive failure is measured by the pregnancy rate calculated using the Pearl Index (PI). PI used all pregnancies, as determined by a positive urine and/or serum pregnancy test, except those for which the date of conception was before starting DR-103 or > 7 days after stopping the combination EE/LNG treatment of DR-103. The estimated date of conception and gestational age of the fetus was determined by transvaginal or abdominal ultrasound. The PI is defined as number of contraceptive failures per 100 women-years of exposure: (100)*(total number of pregnancies)*(4)/(total number of 91-day cycles) | Pregnancy Intent-to-Treat Population (PITT) of participants who were 18 to 35 years of age when study treatment started. The 'Typical-Use' set included PITT participants who completed at least one 91-day cycle and no other birth control methods including condoms were used. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | pregnancies / 100 woman years exposure | Day 1 up to year 1 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Compliant-Use Pregnancy Rates Based on Pearl Index (PI) Analyses for 91-Day Cycles and Broken Out by Subpopulations Defined by Participant Weight | Contraceptive failure is measured by the pregnancy rate calculated using the Pearl Index (PI). PI used all pregnancies, as determined by a positive urine and/or serum pregnancy test, except those for which the date of conception was before starting DR-103 or > 7 days after stopping the combination EE/LNG treatment of DR-103. The estimated date of conception and gestational age of the fetus was determined by transvaginal or abdominal ultrasound. The PI is defined as number of contraceptive failures per 100 women-years of exposure: (100)*(total number of pregnancies)*(4)/(total number of 91-day cycles) | 'Compliant-Use' set included PITT participants who completed at least one 91-day cycle and no other birth control methods were used. Cycles were excluded if a subject 1) skipped 2 or more consecutive combination pills, 2) had a pattern of substantial non-compliance with treatment, or 3) used a prohibited concomitant medication | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | pregnancies / 100 woman years exposure | Day 1 up to year 1 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | All Users Life-Table Estimates of Pregnancy Rates Based on 91-day Cycles and Broken Out by Subpopulations Defined by Participant Weight | A life table approach was used to estimate the cumulative pregnancy rate on a cycle-by-cycle basis for each of the four 91-day treatment cycles. | Pregnancy Intent-to-Treat Population (PITT) of participants who were 18 to 35 years of age when study treatment started. The 'All Users' set included PITT participants who completed at least one 91-day cycle. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | pregnancies / cumulative exposure | Day 1 up to year 1 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | All Users Pregnancy Rates Based on Pearl Index (PI) Analyses for 28-Day Cycle-Equivalents and Broken Out by Subpopulations Defined by Participant Weight | Contraceptive failure is measured by the pregnancy rate calculated using the Pearl Index (PI). PI used all pregnancies, as determined by a positive urine and/or serum pregnancy test, except those for which the date of conception was before starting DR-103 or > 7 days after stopping the combination EE/LNG treatment of DR-103. The estimated date of conception and gestational age of the fetus was determined by transvaginal or abdominal ultrasound. In order to compare the efficacy of extended treatment with DR-103 to conventional 28-day cyclic oral contraceptive treatment, the 91-day DR-103 treatment cycle was separated into three 28-day cycle-equivalents, derived from the 84-day active combination (EE/LNG) pill period of each 91-day extended cycle. The PI is defined as number of contraceptive failures per 100 women-years of exposure: (100)*(total number of pregnancies)*(13)/(total number of 28-day cycles) | Pregnancy Intent-to-Treat Population (PITT) of participants who were 18 to 35 years of age when study treatment started. The 'All Users' set included PITT participants who completed at least one 28-day cycle. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | pregnancies / 100 woman years exposure | Day 1 up to year 1 | Treatment cycles | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Typical-Use Pregnancy Rates Based on Pearl Index (PI) Analyses for 28-Day Cycle-Equivalents and Broken Out by Subpopulations Defined by Participant Weight | Contraceptive failure is measured by the pregnancy rate calculated using the Pearl Index (PI). PI used all pregnancies, as determined by a positive urine and/or serum pregnancy test, except those for which the date of conception was before starting DR-103 or > 7 days after stopping the combination EE/LNG treatment of DR-103. The estimated date of conception and gestational age of the fetus was determined by transvaginal or abdominal ultrasound. In order to compare the efficacy of extended treatment with DR-103 to conventional 28-day cyclic oral contraceptive treatment, the 91-day DR-103 treatment cycle was separated into three 28-day cycle-equivalents, derived from the 84-day active combination (EE/LNG) pill period of each 91-day extended cycle. The PI is defined as number of contraceptive failures per 100 women-years of exposure: (100)*(total number of pregnancies)*(13)/(total number of 28-day cycles) | Pregnancy Intent-to-Treat Population (PITT) of participants who were 18 to 35 years of age when study treatment started. The 'Typical-Use' set included PITT participants who completed at least one 28-day cycle and no other birth control methods including condoms were used. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | pregnancies / 100 woman years exposure | Day 1 up to year 1 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Compliant-Use Pregnancy Rates Based on Pearl Index (PI) Analyses for 28-Day Cycle-Equivalents and Broken Out by Subpopulations Defined by Participant Weight | Contraceptive failure is measured by the pregnancy rate calculated using the Pearl Index (PI). PI used all pregnancies, as determined by a positive urine and/or serum pregnancy test, except those for which the date of conception was before starting DR-103 or > 7 days after stopping the combination EE/LNG treatment of DR-103. The estimated date of conception and gestational age of the fetus was determined by transvaginal or abdominal ultrasound. In order to compare the efficacy of extended treatment with DR-103 to conventional 28-day cyclic oral contraceptive treatment, the 91-day DR-103 treatment cycle was separated into three 28-day cycle-equivalents, derived from the 84-day active combination (EE/LNG) pill period of each 91-day extended cycle. The PI is defined as number of contraceptive failures per 100 women-years of exposure: (100)*(total number of pregnancies)*(13)/(total number of 28-day cycles) | 'Compliant-Use' set included PITT participants who completed at least one 28-day cycle and no other birth control methods were used. Cycles were excluded if a subject 1) skipped 2 or more consecutive combination pills, 2) had a pattern of substantial non-compliance with treatment, or 3) used a prohibited concomitant medication | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | pregnancies / 100 woman years exposure | Day 1 up to year 1 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Summary of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events | The on-treatment time frame spanned the time during which study drug was administered until 3 weeks beyond the last study drug date. Relationship to study drug was assessed by the investigator. Serious AEs (SAEs) are those that resulted in death, were life-threatening, required or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly, or resulted in an important medical event that may have jeopardized the patient or required medical or surgical intervention. | Safety population of treated participants | Posted | Number | participants | Day 1 up to 13 months |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Compliant-Use Life-Table Estimates of Pregnancy Rates Based on 91-day Cycles and Broken Out by Subpopulations Defined by Participant Weight | A life table approach was used to estimate the cumulative pregnancy rate on a cycle-by-cycle basis for each of the four 91-day treatment cycles. | 'Compliant-Use' set included PITT participants who completed at least one 91-day cycle and no other birth control methods were used. Cycles were excluded if a subject 1) skipped 2 or more consecutive combination pills, 2) had a pattern of substantial non-compliance with treatment, or 3) used a prohibited concomitant medication | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | pregnancies / cumulative exposure | Day 1 up to year 1 |
|
Day 1 - one year and three weeks
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | DR-103 | Four 91-day cycles of the DR-103 regimen:
| 58 | 3,597 | 1,567 | 3,597 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pneumonia | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 9.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bursitis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 9.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Deep vein thrombosis | Vascular disorders | MedDRA 9.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Staphylococcal infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 9.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Colitis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 9.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abortion spontaneous | Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions | MedDRA 9.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abortion missed | Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions | MedDRA 9.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pelvic inflammatory disease | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 9.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Convulsion | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 9.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Supraventricular tachycardia | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 9.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Premature separation of placenta | Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions | MedDRA 9.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cholecystitis | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA 9.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cholelithiasis | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA 9.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Injury | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 9.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Atrial fibrillation | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 9.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 9.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Convulsion | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 9.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Syncope | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 9.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pain in extremity | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 9.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Depression suicidal | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 9.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pharyngitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 9.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Depression | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 9.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Suicide attempt | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 9.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Overdose | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 9.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Intervertebral disc protrusion | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 9.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hepatitis C | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 9.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Viral infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 9.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Lower limb fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 9.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Anxiety | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 9.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rectal abscess | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 9.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Appendicitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 9.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Blighted ovum | Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions | MedDRA 9.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 9.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 9.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ectopic pregnancy | Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions | MedDRA 9.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastrointestinal haemorrhage | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 9.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Anemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA 9.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pulmonary embolism | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 9.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Spinal fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 9.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Mental status changes | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 9.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pyelonephritis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 9.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Drug dependence | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 9.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pleural effusion | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 9.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Salpingitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 9.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Uterine inflammation | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA 9.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hip dysplasia | Congenital, familial and genetic disorders | MedDRA 9.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Joint injury | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 9.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ileitis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 9.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Helicobacter gastritis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 9.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Angina pectoris | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 9.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Multiple drug overdose | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 9.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cholecystitis acute | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA 9.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nasopharyngitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 9.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Upper respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 9.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Sinusitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 9.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 9.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Metrorrhagia | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA 9.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dysmenorrhoea | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA 9.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 9.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 9.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Acne | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA 9.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
Details of the study and its results shall not be publicized or published in any form to cooperative publication without prior, written consent of sponsor. Such approval is necessary to prevent premature disclosure of trade secrets and other confidential information.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Director, Clinical Research | Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products, R&D Inc. | 215-591-3000 | ustevatrials@tevapharm.com |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C100845 | HLA-DR103 antigen |
| D019304 | Ethinyl Estradiol-Norgestrel Combination |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004997 | Ethinyl Estradiol |
| D009651 | Norpregnatrienes |
| D009650 | Norpregnanes |
| D009654 | Norsteroids |
| D013256 | Steroids |
| D000072473 | Fused-Ring Compounds |
| D011083 | Polycyclic Compounds |
| D009644 | Norgestrel |
| D009652 | Norpregnenes |
| D042782 | Estrogenic Steroids, Alkylated |
| D045166 | Estradiol Congeners |
| D012739 | Gonadal Steroid Hormones |
| D042341 | Gonadal Hormones |
| D006728 | Hormones |
| D006730 | Hormones, Hormone Substitutes, and Hormone Antagonists |
Not provided
Not provided
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
|
| Black or African American |
|
| White |
|
| Hispanic or Latino |
|
| Other |
|
| Prior User |
|
| Never Smoked |
|
Subpopulation of the total participants who weighed <90 kg during the screening visit. |
| OG002 | DR-103: >=90kg Subpopulation | Subpopulation of the total participants who weighed >=90 kg during the screening visit. |
|
|
Subpopulation of the total participants who weighed <90 kg during the screening visit. |
| OG002 | DR-103: >=90kg Subpopulation | Subpopulation of the total participants who weighed >=90 kg during the screening visit. |
|
|
|
|
| OG001 | DR-103: <90 kg Subpopulation | Subpopulation of the total participants who weighed <90 kg during the screening visit. |
| OG002 | DR-103: >=90kg Subpopulation | Subpopulation of the total participants who weighed >=90 kg during the screening visit. |
|
|
| OG001 | DR-103: <90 kg Subpopulation | Subpopulation of the total participants who weighed <90 kg during the screening visit. |
| OG002 | DR-103: >=90kg Subpopulation | Subpopulation of the total participants who weighed >=90 kg during the screening visit. |
|
|
| OG001 | DR-103: <90 kg Subpopulation | Subpopulation of the total participants who weighed <90 kg during the screening visit. |
| OG002 | DR-103: >=90kg Subpopulation | Subpopulation of the total participants who weighed >=90 kg during the screening visit. |
|
|
|
Subpopulation of the total participants who weighed >=90 kg during the screening visit.
|
|