Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The aim of this study is to compare whether oocyte flushing during retrieval is effective or not.
In total 300 patients will be randomized for the effectiveness of single or double lumen needle during oocyte retrieval. Double lumen needles give an opportunity of washing to the follicle with flush. Single lumen needles seem to be faster and no need for flushing. We aim to compare to the differences of the use of both needles.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Active Comparator | Single lumen needle use in oocyte retrieval |
|
| 2 | Active Comparator | Double lumen needle with follicle flushing during oocyte retrieval |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| single lumen needle oocyte retrieval | Device | single lumen needle use during oocyte retrieval |
| |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Metaphase 2 oocyte number | 6months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| clinical pregnancy rate | 6 months |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baskent University | Adana | 01120 | Turkey (Türkiye) |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| double lumen needle oocyte retrieval |
| Device |
double lumen needle with 1 time follicle flushing with at least 2 ml during oocyte retrieval |
|