Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1U01AI068636 | U.S. NIH Grant/Contract | View source | |
| 10654 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) | NIH |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Adherence to highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) is critical to successful treatment of HIV. This study tested an intervention that helps people infected with HIV take all their medications when and how they were supposed to.
People infected with HIV must take the regimen of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) medications as prescribed to them, without missing doses, or they risk developing a resistant strain of the virus. Resistant strains of the virus do not respond to certain HAART regimens and are more dangerous for patients. Poor HAART adherence can lead to further HIV progression, more hospitalizations and opportunistic infections, and required use of second-line therapies. Interventions to increase adherence have had mixed success, with little data to support long-term effects and no one strategy emerging that provides consistent positive effects. The client adherence profiling and intervention tailoring (CAP-IT) program was first developed to increase adherence among people already on HAART with in-home nursing. This study modified CAP-IT to treat people newly on HAART and then tested whether this modified CAP-IT improved long-term HAART adherence.
This study included two stages. The first stage consisted of two focus groups, one made up of HIV care providers and professionals and the other made up of people infected with HIV who had started HAART within the last year. Each focus group met once, for approximately 2 hours, to determine what modifications would best adapt the CAP-IT program to HIV-infected people first starting HAART.
The second stage consisted of a randomized trial comparing the modified CAP-IT program to standard of care. Participation in this stage lasted for 72 weeks. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either standard care or the modified CAP-IT program in addition to standard care. The CAP-IT program involved two steps. The first was an assessment of factors relating to adherence, and the second was development of an individualized plan to address the deficits found.
Study visits were completed at entry, at Weeks 4 and 12, and then every 12 weeks for approximately 72 weeks. Assessments for the study included a questionnaire about health attitudes, a physical exam, counting of pills, and answering questions about taking medications.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| CAP-IT | Experimental | Participants received the modified CAP-IT adherence intervention in addition to standard care. Modified client adherence profiling and intervention tailoring (CAP-IT): Interventions designed to improve medication adherence, modified to specifically target people first starting highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) |
|
| Standard care | No Intervention | Participants received standard care. |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAP-IT | Behavioral | Interventions designed to improve medication adherence, modified to specifically target people first starting highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Mean Self-reported Adherence Score (%) Over a One-month Recall | The adherence self-report questionnaire captured adherence at an Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) regimen over a one-month recall (0-100): 0 means none of anti-HIV medications were taken, 100 means every single dose of anti-HIV medications were taken. The primary endpoint evaluated for each participant was the average self-reported adherence over a one-month recall across each of their study visit week 4, 12, 24, 36, and 48: missing values were ignored. Note: This was a change to the primary endpoint as described in the study protocol. This was due to an update to ACTG Case Report Form (CRF) that captured self-report adherence. Since the data captured on this form captured adherence over a longer timeframe and allowed for more variability in response, it was anticipated this endpoint would provide greater power to assess treatment differences. | At weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 48 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Mean Self-reported Adherence Score Over a One-month Recall | The mean of participant's average self-reported adherence score over a one-month recall across visit week 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, and 72; missing values were ignored. | Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, and 72 |
| Kaplan-Meier Estimate of the Cumulative Probability of Time to Change of Initial Antiretroviral (ARV) Treatment Regimen for Any Reason by Week 48 |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Stage 1
HIV infected Individuals on Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy (HAART):
Health Care Providers and Professionals:
Stage 2:
Exclusion Criteria:
Stage 1
HIV-1 Infected Individuals on HAART:
Health Care Providers and Professionals:
Stage 2:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Constance Benson, MD | University of California, San Diego | Study Chair |
| Tari Gilbert, MSN | University of California, San Diego | Study Chair |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ucsd, Avrc Crs | San Diego | California | 92037 | United States | ||
| Barranco CRS (11301) |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17577653 | Background | Lu M, Safren SA, Skolnik PR, Rogers WH, Coady W, Hardy H, Wilson IB. Optimal recall period and response task for self-reported HIV medication adherence. AIDS Behav. 2008 Jan;12(1):86-94. doi: 10.1007/s10461-007-9261-4. Epub 2007 Jun 19. | |
| 16816559 | Background | Wagner GJ, Kanouse DE, Golinelli D, Miller LG, Daar ES, Witt MD, Diamond C, Tilles JG, Kemper CA, Larsen R, Goicoechea M, Haubrich RH. Cognitive-behavioral intervention to enhance adherence to antiretroviral therapy: a randomized controlled trial (CCTG 578). AIDS. 2006 Jun 12;20(9):1295-302. doi: 10.1097/01.aids.0000232238.28415.d2. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | CAP-IT | Participants received the modified CAP-IT adherence intervention in addition to standard care. Modified client adherence profiling and intervention tailoring (CAP-IT): Interventions designed to improve medication adherence, modified to specifically target people first starting highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) |
| FG001 | Standard Care | Participants received standard care. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Intention to treat: All eligible participants were included in the baseline characteristics.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | CAP-IT | Participants received the modified CAP-IT adherence intervention in addition to standard care. Modified client adherence profiling and intervention tailoring (CAP-IT): Interventions designed to improve medication adherence, modified to specifically target people first starting highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) |
| BG001 |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Mean Self-reported Adherence Score (%) Over a One-month Recall | The adherence self-report questionnaire captured adherence at an Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) regimen over a one-month recall (0-100): 0 means none of anti-HIV medications were taken, 100 means every single dose of anti-HIV medications were taken. The primary endpoint evaluated for each participant was the average self-reported adherence over a one-month recall across each of their study visit week 4, 12, 24, 36, and 48: missing values were ignored. Note: This was a change to the primary endpoint as described in the study protocol. This was due to an update to ACTG Case Report Form (CRF) that captured self-report adherence. Since the data captured on this form captured adherence over a longer timeframe and allowed for more variability in response, it was anticipated this endpoint would provide greater power to assess treatment differences. | Intention to treat: All eligible participants were included in the analysis: participants were analyzed per original assigned randomized treatment. Missing data were assumed missing completely at random. | Posted | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | percentage of adherence score | At weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 48 |
From treatment dispensation until off-study at any time throughout the study (up to 213 weeks), participant follow-up time was variable
There were no drugs administered through the study and SAEs were reported to local IRB/ECs only. The protocol requested recording of new signs and symptoms >=Grade 3, any AEs that led to a change in ART, regardless of grade, and all diagnoses identified according to ACTG criteria. DAIDS AE Grading Table (V1, 2004; Clarification 2009) was used.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | CAP-IT | Participants received the modified CAP-IT adherence intervention in addition to standard care. Modified client adherence profiling and intervention tailoring (CAP-IT): Interventions designed to improve medication adherence, modified to specifically target people first starting highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) |
Not provided
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anaemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA 18.0 | Systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACTG Clinicaltrials.gov Coordinator | ACTG Network Coordinating Center, Social and Scientific Systems, Inc. | (301) 628-3313 | ACTGCT.Gov@s-3.com |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D015658 | HIV Infections |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000086982 | Blood-Borne Infections |
| D003141 | Communicable Diseases |
| D007239 | Infections |
| D015229 | Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Viral |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the cumulative probability of initial antiretroviral (ARV) treatment regimen for any reason by week 48. Time to ARV treatment regimen change was defined as first time to change in the drug class of participant's ART regimen for any reason from study entry. Participants completing the study without a change in the drug class of their ART regimen were censored at their last visit. |
| From study entry to week 48 |
| Virologic Suppression | Virologic suppression was defined as HIV-1 RNA <=200 copies/mL at week 24, 48, and 72. The results obtained within +/- 12 weeks of 24, 48, and 72 weeks were included. If there were multiple HIV-1 RNA measurement within the specified window, the HIV-1 RNA result closest to the center of the window was selected. | At week 24, 48, 72 |
| Self-management Skills, as Measured by Self-reported General Self-efficacy Scale (GSES) Score | The GSES is a 10-item scale designed to assess optimistic self-beliefs used to cope with a variety of demands in life. The scale was designed to assess self efficacy, i.e., the belief that one's actions are responsible for successful outcomes. The scaled score for each question ranges from 1 to 4. Higher scores indicate participant's stronger belief in self-efficacy. The GSES score was sum of all responses. The range was from 0 to 40 scores: any unfinished question got a score of zero. | At weeks 0 (entry), 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, and 72 |
| Cumulative Probability of First Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events (AEs) | The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the cumulative probability of experiencing a grade 3 or 4 adverse event by week 72. New Grade 3 or 4 signs, symptoms were identified by MedDRA preferred term. Events were included regardless of participant status on ART. If a participant had multiple reports of the same event, only the event reported at the highest grade were included. Time was measured from the study entry until the date of the first new grade 3 or 4 adverse event. Participants lost to follow-up prior to reaching an adverse event endpoint or not documented to have reached an adverse event endpoint at the end of the study had their endpoint censored at the date of their last visit. | From study entry to week 72 |
| Lima |
| 18 PE |
| Peru |
| Standard Care |
Participants received standard care. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| years |
|
| Age, Customized | Number | participants |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Number | participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Regimen complexity | Number | participants |
|
| HIV-1 RNA | Mean | Standard Deviation | log10 copies/mL |
|
| CD4+ T-cell count | Mean | Standard Deviation | cells/mm^3 |
|
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | CAP-IT | Participants received the modified CAP-IT adherence intervention in addition to standard care. Modified client adherence profiling and intervention tailoring (CAP-IT): Interventions designed to improve medication adherence, modified to specifically target people first starting highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) |
| OG001 | Standard Care | Participants received standard care. |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Mean Self-reported Adherence Score Over a One-month Recall | The mean of participant's average self-reported adherence score over a one-month recall across visit week 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, and 72; missing values were ignored. | Intention to treat: All eligible participants were included in the analysis: participants were analyzed per original assigned randomized treatment. Missing data were assumed missing completely at random. | Posted | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | percentage of adherence score | Weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, and 72 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Kaplan-Meier Estimate of the Cumulative Probability of Time to Change of Initial Antiretroviral (ARV) Treatment Regimen for Any Reason by Week 48 | The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the cumulative probability of initial antiretroviral (ARV) treatment regimen for any reason by week 48. Time to ARV treatment regimen change was defined as first time to change in the drug class of participant's ART regimen for any reason from study entry. Participants completing the study without a change in the drug class of their ART regimen were censored at their last visit. | Intention to treat: All eligible participants were included in the analysis: participants were analyzed per original assigned randomized treatment. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | cumulative probability per 100 persons | From study entry to week 48 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Virologic Suppression | Virologic suppression was defined as HIV-1 RNA <=200 copies/mL at week 24, 48, and 72. The results obtained within +/- 12 weeks of 24, 48, and 72 weeks were included. If there were multiple HIV-1 RNA measurement within the specified window, the HIV-1 RNA result closest to the center of the window was selected. | Intention to treat: All eligible participants were included in the analysis: participants were analyzed per original assigned randomized treatment. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | At week 24, 48, 72 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Self-management Skills, as Measured by Self-reported General Self-efficacy Scale (GSES) Score | The GSES is a 10-item scale designed to assess optimistic self-beliefs used to cope with a variety of demands in life. The scale was designed to assess self efficacy, i.e., the belief that one's actions are responsible for successful outcomes. The scaled score for each question ranges from 1 to 4. Higher scores indicate participant's stronger belief in self-efficacy. The GSES score was sum of all responses. The range was from 0 to 40 scores: any unfinished question got a score of zero. | Intention to treat: All eligible participants were included in the analysis: participants were analyzed per original assigned randomized treatment. | Posted | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | scores on a scale | At weeks 0 (entry), 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, and 72 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Cumulative Probability of First Grade 3 or 4 Adverse Events (AEs) | The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the cumulative probability of experiencing a grade 3 or 4 adverse event by week 72. New Grade 3 or 4 signs, symptoms were identified by MedDRA preferred term. Events were included regardless of participant status on ART. If a participant had multiple reports of the same event, only the event reported at the highest grade were included. Time was measured from the study entry until the date of the first new grade 3 or 4 adverse event. Participants lost to follow-up prior to reaching an adverse event endpoint or not documented to have reached an adverse event endpoint at the end of the study had their endpoint censored at the date of their last visit. | Intention to treat: All eligible participants were included in the analysis: participants were analyzed per original assigned randomized treatment. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | cumulative probability per 100 persons | From study entry to week 72 |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 86 |
| 44 |
| 86 |
| EG001 | Standard Care | Participants received standard care. | 0 | 86 | 38 | 86 |
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 18.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 18.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hypertransaminasaemia | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA 18.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Drug hypersensitivity | Immune system disorders | MedDRA 18.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Latent syphilis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 18.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Nasopharyngitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 18.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Anogenital warts | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 18.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 18.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 18.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Depression | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 18.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Skin lesion | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA 18.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| D012749 | Sexually Transmitted Diseases |
| D016180 | Lentivirus Infections |
| D012192 | Retroviridae Infections |
| D012327 | RNA Virus Infections |
| D014777 | Virus Diseases |
| D000091662 | Genital Diseases |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |
| D007153 | Immunologic Deficiency Syndromes |
| D007154 | Immune System Diseases |
| Week 72 (nCAP-IT=64, nSOC=66) |
|
| Week 12 (nCAP-IT=81, nSOC=77) |
|
| Week 24 (nCAP-IT=81, nSOC=82) |
|
| Week 36 (nCAP-IT=81, nSOC=79) |
|
| Week 48 (nCAP-IT=75, nSOC=77) |
|
| Week 60 (nCAP-IT=73, nSOC=73) |
|
| Week 72 (nCAP-IT=71, nSOC=72) |
|