Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to characterize the safety and immunogenicity of the H1N1 (swine) flu vaccines GSK2340274A and GSK2340273A when co-administered with the seasonal flu vaccine in adults 19 to 40 years of age.
Collaborators: United States Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Flulaval/placebo/unadjuvanted Arepanrix Group | Experimental | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
|
| Flulaval/placebo/Arepanrix Group | Experimental | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed the administration of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
|
| Flulaval/unadjuvanted Arepanrix/placebo Group | Experimental | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 0 followed by the administration of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and saline placebo on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSK2340274A | Biological | Two intramuscular injections |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Hemagglutination Inhibition (HI) Antibody Titers Against A/California/7/2009 H1N1 Vaccine Strain. | The A/California vaccine virus-homologous antibody response was measured in subjects having received Flulaval vaccine co-administered with the first dose of Arepanrix vaccine, and in subjects having received two doses of Arepanrix vaccine alone. Titers were expressed as geometric mean antibody titers (GMTs). | 21 days after the second dose of Arepanrix vaccine (at Day 42). |
| Hemagglutination Inhibition (HI) Antibody Titers Against A/California/7/2009 H1N1 Vaccine Strain. | The A/California vaccine virus-homologous antibody response was measured in subjects having received Flulaval vaccine co-administered with the first dose of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine, and in subjects having received two doses of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine alone. Titers were expressed as geometric mean antibody titers (GMTs). | 21 days after the second dose of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine (at Day 42) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Influenza-specific Cluster of Differentiation 4 (CD4) T-cells Per Million Producing Two or More Markers Within Cluster Differentiation 40 Ligand (CD40L), Interleukin-2 (IL-2), Interferon-γ (IFN-γ) and Tumor Necrosis Factor-α (TNF-α). | Influenza-specific CD4 T-Cells were stimulated in vitro with A/California virus and seasonal Influenza viruses, related antigens or derived peptides. Stimulating antigens were A/Brisbane, A/California, pool peptides H1N1 and pool FLU. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| GSK Clinical Trials | GlaxoSmithKline | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSK Investigational Site | Stockbridge | Georgia | 30281 | United States | ||
| GSK Investigational Site |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 32889792 | Derived | Friel D, Co M, Ollinger T, Salaun B, Schuind A, Li P, Walravens K, Ennis FA, Vaughn DW. Non-neutralizing antibody responses following A(H1N1)pdm09 influenza vaccination with or without AS03 adjuvant system. Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2021 Jan;15(1):110-120. doi: 10.1111/irv.12780. Epub 2020 Sep 5. | |
| 23110320 | Derived |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Researchers can use this site to request access to anonymised patient level data and/or supporting documents from clinical studies to conduct further research. | View source |
| ID | Type | URL | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
| 113536 | Dataset Specification | View IPD |
Patient-level data for this study will be made available through www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com following the timelines and process described on this site.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Flulaval/Placebo/Unadjuvanted Arepanrix Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Flulaval/Arepanrix/placebo Group | Experimental | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and Arepanrix vaccine on Day 0 followed by Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and saline placebo on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
|
| Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/placebo/Flulaval Group | Experimental | subjects received co-administration of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Flulaval vaccine on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
|
| Arepanrix/placebo/Flulaval Group | Experimental | subjects received co-administration of Arepanrix vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Flulaval vaccine on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
|
| GSK2340273A | Biological | Two intramuscular injections |
|
| Seasonal trivalent influenza vaccine (TIV) | Biological | Single intramuscular injection |
|
| Saline placebo | Biological | Single intramuscular injection |
|
| On Days 0, 7, 21, 28, 42, 63 and 182 |
| Number of Influenza-specific Cluster of Differentiation 8 (CD8) T-cells Per Million Producing Two or More Markers Within Cluster Differentiation 40 Ligand (CD40L), Interleukin-2 (IL-2), Interferon-γ (IFN-γ) and Tumor Necrosis Factor-α (TNF-α). | Influenza-specific CD8 T-Cells were stimulated in vitro with A/California virus and seasonal Influenza viruses, related antigens or derived peptides. Stimulating antigens were A/Brisbane, A/California, pool peptides H1N1 and pool FLU. | On Days 0, 7, 21, 28, 42, 63 and 182 |
| Number of Subjects Reporting Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemical and Haematological Parameters Assessed | Laboratory parameters assessed were alanine aminotransferase (ALAT), aspartate aminotransferase (ASAT), alkaline phosphatase (AP), bilirubin (BIL) (total (T)), basophils (BAS). For each parameter and for each range it was assessed whether the values of the subjects were in unkown, above, below or within the range. | On Days 0, 7, 21, 28, 42, 63 and 182 |
| Number of Subjects Reporting Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemical and Haematological Parameters Assessed | Laboratory parameters assessed were creatinine (CREA), bilirubin (BIL) (direct (D)), eosinophils (EOS), hemoglobin (Hgb), hematocrit (Hct). For each parameter and for each range it was assessed whether the values of the subjects were unknown, in above, below or within the range. | On Days 0, 7, 21, 28, 42, 63 and 182 |
| Number of Subjects Reporting Solicited Local Symptoms. | Solicited local symptoms assessed were pain, redness and swelling | During a 7-day follow-up period (Days 0-6) post-vaccination period |
| Number of Subjects Reporting Solicited General Symptoms. | Solicited general symptoms assessed were fatigue, headache, joint pain at other location, muscle aches, shivering, sweating and temperature. Temperature is defined as an axillary temperature equal to or above 38.0 degrees Celsius (°C). | During a 7-day follow-up period (Days 0-6) post-vaccination period |
| Number of Subjects Reporting Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemical and Haematological Parameters Assessed | Laboratory parameters assessed were serum urea nitrogen (SUN), white blood cells (WBC), red blood cells (RBC). For each parameter and for each range it was assessed whether the values of the subjects were unknown, above, below or within the range. | On Days 0, 7, 21, 28, 42, 63 and 182 |
| Number of Subjects Reporting Unsolicited Adverse Events (AEs). | An unsolicited adverse event is any adverse event (i.e. any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject, temporally associated with use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product) reported in addition to those solicited during the clinical study and any solicited symptom with onset outside the specified period of follow-up for solicited symptoms. | Within the 84-day (Days 0-83) post-vaccination period. |
| Number of Subjects Reporting Medically Attended Visits (MAEs). | The day 368 was the last contact day for the last subject reporting the event. For each solicited and unsolicited symptom the subject experienced, the subject was asked if they received medical attention defined as hospitalization, an emergency room visit or a visit to or from medical personnel for any reason. | During the entire study period (Days 0-368). |
| Number of Subjects Reporting Potential Immune Diseases (pIMDs). | The day 406 was the last contact day with the subjects reporting the event. Potential immune-mediated diseases (pIMDs) are a subset of AEs that include both clearly autoimmune diseases and also other inflammatory and/or neurologic disorders which may or may not have an autoimmune etiology. | During the entire study period (Days 0-406). |
| Number of Subjects Reporting Serious Adverse Events (SAEs). | The day 329 was the last contact day with the subjects reporting serious adverse events. SAEs assessed include medical occurrences that results in death, are life threatening, require hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity or are a congenital anomaly/birth defect in the offspring of a study subjects. | During the entire study period (Days 0-329). |
| Number of Subjects Reporting Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemical and Haematological Parameters Assessed | Laboratory parameters assessed were neutrophils (NEU), lymphocytes (LYM), monocytes (MON) and platelets (PLA). For each parameter and for each range it was assessed whether the values of the subjects were unknown, in above, below or within the range. | On Days 0, 7, 21, 28, 42, 63 and 182 |
| Microneutralization Antibody Titers Against A/California/7/2009 (H1N1) Strain. | Titers were expressed as geometric mean titers (GMTs) and measured by microneutralization. Arepanrix vaccine strain and the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine strain was A/California/7/2009 (H1N1). Microneutralization testing was cancelled. | On Days 0, 21, 42, 63 and 182 |
| Number of Subjects With a Microneutralization Titer Greater Than or Equal to 1:28 for Antibodies Against A/California/7/2009 (H1N1) Strain. | Arepanrix vaccine strain and the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine strain was A/California/7/2009 (H1N1). The antibody cut-off value assessed was a titer of 1:10 and this value was considered as seropositivity. Seronegative subject is a subject whose antibody titer is below the cut-off value, a seropositive subject is a subject whose antibody titer is greater than or equal to the cut-off value. Microneutralization titers < 1:28 were considered below the cut-off. Microneutralization testing was cancelled. | On Days 0, 21, 42, 63 and 182 |
| Vaccine Response Rates (VRR) for Microneutralization Antibody Titers Against A/California/7/2009 (H1N1) Strain. | Arepanrix vaccine strain and the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine strain was A/California/7/2009 (H1N1). Vaccine Response Rate for microneutralization titers was defined as the incidence rate of vaccinees with at least a 4-fold increase in post vaccination reciprocal titer relative to Day 0. Microneutralization testing was cancelled. | On Days 0, 21, 42, 63 and 182 |
| Hemagglutination Inhibition (HI) Antibody Titers Against A/California/7/2009 H1N1 Vaccine Strain. | The A/California vaccine virus-homologous antibody response was measured in subjects having received two doses of Arepanrix vaccine, with prior treatment with Flulaval vaccine 21 days before the first dose and in subjects having received two doses of Arepanrix vaccine alone. Titers were expressed as geometric mean antibody titers (GMTs). | 21 days after the second dose of Arepanrix vaccine (Day 63 for Flulaval/placebo/Arepanrix Group and Day 42 for Arepanrix/placebo/Flulaval Group) |
| Hemagglutination Inhibition (HI) Antibody Titers Against A/California/7/2009 H1N1 Vaccine Strain. | The A/California vaccine virus-homologous antibody response was measured in subjects having received two doses of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine, with prior treatment with Flulaval vaccine 21 days before the first dose and in subjects having received two doses of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine alone. Titers were expressed as geometric mean antibody titers (GMTs). | 21 days after the second dose of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine (Day 63 for Flulaval/placebo/unadjuvanted Arepanrix Group and Day 42 for Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/placebo/Flulaval Group) |
| Hemagglutination Inhibition (HI) Antibody Titers Against A/California/7/2009 H1N1 Vaccine Strain. | The A/California vaccine virus-homologous antibody response was measured in subjects pre-treated with Flulaval who subsequently received two doses of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine compared to subjects pre-treated with Flulaval vaccine who subsequently received two doses of Arepanrix vaccine. Titers were expressed as geometric mean antibody titers (GMTs). | 21 days after the second dose of the pandemic vaccine (at Day 63) |
| Hemagglutination Inhibition (HI) Antibody Titers Against Each of the Three Flulaval Strains. | The antibody response against each of the three Flulaval vaccine components in subjects exposed to co-administration of Flulaval vaccine with the first of two doses of Arepanrix vaccine and in subjects exposed to a single dose of Flulaval vaccine. Flulaval vaccine strains were Flu A/Brisbane/59/2007 H1N1, Flu A/Uruguay/716/2007 H3N2 and Flu B/Brisbane/60/2008. Titers were expressed as geometric mean antibody titers (GMTs). | 21 days after the Flulaval vaccination (at Day 21). |
| Hemagglutination Inhibition (HI) Antibody Titers Against Each of the Three Flulaval Strains. | The antibody response against each of the three Flulaval vaccine components in subjects exposed to co-administration of Flulaval vaccine with the first of two doses of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine and in subjects exposed to a single dose of Flulaval vaccine. Flulaval vaccine strains were Flu A/Brisbane/59/2007 H1N1, Flu A/Uruguay/716/2007 H3N2 and Flu B/Brisbane/60/2008. Titers were expressed as geometric mean antibody titers (GMTs). | 21 days after the Flulaval vaccination (at Day 21). |
| Hemagglutination Inhibition (HI) Antibody Titers Against Each of the Three Flulaval Strains. | The antibody response against each of the three Flulaval vaccine components in subjects exposed to pre-treatment with two doses of Arepanrix vaccine and in subjects exposed to a single dose of Flulaval vaccine. Flulaval vaccine strains were Flu A/Brisbane/59/2007 H1N1, Flu A/Uruguay/716/2007 H3N2 and Flu B/Brisbane/60/2008. Titers were expressed as geometric mean antibody titers (GMTs). | 21 days after the Flulaval vaccination (Day 63 for Arepanrix/placebo/Flulaval Group and Day 21 for Flulaval/placebo/unadjuvanted Arepanrix and Flulaval/placebo/Arepanrix Groups) |
| Hemagglutination Inhibition (HI) Antibody Titers Against Each of the Three Flulaval Strains. | The antibody response against each of the three Flulaval vaccine components in subjects exposed to pre-treatment with two doses of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine and in subjects exposed to a single dose of Flulaval vaccine. Flulaval vaccine strains were Flu A/Brisbane/59/2007 H1N1, Flu A/Uruguay/716/2007 H3N2 and Flu B/Brisbane/60/2008. Titers were expressed as geometric mean antibody titers (GMTs). | 21 days after the Flulaval vaccination (Day 63 for Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/placebo/Flulaval Group and Day 21 for Flulaval/placebo/unadjuvanted Arepanrix and Flulaval/placebo/Arepanrix Groups) |
| Geometric Mean Antibody Titers (GMTs) for Hemagglutination Inhibition (HI) Antibodies Against Flu A/California H1N1 Strain. | Titers were expressed as geometric mean antibody titers (GMTs). | On Days 0, 21, 42 and 63 |
| Geometric Mean Antibody Titers (GMTs) for Hemagglutination Inhibition (HI) Antibodies Against Flu A/California H1N1 Strain. | Titers were expressed as geometric mean antibody titers (GMTs). | At Day 182 |
| Number of Seroconverted Subjects for Antibodies Against A/ California Strain. | Seroconversion rate was defined as the incidence rate of vaccinees who had either a pre-vaccination titer recorded as < 1:10 and a post-vaccination reciprocal titer ≥ 40 or a pre-vaccination reciprocal titer ≥ 10 and at least a 4-fold increase in post vaccination reciprocal titer. Seroconversion defined as: For initially seronegative subjects, antibody titer ≥ 1:40 after vaccination For initially seropositive subjects, antibody titer after vaccination ≥ 4 fold the pre-vaccination antibody titer | At Day 63 from Day 21 for Flulaval/placebo/unadjuvanted Arepanrix and Flulaval/placebo/Arepanrix Groups; At Day 42 from Day 0 for the 4 other groups |
| Number of Seroprotected Subjects for Antibodies Against A/California Strain. | Seroprotection rate was defined as the proportion of subjects with H1N1 reciprocal HI titers ≥ 40 against the tested vaccine virus. | At Day 63 for Flulaval/placebo/unadjuvanted Arepanrix and Flulaval/placebo/Arepanrix Groups; At Day 42 for the 4 other groups. |
| Seroconversion Factor for Antibodies Against A/California Strain. | Seroconversion factor was defined as the geometric mean of the within-subject ratios of the post-vaccination reciprocal HI titer to the prevaccination reciprocal HI titer. | At Day 63 from Day 21 for Flulaval/placebo/unadjuvanted Arepanrix and Flulaval/placebo/Arepanrix Groups; At Day 42 from Day 0 for the 4 other groups |
| Number of Seroconverted Subjects for Antibodies Against Flulaval Vaccine Strains. | Seroconversion defined as: For initially seronegative subjects, antibody titer ≥ 1:40 after vaccination For initially seropositive subjects, antibody titer after vaccination ≥ 4 fold the pre-vaccination antibody titer Flulaval vaccines strains were A/Brisbane/59/2007 H1N1, A/Uruguay/716/2007 H3N2 and B/Brisbane/60/2008. For the analysis the Flulaval/placebo/unadjuvanted Arepanrix Group and the Flulaval/placebo/Arepanrix Group were pooled. | At Day 21 from Day 0 for the pooled group, Flulaval/unadjuvanted Arepanrix/placebo and Flulaval/Arepanrix/placebo Groups; at Day 63 from Day 42 for Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/placebo/Flulaval Group and Arepanrix/placebo/Flulaval Group |
| Number of Seroprotected Subjects for Antibodies Against Flulaval Vaccine Strains | Seroprotection was defined as the proportion of subjects with H1N1 reciprocal Hemagglutination Inhibition (HI) titers ≥ 1:40 against the tested vaccine virus. Flulaval vaccines strains were A/Brisbane/59/2007 H1N1, A/Uruguay/716/2007 H3N2 and B/Brisbane/60/2008. For the analysis the Flulaval/placebo/unadjuvanted Arepanrix Group and the Flulaval/placebo/Arepanrix Group were pooled. | At Day 21 for the pooled group, Flulaval/unadjuvanted Arepanrix/placebo and Flulaval/Arepanrix/placebo Groups; at Day 63 for Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/placebo/Flulaval Group and Arepanrix/placebo/Flulaval Group |
| Seroconversion Factor for Antibodies Against Flulaval Vaccine Strains. | Seroconversion factor was defined as the geometric mean of the within-subject ratios of the post-vaccination reciprocal Hemagglutination Inhibition (HI) titer to the prevaccination reciprocal HI titer. Flulaval vaccines strains were A/Brisbane/59/2007 H1N1, A/Uruguay/716/2007 H3N2 and B/Brisbane/60/2008. For the analysis the Flulaval/placebo/unadjuvanted Arepanrix Group and the Flulaval/placebo/Arepanrix Group were pooled. | At Day 21 from Day 0 for the pooled group, Flulaval/unadjuvanted Arepanrix/placebo and Flulaval/Arepanrix/placebo Groups; at Day 63 from Day 42 for Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/placebo/Flulaval Group and Arepanrix/placebo/Flulaval Group |
| Number of Seroconverted Subjects for Antibodies Against Flulaval Vaccine Strains | Seroconversion defined as: For initially seronegative subjects, antibody titer ≥ 1:40 after vaccination For initially seropositive subjects, antibody titer after vaccination ≥ 4 fold the pre-vaccination antibody titer Flulaval vaccines strains were A/Brisbane/59/2007 H1N1, A/Uruguay/716/2007 H3N2 and B/Brisbane/60/2008. | on Days 21 and 63 from Day 0 for the first 4 groups; on Days 42 and 63 from Day 0 for the Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/placebo/Flulaval and Arepanrix/placebo/Flulaval Groups |
| Number of Seroconverted Subjects for Antibodies Against Flulaval Vaccine Strains | Seroconversion defined as: For initially seronegative subjects, antibody titer ≥ 1:40 after vaccination For initially seropositive subjects, antibody titer after vaccination ≥ 4 fold the pre-vaccination antibody titer Flulaval vaccines strains were A/Brisbane/59/2007 H1N1, A/Uruguay/716/2007 H3N2 and B/Brisbane/60/2008. | At Day 182 from Day 0 |
| Number of Seroprotected Subjects for Antibodies Against Flulaval Vaccine Strains. | Seroprotection rate was defined as the proportion of subjects with H1N1 reciprocal HI titers ≥ 40 against the tested vaccine virus. Flulaval vaccines strains were A/Brisbane/59/2007 H1N1, A/Uruguay/716/2007 H3N2 and B/Brisbane/60/2008. | before vaccination and on days 21 and 63 for the first 4 groups and before vaccination and on days 42 and 63 for the Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/placebo/Flulaval and Arepanrix/placebo/Flulaval Groups |
| Number of Seroprotected Subjects for Antibodies Against Flulaval Vaccine Strains. | Seroprotection rate was defined as the proportion of subjects with H1N1 reciprocal HI titers ≥ 40 against the tested vaccine virus. Flulaval vaccines strains were A/Brisbane/59/2007 H1N1, A/Uruguay/716/2007 H3N2 and B/Brisbane/60/2008. | At Day 182 after the first dose |
| Seroconversion Factor for Antibodies Against Flulaval Vaccine Strains. | Seroconversion factor of the within-subject ratios of the post-vaccination reciprocal HI titer to the Day 0 reciprocal HI titer. Flulaval vaccines strains were A/Brisbane/59/2007 H1N1, A/Uruguay/716/2007 H3N2 and B/Brisbane/60/2008. | On Days 21 and 63 from Day 0 for the first 4 groups and on Days 42 and 63 from Day 0 for the Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/placebo/Flulaval and Arepanrix/placebo/Flulaval Groups |
| Seroconversion Factor for Antibodies Against Flulaval Vaccine Strains. | Seroconversion factor of the within-subject ratios of the post-vaccination reciprocal HI titer to the Day 0 reciprocal HI titer. Flulaval vaccines strains were A/Brisbane/59/2007 H1N1, A/Uruguay/716/2007 H3N2 and B/Brisbane/60/2008. | At Day 182 from Day 0 |
| Geometric Mean Antibody Titers (GMTs) for Hemagglutination Inhibition (HI) Antibodies Against Flulaval Vaccine Strains. | Titers were expressed as geometric mean titers (GMTs). Flulaval vaccines strains were A/Brisbane/59/2007 H1N1, A/Uruguay/716/2007 H3N2 and B/Brisbane/60/2008. | On Days 0, 21 and 63 for the first 4 groups and on Days 0, 42 and 63 for the Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/placebo/Flulaval and Arepanrix/placebo/Flulaval Groups |
| Geometric Mean Antibody Titers (GMTs) for Hemagglutination Inhibition (HI) Antibodies Against Flulaval Vaccine Strains. | Titers were expressed as geometric mean titers (GMTs). Flulaval vaccines strains were A/Brisbane/59/2007 H1N1, A/Uruguay/716/2007 H3N2 and B/Brisbane/60/2008. | At Day 182 after dose 1 vaccination |
| Raleigh |
| North Carolina |
| 27612 |
| United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Austin | Texas | 78705 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Fort Worth | Texas | 76135 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Halifax | Nova Scotia | B3K 6R8 | Canada |
| GSK Investigational Site | Montreal | Quebec | H2K 4L5 | Canada |
| GSK Investigational Site | Sherbrooke | Quebec | J1H 4J6 | Canada |
| Langley JM, Frenette L, Chu L, McNeil S, Halperin S, Li P, Vaughn D. A randomized, controlled non-inferiority trial comparing A(H1N1)pmd09 vaccine antigen, with and without AS03 adjuvant system, co-administered or sequentially administered with an inactivated trivalent seasonal influenza vaccine. BMC Infect Dis. 2012 Oct 30;12:279. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-12-279. |
For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register |
| 113536 | Informed Consent Form | View IPD | For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register |
| 113536 | Study Protocol | View IPD | For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register |
| 113536 | Individual Participant Data Set | View IPD | For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register |
| 113536 | Clinical Study Report | View IPD | For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register |
| 113536 | Statistical Analysis Plan | View IPD | For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register |
| 113536 | Annotated Case Report Form | View IPD | For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register |
| FG001 | Flulaval/Placebo/Arepanrix Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed the administration of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| FG002 | Flulaval/Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/Placebo Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 0 followed by the administration of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and saline placebo on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| FG003 | Flulaval/Arepanrix/Placebo Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and Arepanrix vaccine on Day 0 followed by Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and saline placebo on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| FG004 | Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/Placebo/Flulaval Group | subjects received co-administration of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Flulaval vaccine on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| FG005 | Arepanrix/Placebo/Flulaval Group | subjects received co-administration of Arepanrix vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Flulaval vaccine on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Flulaval/Placebo/Unadjuvanted Arepanrix Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| BG001 | Flulaval/Placebo/Arepanrix Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed the administration of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| BG002 | Flulaval/Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/Placebo Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 0 followed by the administration of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and saline placebo on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| BG003 | Flulaval/Arepanrix/Placebo Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and Arepanrix vaccine on Day 0 followed by Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and saline placebo on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| BG004 | Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/Placebo/Flulaval Group | subjects received co-administration of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Flulaval vaccine on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| BG005 | Arepanrix/Placebo/Flulaval Group | subjects received co-administration of Arepanrix vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Flulaval vaccine on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| BG006 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | Years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Hemagglutination Inhibition (HI) Antibody Titers Against A/California/7/2009 H1N1 Vaccine Strain. | The A/California vaccine virus-homologous antibody response was measured in subjects having received Flulaval vaccine co-administered with the first dose of Arepanrix vaccine, and in subjects having received two doses of Arepanrix vaccine alone. Titers were expressed as geometric mean antibody titers (GMTs). | The According-To-Protocol (ATP) cohort for immunogenicity included evaluable subjects (i.e. those meeting eligibility criteria, with no elimination criteria) who received 2 doses and for whom assay results were available for antibodies against H1N1 antigen 21 days after the 2nd vaccine dose. | Posted | Geometric Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | Titers | 21 days after the second dose of Arepanrix vaccine (at Day 42). |
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Hemagglutination Inhibition (HI) Antibody Titers Against A/California/7/2009 H1N1 Vaccine Strain. | The A/California vaccine virus-homologous antibody response was measured in subjects having received Flulaval vaccine co-administered with the first dose of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine, and in subjects having received two doses of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine alone. Titers were expressed as geometric mean antibody titers (GMTs). | The According-To-Protocol (ATP) cohort for immunogenicity included evaluable subjects (i.e. those meeting eligibility criteria, with no elimination criteria) who received 2 doses and for whom assay results were available for antibodies against H1N1 antigen 21 days after the 2nd vaccine dose. | Posted | Geometric Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | Titers | 21 days after the second dose of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine (at Day 42) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Influenza-specific Cluster of Differentiation 4 (CD4) T-cells Per Million Producing Two or More Markers Within Cluster Differentiation 40 Ligand (CD40L), Interleukin-2 (IL-2), Interferon-γ (IFN-γ) and Tumor Necrosis Factor-α (TNF-α). | Influenza-specific CD4 T-Cells were stimulated in vitro with A/California virus and seasonal Influenza viruses, related antigens or derived peptides. Stimulating antigens were A/Brisbane, A/California, pool peptides H1N1 and pool FLU. | The According-To-Protocol (ATP) cohort for immunogenicity at Day 182 included evaluable subjects (i.e. those meeting eligibility criteria, with no elimination criteria) for whom 1 dose of Flulaval vaccine and 2 doses of pandemic vaccine were administered and results were available for antibodies against H1N1 antigen at day 182. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Number of T cells/million | On Days 0, 7, 21, 28, 42, 63 and 182 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Influenza-specific Cluster of Differentiation 8 (CD8) T-cells Per Million Producing Two or More Markers Within Cluster Differentiation 40 Ligand (CD40L), Interleukin-2 (IL-2), Interferon-γ (IFN-γ) and Tumor Necrosis Factor-α (TNF-α). | Influenza-specific CD8 T-Cells were stimulated in vitro with A/California virus and seasonal Influenza viruses, related antigens or derived peptides. Stimulating antigens were A/Brisbane, A/California, pool peptides H1N1 and pool FLU. | The According-To-Protocol (ATP) cohort for immunogenicity at Day 182 included evaluable subjects (i.e. those meeting eligibility criteria, with no elimination criteria) for whom 1 dose of Flulaval vaccine and 2 doses of pandemic vaccine were administered and results were available for antibodies against H1N1 antigen at day 182. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Number of T cells/million | On Days 0, 7, 21, 28, 42, 63 and 182 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Subjects Reporting Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemical and Haematological Parameters Assessed | Laboratory parameters assessed were alanine aminotransferase (ALAT), aspartate aminotransferase (ASAT), alkaline phosphatase (AP), bilirubin (BIL) (total (T)), basophils (BAS). For each parameter and for each range it was assessed whether the values of the subjects were in unkown, above, below or within the range. | The Total Vaccinated Cohort included all vaccinated subjects. | Posted | Number | Subjects | On Days 0, 7, 21, 28, 42, 63 and 182 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Subjects Reporting Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemical and Haematological Parameters Assessed | Laboratory parameters assessed were creatinine (CREA), bilirubin (BIL) (direct (D)), eosinophils (EOS), hemoglobin (Hgb), hematocrit (Hct). For each parameter and for each range it was assessed whether the values of the subjects were unknown, in above, below or within the range. | The Total Vaccinated cohort included all vaccinated subjects | Posted | Number | Subjects | On Days 0, 7, 21, 28, 42, 63 and 182 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Subjects Reporting Solicited Local Symptoms. | Solicited local symptoms assessed were pain, redness and swelling | The Total Vaccinated cohort included all vaccinated subjects | Posted | Number | Subjects | During a 7-day follow-up period (Days 0-6) post-vaccination period |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Subjects Reporting Solicited General Symptoms. | Solicited general symptoms assessed were fatigue, headache, joint pain at other location, muscle aches, shivering, sweating and temperature. Temperature is defined as an axillary temperature equal to or above 38.0 degrees Celsius (°C). | The Total Vaccinated cohort included all vaccinated subjects | Posted | Number | Subjects | During a 7-day follow-up period (Days 0-6) post-vaccination period |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Subjects Reporting Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemical and Haematological Parameters Assessed | Laboratory parameters assessed were serum urea nitrogen (SUN), white blood cells (WBC), red blood cells (RBC). For each parameter and for each range it was assessed whether the values of the subjects were unknown, above, below or within the range. | The Total Vaccinated cohort included all vaccinated subjects | Posted | Number | Subjects | On Days 0, 7, 21, 28, 42, 63 and 182 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Subjects Reporting Unsolicited Adverse Events (AEs). | An unsolicited adverse event is any adverse event (i.e. any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject, temporally associated with use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product) reported in addition to those solicited during the clinical study and any solicited symptom with onset outside the specified period of follow-up for solicited symptoms. | The Total Vaccinated Cohort included all vaccinated subjects. | Posted | Number | Subjects | Within the 84-day (Days 0-83) post-vaccination period. |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Subjects Reporting Medically Attended Visits (MAEs). | The day 368 was the last contact day for the last subject reporting the event. For each solicited and unsolicited symptom the subject experienced, the subject was asked if they received medical attention defined as hospitalization, an emergency room visit or a visit to or from medical personnel for any reason. | The Total Vaccinated Cohort included all vaccinated subjects. | Posted | Number | Subjects | During the entire study period (Days 0-368). |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Subjects Reporting Potential Immune Diseases (pIMDs). | The day 406 was the last contact day with the subjects reporting the event. Potential immune-mediated diseases (pIMDs) are a subset of AEs that include both clearly autoimmune diseases and also other inflammatory and/or neurologic disorders which may or may not have an autoimmune etiology. | The Total Vaccinated Cohort included all vaccinated subjects. | Posted | Number | Subjects | During the entire study period (Days 0-406). |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Subjects Reporting Serious Adverse Events (SAEs). | The day 329 was the last contact day with the subjects reporting serious adverse events. SAEs assessed include medical occurrences that results in death, are life threatening, require hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity or are a congenital anomaly/birth defect in the offspring of a study subjects. | The Total Vaccinated Cohort included all vaccinated subjects. | Posted | Number | Subjects | During the entire study period (Days 0-329). |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Subjects Reporting Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemical and Haematological Parameters Assessed | Laboratory parameters assessed were neutrophils (NEU), lymphocytes (LYM), monocytes (MON) and platelets (PLA). For each parameter and for each range it was assessed whether the values of the subjects were unknown, in above, below or within the range. | The Total Vaccinated cohort included all vaccinated subjects | Posted | Number | Subjects | On Days 0, 7, 21, 28, 42, 63 and 182 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Microneutralization Antibody Titers Against A/California/7/2009 (H1N1) Strain. | Titers were expressed as geometric mean titers (GMTs) and measured by microneutralization. Arepanrix vaccine strain and the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine strain was A/California/7/2009 (H1N1). Microneutralization testing was cancelled. | Microneutralization testing was cancelled. | Posted | On Days 0, 21, 42, 63 and 182 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Subjects With a Microneutralization Titer Greater Than or Equal to 1:28 for Antibodies Against A/California/7/2009 (H1N1) Strain. | Arepanrix vaccine strain and the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine strain was A/California/7/2009 (H1N1). The antibody cut-off value assessed was a titer of 1:10 and this value was considered as seropositivity. Seronegative subject is a subject whose antibody titer is below the cut-off value, a seropositive subject is a subject whose antibody titer is greater than or equal to the cut-off value. Microneutralization titers < 1:28 were considered below the cut-off. Microneutralization testing was cancelled. | Microneutralization testing was cancelled. | Posted | On Days 0, 21, 42, 63 and 182 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Vaccine Response Rates (VRR) for Microneutralization Antibody Titers Against A/California/7/2009 (H1N1) Strain. | Arepanrix vaccine strain and the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine strain was A/California/7/2009 (H1N1). Vaccine Response Rate for microneutralization titers was defined as the incidence rate of vaccinees with at least a 4-fold increase in post vaccination reciprocal titer relative to Day 0. Microneutralization testing was cancelled. | Microneutralization testing was cancelled. | Posted | On Days 0, 21, 42, 63 and 182 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Hemagglutination Inhibition (HI) Antibody Titers Against A/California/7/2009 H1N1 Vaccine Strain. | The A/California vaccine virus-homologous antibody response was measured in subjects having received two doses of Arepanrix vaccine, with prior treatment with Flulaval vaccine 21 days before the first dose and in subjects having received two doses of Arepanrix vaccine alone. Titers were expressed as geometric mean antibody titers (GMTs). | The According-To-Protocol (ATP) cohort for immunogenicity included evaluable subjects (i.e. those meeting eligibility criteria, with no elimination criteria) who received 2 doses and for whom assay results were available for antibodies against H1N1 antigen 21 days after the 2nd vaccine dose. | Posted | Geometric Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | Titers | 21 days after the second dose of Arepanrix vaccine (Day 63 for Flulaval/placebo/Arepanrix Group and Day 42 for Arepanrix/placebo/Flulaval Group) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Hemagglutination Inhibition (HI) Antibody Titers Against A/California/7/2009 H1N1 Vaccine Strain. | The A/California vaccine virus-homologous antibody response was measured in subjects having received two doses of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine, with prior treatment with Flulaval vaccine 21 days before the first dose and in subjects having received two doses of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine alone. Titers were expressed as geometric mean antibody titers (GMTs). | The According-To-Protocol (ATP) cohort for immunogenicity included evaluable subjects (i.e. those meeting eligibility criteria, with no elimination criteria) who received 2 doses and for whom assay results were available for antibodies against H1N1 antigen 21 days after the 2nd vaccine dose. | Posted | Geometric Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | Titers | 21 days after the second dose of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine (Day 63 for Flulaval/placebo/unadjuvanted Arepanrix Group and Day 42 for Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/placebo/Flulaval Group) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Hemagglutination Inhibition (HI) Antibody Titers Against A/California/7/2009 H1N1 Vaccine Strain. | The A/California vaccine virus-homologous antibody response was measured in subjects pre-treated with Flulaval who subsequently received two doses of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine compared to subjects pre-treated with Flulaval vaccine who subsequently received two doses of Arepanrix vaccine. Titers were expressed as geometric mean antibody titers (GMTs). | The According-To-Protocol (ATP) cohort for immunogenicity included evaluable subjects (i.e. those meeting eligibility criteria, with no elimination criteria) who received 2 doses and for whom assay results were available for antibodies against H1N1 antigen 21 days after the 2nd vaccine dose. | Posted | Geometric Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | Titers | 21 days after the second dose of the pandemic vaccine (at Day 63) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Hemagglutination Inhibition (HI) Antibody Titers Against Each of the Three Flulaval Strains. | The antibody response against each of the three Flulaval vaccine components in subjects exposed to co-administration of Flulaval vaccine with the first of two doses of Arepanrix vaccine and in subjects exposed to a single dose of Flulaval vaccine. Flulaval vaccine strains were Flu A/Brisbane/59/2007 H1N1, Flu A/Uruguay/716/2007 H3N2 and Flu B/Brisbane/60/2008. Titers were expressed as geometric mean antibody titers (GMTs). | The According-To-Protocol (ATP) cohort for immunogenicity included evaluable subjects (i.e. those meeting eligibility criteria, with no elimination criteria) who received 2 doses and for whom assay results were available for antibodies against H1N1 antigen 21 days after the 2nd vaccine dose. | Posted | Geometric Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | Titers | 21 days after the Flulaval vaccination (at Day 21). |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Hemagglutination Inhibition (HI) Antibody Titers Against Each of the Three Flulaval Strains. | The antibody response against each of the three Flulaval vaccine components in subjects exposed to co-administration of Flulaval vaccine with the first of two doses of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine and in subjects exposed to a single dose of Flulaval vaccine. Flulaval vaccine strains were Flu A/Brisbane/59/2007 H1N1, Flu A/Uruguay/716/2007 H3N2 and Flu B/Brisbane/60/2008. Titers were expressed as geometric mean antibody titers (GMTs). | The According-To-Protocol (ATP) cohort for immunogenicity included evaluable subjects (i.e. those meeting eligibility criteria, with no elimination criteria) who received 2 doses and for whom assay results were available for antibodies against H1N1 antigen 21 days after the 2nd vaccine dose. | Posted | Geometric Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | Titers | 21 days after the Flulaval vaccination (at Day 21). |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Hemagglutination Inhibition (HI) Antibody Titers Against Each of the Three Flulaval Strains. | The antibody response against each of the three Flulaval vaccine components in subjects exposed to pre-treatment with two doses of Arepanrix vaccine and in subjects exposed to a single dose of Flulaval vaccine. Flulaval vaccine strains were Flu A/Brisbane/59/2007 H1N1, Flu A/Uruguay/716/2007 H3N2 and Flu B/Brisbane/60/2008. Titers were expressed as geometric mean antibody titers (GMTs). | The According-To-Protocol (ATP) cohort for immunogenicity included evaluable subjects (i.e. those meeting eligibility criteria, with no elimination criteria) who received 2 doses and for whom assay results were available for antibodies against H1N1 antigen 21 days after the 2nd vaccine dose. | Posted | Geometric Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | Titers | 21 days after the Flulaval vaccination (Day 63 for Arepanrix/placebo/Flulaval Group and Day 21 for Flulaval/placebo/unadjuvanted Arepanrix and Flulaval/placebo/Arepanrix Groups) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Hemagglutination Inhibition (HI) Antibody Titers Against Each of the Three Flulaval Strains. | The antibody response against each of the three Flulaval vaccine components in subjects exposed to pre-treatment with two doses of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine and in subjects exposed to a single dose of Flulaval vaccine. Flulaval vaccine strains were Flu A/Brisbane/59/2007 H1N1, Flu A/Uruguay/716/2007 H3N2 and Flu B/Brisbane/60/2008. Titers were expressed as geometric mean antibody titers (GMTs). | The According-To-Protocol (ATP) cohort for immunogenicity included evaluable subjects (i.e. those meeting eligibility criteria, with no elimination criteria) who received 2 doses and for whom assay results were available for antibodies against H1N1 antigen 21 days after the 2nd vaccine dose. | Posted | Geometric Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | Titers | 21 days after the Flulaval vaccination (Day 63 for Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/placebo/Flulaval Group and Day 21 for Flulaval/placebo/unadjuvanted Arepanrix and Flulaval/placebo/Arepanrix Groups) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Geometric Mean Antibody Titers (GMTs) for Hemagglutination Inhibition (HI) Antibodies Against Flu A/California H1N1 Strain. | Titers were expressed as geometric mean antibody titers (GMTs). | The According-To-Protocol (ATP) cohort for immunogenicity included evaluable subjects (i.e. those meeting eligibility criteria, with no elimination criteria) who received 2 doses and for whom assay results were available for antibodies against H1N1 antigen 21 days after the 2nd vaccine dose. | Posted | Geometric Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | Titers | On Days 0, 21, 42 and 63 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Geometric Mean Antibody Titers (GMTs) for Hemagglutination Inhibition (HI) Antibodies Against Flu A/California H1N1 Strain. | Titers were expressed as geometric mean antibody titers (GMTs). | The According-To-Protocol (ATP) cohort for immunogenicity at Day 182 included evaluable subjects (i.e. those meeting eligibility criteria, with no elimination criteria) for whom 1 dose of Flulaval vaccine and 2 doses of pandemic vaccine were administered and results were available for antibodies against H1N1 antigen at Day 182. | Posted | Geometric Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | Titers | At Day 182 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Seroconverted Subjects for Antibodies Against A/ California Strain. | Seroconversion rate was defined as the incidence rate of vaccinees who had either a pre-vaccination titer recorded as < 1:10 and a post-vaccination reciprocal titer ≥ 40 or a pre-vaccination reciprocal titer ≥ 10 and at least a 4-fold increase in post vaccination reciprocal titer. Seroconversion defined as: For initially seronegative subjects, antibody titer ≥ 1:40 after vaccination For initially seropositive subjects, antibody titer after vaccination ≥ 4 fold the pre-vaccination antibody titer | The According-To-Protocol (ATP) cohort for immunogenicity included evaluable subjects (i.e. those meeting eligibility criteria, with no elimination criteria) who received 2 doses and for whom assay results were available for antibodies against H1N1 antigen 21 days after the 2nd vaccine dose. | Posted | Number | Subjects | At Day 63 from Day 21 for Flulaval/placebo/unadjuvanted Arepanrix and Flulaval/placebo/Arepanrix Groups; At Day 42 from Day 0 for the 4 other groups |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Seroprotected Subjects for Antibodies Against A/California Strain. | Seroprotection rate was defined as the proportion of subjects with H1N1 reciprocal HI titers ≥ 40 against the tested vaccine virus. | The According-To-Protocol (ATP) cohort for immunogenicity included evaluable subjects (i.e. those meeting eligibility criteria, with no elimination criteria) who received 2 doses and for whom assay results were available for antibodies against H1N1 antigen 21 days after the 2nd vaccine dose. | Posted | Number | Subjects | At Day 63 for Flulaval/placebo/unadjuvanted Arepanrix and Flulaval/placebo/Arepanrix Groups; At Day 42 for the 4 other groups. |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Seroconversion Factor for Antibodies Against A/California Strain. | Seroconversion factor was defined as the geometric mean of the within-subject ratios of the post-vaccination reciprocal HI titer to the prevaccination reciprocal HI titer. | The According-To-Protocol (ATP) cohort for immunogenicity included evaluable subjects (i.e. those meeting eligibility criteria, with no elimination criteria) who received 2 doses and for whom assay results were available for antibodies against H1N1 antigen 21 days after the 2nd vaccine dose. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | Fold | At Day 63 from Day 21 for Flulaval/placebo/unadjuvanted Arepanrix and Flulaval/placebo/Arepanrix Groups; At Day 42 from Day 0 for the 4 other groups |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Seroconverted Subjects for Antibodies Against Flulaval Vaccine Strains. | Seroconversion defined as: For initially seronegative subjects, antibody titer ≥ 1:40 after vaccination For initially seropositive subjects, antibody titer after vaccination ≥ 4 fold the pre-vaccination antibody titer Flulaval vaccines strains were A/Brisbane/59/2007 H1N1, A/Uruguay/716/2007 H3N2 and B/Brisbane/60/2008. For the analysis the Flulaval/placebo/unadjuvanted Arepanrix Group and the Flulaval/placebo/Arepanrix Group were pooled. | The According-To-Protocol (ATP) cohort for immunogenicity included evaluable subjects (i.e. those meeting eligibility criteria, with no elimination criteria) who received 2 doses and for whom assay results were available for antibodies against H1N1 antigen 21 days after the 2nd vaccine dose. | Posted | Number | Subjects | At Day 21 from Day 0 for the pooled group, Flulaval/unadjuvanted Arepanrix/placebo and Flulaval/Arepanrix/placebo Groups; at Day 63 from Day 42 for Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/placebo/Flulaval Group and Arepanrix/placebo/Flulaval Group |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Seroprotected Subjects for Antibodies Against Flulaval Vaccine Strains | Seroprotection was defined as the proportion of subjects with H1N1 reciprocal Hemagglutination Inhibition (HI) titers ≥ 1:40 against the tested vaccine virus. Flulaval vaccines strains were A/Brisbane/59/2007 H1N1, A/Uruguay/716/2007 H3N2 and B/Brisbane/60/2008. For the analysis the Flulaval/placebo/unadjuvanted Arepanrix Group and the Flulaval/placebo/Arepanrix Group were pooled. | The According-To-Protocol (ATP) cohort for immunogenicity included evaluable subjects (i.e. those meeting eligibility criteria, with no elimination criteria) who received 2 doses and for whom assay results were available for antibodies against H1N1 antigen 21 days after the 2nd vaccine dose. | Posted | Number | Subjects | At Day 21 for the pooled group, Flulaval/unadjuvanted Arepanrix/placebo and Flulaval/Arepanrix/placebo Groups; at Day 63 for Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/placebo/Flulaval Group and Arepanrix/placebo/Flulaval Group |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Seroconversion Factor for Antibodies Against Flulaval Vaccine Strains. | Seroconversion factor was defined as the geometric mean of the within-subject ratios of the post-vaccination reciprocal Hemagglutination Inhibition (HI) titer to the prevaccination reciprocal HI titer. Flulaval vaccines strains were A/Brisbane/59/2007 H1N1, A/Uruguay/716/2007 H3N2 and B/Brisbane/60/2008. For the analysis the Flulaval/placebo/unadjuvanted Arepanrix Group and the Flulaval/placebo/Arepanrix Group were pooled. | The According-To-Protocol (ATP) cohort for immunogenicity included evaluable subjects (i.e. those meeting eligibility criteria, with no elimination criteria) who received 2 doses and for whom assay results were available for antibodies against H1N1 antigen 21 days after the 2nd vaccine dose. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | Fold | At Day 21 from Day 0 for the pooled group, Flulaval/unadjuvanted Arepanrix/placebo and Flulaval/Arepanrix/placebo Groups; at Day 63 from Day 42 for Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/placebo/Flulaval Group and Arepanrix/placebo/Flulaval Group |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Seroconverted Subjects for Antibodies Against Flulaval Vaccine Strains | Seroconversion defined as: For initially seronegative subjects, antibody titer ≥ 1:40 after vaccination For initially seropositive subjects, antibody titer after vaccination ≥ 4 fold the pre-vaccination antibody titer Flulaval vaccines strains were A/Brisbane/59/2007 H1N1, A/Uruguay/716/2007 H3N2 and B/Brisbane/60/2008. | The According-To-Protocol (ATP) cohort for immunogenicity included evaluable subjects (i.e. those meeting eligibility criteria, with no elimination criteria) who received 2 doses and for whom assay results were available for antibodies against H1N1 antigen 21 days after the 2nd vaccine dose. | Posted | Number | Subjects | on Days 21 and 63 from Day 0 for the first 4 groups; on Days 42 and 63 from Day 0 for the Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/placebo/Flulaval and Arepanrix/placebo/Flulaval Groups |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Seroconverted Subjects for Antibodies Against Flulaval Vaccine Strains | Seroconversion defined as: For initially seronegative subjects, antibody titer ≥ 1:40 after vaccination For initially seropositive subjects, antibody titer after vaccination ≥ 4 fold the pre-vaccination antibody titer Flulaval vaccines strains were A/Brisbane/59/2007 H1N1, A/Uruguay/716/2007 H3N2 and B/Brisbane/60/2008. | The According-To-Protocol (ATP) cohort for immunogenicity at Day 182 included evaluable subjects (i.e. those meeting eligibility criteria, with no elimination criteria) for whom 1 dose of Flulaval vaccine and 2 doses of pandemic vaccine were administered and results were available for antibodies against H1N1 antigen at Day 182. | Posted | Number | Subjects | At Day 182 from Day 0 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Seroprotected Subjects for Antibodies Against Flulaval Vaccine Strains. | Seroprotection rate was defined as the proportion of subjects with H1N1 reciprocal HI titers ≥ 40 against the tested vaccine virus. Flulaval vaccines strains were A/Brisbane/59/2007 H1N1, A/Uruguay/716/2007 H3N2 and B/Brisbane/60/2008. | The According-To-Protocol (ATP) cohort for immunogenicity included evaluable subjects (i.e. those meeting eligibility criteria, with no elimination criteria) who received 2 doses and for whom assay results were available for antibodies against H1N1 antigen 21 days after the 2nd vaccine dose. | Posted | Number | Subjects | before vaccination and on days 21 and 63 for the first 4 groups and before vaccination and on days 42 and 63 for the Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/placebo/Flulaval and Arepanrix/placebo/Flulaval Groups |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Seroprotected Subjects for Antibodies Against Flulaval Vaccine Strains. | Seroprotection rate was defined as the proportion of subjects with H1N1 reciprocal HI titers ≥ 40 against the tested vaccine virus. Flulaval vaccines strains were A/Brisbane/59/2007 H1N1, A/Uruguay/716/2007 H3N2 and B/Brisbane/60/2008. | The According-To-Protocol (ATP) cohort for immunogenicity at Day 182 included evaluable subjects (i.e. those meeting eligibility criteria, with no elimination criteria) for whom 1 dose of Flulaval vaccine and 2 doses of pandemic vaccine were administered and results were available for antibodies against H1N1 antigen at Day 182. | Posted | Number | Subjects | At Day 182 after the first dose |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Seroconversion Factor for Antibodies Against Flulaval Vaccine Strains. | Seroconversion factor of the within-subject ratios of the post-vaccination reciprocal HI titer to the Day 0 reciprocal HI titer. Flulaval vaccines strains were A/Brisbane/59/2007 H1N1, A/Uruguay/716/2007 H3N2 and B/Brisbane/60/2008. | The According-To-Protocol (ATP) cohort for immunogenicity included evaluable subjects (i.e. those meeting eligibility criteria, with no elimination criteria) who received 2 doses and for whom assay results were available for antibodies against H1N1 antigen 21 days after the 2nd vaccine dose. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | Fold | On Days 21 and 63 from Day 0 for the first 4 groups and on Days 42 and 63 from Day 0 for the Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/placebo/Flulaval and Arepanrix/placebo/Flulaval Groups |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Seroconversion Factor for Antibodies Against Flulaval Vaccine Strains. | Seroconversion factor of the within-subject ratios of the post-vaccination reciprocal HI titer to the Day 0 reciprocal HI titer. Flulaval vaccines strains were A/Brisbane/59/2007 H1N1, A/Uruguay/716/2007 H3N2 and B/Brisbane/60/2008. | The According-To-Protocol (ATP) cohort for immunogenicity at Day 182 included evaluable subjects (i.e. those meeting eligibility criteria, with no elimination criteria) for whom 1 dose of Flulaval vaccine and 2 doses of pandemic vaccine were administered and results were available for antibodies against H1N1 antigen at Day 182. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | Fold | At Day 182 from Day 0 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Geometric Mean Antibody Titers (GMTs) for Hemagglutination Inhibition (HI) Antibodies Against Flulaval Vaccine Strains. | Titers were expressed as geometric mean titers (GMTs). Flulaval vaccines strains were A/Brisbane/59/2007 H1N1, A/Uruguay/716/2007 H3N2 and B/Brisbane/60/2008. | The According-To-Protocol (ATP) cohort for immunogenicity included evaluable subjects (i.e. those meeting eligibility criteria, with no elimination criteria) who received 2 doses and for whom assay results were available for antibodies against H1N1 antigen 21 days after the 2nd vaccine dose. | Posted | Geometric Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | Titers | On Days 0, 21 and 63 for the first 4 groups and on Days 0, 42 and 63 for the Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/placebo/Flulaval and Arepanrix/placebo/Flulaval Groups |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Geometric Mean Antibody Titers (GMTs) for Hemagglutination Inhibition (HI) Antibodies Against Flulaval Vaccine Strains. | Titers were expressed as geometric mean titers (GMTs). Flulaval vaccines strains were A/Brisbane/59/2007 H1N1, A/Uruguay/716/2007 H3N2 and B/Brisbane/60/2008. | The According-To-Protocol (ATP) cohort for immunogenicity at Day 182 included evaluable subjects (i.e. those meeting eligibility criteria, with no elimination criteria) for whom 1 dose of Flulaval vaccine and 2 doses of pandemic vaccine were administered and results were available for antibodies against H1N1 antigen at Day 182. | Posted | Geometric Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | Titers | At Day 182 after dose 1 vaccination |
|
SAEs:during the entire study period (Days 0-329). Unsolicited AEs: within the 84-day (Days 0-83) post-vaccination period. Solicited symptoms: During a 7-day follow-up period (Days 0-6) after vaccination
SAEs were collected up to Day 329 which corresponds to the last contact day with the subjects reporting serious adverse events.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Flulaval/Placebo/Unadjuvanted Arepanrix Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. | 3 | 102 | 92 | 102 | ||
| EG001 | Flulaval/Placebo/Arepanrix Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed the administration of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. | 1 | 104 | 91 | 104 | ||
| EG002 | Flulaval/Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/Placebo Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 0 followed by the administration of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and saline placebo on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. | 1 | 102 | 86 | 102 | ||
| EG003 | Flulaval/Arepanrix/Placebo Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and Arepanrix vaccine on Day 0 followed by Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and saline placebo on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. | 2 | 100 | 97 | 100 | ||
| EG004 | Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/Placebo/Flulaval Group | subjects received co-administration of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Flulaval vaccine on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. | 1 | 101 | 84 | 101 | ||
| EG005 | Arepanrix/Placebo/Flulaval Group | subjects received co-administration of Arepanrix vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Flulaval vaccine on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. | 3 | 102 | 99 | 102 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tenosynovitis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Abscess limb | Infections and infestations | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Alanine aminotransferase increased | Investigations | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Gestational hypertension | Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Jaundice | Hepatobiliary disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Oral disorder | Gastrointestinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pelvic fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Radius fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Scapula fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Seminoma | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Sinus bradycardia | Cardiac disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Suicide attempt | Psychiatric disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| VIIth nerve paralysis | Nervous system disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Upper respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Oropharyngeal pain | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Cough | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Nasal congestion | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Nasopharyngitis | Infections and infestations | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Rhinorrhoea | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pain | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Redness | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Swelling | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Fatigue | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Headache | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Joint pain at other location | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Muscle aches | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Shivering | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Sweating | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Temperature | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
GSK agreements may vary with individual investigators, but will not prohibit any investigator from publishing. GSK supports the publication of results from all centers of a multi-center trial but requests that reports based on single-site data not precede the primary publication of the entire clinical trial.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSK Response Center | GlaxoSmithKline | 866-435-7343 |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007251 | Influenza, Human |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012141 | Respiratory Tract Infections |
| D007239 | Infections |
| D009976 | Orthomyxoviridae Infections |
| D012327 | RNA Virus Infections |
| D014777 | Virus Diseases |
| D012140 | Respiratory Tract Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| Male |
|
| OG002 | Flulaval/Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/Placebo Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 0 followed by the administration of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and saline placebo on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG003 | Flulaval/Arepanrix/Placebo Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and Arepanrix vaccine on Day 0 followed by Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and saline placebo on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG004 | Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/Placebo/Flulaval Group | subjects received co-administration of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Flulaval vaccine on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG005 | Arepanrix/Placebo/Flulaval Group | subjects received co-administration of Arepanrix vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Flulaval vaccine on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
|
|
| OG002 | Flulaval/Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/Placebo Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 0 followed by the administration of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and saline placebo on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG003 | Flulaval/Arepanrix/Placebo Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and Arepanrix vaccine on Day 0 followed by Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and saline placebo on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG004 | Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/Placebo/Flulaval Group | subjects received co-administration of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Flulaval vaccine on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG005 | Arepanrix/Placebo/Flulaval Group | subjects received co-administration of Arepanrix vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Flulaval vaccine on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
|
|
| OG002 | Flulaval/Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/Placebo Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 0 followed by the administration of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and saline placebo on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG003 | Flulaval/Arepanrix/Placebo Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and Arepanrix vaccine on Day 0 followed by Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and saline placebo on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG004 | Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/Placebo/Flulaval Group | subjects received co-administration of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Flulaval vaccine on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG005 | Arepanrix/Placebo/Flulaval Group | subjects received co-administration of Arepanrix vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Flulaval vaccine on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
|
|
| OG002 | Flulaval/Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/Placebo Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 0 followed by the administration of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and saline placebo on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG003 | Flulaval/Arepanrix/Placebo Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and Arepanrix vaccine on Day 0 followed by Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and saline placebo on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG004 | Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/Placebo/Flulaval Group | subjects received co-administration of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Flulaval vaccine on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG005 | Arepanrix/Placebo/Flulaval Group | subjects received co-administration of Arepanrix vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Flulaval vaccine on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
|
|
| OG002 | Flulaval/Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/Placebo Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 0 followed by the administration of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and saline placebo on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG003 | Flulaval/Arepanrix/Placebo Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and Arepanrix vaccine on Day 0 followed by Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and saline placebo on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG004 | Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/Placebo/Flulaval Group | subjects received co-administration of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Flulaval vaccine on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG005 | Arepanrix/Placebo/Flulaval Group | subjects received co-administration of Arepanrix vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Flulaval vaccine on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
|
|
subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 0 followed by the administration of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and saline placebo on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm.
| OG003 | Flulaval/Arepanrix/Placebo Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and Arepanrix vaccine on Day 0 followed by Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and saline placebo on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG004 | Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/Placebo/Flulaval Group | subjects received co-administration of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Flulaval vaccine on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG005 | Arepanrix/Placebo/Flulaval Group | subjects received co-administration of Arepanrix vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Flulaval vaccine on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
|
|
| OG002 |
| Flulaval/Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/Placebo Group |
subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 0 followed by the administration of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and saline placebo on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG003 | Flulaval/Arepanrix/Placebo Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and Arepanrix vaccine on Day 0 followed by Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and saline placebo on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG004 | Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/Placebo/Flulaval Group | subjects received co-administration of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Flulaval vaccine on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG005 | Arepanrix/Placebo/Flulaval Group | subjects received co-administration of Arepanrix vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Flulaval vaccine on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
|
|
| OG002 | Flulaval/Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/Placebo Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 0 followed by the administration of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and saline placebo on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG003 | Flulaval/Arepanrix/Placebo Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and Arepanrix vaccine on Day 0 followed by Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and saline placebo on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG004 | Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/Placebo/Flulaval Group | subjects received co-administration of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Flulaval vaccine on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG005 | Arepanrix/Placebo/Flulaval Group | subjects received co-administration of Arepanrix vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Flulaval vaccine on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
|
|
| OG002 | Flulaval/Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/Placebo Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 0 followed by the administration of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and saline placebo on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG003 | Flulaval/Arepanrix/Placebo Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and Arepanrix vaccine on Day 0 followed by Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and saline placebo on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG004 | Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/Placebo/Flulaval Group | subjects received co-administration of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Flulaval vaccine on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG005 | Arepanrix/Placebo/Flulaval Group | subjects received co-administration of Arepanrix vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Flulaval vaccine on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
|
|
| OG002 | Flulaval/Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/Placebo Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 0 followed by the administration of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and saline placebo on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG003 | Flulaval/Arepanrix/Placebo Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and Arepanrix vaccine on Day 0 followed by Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and saline placebo on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG004 | Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/Placebo/Flulaval Group | subjects received co-administration of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Flulaval vaccine on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG005 | Arepanrix/Placebo/Flulaval Group | subjects received co-administration of Arepanrix vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Flulaval vaccine on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
|
|
| OG002 | Flulaval/Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/Placebo Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 0 followed by the administration of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and saline placebo on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG003 | Flulaval/Arepanrix/Placebo Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and Arepanrix vaccine on Day 0 followed by Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and saline placebo on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG004 | Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/Placebo/Flulaval Group | subjects received co-administration of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Flulaval vaccine on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG005 | Arepanrix/Placebo/Flulaval Group | subjects received co-administration of Arepanrix vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Flulaval vaccine on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
|
|
| OG002 | Flulaval/Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/Placebo Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 0 followed by the administration of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and saline placebo on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG003 | Flulaval/Arepanrix/Placebo Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and Arepanrix vaccine on Day 0 followed by Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and saline placebo on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG004 | Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/Placebo/Flulaval Group | subjects received co-administration of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Flulaval vaccine on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG005 | Arepanrix/Placebo/Flulaval Group | subjects received co-administration of Arepanrix vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Flulaval vaccine on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
|
|
| OG002 | Flulaval/Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/Placebo Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 0 followed by the administration of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and saline placebo on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG003 | Flulaval/Arepanrix/Placebo Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and Arepanrix vaccine on Day 0 followed by Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and saline placebo on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG004 | Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/Placebo/Flulaval Group | subjects received co-administration of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Flulaval vaccine on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG005 | Arepanrix/Placebo/Flulaval Group | subjects received co-administration of Arepanrix vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Flulaval vaccine on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
|
|
| Flulaval/Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/Placebo Group |
subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 0 followed by the administration of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and saline placebo on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG003 | Flulaval/Arepanrix/Placebo Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and Arepanrix vaccine on Day 0 followed by Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and saline placebo on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG004 | Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/Placebo/Flulaval Group | subjects received co-administration of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Flulaval vaccine on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG005 | Arepanrix/Placebo/Flulaval Group | subjects received co-administration of Arepanrix vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Flulaval vaccine on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
|
| OG002 | Flulaval/Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/Placebo Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 0 followed by the administration of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and saline placebo on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG003 | Flulaval/Arepanrix/Placebo Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and Arepanrix vaccine on Day 0 followed by Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and saline placebo on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG004 | Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/Placebo/Flulaval Group | subjects received co-administration of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Flulaval vaccine on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG005 | Arepanrix/Placebo/Flulaval Group | subjects received co-administration of Arepanrix vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Flulaval vaccine on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
|
| OG002 | Flulaval/Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/Placebo Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 0 followed by the administration of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and saline placebo on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG003 | Flulaval/Arepanrix/Placebo Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and Arepanrix vaccine on Day 0 followed by Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and saline placebo on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG004 | Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/Placebo/Flulaval Group | subjects received co-administration of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Flulaval vaccine on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG005 | Arepanrix/Placebo/Flulaval Group | subjects received co-administration of Arepanrix vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Flulaval vaccine on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
|
subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed the administration of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm.
| OG002 | Flulaval/Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/Placebo Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 0 followed by the administration of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and saline placebo on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG003 | Flulaval/Arepanrix/Placebo Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and Arepanrix vaccine on Day 0 followed by Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and saline placebo on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG004 | Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/Placebo/Flulaval Group | subjects received co-administration of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Flulaval vaccine on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG005 | Arepanrix/Placebo/Flulaval Group | subjects received co-administration of Arepanrix vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Flulaval vaccine on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
|
|
subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed the administration of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG002 | Flulaval/Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/Placebo Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 0 followed by the administration of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and saline placebo on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG003 | Flulaval/Arepanrix/Placebo Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and Arepanrix vaccine on Day 0 followed by Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and saline placebo on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG004 | Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/Placebo/Flulaval Group | subjects received co-administration of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Flulaval vaccine on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG005 | Arepanrix/Placebo/Flulaval Group | subjects received co-administration of Arepanrix vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Flulaval vaccine on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
|
|
| OG002 | Flulaval/Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/Placebo Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 0 followed by the administration of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and saline placebo on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG003 | Flulaval/Arepanrix/Placebo Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and Arepanrix vaccine on Day 0 followed by Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and saline placebo on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG004 | Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/Placebo/Flulaval Group | subjects received co-administration of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Flulaval vaccine on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG005 | Arepanrix/Placebo/Flulaval Group | subjects received co-administration of Arepanrix vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Flulaval vaccine on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
|
|
| OG002 | Flulaval/Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/Placebo Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 0 followed by the administration of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and saline placebo on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG003 | Flulaval/Arepanrix/Placebo Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and Arepanrix vaccine on Day 0 followed by Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and saline placebo on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG004 | Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/Placebo/Flulaval Group | subjects received co-administration of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Flulaval vaccine on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG005 | Arepanrix/Placebo/Flulaval Group | subjects received co-administration of Arepanrix vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Flulaval vaccine on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
|
|
subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed the administration of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm.
| OG002 | Flulaval/Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/Placebo Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 0 followed by the administration of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and saline placebo on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG003 | Flulaval/Arepanrix/Placebo Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and Arepanrix vaccine on Day 0 followed by Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and saline placebo on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG004 | Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/Placebo/Flulaval Group | subjects received co-administration of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Flulaval vaccine on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG005 | Arepanrix/Placebo/Flulaval Group | subjects received co-administration of Arepanrix vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Flulaval vaccine on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
|
|
subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed the administration of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG002 | Flulaval/Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/Placebo Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 0 followed by the administration of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and saline placebo on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG003 | Flulaval/Arepanrix/Placebo Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and Arepanrix vaccine on Day 0 followed by Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and saline placebo on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG004 | Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/Placebo/Flulaval Group | subjects received co-administration of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Flulaval vaccine on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG005 | Arepanrix/Placebo/Flulaval Group | subjects received co-administration of Arepanrix vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Flulaval vaccine on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
|
|
subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed the administration of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG002 | Flulaval/Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/Placebo Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 0 followed by the administration of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and saline placebo on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG003 | Flulaval/Arepanrix/Placebo Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and Arepanrix vaccine on Day 0 followed by Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and saline placebo on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG004 | Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/Placebo/Flulaval Group | subjects received co-administration of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Flulaval vaccine on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG005 | Arepanrix/Placebo/Flulaval Group | subjects received co-administration of Arepanrix vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Flulaval vaccine on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
|
|
| OG002 | Flulaval/Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/Placebo Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 0 followed by the administration of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and saline placebo on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG003 | Flulaval/Arepanrix/Placebo Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and Arepanrix vaccine on Day 0 followed by Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and saline placebo on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG004 | Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/Placebo/Flulaval Group | subjects received co-administration of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Flulaval vaccine on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG005 | Arepanrix/Placebo/Flulaval Group | subjects received co-administration of Arepanrix vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Flulaval vaccine on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
|
|
| OG002 | Flulaval/Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/Placebo Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 0 followed by the administration of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and saline placebo on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG003 | Flulaval/Arepanrix/Placebo Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and Arepanrix vaccine on Day 0 followed by Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and saline placebo on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG004 | Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/Placebo/Flulaval Group | subjects received co-administration of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Flulaval vaccine on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG005 | Arepanrix/Placebo/Flulaval Group | subjects received co-administration of Arepanrix vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Flulaval vaccine on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
|
|
subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed the administration of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG002 | Flulaval/Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/Placebo Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 0 followed by the administration of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and saline placebo on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG003 | Flulaval/Arepanrix/Placebo Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and Arepanrix vaccine on Day 0 followed by Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and saline placebo on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG004 | Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/Placebo/Flulaval Group | subjects received co-administration of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Flulaval vaccine on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG005 | Arepanrix/Placebo/Flulaval Group | subjects received co-administration of Arepanrix vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Flulaval vaccine on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
|
|
| OG002 | Flulaval/Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/Placebo Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 0 followed by the administration of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and saline placebo on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG003 | Flulaval/Arepanrix/Placebo Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and Arepanrix vaccine on Day 0 followed by Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and saline placebo on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG004 | Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/Placebo/Flulaval Group | subjects received co-administration of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Flulaval vaccine on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG005 | Arepanrix/Placebo/Flulaval Group | subjects received co-administration of Arepanrix vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Flulaval vaccine on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
|
|
| OG002 | Flulaval/Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/Placebo Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 0 followed by the administration of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and saline placebo on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG003 | Flulaval/Arepanrix/Placebo Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and Arepanrix vaccine on Day 0 followed by Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and saline placebo on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG004 | Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/Placebo/Flulaval Group | subjects received co-administration of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Flulaval vaccine on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG005 | Arepanrix/Placebo/Flulaval Group | subjects received co-administration of Arepanrix vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Flulaval vaccine on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
|
|
| Flulaval/Placebo/Arepanrix Group |
subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed the administration of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG002 | Flulaval/Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/Placebo Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 0 followed by the administration of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and saline placebo on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG003 | Flulaval/Arepanrix/Placebo Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and Arepanrix vaccine on Day 0 followed by Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and saline placebo on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG004 | Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/Placebo/Flulaval Group | subjects received co-administration of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Flulaval vaccine on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG005 | Arepanrix/Placebo/Flulaval Group | subjects received co-administration of Arepanrix vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Flulaval vaccine on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG006 | Flulaval/Placebo/(Unadjuvanted) Arepanrix Pooled Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by the (unadjuvanted formulation of ) Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
|
|
subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed the administration of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG002 | Flulaval/Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/Placebo Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 0 followed by the administration of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and saline placebo on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG003 | Flulaval/Arepanrix/Placebo Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and Arepanrix vaccine on Day 0 followed by Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and saline placebo on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG004 | Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/Placebo/Flulaval Group | subjects received co-administration of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Flulaval vaccine on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG005 | Arepanrix/Placebo/Flulaval Group | subjects received co-administration of Arepanrix vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Flulaval vaccine on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG006 | Flulaval/Placebo/(Unadjuvanted) Arepanrix Pooled Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by the (unadjuvanted formulation of ) Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
|
|
subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed the administration of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG002 | Flulaval/Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/Placebo Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 0 followed by the administration of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and saline placebo on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG003 | Flulaval/Arepanrix/Placebo Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and Arepanrix vaccine on Day 0 followed by Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and saline placebo on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG004 | Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/Placebo/Flulaval Group | subjects received co-administration of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Flulaval vaccine on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG005 | Arepanrix/Placebo/Flulaval Group | subjects received co-administration of Arepanrix vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Flulaval vaccine on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG006 | Flulaval/Placebo/(Unadjuvanted) Arepanrix Pooled Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by the (unadjuvanted formulation of ) Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
|
|
| OG002 | Flulaval/Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/Placebo Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 0 followed by the administration of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and saline placebo on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG003 | Flulaval/Arepanrix/Placebo Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and Arepanrix vaccine on Day 0 followed by Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and saline placebo on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG004 | Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/Placebo/Flulaval Group | subjects received co-administration of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Flulaval vaccine on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG005 | Arepanrix/Placebo/Flulaval Group | subjects received co-administration of Arepanrix vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Flulaval vaccine on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
|
|
| OG002 | Flulaval/Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/Placebo Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 0 followed by the administration of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and saline placebo on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG003 | Flulaval/Arepanrix/Placebo Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and Arepanrix vaccine on Day 0 followed by Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and saline placebo on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG004 | Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/Placebo/Flulaval Group | subjects received co-administration of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Flulaval vaccine on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG005 | Arepanrix/Placebo/Flulaval Group | subjects received co-administration of Arepanrix vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Flulaval vaccine on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
|
|
| OG002 | Flulaval/Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/Placebo Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 0 followed by the administration of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and saline placebo on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG003 | Flulaval/Arepanrix/Placebo Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and Arepanrix vaccine on Day 0 followed by Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and saline placebo on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG004 | Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/Placebo/Flulaval Group | subjects received co-administration of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Flulaval vaccine on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG005 | Arepanrix/Placebo/Flulaval Group | subjects received co-administration of Arepanrix vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Flulaval vaccine on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
|
|
| OG002 | Flulaval/Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/Placebo Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 0 followed by the administration of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and saline placebo on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG003 | Flulaval/Arepanrix/Placebo Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and Arepanrix vaccine on Day 0 followed by Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and saline placebo on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG004 | Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/Placebo/Flulaval Group | subjects received co-administration of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Flulaval vaccine on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG005 | Arepanrix/Placebo/Flulaval Group | subjects received co-administration of Arepanrix vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Flulaval vaccine on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
|
|
| OG002 | Flulaval/Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/Placebo Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 0 followed by the administration of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and saline placebo on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG003 | Flulaval/Arepanrix/Placebo Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and Arepanrix vaccine on Day 0 followed by Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and saline placebo on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG004 | Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/Placebo/Flulaval Group | subjects received co-administration of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Flulaval vaccine on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG005 | Arepanrix/Placebo/Flulaval Group | subjects received co-administration of Arepanrix vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Flulaval vaccine on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
|
|
| OG002 | Flulaval/Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/Placebo Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 0 followed by the administration of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and saline placebo on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG003 | Flulaval/Arepanrix/Placebo Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and Arepanrix vaccine on Day 0 followed by Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and saline placebo on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG004 | Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/Placebo/Flulaval Group | subjects received co-administration of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Flulaval vaccine on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG005 | Arepanrix/Placebo/Flulaval Group | subjects received co-administration of Arepanrix vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Flulaval vaccine on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
|
|
| OG002 | Flulaval/Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/Placebo Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 0 followed by the administration of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and saline placebo on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG003 | Flulaval/Arepanrix/Placebo Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and Arepanrix vaccine on Day 0 followed by Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and saline placebo on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG004 | Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/Placebo/Flulaval Group | subjects received co-administration of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Flulaval vaccine on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG005 | Arepanrix/Placebo/Flulaval Group | subjects received co-administration of Arepanrix vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Flulaval vaccine on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
|
|
| OG002 | Flulaval/Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/Placebo Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 0 followed by the administration of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and saline placebo on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG003 | Flulaval/Arepanrix/Placebo Group | subjects received co-administration of Flulaval vaccine and Arepanrix vaccine on Day 0 followed by Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and saline placebo on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG004 | Unadjuvanted Arepanrix/Placebo/Flulaval Group | subjects received co-administration of the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by the unadjuvanted formulation of Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Flulaval vaccine on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
| OG005 | Arepanrix/Placebo/Flulaval Group | subjects received co-administration of Arepanrix vaccine and saline placebo on Day 0 followed by Arepanrix vaccine on Day 21 and Flulaval vaccine on Day 42. All vaccines were administered intramuscularly in the deltoids of the dominant or non dominant arm. At Day 0 the two vaccines were administered each in a separate arm, at Day 21 in the dominant arm and at Day 42 in the non-dominant arm. |
|
|