Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| EudraCT:2008-007 334-22 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to evaluate benefits and risks of lixisenatide (AVE0010), in comparison to sitagliptin, as an add-on treatment to metformin, in obese (body mass index [BMI] greater than or equal to 30 kilogram per square meter [kg/m^2]) type 2 diabetic patients less than 50 years of age, over a period of 24 weeks of treatment.
The primary objective of this study is to assess the efficacy of lixisenatide, in comparison to sitagliptin, as an add-on treatment to metformin on a composite endpoint of glycemic control in terms of glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and body weight, at Week 24.
Secondary objectives are to assess the effects of lixisenatide, in comparison to sitagliptin, as an add-on treatment to metformin on absolute changes in HbA1c values and body weight; fasting plasma glucose (FPG); plasma glucose, insulin, C-peptide, glucagon, and proinsulin during a 2-hour standardized meal test; insulin resistance assessed by homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR); beta cell function assessed by homeostatic model assessment of beta-cell function (HOMA-beta); to evaluate safety, tolerability, and anti-lixisenatide antibody development.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lixisenatide | Experimental | 2-step initiation regimen of lixisenatide along with sitagliptin placebo: lixisenatide 10 microgram (mcg) once daily (QD) for 1 week, followed by 15 mcg QD for 1 week, then 20 mcg QD up to Week 24 along with placebo matching to sitagliptin 100 milligram (mg) capsule orally QD up to Week 24. |
|
| Sitagliptin | Active Comparator | Sitagliptin along with 2-step initiation regimen of volume matching lixisenatide placebo: sitagliptin 100 mg capsule orally QD up to Week 24 along with volume matching lixisenatide placebo 10 mcg QD for 1 week, followed by 15 mcg QD for 1 week, then 20 mcg QD up to Week 24. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lixisenatide (AVE0010) | Drug | Self-administered by subcutaneous injections once daily within the hour preceding breakfast. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Patients With Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Level Less Than 7% and at Least 5% Weight Loss From Baseline at Week 24 | Percentage of patients who met both criteria (HbA1c <7% at Week 24 and at least 5% weight loss from baseline at Week 24) is reported. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is the time from the first dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose of study drug or up to the introduction of rescue therapy, whichever is the earliest. | Week 24 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Absolute Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Week 24 | Absolute change = HbA1c value at Week 24 minus HbA1c value at baseline. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is the time from the first dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose of study drug or up to the introduction of rescue therapy, whichever is the earliest. | Baseline, Week 24 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Patients With Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Level Less Than 7% at Week 24 | The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is the time from the first dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose of study drug or up to the introduction of rescue therapy, whichever is the earliest. | Week 24 |
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Clinical Sciences & Operations | Sanofi | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 840019 | Montgomery | Alabama | 36109 | United States | ||
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 840003 |
A total of 620 patients were screened of which 301 (48.5%) were screen failures; main reason for screen failure was glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) values being out of the defined protocol range (greater than or equal to 7% and less than or equal to 10%). A total of 319 patients were randomized.
The study was conducted at 92 centers in 13 countries between August 31, 2009 and March 19, 2011.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Lixisenatide | 2-step initiation regimen of lixisenatide along with sitagliptin placebo: lixisenatide 10 microgram (mcg) once daily (QD) subcutaneously for 1 week, followed by 15 mcg QD for 1 week, then 20 mcg QD up to Week 24 along with placebo matching to sitagliptin 100 milligram (mg) capsule orally QD up to Week 24. |
| FG001 |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Lixisenatide Placebo | Drug | Self-administered by subcutaneous injections once daily within the hour preceding breakfast. |
|
| Pen auto-injector | Device |
|
|
| Sitagliptin | Drug | Administered orally once a day in the morning with or without food at approximately the same time each day. |
|
|
| Sitagliptin Placebo | Drug | Administered orally once a day in the morning with or without food at approximately the same time each day. |
|
| Metformin | Drug | Metformin to be continued at stable dose (at least 1.5 gram per day) up to Week 24. |
|
| Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 24 | Change was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 24 value. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is the time from the first dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose of study drug or up to the introduction of rescue therapy, whichever is the earliest. | Baseline, Week 24 |
| Change From Baseline in 2-hour Postprandial Plasma Glucose (PPG) at Week 24 | The 2-hour PPG test measured blood glucose 2 hours after eating a standardized meal. Change was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 24 value. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dosing day of the study drug or up to the introduction of rescue therapy, whichever is the earliest. | Baseline, Week 24 |
| Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 24 | Change was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 24 value. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is the time from the first dose of study drug up to 1 day after the last dose of study drug or up to the introduction of rescue therapy, whichever is the earliest. | Baseline, Week 24 |
| Change From Baseline in Glucose Excursion at Week 24 | Glucose excursion = 2-hour PPG minus plasma glucose 30 minutes prior to the standardized meal test, before study drug administration. Change was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 24 value. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dosing day of the study drug or up to the introduction of rescue therapy, whichever is the earliest. | Baseline, Week 24 |
| Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Insulin (FPI) and 2-hour Postprandial Plasma Insulin (PPI) at Week 24 | Change was calculated for fasting plasma insulin and 2-hour post prandial plasma insulin by subtracting the baseline value from Week 24 value. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dosing day of the study drug or up to the introduction of rescue therapy, whichever is the earliest. | Baseline, Week 24 |
| Change From Baseline in Fasting C-peptide and 2-hour Postprandial C-peptide at Week 24 | Change was calculated for fasting C-peptide and 2-hour postprandial C-peptide by subtracting the baseline value from Week 24 value. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dosing day of study drug or up to the introduction of rescue therapy, whichever is the earliest. | Baseline, Week 24 |
| Change From Baseline in Fasting Glucagon and 2-hour Postprandial Glucagon at Week 24 | Change was calculated for fasting glucagon and 2-hour postprandial glucagon by subtracting the baseline value from Week 24 value. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dosing day of study drug or up to the introduction of rescue therapy, whichever is the earliest. | Baseline, Week 24 |
| Change From Baseline in Fasting Proinsulin and 2-hour Postprandial Proinsulin at Week 24 | Change was calculated for fasting proinsulin and 2-hour postprandial proinsulin by subtracting the baseline value from Week 24 value. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is the time from the first dose of the study drug up to the last dosing day of study drug or up to the introduction of rescue therapy, whichever is the earliest. | Baseline, Week 24 |
| Change From Baseline in Insulin Resistance Assessed by Homeostasis Model Assessment- Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) at Week 24 | HOMA-IR was derived from FPG and FPI as: (FPI [micro units per milliliter]*FPG [mmol/L]) divided by 22.5. Change was calculated for HOMA-IR by subtracting the baseline value from Week 24 value. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dosing day of study drug or up to the introduction of rescue therapy, whichever is the earliest. | Baseline, Week 24 |
| Change From Baseline in Beta Cell Function Assessed by Homeostasis Model Assessment-Beta (HOMA-beta) at Week 24 | HOMA-beta was derived from FPG and FPI as: (20*FPI [micro units/milliliter]) divided by (FPG [mmol/L] minus 3.5). Change was calculated for HOMA-beta by subtracting the baseline value from Week 24 value. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dosing day of study drug or up to the introduction of rescue therapy, whichever is the earliest. | Baseline, Week 24 |
| Percentage of Patients With Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Level Less Than or Equal to 6.5% at Week 24 | The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is the time from the first dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose of study drug or up to the introduction of rescue therapy, whichever is the earliest. | Week 24 |
| Percentage of Patients Requiring Rescue Therapy During 24-Week Period | Routine fasting self-measured plasma glucose (SMPG) and central laboratory FPG (and HbA1c after week 12) values were used to determine the requirement of rescue medication. If fasting SMPG value exceeded the specified limit for 3 consecutive days, the central laboratory FPG (and HbA1c after week 12) were performed. Threshold values - from baseline to Week 8: fasting SMPG/FPG >270 milligram/deciliter (mg/dL) (15.0 mmol/L), from Week 8 to Week 12: fasting SMPG/FPG >240 mg/dL (13.3 mmol/L), and from Week 12 to Week 24: fasting SMPG/FPG >200 mg/dL (11.1 mmol/L) or HbA1c >8.5%. | Baseline up to Week 24 |
| Percentage of Patients With at Least 5% Weight Loss From Baseline at Week 24 |
The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is the time from the first dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose of study drug or up to the introduction of rescue therapy, whichever is the earliest. |
| Baseline, Week 24 |
| Change From Baseline in Fasting Proinsulin-to-insulin Ratio and 2-hour Postprandial Proinsulin-to-insulin Ratio at Week 24 | Change was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 24 value. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dosing day of the study drug or up to the introduction of rescue therapy, whichever is the earliest. | Baseline, Week 24 |
| Number of Patients With Symptomatic Hypoglycemia and Severe Symptomatic Hypoglycemia | Symptomatic hypoglycemia was an event with clinical symptoms that were considered to result from a hypoglycemic episode with an accompanying plasma glucose less than 60 mg/dL (3.3 mmol/L) or associated with prompt recovery after oral carbohydrate, intravenous glucose, or glucagon administration if no plasma glucose measurement was available. Severe symptomatic hypoglycemia was symptomatic hypoglycemia event in which the patient required the assistance of another person and was associated with either a plasma glucose level below 36 mg/dL (2.0 mmol/L) or prompt recovery after oral carbohydrate, intravenous glucose, or glucagon administration, if no plasma glucose measurement was available. | First dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose administration |
| Muscle Shoals |
| Alabama |
| 35661 |
| United States |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 840022 | Mesa | Arizona | 85206 | United States |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 840011 | Anaheim | California | 92801 | United States |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 840014 | Paramount | California | 90723 | United States |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 840027 | Redlands | California | 92374 | United States |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 840021 | Augusta | Georgia | 30909 | United States |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 840007 | Roswell | Georgia | 30076 | United States |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 840016 | Chicago | Illinois | 60610 | United States |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 840018 | Chicago | Illinois | 60616 | United States |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 840001 | Evansville | Indiana | 47714 | United States |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 840002 | Baton Rouge | Louisiana | 70808 | United States |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 840031 | Clarkston | Michigan | 48346 | United States |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 840020 | Florissant | Missouri | 63031 | United States |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 840006 | Butte | Montana | 59701 | United States |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 840026 | Perrysburg | Ohio | 43551 | United States |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 840004 | Medford | Oregon | 97504 | United States |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 840025 | Altoona | Pennsylvania | 16602 | United States |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 840009 | Brentwood | Tennessee | 37207 | United States |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 840008 | Dallas | Texas | 75230 | United States |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 840010 | San Antonio | Texas | 78229 | United States |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 036006 | Adelaide | 5000 | Australia |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 036001 | Box Hill | 3128 | Australia |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 036004 | Elizabeth Vale | 5112 | Australia |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 036002 | Geelong | 3220 | Australia |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 036005 | Meadowbrook | 4131 | Australia |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 036003 | Sydney | 2006 | Australia |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 076005 | Belém | 66073-000 | Brazil |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 076001 | Brasília | 71625-009 | Brazil |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 076006 | Caxias do Sul | 95070-560 | Brazil |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 076003 | Curitiba | 80060-900 | Brazil |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 076002 | Rio de Janeiro | 20211-340 | Brazil |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 076004 | São Paulo | 04024-002 | Brazil |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 076007 | São Paulo | 05403-000 | Brazil |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 124004 | Calgary | T2N 4N1 | Canada |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 124008 | Hamilton | L8L 5G8 | Canada |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 124005 | London | N6G 2M3 | Canada |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 124006 | Montreal | H2W 1R7 | Canada |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 124013 | Oakville | L6H 3P1 | Canada |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 124002 | Saint Romuald | G6W 5M6 | Canada |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 124012 | Thornhill | L4J 8L7 | Canada |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 124011 | Toronto | Canada |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 124003 | Vancouver | V5Z 1C6 | Canada |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 124007 | Victoria | V8R 6V4 | Canada |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 152001 | Santiago | 7500347 | Chile |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 152004 | Santiago | 7500710 | Chile |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 152003 | Santiago | 8053095 | Chile |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 152002 | Santiago | Chile |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 152005 | Santiago | Chile |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 276002 | Berlin | 13125 | Germany |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 276005 | Ludwigshafen | 67059 | Germany |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 276004 | Schkeuditz | 04435 | Germany |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 320002 | Guatemala City | 01010 | Guatemala |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 320001 | Guatemala City | 01014 | Guatemala |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 320004 | Guatemala City | 1010 | Guatemala |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 320005 | Guatemala City | Guatemala |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 320006 | Guatemala City | Guatemala |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 484003 | Aguascalientes | 20230 | Mexico |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 484010 | Chihuahua City | 31000 | Mexico |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 484009 | Chihuahua City | 31238 | Mexico |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 484012 | Df | 03300 | Mexico |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 484008 | Mérida | 97000 | Mexico |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 484011 | México | 14050 | Mexico |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 484001 | Pachuca | 42090 | Mexico |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 484005 | Pachuca | 42090 | Mexico |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 484006 | Veracruz | 91700 | Mexico |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 484002 | Zapopan | 44030 | Mexico |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 604005 | Lima | 27 | Peru |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 604003 | Lima | Lima 27 | Peru |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 604001 | Lima | Peru |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 604002 | Lima | Peru |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 604004 | Lima | Peru |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 616002 | Bialystok | 15-435 | Poland |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 616001 | Bydgoszcz | 85-822 | Poland |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 616006 | Warsaw | 02-507 | Poland |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 616003 | Wroclaw | 50-127 | Poland |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 642004 | Bacau | 600164 | Romania |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 642006 | Bucharest | 020475 | Romania |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 642008 | Bucharest | 022441 | Romania |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 642010 | Iași | 700515 | Romania |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 642009 | Ploieşti | 100097 | Romania |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 642001 | Reşiţa | 320076 | Romania |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 642005 | Suceava | 720262 | Romania |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 642007 | Timișoara | 300593 | Romania |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 643002 | Kazan' | 420012 | Russia |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 643001 | Saint Petersburg | 194358 | Russia |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 643003 | Saint Petersburg | 195257 | Russia |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 643005 | Saint Petersburg | 198013 | Russia |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 643004 | Tyumen | 625023 | Russia |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 804003 | Chernivtsi | 58022 | Ukraine |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 804001 | Kiev | 2091 | Ukraine |
| Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 804004 | Kyiv | 31156 | Ukraine |
| Sitagliptin |
Sitagliptin along with 2-step initiation regimen of volume matching lixisenatide placebo: sitagliptin 100 mg capsule orally QD up to Week 24 along with volume matching lixisenatide placebo 10 mcg QD subcutaneously for 1 week, followed by 15 mcg QD for 1 week, then 20 mcg QD up to Week 24. |
| Treated/Safety Population |
|
| Modified Intent-to-Treat(mITT)Population |
|
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
Safety population included all randomized patients who were exposed to at least 1 dose of study drug, regardless of the amount of treatment administered.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Lixisenatide | 2-step initiation regimen of lixisenatide along with sitagliptin placebo: lixisenatide 10 mcg QD subcutaneously for 1 week, followed by 15 mcg QD for 1 week, then 20 mcg QD up to Week 24 along with placebo matching to sitagliptin 100 mg capsule orally QD up to Week 24. |
| BG001 | Sitagliptin | Sitagliptin along with 2-step initiation regimen of volume matching lixisenatide placebo: sitagliptin 100 mg capsule orally QD up to Week 24 along with volume matching lixisenatide placebo 10 mcg QD subcutaneously for 1 week, followed by 15 mcg QD for 1 week, then 20 mcg QD up to Week 24. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Number | participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) | Mean | Standard Deviation | percentage of hemoglobin |
| |||||||||||||||
| Body Mass Index (BMI) | BMI was calculated by dividing body weight by the height squared. | Mean | Standard Deviation | kilogram per square meter (kg/m^2) |
| ||||||||||||||
| Duration of Diabetes | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Body Weight | Mean | Standard Deviation | kilogram |
| |||||||||||||||
| 2-hour Postprandial Plasma Glucose (PPG) | The 2-hour PPG test measured blood glucose 2 hours after eating a standardized meal. Number of patients analyzed = 158 and 157 for lixisenatide and sitagliptin treatment arm, respectively. | Mean | Standard Deviation | millimole per liter (mmol/L) |
| ||||||||||||||
| Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) | Mean | Standard Deviation | mmol/L |
| |||||||||||||||
| Glucose Excursion | Glucose excursion = 2-hour PPG minus plasma glucose 30 minutes prior to the meal test, before study drug administration. Number of patients analyzed = 157 and 157 for lixisenatide and sitagliptin treatment arm, respectively. | Mean | Standard Deviation | mmol/L |
| ||||||||||||||
| Fasting Plasma Insulin (FPI) | Here, number of patients analyzed = 149 and 154 for lixisenatide and sitagliptin treatment arm, respectively. | Mean | Standard Deviation | picomole/liter (pmol/L) |
| ||||||||||||||
| 2-hour Postprandial Plasma Insulin | Here, number of patients analyzed = 152 and 151 for lixisenatide and sitagliptin treatment arm, respectively. | Mean | Standard Deviation | pmol/L |
| ||||||||||||||
| Fasting C-Peptide | Here, number of patients analyzed = 154 and 156 for lixisenatide and sitagliptin treatment arm, respectively. | Mean | Standard Deviation | mmol/L |
| ||||||||||||||
| 2-hour Postprandial C-peptide | Here, number of patients analyzed = 154 and 156 for lixisenatide and sitagliptin treatment arm, respectively. | Mean | Standard Deviation | mmol/L |
| ||||||||||||||
| Fasting Glucagon | Here, number of patients analyzed = 154 and 157 for lixisenatide and sitagliptin treatment arm, respectively. | Mean | Standard Deviation | nanogram/liter (ng/L) |
| ||||||||||||||
| 2-hour Postprandial Glucagon | Here, number of patients analyzed = 154 and 155 for lixisenatide and sitagliptin treatment arm, respectively. | Mean | Standard Deviation | ng/L |
| ||||||||||||||
| Fasting Proinsulin | Here, number of patients analyzed = 154 and 157 for lixisenatide and sitagliptin treatment arm, respectively. | Mean | Standard Deviation | pmol/L |
| ||||||||||||||
| 2-hour Postprandial Proinsulin | Here, number of patients analyzed = 154 and 156 for lixisenatide and sitagliptin treatment arm, respectively. | Mean | Standard Deviation | pmol/L |
| ||||||||||||||
| Fasting Proinsulin-to-Insulin Ratio | Here, number of patients analyzed = 149 and 154 for lixisenatide and sitagliptin treatment arm, respectively. | Mean | Standard Deviation | ratio |
| ||||||||||||||
| 2-hour Postprandial Proinsulin-to-Insulin Ratio | Here, number of patients analyzed = 152 and 151 for lixisenatide and sitagliptin treatment arm, respectively. | Mean | Standard Deviation | ratio |
| ||||||||||||||
| Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) | HOMA-IR was derived from FPG and FPI as: (FPI [micro units per milliliter] * FPG [mmol/L]) divided by 22.5. Here, number of patients analyzed = 148 and 154 for lixisenatide and sitagliptin treatment arm, respectively. | Mean | Standard Deviation | milliunit * mmol /liter^2(mU * mmol/L^2) |
| ||||||||||||||
| Homeostatic Model Assessment of Beta-cell Function (HOMA-beta) | HOMA-beta was derived from FPG and FPI as: (20 * FPI [micro units/milliliter]) divided by (FPG [mmol/L] minus 3.5). Here, number of patients analyzed = 148 and 154 for lixisenatide and sitagliptin treatment arm, respectively. | Mean | Standard Deviation | percentage of normal beta cells function |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Percentage of Patients With Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Level Less Than 7% and at Least 5% Weight Loss From Baseline at Week 24 | Percentage of patients who met both criteria (HbA1c <7% at Week 24 and at least 5% weight loss from baseline at Week 24) is reported. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is the time from the first dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose of study drug or up to the introduction of rescue therapy, whichever is the earliest. | mITT population included randomized patients who received at least 1 dose of study drug. Missing data was imputed using Last observation carried forward (LOCF). | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Week 24 |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Absolute Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Week 24 | Absolute change = HbA1c value at Week 24 minus HbA1c value at baseline. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is the time from the first dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose of study drug or up to the introduction of rescue therapy, whichever is the earliest. | mITT population. Missing data was imputed using LOCF. Here, number of patients analyzed=patients with baseline and at least 1 post-baseline HbA1c assessment during on-treatment period. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | percentage of hemoglobin | Baseline, Week 24 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 24 | Change was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 24 value. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is the time from the first dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose of study drug or up to the introduction of rescue therapy, whichever is the earliest. | mITT population. Missing data was imputed using LOCF. Here, number of patients analyzed = patients with baseline and at least 1 post-baseline body weight assessment during on-treatment period. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | kilogram | Baseline, Week 24 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in 2-hour Postprandial Plasma Glucose (PPG) at Week 24 | The 2-hour PPG test measured blood glucose 2 hours after eating a standardized meal. Change was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 24 value. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dosing day of the study drug or up to the introduction of rescue therapy, whichever is the earliest. | mITT population. Missing data was imputed using LOCF. Here, number of patients analyzed = patients with baseline and at least 1 post-baseline 2-hour PPG assessment during on-treatment period. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | mmol/L | Baseline, Week 24 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 24 | Change was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 24 value. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is the time from the first dose of study drug up to 1 day after the last dose of study drug or up to the introduction of rescue therapy, whichever is the earliest. | mITT population. Missing data was imputed using LOCF. Here, number of patients analyzed = patients with baseline and at least 1 post-baseline FPG assessment during on-treatment period. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | mmol/L | Baseline, Week 24 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Glucose Excursion at Week 24 | Glucose excursion = 2-hour PPG minus plasma glucose 30 minutes prior to the standardized meal test, before study drug administration. Change was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 24 value. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dosing day of the study drug or up to the introduction of rescue therapy, whichever is the earliest. | mITT population. Missing data was imputed using LOCF. Here, number of patients analyzed = patients with baseline and at least 1 post-baseline glucose excursion assessment during on-treatment period. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | mmol/L | Baseline, Week 24 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Insulin (FPI) and 2-hour Postprandial Plasma Insulin (PPI) at Week 24 | Change was calculated for fasting plasma insulin and 2-hour post prandial plasma insulin by subtracting the baseline value from Week 24 value. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dosing day of the study drug or up to the introduction of rescue therapy, whichever is the earliest. | mITT population. Missing data was imputed using LOCF. Here, number of patients analyzed = patients with baseline and at least 1 post-baseline plasma insulin assessment during on-treatment period and 'n' = patients with baseline and at least 1 post-baseline assessment for the specified category. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | pmol/L | Baseline, Week 24 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Fasting C-peptide and 2-hour Postprandial C-peptide at Week 24 | Change was calculated for fasting C-peptide and 2-hour postprandial C-peptide by subtracting the baseline value from Week 24 value. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dosing day of study drug or up to the introduction of rescue therapy, whichever is the earliest. | mITT population. Missing data was imputed using LOCF. Here, number of patients analyzed = patients with baseline and at least 1 post-baseline C-peptide assessment during on-treatment period and 'n' = patients with baseline and at least 1 post-baseline assessment for the specified category. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | nmol/L | Baseline, Week 24 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Fasting Glucagon and 2-hour Postprandial Glucagon at Week 24 | Change was calculated for fasting glucagon and 2-hour postprandial glucagon by subtracting the baseline value from Week 24 value. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dosing day of study drug or up to the introduction of rescue therapy, whichever is the earliest. | mITT population. Missing data was imputed using LOCF. Here, number of patients analyzed = patients with baseline and at least 1 post-baseline glucagon assessment during on-treatment period and 'n' = patients with baseline and at least 1 post-baseline assessment for the specified category. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | ng/L | Baseline, Week 24 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Fasting Proinsulin and 2-hour Postprandial Proinsulin at Week 24 | Change was calculated for fasting proinsulin and 2-hour postprandial proinsulin by subtracting the baseline value from Week 24 value. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is the time from the first dose of the study drug up to the last dosing day of study drug or up to the introduction of rescue therapy, whichever is the earliest. | mITT population. Missing data was imputed using LOCF. Here, number of patients analyzed = patients with baseline and at least 1 post-baseline proinsulin assessment during on-treatment period and 'n' = patients with baseline and at least 1 post-baseline assessment for the specified category. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | pmol/L | Baseline, Week 24 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Insulin Resistance Assessed by Homeostasis Model Assessment- Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) at Week 24 | HOMA-IR was derived from FPG and FPI as: (FPI [micro units per milliliter]*FPG [mmol/L]) divided by 22.5. Change was calculated for HOMA-IR by subtracting the baseline value from Week 24 value. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dosing day of study drug or up to the introduction of rescue therapy, whichever is the earliest. | mITT population. Missing data was imputed using LOCF. Here, number of patients analyzed = patients with baseline and at least 1 post-baseline HOMA-IR assessment during on-treatment period. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | mU * mmol/L^2 | Baseline, Week 24 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Beta Cell Function Assessed by Homeostasis Model Assessment-Beta (HOMA-beta) at Week 24 | HOMA-beta was derived from FPG and FPI as: (20*FPI [micro units/milliliter]) divided by (FPG [mmol/L] minus 3.5). Change was calculated for HOMA-beta by subtracting the baseline value from Week 24 value. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dosing day of study drug or up to the introduction of rescue therapy, whichever is the earliest. | mITT population. Missing data was imputed using LOCF. Here, number of patients analyzed = patients with baseline and at least 1 post-baseline HOMA-beta assessment during on-treatment period. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | percentage of normal beta cells function | Baseline, Week 24 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Patients With Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Level Less Than or Equal to 6.5% at Week 24 | The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is the time from the first dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose of study drug or up to the introduction of rescue therapy, whichever is the earliest. | mITT population. Here, number of patients analyzed = patients with baseline and at least 1 post-baseline HbA1c assessment during on-treatment period. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Week 24 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other Pre-specified | Percentage of Patients With Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Level Less Than 7% at Week 24 | The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is the time from the first dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose of study drug or up to the introduction of rescue therapy, whichever is the earliest. | mITT population. Here, number of patients analyzed = patients with baseline and at least 1 post-baseline HbA1c assessment during on-treatment period. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Week 24 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Patients Requiring Rescue Therapy During 24-Week Period | Routine fasting self-measured plasma glucose (SMPG) and central laboratory FPG (and HbA1c after week 12) values were used to determine the requirement of rescue medication. If fasting SMPG value exceeded the specified limit for 3 consecutive days, the central laboratory FPG (and HbA1c after week 12) were performed. Threshold values - from baseline to Week 8: fasting SMPG/FPG >270 milligram/deciliter (mg/dL) (15.0 mmol/L), from Week 8 to Week 12: fasting SMPG/FPG >240 mg/dL (13.3 mmol/L), and from Week 12 to Week 24: fasting SMPG/FPG >200 mg/dL (11.1 mmol/L) or HbA1c >8.5%. | mITT population. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Baseline up to Week 24 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other Pre-specified | Percentage of Patients With at Least 5% Weight Loss From Baseline at Week 24 | The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is the time from the first dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose of study drug or up to the introduction of rescue therapy, whichever is the earliest. | mITT population. Here, number of patients analyzed = patients with baseline and at least 1 post-baseline body weight assessment during on-treatment period. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Baseline, Week 24 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other Pre-specified | Change From Baseline in Fasting Proinsulin-to-insulin Ratio and 2-hour Postprandial Proinsulin-to-insulin Ratio at Week 24 | Change was calculated by subtracting baseline value from Week 24 value. The on-treatment period for this efficacy variable is the time from the first dose of study drug up to the last dosing day of the study drug or up to the introduction of rescue therapy, whichever is the earliest. | mITT population. Missing data was imputed using LOCF. Here, number of patients analyzed = patients with baseline and at least 1 post-baseline proinsulin-to-insulin ratio assessment during on-treatment period and 'n' = patients with baseline and at least 1 post-baseline assessment for the specified category. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | ratio | Baseline, Week 24 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other Pre-specified | Number of Patients With Symptomatic Hypoglycemia and Severe Symptomatic Hypoglycemia | Symptomatic hypoglycemia was an event with clinical symptoms that were considered to result from a hypoglycemic episode with an accompanying plasma glucose less than 60 mg/dL (3.3 mmol/L) or associated with prompt recovery after oral carbohydrate, intravenous glucose, or glucagon administration if no plasma glucose measurement was available. Severe symptomatic hypoglycemia was symptomatic hypoglycemia event in which the patient required the assistance of another person and was associated with either a plasma glucose level below 36 mg/dL (2.0 mmol/L) or prompt recovery after oral carbohydrate, intravenous glucose, or glucagon administration, if no plasma glucose measurement was available. | Safety population included all randomized patients who were exposed to at least 1 dose of study drug, regardless of the amount of treatment administered. | Posted | Number | participants | First dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose administration |
|
First dose of study drug up to 3 days after the last dose administration
Median exposure to study treatment was 169.0 days in both lixisenatide and sitagliptin treatment arm. The analysis was performed on safety population, defined as all randomized patients who were exposed to at least 1 dose of study drug, regardless of the amount of treatment administered.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Lixisenatide | 2-step initiation regimen of lixisenatide along with sitagliptin placebo. | 3 | 158 | 54 | 158 | ||
| EG001 | Sitagliptin | Sitagliptin along with 2-step initiation regimen of volume matching lixisenatide placebo. | 3 | 161 | 45 | 161 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abscess limb | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 13.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Anaphylactic reaction | Immune system disorders | MedDRA 13.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Arteriovenous fistula | Vascular disorders | MedDRA 13.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bile duct stone | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA 13.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nephrolithiasis | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 13.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Renal failure | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 13.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Influenza | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 13.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nasopharyngitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 13.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 13.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 13.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 13.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 13.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
If no publication has occurred within 12 months of the completion of the study, the Investigator shall have the right to publish/present independently the results of the study. The Investigator shall provide the Sponsor with a copy of any such presentation/publication for comment at least 30 days before any presentation/submission for publication. If requested by the Sponsor, any presentation/submission shall be delayed up to 90 days, to allow the Sponsor to preserve its proprietary rights.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trial Transparency Team | Sanofi | Contact-us@sanofi.com |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003924 | Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003920 | Diabetes Mellitus |
| D044882 | Glucose Metabolism Disorders |
| D008659 | Metabolic Diseases |
| D009750 | Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases |
| D004700 | Endocrine System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C479460 | lixisenatide |
| D000068900 | Sitagliptin Phosphate |
| D008687 | Metformin |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014230 | Triazoles |
| D001393 | Azoles |
| D006573 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring |
| D006571 | Heterocyclic Compounds |
| D011719 | Pyrazines |
| D001645 | Biguanides |
| D006146 | Guanidines |
| D000578 | Amidines |
| D009930 | Organic Chemicals |
Not provided
Not provided
| Male |
|
| Race: Black |
|
| Race: Asian/Oriental |
|
| Race: Other |
|
| Ethnicity: Hispanic |
|
| Ethnicity: Non Hispanic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|