Randomized Trial of Prasugrel Plus Bivalirudin vs. Clopidogrel Plus Heparin in Patients With Acute STEMI
Randomized Trial of Prasugrel Plus Bivalirudin vs. Clopidogrel Plus Heparin in Patients With Acute STEMI
Randomized comparison of two different anticoagulation strategies: prasugrel plus bivalirudin versus clopidogrel plus heparin in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing emergency catheterization and coronary intervention.
Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) is the preferred reperfusion strategy for patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Additional anticoagulation therapy prior or during intervention plays an important role in the short- and long-term outcomes after PPCI. Two separate studies have shown significant benefit against conventional therapy based on clopidogrel and heparin for two recently approved drugs: the direct thrombin inhibitor bivalirudin and the thienopyridine prasugrel. In the HORIZONS-AMI trial, bivalirudin after pretreatment with clopidogrel resulted in improved net clinical outcomes. However, during the first 24 hours after PPCI an increase in the stent thrombosis rate was observed with bivalirudin therapy. Prasugrel has been shown to be superior to clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing PCI. The benefit in reduction of ischemic complication was even greater in the subset of patients with STEMI without any increase in the bleeding risk and with a significant reduction in the stent thrombosis rate. Expectedly, the synergic actions of prasugrel and bivalirudin may maximize the benefit of antithrombotic therapy for STEMI patients undergoing PPCI.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: