An Open-Label Study Assessing the Addition of Subcutaneous Golimumab (GLM) to Conventional Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drug (DMARD) Therapy in Biologic-Naïve Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis (Part 1), Followed by a Randomized Study Assessing the Value of Combined Intravenous and Subcutaneous GLM Administration Aimed at Inducing and Maintaining Remission (Part 2)
An Open-Label Study Assessing the Addition of Subcutaneous Golimumab (GLM) to Conventional Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drug (DMARD) Therapy in Biologic-Naïve Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis (Part 1), Followed by a Randomized Study Assessing the Value of Combined Intravenous and Subcutaneous GLM Administration Aimed at Inducing and Maintaining Remission (Part 2)
Part 1 of this trial will assess the safety and effectiveness of subcutaneous (SC) golimumab administered by autoinjector once monthly, when combined with different disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) regimens used in daily rheumatology practice. Subsequently, Part 2 will study if a strategy of intravenous (IV) golimumab to induce remission followed by SC golimumab to retain remission is superior to continuing a SC regimen.
Participants who had a good or moderate European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response but not achieve remission at the end of Part 1 were invited to participate in Part 2 and were randomized to either intravenous golimumab (IV GLM) + subcutaneous golimumab (SC GLM) or SC GLM alone.
Inclusion Criteria:
For Part 1:
Age >=18 years, either sex, any race.
Diagnosis of RA according to the 1987 revised American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria.
Active disease despite DMARD treatment
Subject must be taking at least one of the allowed DMARDs, and must be able to continue with it during the trial.
Eligibility for anti tumor necrosis factor (TNF) use according to the following criteria:
For Part 2:
Participant must have completed Part 1 of this trial.
Participant must have:
Both the investigator and the subject must agree to switch the participant's treatment to IV administration as may be required in Part 2 of this trial.
The investigator must judge that no safety events (eg, serious adverse events [SAEs], serious infections, marked injection-site reactions or intolerance to drug) have occurred that could reoccur or aggravate with increased drug exposure.
Exclusion Criteria: