Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
To compare HP828-101 to standard of care for the management of partial or full thickness wounds
The primary objective is to compare HP828-101 to standard of care for the management of partial or full thickness wounds, evaluated using the Bates Jensen Wound Assessment Tool (BWAT).
The secondary objectives are comparison of the proportion of subjects with wound closure by day 22, comparison of pain assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS), and evaluation of moist wound environment as per the BWAT.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| HP828-101 | Experimental |
| |
| Standard of Care | Active Comparator | For DFU SoC is a hydrogel. For PU SoC is a hydrocolloid gel. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HP828-101 | Device | Topical test article applied once daily |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Adequate Management of the Wound Assessed by a Left Movement (Improvement) in the Modified Bates Jensen Wound Assessment Tool. | Modified Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment (BWAT-m) Scores for those characteristics measured (wound size, depth, edges, undermining, necrotic tissue type and amount, exudate type and amount, periwound color and edema, granulation tissue, and epithelialization) were each graded on a 5-point scale, with 1 being the best and 5 being the worst. | 22 - 29 days |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Wound Closure by Day 22. | 22 days | |
| Pain Assessed by a 100-mm VAS Scale. | 100-mm VAS scale was used to evaluate pain, with 1 being healthy tissue (no pain) up to 100 (wound degeneration and severe pain) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Innes Cargill, PhD | Healthpoint, Ltd | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trovare Clinical Research | Bakersfield | California | 93311 | United States | ||
| Absolute Foot Care |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12394337 | Background | Ovington LG. The evolution of wound management: ancient origins and advances of the past 20 years. Home Healthc Nurse. 2002 Oct;20(10):652-6. doi: 10.1097/00004045-200210000-00009. | |
| 7553187 | Background | Winter GD. Formation of the scab and the rate of epithelisation of superficial wounds in the skin of the young domestic pig. 1962. J Wound Care. 1995 Sep;4(8):366-7; discussion 368-71. No abstract available. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Adults 18 years of age and older who had a DFU or PU on the foot that was a partial or full thickness wound
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | HP828-101 Treating DFU | HP828-101 : Topical test article approximately the size of a nickel, applied once daily Treatment group had diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) |
| FG001 | Standard of Care Treating DFU |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Hydrogel/Hydrocolloid | Device | Hydrogel for DFU and Hydrocolloid for PU (3M Tegaderm Hydrogel for DFU; ConvaTec DuoDERM Hydroactive Gel for PU); Topical test articles applied once daily |
|
|
| At every visit: Day 8, Day 15, Day 22, Day 29 |
| Moist Wound Environment as Per the Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool (BWAT) | Modified Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment (BWAT-m) Scores for those characteristics measured (wound exudate type and amount) were each graded on a 5-point scale, with 1 being the best and 5 being the worst. | At every visit: Day 8, Day 15, Day 22, Day 29 |
| Chula Vista |
| California |
| 91910 |
| United States |
| Roy Kroeker | Fresno | California | 93710 | United States |
| Innovative Medical Technologies | Los Angeles | California | 90063 | United States |
| San Diego Research Center | San Diego | California | 92103 | United States |
| Foot and Ankle Associates of Florida | Altamonte Springs | Florida | 32701 | United States |
| Weil Foot and Ankle Institute | Des Plaines | Illinois | 60016 | United States |
| Prigoff-Bowers LLP | Dallas | Texas | 75224 | United States |
| Richard Galperin, DPM | Dallas | Texas | 75224 | United States |
| Robert Wunderlich, DPM | San Antonio | Texas | 78212 | United States |
| Dixie Regional Wound Clinic | St. George | Utah | 84770 | United States |
| 14087904 | Background | HINMAN CD, MAIBACH H. EFFECT OF AIR EXPOSURE AND OCCLUSION ON EXPERIMENTAL HUMAN SKIN WOUNDS. Nature. 1963 Oct 26;200:377-8. doi: 10.1038/200377a0. No abstract available. |
| 17936480 | Background | Andersen CA, Roukis TS. The diabetic foot. Surg Clin North Am. 2007 Oct;87(5):1149-77, x. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2007.08.001. |
| 10655794 | Background | Frykberg RG. Epidemiology of the diabetic foot: ulcerations and amputations. Adv Wound Care. 1999 Apr;12(3):139-41. No abstract available. |
| Background | Sussman C, Bates-Jensen B. Wound Care - A Collaborative Practice Manual for Health Professionals. 3rd Ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2006. |
| Background | Hess CT. Wound Care. 5th Ed ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2005. |
| 17199833 | Background | Steed DL, Attinger C, Colaizzi T, Crossland M, Franz M, Harkless L, Johnson A, Moosa H, Robson M, Serena T, Sheehan P, Veves A, Wiersma-Bryant L. Guidelines for the treatment of diabetic ulcers. Wound Repair Regen. 2006 Nov-Dec;14(6):680-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2006.00176.x. No abstract available. |
| 9534889 | Background | Agren MS. An amorphous hydrogel enhances epithelialisation of wounds. Acta Derm Venereol. 1998 Mar;78(2):119-22. doi: 10.1080/000155598433449. |
| 17199832 | Background | Whitney J, Phillips L, Aslam R, Barbul A, Gottrup F, Gould L, Robson MC, Rodeheaver G, Thomas D, Stotts N. Guidelines for the treatment of pressure ulcers. Wound Repair Regen. 2006 Nov-Dec;14(6):663-79. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2006.00175.x. No abstract available. |
For diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) Standard of Care (SoC) is a hydrogel
Hydrogel for DFU (3M Tegaderm Hydrogel)
| FG002 | HP828-101 Treating PU | HP828-101 : Topical test article approximately the size of a nickel, applied once daily Treatment group had pressure ulcers (PU) |
| FG003 | Standard of Care Treating PU | For Pressure Ulcers (PU) Standard of Care (SoC) was a hydrocolloid gel Hydrocolloid for PU: Topical test articles applied once daily (ConvaTec DuoDERM Hydroactive Gel for PU) |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | HP828-101 Treating DFU | HP828-101 : Topical test article applied once daily Treatment group had diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) |
| BG001 | Standard of Care Treating DFU | For diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) Standard of Care (SoC) is a hydrogel Hydrogel for DFU(3M Tegaderm Hydrogel) |
| BG002 | HP828-101 Treating PU | HP828-101 : Topical test article applied once daily Treatment group had pressure ulcers (PU) |
| BG003 | Standard of Care Treating PU | For Pressure Ulcers (PU) Standard of Care (SoC) was a hydrocolloid gel Hydrocolloid for PU: Topical test articles applied once daily (ConvaTec DuoDERM Hydroactive Gel for PU) |
| BG004 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Adequate Management of the Wound Assessed by a Left Movement (Improvement) in the Modified Bates Jensen Wound Assessment Tool. | Modified Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment (BWAT-m) Scores for those characteristics measured (wound size, depth, edges, undermining, necrotic tissue type and amount, exudate type and amount, periwound color and edema, granulation tissue, and epithelialization) were each graded on a 5-point scale, with 1 being the best and 5 being the worst. | Intent-to-Treat | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | units on a scale | 22 - 29 days |
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Wound Closure by Day 22. | Posted | Number | Subjects | 22 days |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Pain Assessed by a 100-mm VAS Scale. | 100-mm VAS scale was used to evaluate pain, with 1 being healthy tissue (no pain) up to 100 (wound degeneration and severe pain) | Intent-to-Treat | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | VAS Pain Scores | At every visit: Day 8, Day 15, Day 22, Day 29 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Moist Wound Environment as Per the Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool (BWAT) | Modified Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment (BWAT-m) Scores for those characteristics measured (wound exudate type and amount) were each graded on a 5-point scale, with 1 being the best and 5 being the worst. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | BWAT-m Exudate Score | At every visit: Day 8, Day 15, Day 22, Day 29 |
|
29 days
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | HP828-101 Treating DFU | HP828-101 : Topical test article applied once daily Treatment group had diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) | 2 | 30 | 0 | 30 | ||
| EG001 | Standard of Care Treating DFU | For diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) Standard of Care (SoC) is a hydrogel Hydrogel for DFU(3M Tegaderm Hydrogel) | 0 | 33 | 0 | 33 | ||
| EG002 | HP828-101 Treating PU | HP828-101 : Topical test article applied once daily Treatment group had pressure ulcers (PU) | 0 | 12 | 0 | 12 | ||
| EG003 | Standard of Care Treating PU | For Pressure Ulcers (PU) Standard of Care (SoC) was a hydrocolloid gel Hydrocolloid for PU: Topical test articles applied once daily (ConvaTec DuoDERM Hydroactive Gel for PU) | 1 | 13 | 0 | 13 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Infection of ulcer - nontarget ulcer | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (11.0) | Non-systematic Assessment | The severity of the event was Moderate; the Investigator determined that the serious adverse event was not related to the test article. Subject discontinued from the study. |
|
| Urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (11.0) | Non-systematic Assessment | Study drug dosage was interrupted during the hospitalization. The severity of the event was Moderate; the Investigator determined that the SAE was not related to the test article. Subject discontinued from the study |
|
| Hyponatremia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (11.0) | Non-systematic Assessment | The severity of the event was Mild; the Investigator determined that the serious adverse event was not related to the test article. Subject completed the study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaime Dickerson, PhD | Smith & Nephew Biotherapeutics | 817-302-3914 | jaime.dickerson@smith-nephew.com |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D017719 | Diabetic Foot |
| D003668 | Pressure Ulcer |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003925 | Diabetic Angiopathies |
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
| D016523 | Foot Ulcer |
| D007871 | Leg Ulcer |
| D012883 | Skin Ulcer |
| D012871 | Skin Diseases |
| D017437 | Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases |
| D048909 | Diabetes Complications |
| D003920 | Diabetes Mellitus |
| D004700 | Endocrine System Diseases |
| D003929 | Diabetic Neuropathies |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D047070 | Bandages, Hydrocolloid |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001458 | Bandages |
| D004864 | Equipment and Supplies |
Not provided
Not provided
| Between 18 and 65 years |
|
| >=65 years |
|
| Male |
|
| Day 29 |
|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
|
|