Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
To demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of the Combo Bio-engineered Sirolimus Eluting Stent (Combo Stent) compared to the Taxus® Liberté® Stent in the treatment of coronary artery lesions.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Combo | Experimental | The Combo Stent is composed of the OrbusNeich R stent™, with an abluminal coating of a bioabsorbable polymer matrix formulated with sirolimus for sustained release, and an anti-CD34 antibody cell capture coating on the luminal surface. |
|
| Taxus® Liberté® Stent | Active Comparator | Commercially available product |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| coronary stenting | Device | Balloon dilatation of obstructive coronary artery disease with deployment of a metallic stent to scaffold the dilated lesion; stent incorporating sustained release of anti-proliferative agent to control neointimal proliferation and reocclusion; test device incorporates affinity surface for circulating EPCs |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| In-stent late lumen loss of the Combo Stent compared to the TAXUS® Liberté® DES | 9 months post-procedure. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| All-cause and cardiac mortality | 30 days, 9 months, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 year | |
| Myocardial infarction: Q-wave and non Q-wave, cumulative and individual | 30 days, 9 months, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years | |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
General Inclusion Criteria
Angiographic Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
General Exclusion Criteria:
Angiographic Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Ian T Meredith, MBBS, PhD | Monash University | Principal Investigator |
| Stephan Windecker, MD | University of Bern | Principal Investigator |
| Alexandre Abizaid, MD | Inst Dante Pazzanese of Cardiology | Principal Investigator |
| Roxana Mehran, MD | CardioVascular Research Foundation | Study Director |
| Alexandra Lansky, MD | CardioVascular Research Foundation | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John Hunter Hospital | Newcastle | New South Wales | 2300 | Australia |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 23523459 | Result | Haude M, Lee SW, Worthley SG, Silber S, Verheye S, Erbs S, Rosli MA, Botelho R, Meredith I, Sim KH, Stella PR, Tan HC, Whitbourn R, Thambar S, Abizaid A, Koh TH, Den Heijer P, Parise H, Cristea E, Maehara A, Mehran R. The REMEDEE trial: a randomized comparison of a combination sirolimus-eluting endothelial progenitor cell capture stent with a paclitaxel-eluting stent. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Apr;6(4):334-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.10.018. Epub 2013 Mar 20. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE) defined as a composite of death, MI (Q-wave or non Q-wave), emergent CABG, or target lesion revascularization by repeat PTCA or CABG |
| Hospital discharge, 30 days, 9 months, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years post-procedure |
| Vascular complications from index procedure | Up to hospital discharge |
| Rate of stent thrombosis, per ARC definition of definite and probable stent thrombosis further categorized as early, late or very late | 30 days, 9 months, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years post-procedure |
| Change in human anti-murine antibody (HAMA) plasma levels | 30 day and 9 month follow-up compared to baseline |
| Device success, defined as attainment of <50% residual stenosis of the target lesion using the Combo Stent | Index procedure |
| Lesion success defined as attainment of < 50% residual stenosis using any percutaneous method | Index procedure |
| Procedure success defined as lesion success without the occurrence of in-hospital MACE | Up to hospital discharge |
| Clinically (ischemia)-driven target lesion revascularization | 30 days, 9 months, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years |
| Clinically (ischemia)-driven target vessel revascularization | 30 days, 9 months, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years |
| In-stent and in-segment angiographic binary restenosis | 9 months |
| In-stent and in-segment minimum lumen diameter (MLD) | 9 months |
| In-stent, proximal and distal late lumen loss | 9 months |
| Neointimal hyperplasia volume and % in-stent volume obstruction as measured by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) for patients receiving angiographic/IVUS follow-up | 9 months |
| Target lesion failure (TLF) (defined as death, MI and ischemic target lesion revascularization (TLR)) | 30 days, 9 months, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years |