Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| NCI-2018-02154 | Registry Identifier | CTRP (Clinical Trial Reporting Program) | |
| 2008-0604 | Other Identifier | M D Anderson Cancer Center | |
| P30CA016672 | U.S. NIH Grant/Contract | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| National Cancer Institute (NCI) | NIH |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This phase II trial studies how well combination chemotherapy with or without bortezomib works in treating patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma that has come back or does not respond to prior treatment. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide, work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Bortezomib is designed to block a protein that plays a role in cell function and growth. Bortezomib may cause cancer cells to die. It is not yet known if combination chemotherapy with or without bortezomib may work better in treating patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To determine the objective response rate (ORR), partial remissions (PR), and complete remissions (CR) after 3 cycles of bortezomib plus ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide (ICE) (BICE) versus ICE in patients with relapsed/refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL).
II. To evaluate 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) in patients treated with 3 cycles of BICE versus ICE.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To compare positron emission tomography (PET) scan response after 3 cycles of BICE versus ICE chemotherapy.
II. To compare serum levels of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) proteins (a proliferation-inducing ligand [APRIL], B lymphocyte stimulator [BLyS], soluble [s]CD30, and CD40L) and CC thymus and activation-related cytokine (TARC) at baseline and after 3 cycles of BICE versus ICE chemotherapy.
III. To correlate baseline cytokine/chemokine levels with response to therapy.
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.
ARM A: Patients receive bortezomib intravenously (IV) over 5 seconds on days 1 and 4, ifosfamide IV continuously over 24 hours on day 1, carboplatin IV over 1 hour on day 1, and etoposide IV over 2 hours on days 1-3. Treatment repeats every 14 days for up to 6 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
ARM B: Patients receive ifosfamide, carboplatin and etoposide as in Arm A. Treatment repeats every 14 days for up to 6 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up every 4 months for 2 years.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arm A (bortezomib, ifosfamide, carboplatin, etoposide) | Experimental | ARM A: Patients receive bortezomib IV over 5 seconds on days 1 and 4, ifosfamide IV continuously over 24 hours on day 1, carboplatin IV over 1 hour on day 1, and etoposide IV over 2 hours on days 1-3. Treatment repeats every 14 days for up to 6 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. |
|
| Arm B (ifosfamide, carboplatin, etoposide) | Active Comparator | Patients receive ifosfamide, carboplatin and etoposide as in Arm A. Treatment repeats every 14 days for up to 6 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bortezomib | Drug | Given IV |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Response After 3 Cycles of Botezomib Plus ICE (BICE) Versus Ifosfamide, Carboplatin, Etoposide (ICE) in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma | Response rates for Bortezomib, Ifosfamide, Carboplatin, Etoposide (BICE) and Ifosfamide, Carboplatin, Etoposide (ICE) treatment groups were assessed by the 1999 International Working Group (IWG)(CT alone) (Cheson et al., 1999) and compared to 2007 IWG (CT plus PET) (Cheson et al., 2007) criteria. Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR | From baseline to 3 cycles of treatment |
| Progression Free Survival (PFS) Rate at 12 Months | Progression free survival time is defined as the time interval from treatment start to progression or death due to any cause whichever happens first. Participants will be censored at the last follow-up date, if an event(progression/death) is not observed during the follow-up. | From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 100 months |
| Overall Survival (OS) Rate at 24 Months | Overall Survival is time from date of treatment start until date of death due to any cause or last Follow-up within 24 months. | 24 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| PET Scan Response After 3 Cycles of BICE Versus ICE Chemotherapy. | Response rates for BICE and ICE treatment groups will be assessed by 1999 IWG (CT alone) (Cheson et al., 1999) and compared to 2007 IWG (CT plus PET) (Cheson et al., 2007) criteria. | Baseline up to 1 year |
| Serum Levels of Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) Proteins (APRIL, BLyS, sCD30, and CD40L) and CC Thymus and Activation-related Cytokine (TARC) at Baseline and After 3 Cycles of BICE Versus ICE Chemotherapy |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Michelle Fanale | M.D. Anderson Cancer Center | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M D Anderson Cancer Center | Houston | Texas | 77030 | United States |
Not provided
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| MD Anderson Cancer Center Website | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Recruitment Period: August 2009 to August 2011 at MD Anderson Cancer Center.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | BICE (Bortezomib, Ifosfamide, Carboplatin, Etoposide) | Relapsed/refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma who have received a front-line standard anthracycline-containing regimen, such as ABVD, Stanford V, or BEACOPP. |
| FG001 | ICE (Ifosfamide, Carboplatin, Etoposide) |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Jun 30, 2010 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Carboplatin | Drug | Given IV |
|
|
| Etoposide | Drug | Given IV |
|
|
| Ifosfamide | Drug | Given IV |
|
|
| November 2009 and December 2010 |
| Baseline Cytokine/Chemokine Levels With Response to Therapy. | 106 weeks/13 months/426 days |
Relapsed/refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma who have received a front-line standard anthracycline-containing regimen, such as ABVD, Stanford V, or BEACOPP. |
| Relapsed |
|
| Refractory |
|
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | BICE (Bortezomib, Ifosfamide, Carboplatin, Etoposide) | Relapsed/refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma who have received a front-line standard anthracycline-containing regimen, such as ABVD, Stanford V, or BEACOPP. |
| BG001 | ICE (Ifosfamide, Carboplatin, Etoposide) | Relapsed/refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma who have received a front-line standard anthracycline-containing regimen, such as ABVD, Stanford V, or BEACOPP. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants | Participants | No |
| |||||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants | No |
| |||||||||||||||||
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants | No |
| |||||||||||||||||
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants | No |
| |||||||||||||||||
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| A Randomized Phase II Study of Bortezomib Plus ICE (BICE) Versus Standard ICE for Patients with Rela | Count of Participants | Participants | No |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Overall Response After 3 Cycles of Botezomib Plus ICE (BICE) Versus Ifosfamide, Carboplatin, Etoposide (ICE) in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma | Response rates for Bortezomib, Ifosfamide, Carboplatin, Etoposide (BICE) and Ifosfamide, Carboplatin, Etoposide (ICE) treatment groups were assessed by the 1999 International Working Group (IWG)(CT alone) (Cheson et al., 1999) and compared to 2007 IWG (CT plus PET) (Cheson et al., 2007) criteria. Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | From baseline to 3 cycles of treatment |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Progression Free Survival (PFS) Rate at 12 Months | Progression free survival time is defined as the time interval from treatment start to progression or death due to any cause whichever happens first. Participants will be censored at the last follow-up date, if an event(progression/death) is not observed during the follow-up. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 100 months |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Overall Survival (OS) Rate at 24 Months | Overall Survival is time from date of treatment start until date of death due to any cause or last Follow-up within 24 months. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | 24 months |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | PET Scan Response After 3 Cycles of BICE Versus ICE Chemotherapy. | Response rates for BICE and ICE treatment groups will be assessed by 1999 IWG (CT alone) (Cheson et al., 1999) and compared to 2007 IWG (CT plus PET) (Cheson et al., 2007) criteria. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | No | Baseline up to 1 year |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Serum Levels of Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) Proteins (APRIL, BLyS, sCD30, and CD40L) and CC Thymus and Activation-related Cytokine (TARC) at Baseline and After 3 Cycles of BICE Versus ICE Chemotherapy | Incomplete report as study was stopped early due to futility | Posted | November 2009 and December 2010 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Baseline Cytokine/Chemokine Levels With Response to Therapy. | Incomplete report as study was stopped early due to futility. Participant with relapsed/refractory HL prior to autologous transplant | Posted | 106 weeks/13 months/426 days |
|
|
2 years
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | BICE (Bortezomib, Ifosfamide, Carboplatin, Etoposide) | Relapsed/refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma who have received a front-line standard anthracycline-containing regimen, such as ABVD, Stanford V, or BEACOPP. | 0 | 10 | 1 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| EG001 | ICE (Ifosfamide, Carboplatin, Etoposide) | Relapsed/refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma who have received a front-line standard anthracycline-containing regimen, such as ABVD, Stanford V, or BEACOPP. | 0 | 10 | 1 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Febrile neutropenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neutrophil count decreased | Investigations | CTCAE (3.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Platelet count decreased | Investigations | CTCAE (3.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Transaminitis | Investigations | CTCAE (3.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hyperbilirubinemia | Investigations | CTCAE (3.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Peripheral sensory neuropathy | Nervous system disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Michelle A Fanale / Associate Professor, Lymphoma/Myeloma | UT MD Anderson Cancer Center | 713-792-2860 | MFANALE@MDANDERSON.ORG |
| Mar 6, 2019 |
| Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000069286 | Bortezomib |
| D016190 | Carboplatin |
| D005047 | Etoposide |
| D007069 | Ifosfamide |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001897 | Boronic Acids |
| D000148 | Acids, Noncarboxylic |
| D000143 | Acids |
| D007287 | Inorganic Chemicals |
| D001896 | Boron Compounds |
| D009930 | Organic Chemicals |
| D011719 | Pyrazines |
| D006573 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring |
| D006571 | Heterocyclic Compounds |
| D056831 | Coordination Complexes |
| D011034 | Podophyllotoxin |
| D013764 | Tetrahydronaphthalenes |
| D009281 | Naphthalenes |
| D011084 | Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons |
| D006841 | Hydrocarbons, Aromatic |
| D006844 | Hydrocarbons, Cyclic |
| D006838 | Hydrocarbons |
| D011083 | Polycyclic Compounds |
| D005960 | Glucosides |
| D006027 | Glycosides |
| D002241 | Carbohydrates |
| D003520 | Cyclophosphamide |
| D010752 | Phosphoramide Mustards |
| D009588 | Nitrogen Mustard Compounds |
| D009150 | Mustard Compounds |
| D006846 | Hydrocarbons, Halogenated |
| D063088 | Phosphoramides |
| D009943 | Organophosphorus Compounds |
| D010078 | Oxazines |
Not provided
Not provided
| >=65 years |
|
| Male |
|
| Not Hispanic or Latino |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| Asian |
|
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
|
| Black or African American |
|
| White |
|
| More than one race |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| Mexico |
|
| Mobilization regimen:Gemcitabine,Navelbine,Doxorub |
|
| Mobilization regimen:Cyclophosphamide |
|
| SD by CT imaging, but given PET negativity, receiv |
|
| Conditioning regimen Gemcitabine/Busulfan/melphala |
|
| Conditioning regimen BEAM followed with ASCT |
|
| Partial Response (PR) |
|
| Progressive Disease (PD) |
|
| Stable Disease (SD) |
|
|
|
|