Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The primary purpose of the study is to investigate the use of VRI to guide the selection of patients for lung surgery. Perfusion scintigraphy is the current method to assess the fractional contribution of lung function of the remaining lung.
The hypothesis is that VRI can determine quantitative postoperative lung function equally accurately as a quantitative perfusion scan.
Primarily, VRI will be compared to perfusion (Q) scan by predicted post-operative (ppo) FEV1 and DLCO as predicted by VRI versus as predicted by Q scan. Secondary, the ppo as predicted by each test will be compared with the actual FEV1 and DLCO at 3 months post-operative; If these two methods provide similar results, VRI will be deemed an acceptable alternative to Q scan for determining patient selection for lung resection. Finally, the patient outcomes (30 day mortality and pulmonary complications) for those patients falling within guideline parameters using the VRI measurement will be analyzed to see if using VRI in clinical practice would indeed allow prediction of satisfactory results (similar to literature benchmarks).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lung resection candidates | Study participants will be patients who are candidates for lung resection (lobectomy or greater) |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lung resection surgery | Procedure | The study is designed in a way that will not alter the surgeon's decision based on routine assessment of candidates for resection (lobectomy or greater). Namely, the VRI data will be gathered prospectively; however, the analyses using VRI data will be performed retrospectively. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Comparison of ppo FEV1 and ppo DLCO as predicted by VRI with the values as predicted by Q scan | Prior to surgery |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Comparison of ppo as predicted by each test with the actual FEV1 and DLCO at 3 months post-operative | 3 months after surgery |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Study participants will be patients who are candidates for lung resection (lobectomy or greater)
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Frank C Detterbeck, MD | Yale University Medical School | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yale University School of Medicine | New Haven | Connecticut | 06520-8062 | United States | ||
| Emory University |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17551264 | Background | Dellinger RP, Parrillo JE, Kushnir A, Rossi M, Kushnir I. Dynamic visualization of lung sounds with a vibration response device: a case series. Respiration. 2008;75(1):60-72. doi: 10.1159/000103558. Epub 2007 Jun 4. | |
| 18022081 | Background | Kramer MR, Raviv Y, Hardoff R, Shteinmatz A, Amital A, Shitrit D. Regional breath sound distribution analysis in single-lung transplant recipients. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2007 Nov;26(11):1149-54. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2007.07.039. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D008175 | Lung Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012142 | Respiratory Tract Neoplasms |
| D013899 | Thoracic Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Atlanta |
| Georgia |
| 30322 |
| United States |
| Boston Medical Center, Boston University | Boston | Massachusetts | 02118 | United States |
| Mt. Sinai School of Medicine | New York | New York | 10029 | United States |
| New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Medical Center | New York | New York | 10032 | United States |
| The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center | Houston | Texas | 77030 | United States |
| 18716118 | Background | Yigla M, Gat M, Meyer JJ, Friedman PJ, Maher TM, Madison JM. Vibration response imaging technology in healthy subjects. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 Sep;191(3):845-52. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.3151. |
| 19085584 | Background | Guntupalli KK, Reddy RM, Loutfi RH, Alapat PM, Bandi VD, Hanania NA. Evaluation of obstructive lung disease with vibration response imaging. J Asthma. 2008 Dec;45(10):923-30. doi: 10.1080/02770900802395496. |
| 19065052 | Background | Becker HD, Slawik M, Miyazawa T, Gat M. Vibration response imaging as a new tool for interventional-bronchoscopy outcome assessment: a prospective pilot study. Respiration. 2009;77(2):179-94. doi: 10.1159/000182972. Epub 2008 Dec 9. |
| 17873167 | Background | Colice GL, Shafazand S, Griffin JP, Keenan R, Bolliger CT; American College of Chest Physicians. Physiologic evaluation of the patient with lung cancer being considered for resectional surgery: ACCP evidenced-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition). Chest. 2007 Sep;132(3 Suppl):161S-77S. doi: 10.1378/chest.07-1359. |
| D008171 |
| Lung Diseases |
| D012140 | Respiratory Tract Diseases |