Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5R01MH069715-04 | U.S. NIH Grant/Contract | View source | |
| DAHBR B4-TBI |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) | NIH |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study aims to determine whether citalopram is a useful, well-tolerated, and safe treatment for children and adolescents ages 7 to 18 years with functional abdominal pain. The study hypothesis is that citalopram will be better than placebo in producing clinical improvement and reductions in abdominal pain. It is also hypothesized that citalopram and placebo will not differ in terms of safety and tolerability.
This study aims to determine the relative efficacy, tolerability, and safety of the citalopram in the treatment of pediatric functional recurrent abdominal pain (FAP) in children and adolescents ages 7 to 18 years, inclusive. The goal is to recruit and randomize 100 subjects to citalopram or placebo. Secondary aims include to determine if citalopram is superior to placebo in reducing comorbid anxiety and depressive symptoms in children and adolescents with FAP, to explore potential mediators (i.e., anxiety, depression) and moderators (e.g., age, gender, referral from primary or specialty care) of treatment response, and to explore the durability and tolerability of citalopram treatment 18 weeks following completion of the double-blind treatment phase with the goal of generating data useful to the development of future studies. The study is novel in conducting recruitment, assessment, and treatment in traditional medical settings. Limited exclusion criteria and the delivery of study assessments and interventions within routine practice settings provide for considerably greater external validity than the typical efficacy study.
Study hypotheses:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Citalopram | Experimental | Citalopram was initiated at 10 mg daily for one week, with dosage increased to 20 mg daily during week 2, with an optional increase to 40 mg daily at week 4 or thereafter if response was judged to be suboptimal (CGI-I or CGI-S > 2). |
|
| Placebo | Placebo Comparator | Placebo administered in capsules identical to those containing citalopram using microcrystalline cellulose. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citalopram | Drug | Participants will be randomly assigned to citalopram or placebo in a parallel groups design for 8 weeks of double-blind treatment beginning with 10 mg per day week 1, 20 mg per day week 2, and 40 mg per day week 4 or thereafter if response is suboptimal and there are no significant side effects. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Clinical Global Impression Scale - Improvement (CGI-I) Will be Used to Assess Overall Global Illness Improvement. CGI-I Scores of 1 (Very Much Improved) or 2 (Much Improved) Indicate an Acceptable Treatment Response. | Clinical Global Impression Scale - Improvement (CGI-I) is a 7-point scale, with lower values being more favorable, used to assess overall global illness improvement. The CGI is a clinician-completed measure, with values ranging from 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), 3 (minimally improved), 4 (no change), 5 (minimally worse), 6 (much worse), to 7 (very much worse). CGI-I scores of 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved) were considered to indicate an acceptable treatment response. A global measure of functional status was chosen as a primary outcome due to the broad array of symptomatology seen in pediatric RAP and the ambiguous relationship between functional status and symptoms of pain, anxiety, and depression in pediatric RAP. The CGI-I is a dichotomous primary outcome measure of global clinical improvement with clinical response be defined as a CGI-I score of 1 or 2 for at least two consecutive weeks. | The CGI will be completed at weeks 2, 4, and 8 |
| Clinical Global Impression Scale - Severity (CGI-S) | Clinical Global Impression Scale - Severity (CGI-S) is a 7-point scale is a clinician-completed measure that requires the clinician to rate the severity of the patient's illness at the time of assessment relative to the clinician's past experience with patients who have the same diagnosis. Considering total clinical experience, a patient is assessed on severity of illness at the time of rating, with values ranging from 1 (normal, not at all ill), 2 (borderline ill), 3 (mildly ill), 4 (moderately ill), 5 (markedly ill), 6 (severely ill), to 7 (extremely ill). | Weeks 0, 2, 4, and 8 |
| Abdominal Pain Index (API) | The API is a well-validated and reliable measure of abdominal pain assessing the frequency, duration, and intensity of abdominal pain consisting of five items assessing the frequency, duration, and intensity of abdominal pain experienced during the prior 2 weeks. Two of the items are scored from 0 to 5, one is scaled 0 to 8, and two are scaled 0 to 10, with lower scores considered to be better than higher scores. Item scores are standardized using Z-scores and then summed to yield an index of abdominal pain that has been sensitive to change in previous epidemiological and treatment studies of FAP. Alpha reliability ranged from 0.80 to 0.93. The API will be a continuous primary outcome measure of abdominal pain. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Pediatric Anxiety Rating Scale (PARS) | Pediatric Anxiety Rating Scale (PARS) is a clinician administered measure of anxiety in children and adolescents. The PARS is comprised of a 50-item symptom checklist used to determine the presence or absence of specific anxiety symptoms during the prior week and 7 severity/impairment items, each scored from 0 to 5 . The the score on the 7 items allows the clinician to rate symptom severity and associated impairment on a range from 0 to 35, with higher scores reflecting greater symptom severity and associated impairment. The PARS is characterized by high interrater reliability (ICC = 0.97), adequate internal consistency (α = 0.64), and fair test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.55). There is preliminary support for convergent and divergent validity, and the PARS has demonstrated sensitivity to treatment effects in previously conducted clinical trials. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Physical disease sufficient to explain the subjective distress and functional impairment suffered by the subject.
FAP with atypical features:
Physical disease in which citalopram monotherapy or study participation might prove to be disadvantageous or incompatible with quality care, including bleeding disorder characterized by prolonged bleeding time, uncontrolled epilepsy, or poorly controlled diabetes mellitus.
Psychiatric problem or disorder in which citalopram monotherapy or study participation might prove to be disadvantageous or incompatible with quality care, including evidence that the child is a serious acute danger to self or others, anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, alcohol or substance abuse/dependence, or bipolar disorder.
History of mental retardation as defined by full scale IQ < 70 on previous testing or participation in special education placement for mild to severe mental retardation.
Inadequate English speaking abilities of child or parent(s) to complete study measures and/or communicate with study examiners.
Adequate prior trial of citalopram, escitalopram, or another selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor or venlafaxine. Adequate trial is defined as at least 4 weeks of citalopram 20 mg/day, escitalopram 10 mg/day, fluoxetine 20 mg/day, fluvoxamine 100 mg/day, paroxetine 20 mg/day, sertraline 50 mg/day, or venlafaxine 75 mg/day.
Concurrent use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), aspirin, or anticoagulant medications.
Treatment for physical or psychiatric illness initiated within the prior 4 weeks or escalating in dosage or intensity.
History of hypersensitivity to citalopram or serotonin-syndrome.
Participation in any investigational drug study within thirty days of study entry.
Pregnancy
Sexually active female subjects refusing to use a medically accepted method of birth control during the study, or who engaged in unprotected sexual activity during the 30 days prior to the study.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| John V Campo, MD | Nationwide Children's Hospital | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital | Columbus | Ohio | 43205 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 15381890 | Background | Campo JV, Perel J, Lucas A, Bridge J, Ehmann M, Kalas C, Monk K, Axelson D, Birmaher B, Ryan N, Di Lorenzo C, Brent DA. Citalopram treatment of pediatric recurrent abdominal pain and comorbid internalizing disorders: an exploratory study. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2004 Oct;43(10):1234-42. doi: 10.1097/01.chi.0000136563.31709.b0. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Potential subjects with physical disease responsible for the abdominal pain, eating disorder, bipolar disorder, psychosis, alcohol/drug abuse, intellectual disability (IQ < 70), pregnancy, or prior trial of SSRI antidepressant or venlafaxine were excluded.
Subjects were clinically referred from primary care and specialty pediatric gastroenterology and were impaired as reflected by a score of less than 70 on the Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS).
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Citalopram | Citlaopram: Participants were randomly assigned to citalopram or placebo in a parallel groups design for 8 weeks of double-blind treatment beginning with 10 mg per day week 1, 20 mg per day week 2, and 40 mg per day week 4 or thereafter if response was suboptimal and there were no significant side effects. |
| FG001 | Placebo | Placebo: Participants were randomly assigned to citalopram or placebo in a parallel groups design for 8 weeks of double-blind treatment beginning with 10 mg per day week 1, 20 mg per day week 2, and 40 mg per day week 4 or thereafter if response was suboptimal and there were no significant side effects. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Citalopram | This double blind, placebo-controlled trial randomized 81 subjects ages 7 to 18 years in parallel groups to citalopram (n=40) or placebo (n=41) for 8 weeks. Citalopram was initiated at 10 mg per day week 1, 20 mg per day week 2, and 40 mg per day week 4 or thereafter if response was suboptimal and there were no significant side effects. Subjects were recruited by clinical referral from both the primary care and specialty pediatric gastroenterology clinical settings. In addition to meeting criteria for FAP, subjects were required to be significantly impaired as reflected by a score of less than 70 on the Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS). Potential subjects with physical disease responsible for the observed abdominal pain, eating disorder, bipolar disorder, psychosis, alcohol/drug abuse, intellectual disability (IQ < 70), pregnancy, or prior trial of SSRI antidepressant or venlafaxine were excluded. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Clinical Global Impression Scale - Improvement (CGI-I) Will be Used to Assess Overall Global Illness Improvement. CGI-I Scores of 1 (Very Much Improved) or 2 (Much Improved) Indicate an Acceptable Treatment Response. | Clinical Global Impression Scale - Improvement (CGI-I) is a 7-point scale, with lower values being more favorable, used to assess overall global illness improvement. The CGI is a clinician-completed measure, with values ranging from 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), 3 (minimally improved), 4 (no change), 5 (minimally worse), 6 (much worse), to 7 (very much worse). CGI-I scores of 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved) were considered to indicate an acceptable treatment response. A global measure of functional status was chosen as a primary outcome due to the broad array of symptomatology seen in pediatric RAP and the ambiguous relationship between functional status and symptoms of pain, anxiety, and depression in pediatric RAP. The CGI-I is a dichotomous primary outcome measure of global clinical improvement with clinical response be defined as a CGI-I score of 1 or 2 for at least two consecutive weeks. | Analysis week 8 | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | units on a scale | The CGI will be completed at weeks 2, 4, and 8 |
8 weeks
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Citalopram | Citlaopram: Participants were randomly assigned to citalopram or placebo in a parallel groups design for 8 weeks of double-blind treatment beginning with 10 mg per day week 1, 20 mg per day week 2, and 40 mg per day week 4 or thereafter if response was suboptimal and there were no significant side effects. |
Not provided
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| gastric distress | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
Relatively small sample size, potentially without sufficient power to detect meaningful between group differences.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| John V. Campo | The Ohio State University | 614-581-5984 | john.campo@hsc.wvu.edu |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D015746 | Abdominal Pain |
| D001008 | Anxiety Disorders |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010146 | Pain |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D015283 | Citalopram |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011437 | Propylamines |
| D000588 | Amines |
| D009930 | Organic Chemicals |
| D009570 | Nitriles |
| D001572 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
| Placebo | Drug | Participants will be randomly assigned to citalopram or placebo in a parallel groups design for 8 weeks of double-blind treatment beginning with 10 mg per day week 1, 20 mg per day week 2, and 40 mg per day week 4 or thereafter if response is suboptimal and there are no significant side effects. |
|
| Weeks 0, 2, 4, and 8 |
| Weeks 0, 2, 4, and 8 |
| Children's Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R) | Children's Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R) is a clinician administered measure of depression in children and adolescents and provides data necessary to diagnose depressive disorder and rate the severity of depressive symptoms over time. The CDRS-R is composed of 17 items, most rated on a 1 to 7 scale, with a minimum score of 17 and a maximum of 113. Higher scores reflect greater depression severity, with scores of 40 and above generally considered to be reflective of a depressive diagnosis. | Weeks 0, 2, 4, and 8 |
| Children's Global Assessment Scale (C-GAS) | Children's Global Assessment Scale (C-GAS) is an interview-based adaptation of the Global Assessment Scale developed to assess child and adolescent functioning during a specified time period. Scores range from one to 100, with scores of 70 or below reflecting abnormally low functioning and higher scores reflecting better functioning. The C-GAS has demonstrated reliability, as well as discriminant and concurrent validity. A CGAS score of < 70 will be a requirement at study entry. | Weeks 0, 2, 4, and 8 |
| BG001 | Placebo | This double blind, placebo-controlled trial randomized 81 subjects ages 7 to 18 years in parallel groups to citalopram (n=40) or placebo (n=41) for 8 weeks. Citalopram was initiated at 10 mg per day week 1, 20 mg per day week 2, and 40 mg per day week 4 or thereafter if response was suboptimal and there were no significant side effects. Subjects were recruited by clinical referral from both the primary care and specialty pediatric gastroenterology clinical settings. In addition to meeting criteria for FAP, subjects were required to be significantly impaired as reflected by a score of less than 70 on the Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS). Potential subjects with physical disease responsible for the observed abdominal pain, eating disorder, bipolar disorder, psychosis, alcohol/drug abuse, intellectual disability (IQ < 70), pregnancy, or prior trial of SSRI antidepressant or venlafaxine were excluded. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Participants |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| OG000 | Citalopram | Citalopram was initiated at 10 mg daily for one week, with dosage increased to 20 mg daily during week 2, with an optional increase to 40 mg daily at week 4 or thereafter if response was judged to be suboptimal (CGI-I or CGI-S > 2). Citalopram: Participants will be randomly assigned to citalopram or placebo in a parallel groups design for 8 weeks of double-blind treatment beginning with 10 mg per day week 1, 20 mg per day week 2, and 40 mg per day week 4 or thereafter if response is suboptimal and there are no significant side effects. |
| OG001 | Placebo | Placebo administered in capsules identical to those containing citalopram using microcrystalline cellulose. Placebo: Participants will be randomly assigned to citalopram or placebo in a parallel groups design for 8 weeks of double-blind treatment beginning with 10 mg per day week 1, 20 mg per day week 2, and 40 mg per day week 4 or thereafter if response is suboptimal and there are no significant side effects. |
|
|
|
| Primary | Clinical Global Impression Scale - Severity (CGI-S) | Clinical Global Impression Scale - Severity (CGI-S) is a 7-point scale is a clinician-completed measure that requires the clinician to rate the severity of the patient's illness at the time of assessment relative to the clinician's past experience with patients who have the same diagnosis. Considering total clinical experience, a patient is assessed on severity of illness at the time of rating, with values ranging from 1 (normal, not at all ill), 2 (borderline ill), 3 (mildly ill), 4 (moderately ill), 5 (markedly ill), 6 (severely ill), to 7 (extremely ill). | Analysis week 8 | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | units on a scale | Weeks 0, 2, 4, and 8 |
|
|
|
|
| Primary | Abdominal Pain Index (API) | The API is a well-validated and reliable measure of abdominal pain assessing the frequency, duration, and intensity of abdominal pain consisting of five items assessing the frequency, duration, and intensity of abdominal pain experienced during the prior 2 weeks. Two of the items are scored from 0 to 5, one is scaled 0 to 8, and two are scaled 0 to 10, with lower scores considered to be better than higher scores. Item scores are standardized using Z-scores and then summed to yield an index of abdominal pain that has been sensitive to change in previous epidemiological and treatment studies of FAP. Alpha reliability ranged from 0.80 to 0.93. The API will be a continuous primary outcome measure of abdominal pain. | Analysis week 8 | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | score on a scale | Weeks 0, 2, 4, and 8 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Pediatric Anxiety Rating Scale (PARS) | Pediatric Anxiety Rating Scale (PARS) is a clinician administered measure of anxiety in children and adolescents. The PARS is comprised of a 50-item symptom checklist used to determine the presence or absence of specific anxiety symptoms during the prior week and 7 severity/impairment items, each scored from 0 to 5 . The the score on the 7 items allows the clinician to rate symptom severity and associated impairment on a range from 0 to 35, with higher scores reflecting greater symptom severity and associated impairment. The PARS is characterized by high interrater reliability (ICC = 0.97), adequate internal consistency (α = 0.64), and fair test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.55). There is preliminary support for convergent and divergent validity, and the PARS has demonstrated sensitivity to treatment effects in previously conducted clinical trials. | Analysis week 8 | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | units on a scale | Weeks 0, 2, 4, and 8 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Children's Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R) | Children's Depression Rating Scale - Revised (CDRS-R) is a clinician administered measure of depression in children and adolescents and provides data necessary to diagnose depressive disorder and rate the severity of depressive symptoms over time. The CDRS-R is composed of 17 items, most rated on a 1 to 7 scale, with a minimum score of 17 and a maximum of 113. Higher scores reflect greater depression severity, with scores of 40 and above generally considered to be reflective of a depressive diagnosis. | Analysis week 8 | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | units on a scale | Weeks 0, 2, 4, and 8 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Children's Global Assessment Scale (C-GAS) | Children's Global Assessment Scale (C-GAS) is an interview-based adaptation of the Global Assessment Scale developed to assess child and adolescent functioning during a specified time period. Scores range from one to 100, with scores of 70 or below reflecting abnormally low functioning and higher scores reflecting better functioning. The C-GAS has demonstrated reliability, as well as discriminant and concurrent validity. A CGAS score of < 70 will be a requirement at study entry. | Analysis week 8 | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | units on a scale | Weeks 0, 2, 4, and 8 |
|
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 40 |
| 31 |
| 40 |
| EG001 | Placebo | Placebo: Participants were randomly assigned to citalopram or placebo in a parallel groups design for 8 weeks of double-blind treatment beginning with 10 mg per day week 1, 20 mg per day week 2, and 40 mg per day week 4 or thereafter if response was suboptimal and there were no significant side effects. | 0 | 41 | 36 | 41 |
| appetite or weight change | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| vision disturbance | Eye disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| dizziness | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| headache | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| itching | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| fatigue | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| nausea or vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| body aches | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| palpitations | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| bowel movement disturbance | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| eye irritation | Eye disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| dry mouth | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| earache | Ear and labyrinth disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| nosebleed | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| hearing disturbance | Ear and labyrinth disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| throat pain | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| motor disturbances (tics, twitches) | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| urinary disturbance | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| upper respiratory infection | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
|
| sweating | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| accidental injuries | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| hyperactive | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| aggression | Psychiatric disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| nightmares | Psychiatric disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| irritability | Psychiatric disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| sleep disturbance | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| anxiety and panic | Psychiatric disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| mood lability | Psychiatric disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| sadness, depression | Psychiatric disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| memory disturbance | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| fever | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| hair loss | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| D012817 | Signs and Symptoms, Digestive |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
| Benzofurans |
| D006574 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 2-Ring |
| D000072471 | Heterocyclic Compounds, Fused-Ring |
| D006571 | Heterocyclic Compounds |
| CGI-S Week 4 |
|
| CGI-S Week 8 |
|
| API-C Week 4 |
|
| API-C Week 8 |
|
| PARS Week 4 |
|
| PARS Week 8 |
|
| CDRS-R Week 4 |
|
| CDRS-R Week 8 |
|
| CGAS Week 4 |
|
| CGAS Week 8 |
|