Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this research study is to attempt to treat apathy in Parkinson's disease (PD) using high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the brain and to investigate the patterns of brain activation that may be involved in apathy. It is hypothesized that high-frequency rTMS of the left mid-dorsolateral frontal cortex will improve apathy in PD.
Apathy is a syndrome characterized by a primary lack of motivation and it manifests in three domains: behavioral (lack of effort and productivity, dependence on others for structuring daily activities), cognitive (loss of interest in new experiences, lack of concern for one's problems) and affective (flattened affect and lack of response to positive or negative events). Apathy has been consistently attributed to functional disturbance of neural systems involving mesial frontal and the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), an area with reciprocal connections with limbic, frontal cortices and the basal ganglia.
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a noninvasive tool used to manipulate activity in specific brain neural circuits through the skull and, in turn, induce short-term (milliseconds) and long-term (minutes to hours) changes in behavior. The duration of effect depends on the stimulation mode. Several studies have now demonstrated that rTMS may facilitate or modulate behavior beyond the actual stimulation. rTMS of the mid-dorsolateral frontal cortex (MDLFC) has been used to treat depression presumably because of its modulatory effect on the fronto-cingulate system (MDLFC and the ACC circuitry). Studies have shown that rTMS of the left MDLFC modulates the blood flow response in the ACC. We therefore hypothesize that high-frequency rTMS of the left MDLFC will also improve apathy in PD.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| High-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magentic Stimulation | Experimental | High-Frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation patients randomized to this treatment will receive left prefrontal rTMS, each treatment will consist of 2000 stimuli (50 - 8-second trains of 40 stimuli at 5 Hz). We will administer rTMS trains every 30 seconds for 25 minutes. Stimulus intensity for the first and second trains will be 80 and 90% of Motor Evoked Potential (MEP) threshold, respectively. |
|
| Sham Repetitive Transcranial Magentic Stimulation | Sham Comparator | Sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation patients randomized to receive the sham rTMS will undergo the same procedure for identifying stimulus location used in patients receiving real rTMS. Simulated rTMS will be administered using Magstim Placebo 70 mm figure-of-8 shaped coils which produce discharge noise and vibration similar to a real 70 mm coil without stimulating the cerebral cortex. However, in addition to obvious coil discharge noise, rTMS also causes electrical stimulation of the scalp. We will simulate this experience by attaching surface electrodes underneath the sham coil and in contact with the scalp. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| High-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation | Device | In patients randomized to receive left prefrontal rTMS, each treatment will consist of 2000 stimuli (50 - 8-second trains of 40 stimuli at 5 Hz). We will administer rTMS trains every 30 seconds for 25 minutes. Stimulus intensity for the first and second trains will be 80 and 90% of MEP threshold, respectively. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES) | The apathy evaluation scale is a 14-item self-report questionaire that provides a quantitative estimate of apathy symptoms. Items are given a score of 0-3, and a total score is summated using all items. Scores may range between 0 and 42. Higher scores are indicative of greater symptoms of apathy, and a score of 14 is suggestive of clinically significant symptoms. | Pre-Tx; 10 days post tx |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Lille Apathy Rating Scale (LARS) | The Lille Apathy Rating Scale (LARS) is a 33-item interviewer administered structured questionaire designed to assess level of apathetic symptoms. The first 3 items are scored from -2 to +2, while the remainder items are scored from -1 to +1. Scores can range between -36 to +36. The more positive the score, the greater level of apathy symptoms. | Pre-Tx; 10 days post-tx |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Hubert H Fernandez, M.D. | University of Florida | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Florida | Gainesville | Florida | 32611 | United States |
Not provided
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Movement Disorders Center at the University of Florida | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Patients seen clinically for routine clinical care were determined by clinicians if they appeared to qualify for the study. Subjects were asked and consented in a non-coercive manner if they wished to be contacted via telephone about future study participation. Recruitment occurred between March 2007-December 2009.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | rTMS Treatment | Participants in this group received rTMS treatment. |
| FG001 | Sham Treatment | Participants in this group did not receive rTMS treatment. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
| Sham Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation | Device | Patients randomized to receive sham rTMS will undergo the same procedure for identifying stimulus location used in patients receiving real rTMS. Simulated rTMS will be administered using Magstim Placebo 70 mm figure-of-8 shaped coils which produce discharge noise and vibration similar to a real 70 mm coil without stimulating the cerebral cortex. However, in addition to obvious coil discharge noise, rTMS also causes electrical stimulation of the scalp. We will simulate this experience by attaching surface electrodes underneath the sham coil and in contact with the scalp. |
|
|
| Beck Depression Inventory-Second Edition (BDI-II) | The Beck Depression Inventory-Second Edition (BDI-II) is a 21-item self-report questionaire that measures depressive symptoms. Each item is scored on a scale of 0-3, and items are summated to yield a total score. A higher score is indicative of greater symptoms of depression. Total scores may range between 0 and 63. A score greater than or equal of 14 is suggestive of clinically significant symptoms. | Pre-Tx; 10 days post-tx |
| Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) | The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) is a 24-item interviewer administered structure questionaire designed to assess symptoms of depression. Items are scored with a range of 0-4, though 11 of the items are scored between 0 and 2. A total score is then calculated of all items which can range from 0 to 74. A higher score is indicative of more depressive symptoms, and a lower score post-tx is indicative of better outcome. | Pre-Tx; 10 days post-tx |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | rTMS Treatment | Participants in this group received rTMS treatment. |
| BG001 | Sham Treatment | Participants in this group did not receive rTMS treatment. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Age Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES) | The apathy evaluation scale is a 14-item self-report questionaire that provides a quantitative estimate of apathy symptoms. Items are given a score of 0-3, and a total score is summated using all items. Scores may range between 0 and 42. Higher scores are indicative of greater symptoms of apathy, and a score of 14 is suggestive of clinically significant symptoms. | All participants who completed study procedures were included for analyses. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Pre-Tx; 10 days post tx |
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Lille Apathy Rating Scale (LARS) | The Lille Apathy Rating Scale (LARS) is a 33-item interviewer administered structured questionaire designed to assess level of apathetic symptoms. The first 3 items are scored from -2 to +2, while the remainder items are scored from -1 to +1. Scores can range between -36 to +36. The more positive the score, the greater level of apathy symptoms. | All participants who completed study procedures were included for analyses. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Pre-Tx; 10 days post-tx |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Beck Depression Inventory-Second Edition (BDI-II) | The Beck Depression Inventory-Second Edition (BDI-II) is a 21-item self-report questionaire that measures depressive symptoms. Each item is scored on a scale of 0-3, and items are summated to yield a total score. A higher score is indicative of greater symptoms of depression. Total scores may range between 0 and 63. A score greater than or equal of 14 is suggestive of clinically significant symptoms. | All participants who completed study procedures were included for analyses. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Pre-Tx; 10 days post-tx |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) | The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) is a 24-item interviewer administered structure questionaire designed to assess symptoms of depression. Items are scored with a range of 0-4, though 11 of the items are scored between 0 and 2. A total score is then calculated of all items which can range from 0 to 74. A higher score is indicative of more depressive symptoms, and a lower score post-tx is indicative of better outcome. | All participants who completed study procedures were included for analyses. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Pre-Tx; 10 days post-tx |
|
Adverse event data were collect from study enrollment to study completion, which occured between March 2007 - December 2009.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | rTMS Treatment | Participants in this group received rTMS treatment. | 0 | 16 | 8 | 16 | ||
| EG001 | Sham Treatment | Participants in this group did not receive rTMS treatment. | 1 | 8 | 3 | 8 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Falling | General disorders | UFL IRB | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Headache | General disorders | UFL IRB | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fatigue | General disorders | UFL IRB | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hallucination | General disorders | UFL IRB | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Back Pain | General disorders | UFL IRB | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Worsening PD symptoms | General disorders | UFL IRB | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fall | General disorders | UFL IRB | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pitting Edema | General disorders | UFL IRB | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
Due to recruiting difficulties, only 24 participants completed study participation. Despite this, the investigators still had significant power to examine effects of interest.
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Hubert Fernandez | Center for Neurological Restoration Cleveland Clinic | (216) 445-1108 | fernandez@neurology.ufl.edu |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010300 | Parkinson Disease |
| D053609 | Lethargy |
| D003863 | Depression |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020734 | Parkinsonian Disorders |
| D001480 | Basal Ganglia Diseases |
| D001927 | Brain Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D009069 | Movement Disorders |
| D000080874 | Synucleinopathies |
| D019636 | Neurodegenerative Diseases |
| D019954 | Neurobehavioral Manifestations |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D001526 | Behavioral Symptoms |
| D001519 | Behavior |
Not provided
Not provided
| >=65 years |
|
| Male |
|
|
|
Participants in this group did not receive rTMS treatment and were assessed approximately 10 days after tx began.
|
|
Participants in this group did not receive rTMS treatment and were assessed approximately 10 days after tx began.
|
|