Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Attorney General Consumer & Prescriber Education Grant | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to test whether cautions about the evidence, in this case an "open questions" statement, decreases enthusiasm for drugs that are approved on surrogate outcomes (compared to patient outcomes) alone.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Directive "open question" statement | Experimental | Survey describes the surrogate outcome of the drug along with a directive warning (i.e., stating the issue and why it matters) for drugs shown to improve surrogate outcomes. This directive warning mentions that it is not known whether the drug will help patients feel better, and that readers should ask their doctor if there is an available drug shown to improve patient outcomes. |
|
| Non-directive open question statement | Experimental | Survey describes the surrogate outcome of the drug along with a non-directive warning (i.e., stating the issue only) for drugs shown to improve surrogate outcomes. This non-directive warning mentions only that it is not known whether the drug will help patients feel better. |
|
| No open question statement | Experimental | Survey only describes the surrogate outcome of the drug. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Presentation of information on approval based on a surrogate outcome and levels of caution | Other | Presentation of information that one drug is approved on a surrogate outcome only while another drug has clinical outcomes. Participants are randomized to 1 of 3 caution (e.g. open question") statements: no open question statement, non-directive open question statement or directive open question statement. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Hypothetical choice of drug approved on surrogate outcomes vs. drug known to improve patient outcomes | 0 weeks (assessed during intervention) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Strength of opinion (take or refuse doctor's recommendation) for taking the drug approved on surrogate outcomes vs. drug known to improve patient outcomes | 0 weeks (assessed during intervention) |
Not provided
Inclusion criteria
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Lisa M Schwartz, MD, MS | White River Junction Veterans Affairs Medical Center | Principal Investigator |
| Steven Woloshin, MD, MS | White River Junction Veterans Affairs Medical Center | Principal Investigator |
Not provided
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21911629 | Derived | Schwartz LM, Woloshin S. Communicating uncertainties about prescription drugs to the public: a national randomized trial. Arch Intern Med. 2011 Sep 12;171(16):1463-8. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.396. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|