Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The objective of this trial is to determine the efficacy and safety of linaclotide administered to patients with irritable bowel syndrome with constipation (IBS-C).
The primary efficacy parameter is the percentage of patients in each treatment group that meet the protocol definition for Abdominal Pain and Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (APC) Responder.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Linaclotide | Experimental | Linaclotide 290 micrograms |
|
| Placebo | Placebo Comparator | Matching placebo |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linaclotide 290 micrograms | Drug | Oral, once daily each morning at least 30 minutes before breakfast for the duration of the study |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Abdominal Pain and Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (APC) Responder, 9 Out of 12 Weeks | A patient is considered to be an APC responder if, for at least 9 out of the 12 weeks of the treatment period, the patient had at least 3 CSBMs, experienced an increase of at least 1 CSBM from baseline, and experienced a decrease of at least 30 percent in their Abdominal Pain (AP) score from baseline during a particular week. The AP score assesses the worst of a patient's AP in the past 24 hours using an 11-point scale (from 0-10), where 0 represents no AP and 10 represents very severe AP. A CSBM is defined as a spontaneous bowel movement, associated with a sense of complete evacuation. | Change from Baseline to Week 12 |
| Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (CSBM) 3+1 Responder, 9 Out of 12 Weeks | A patient is considered to be a CSBM 3+1 responder if, for at least 9 out of the 12 weeks of the treatment period, the patient had at least 3 CSBMs and experienced an increase of at least 1 CSBM from baseline during a particular week. A CSBM was defined as a Spontaneous Bowel Movement (SBM) that was associated with a sense of complete evacuation. An SBM was defined as a bowel movement (BM) that occurred in the absence of laxative, enema, or suppository use on either the calendar day of the BM or the calendar day before the BM. | Change from Baseline to Week 12 |
| Abdominal Pain Responder, 9 Out of 12 Weeks | A patient is considered to be an abdominal pain responder if, for at least 9 out of the 12 weeks of the treatment period, they experienced a decrease of at least 30 percent in the mean abdominal pain score from baseline during a particular week. The Abdominal Pain score assesses the worst of a patient's abdominal pain in the past 24 hours using an 11-point scale (from 0-10), where 0 represents no abdominal pain and 10 represents very severe abdominal pain. | Change from Baseline to Week 12 |
| Abdominal Pain and Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (APC) Responder, 6 Out of 12 Weeks. | A patient is considered an APC responder if, for at least 6 of the 12 weeks of the treatment, the patient experienced an increase of at least 1 Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (CSBM) from baseline and experienced a decrease of at least 30 percent in their Abdominal Pain (AP)score during a particular week. The AP score assesses the worst of a patient's AP in the past 24 hours using an 11-point scale (from 0-10), where 0 represents no AP and 10 represents very severe AP. A CSBM was defined as a Spontaneous Bowel Movement (SBM) that was associated with a sense of complete evacuation. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| 12-Week Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (CSBM) Frequency Rate | The number of CSBMs per week. | Change from Baseline to Week 12 |
| 12-Week Spontaneous Bowl Movement (SBM) Frequency Rate | The number of Spontaneous Bowl Movements experienced per week. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Patient meets protocol criteria for IBS: reports abdominal discomfort or pain that has two or more of the following three features:
Patient reports < 3 bowel movements (BMs) per week (in the absence of any laxative, suppository, or enema use during the preceding 24 hours) and reports straining, lumpy or hard stools, and/or sensation of incomplete evacuation during > 25% of BMs
Patient has successfully completed protocol procedures (with no clinically significant findings): physical exam, 12-lead ECG, or clinical laboratory tests (some patients may require a colonoscopy per American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) guidelines)
Patient is compliant with Interactive Voice Response System (IVRS) for daily diary reporting of BM habits and IBS symptoms
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Paul F.C. Eng, PhD | Forest Research Institute, a subsidiary of Forest Laboratories Inc. | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Forest Investigative Site 037 | Birmingham | Alabama | 35209 | United States | ||
| Forest Investigative Site 036 |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24075889 | Derived | Rao SS, Quigley EM, Shiff SJ, Lavins BJ, Kurtz CB, MacDougall JE, Currie MG, Johnston JM. Effect of linaclotide on severe abdominal symptoms in patients with irritable bowel syndrome with constipation. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Apr;12(4):616-23. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.09.022. Epub 2013 Sep 25. | |
| 23116208 | Derived |
Not provided
Not provided
Patients went through a 14 to 21 day Pretreatment Period during which the patients provided qualifying bowel habit and symptoms, and rescue medicine usage information through an interactive voice response system (IVRS). All randomized patients needed an abdominal pain score ≥ 3. One randomized patient in the Placebo arm did not receive study drug.
Patient recruitment occurred over an eight month period from July 2009 to March 2009 at 118 study sites (111 in the United States, 7 in Canada).
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Placebo | Dose-matched placebo, oral administration, once per day. |
| FG001 | Linaclotide | Linaclotide 290µg, oral administration, once per day. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Matching placebo | Drug | Oral, once daily each morning at least 30 minutes before breakfast for the duration of the study |
|
| Change from Baseline to Week 12 |
| Change from Baseline to Week 12 |
| 12-Week Stool Consistency | The consistency of each BM was assessed by patients using the 7-point Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS) from 1 to 7.
| Change from Baseline to Week 12 |
| 12-Week Severity of Straining | Straining is measured on a 5-point scale where a value of 1 is "not at all" and a value of 5 is "an extreme amount. | Change from Baseline to Week 12 |
| 12-Week Change in Abdominal Pain Score | Abdominal Pain at its worst (in the last 24 hours) is based on an 11-point scale where 0 represents no abdominal pain and 10 represents very severe abdominal pain. | Change from Baseline to Week 12 |
| 12-Week Change in Abdominal Discomfort | Abdominal Discomfort is measured on an 11-point scale where a value of 0 is "none" and a value of 10 is "very severe." | Change from Baseline to Week 12 |
| 12-Week Change in Bloating | Bloating was assessed on an 11-point scale where a value of 0 is "none" and a value of 10 is "very severe". | Change from Baseline to Week 12 |
| Complete Spontaneous Bowl Movement (CSBM) Responder for 6 Weeks Out of 12 Weeks of Treatment | A patient is considered to be a CSBM responder if, for at least 6 out of the 12 weeks of the treatment period, an increase of at least 1 CSBM per week from baseline was experienced. | Change from Baseline to Week 12 |
| Abdominal Pain Responder for 6 Out of 12 Weeks | A patient is considered to be an abdominal pain responder if, for at least 6 out of the 12 weeks of the treatment period, they experienced a decrease of 30 percent or more in the abdominal pain score from baseline. The Abdominal Pain score assesses the worst of a patient's abdominal pain in the past 24 hours using an 11-point scale (from 0-10), where 0 represents no abdominal pain and 10 represents very severe abdominal pain. | Change from Baseline to Week 12 |
| 12-Week Percent of Abdominal Pain-free (APF) Days | Abdominal pain free (APF) days are those days where the patient reported a score of '0' for abdominal pain at its worst Abdominal Pain at its worst (in the last 24 hours) is based on an 11-point scale where 0 represents no abdominal pain and 10 represents very severe abdominal pain. | Change from Baseline to Week 12 |
| Birmingham |
| Alabama |
| 35215 |
| United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 135 | Hueytown | Alabama | 35023 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 014 | Huntsville | Alabama | 35801 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 080 | Chandler | Arizona | 85225 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 053 | Mesa | Arizona | 85210 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 078 | Peoria | Arizona | 85381 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 101 | Phoenix | Arizona | 85012 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 128 | Phoenix | Arizona | 85018 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 051 | Scottsdale | Arizona | 85251 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 136 | Tucson | Arizona | 85712 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 087 | Tucson | Arizona | 85741 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 094 | Burbank | California | 91505 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 026 | Encinitas | California | 92024 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 096 | Foothill Ranch | California | 92610 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 057 | Los Angeles | California | 90036 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 097 | Mission Hills | California | 91345 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 005 | Orange | California | 92869 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 024 | Westlake Village | California | 91361 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 021 | Boulder | Colorado | 80304 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 019 | Colorado Springs | Colorado | 80907 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 034 | Denver | Colorado | 80205 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 074 | Longmont | Colorado | 80501 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 010 | Wheat Ridge | Colorado | 80033 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 058 | Waterbury | Connecticut | 06708 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 042 | Boca Raton | Florida | 33486 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 003 | Bradenton | Florida | 34203 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 137 | Brandon | Florida | 33511 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 070 | Brooksville | Florida | 34613 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 018 | Fort Myers | Florida | 33916 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 030 | Jupiter | Florida | 33458 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 077 | Kissimmee | Florida | 34741 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 133 | Miami | Florida | 33126 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 031 | Miami | Florida | 33143 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 129 | New Smyrna Beach | Florida | 32168 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 108 | Ocala | Florida | 34471 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 092 | Orlando | Florida | 32806 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 038 | Panama City | Florida | 32405 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 027 | Pembroke Pines | Florida | 33024 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 045 | St. Petersburg | Florida | 33709 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 015 | Tampa | Florida | 33606 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 104 | Trinity | Florida | 34655 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 068 | Zephyrhills | Florida | 33542 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 032 | Atlanta | Georgia | 30342 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 103 | Atlanta | Georgia | 30342 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 033 | Marietta | Georgia | 30060 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 020 | Marietta | Georgia | 30067 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 040 | Woodstock | Georgia | 30189 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 055 | Idaho Falls | Idaho | 83404 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 043 | Rockford | Illinois | 61107 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 047 | Evansville | Indiana | 47714 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 046 | Iowa City | Iowa | 52242 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 029 | Arkansas City | Kansas | 67005 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 009 | Newton | Kansas | 67114 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 023 | Wichita | Kansas | 67205 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 093 | Wichita | Kansas | 67207 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 067 | Lexington | Kentucky | 40509 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 114 | Madisonville | Kentucky | 42431 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 132 | Baton Rouge | Louisiana | 70808 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 124 | Shreveport | Louisiana | 71101 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 013 | Chevy Chase | Maryland | 20815 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 006 | Hagerstown | Maryland | 21742 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 073 | Lutherville | Maryland | 21093 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 001 | Boston | Massachusetts | 02135 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 125 | Kalamazoo | Michigan | 49048 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 064 | Chaska | Minnesota | 55318 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 004 | St Louis | Missouri | 63128 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 085 | Vineland | New Jersey | 08360 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 052 | Albuquerque | New Mexico | 87106 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 035 | Brooklyn | New York | 11214 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 017 | Great Neck | New York | 11021 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 011 | Great Neck | New York | 11023 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 134 | Setauket | New York | 11733 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 122 | Boone | North Carolina | 28607 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 072 | Fayetteville | North Carolina | 28304 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 016 | Greensboro | North Carolina | 27403 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 119 | Hickory | North Carolina | 28601 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 088 | Raleigh | North Carolina | 27612 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 056 | Wilmington | North Carolina | 28401 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 065 | Winston-Salem | North Carolina | 27103 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 028 | Cincinnati | Ohio | 45219 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 044 | Cleveland | Ohio | 44122 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 123 | Columbus | Ohio | 43215 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 130 | Dayton | Ohio | 45432 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 082 | Oklahoma City | Oklahoma | 73104 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 102 | Tulsa | Oklahoma | 74135 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 039 | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania | 15206 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 121 | Greenville | South Carolina | 29615 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 069 | Greer | South Carolina | 29651 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 131 | Greer | South Carolina | 29651 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 025 | Nashville | Tennessee | 37205 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 099 | Austin | Texas | 78705 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 002 | Dallas | Texas | 75234 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 041 | Houston | Texas | 77090 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 110 | Houston | Texas | 77090 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 063 | Lake Jackson | Texas | 77566 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 095 | San Antonio | Texas | 78209 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 076 | San Antonio | Texas | 78229 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 089 | Salt Lake City | Utah | 84102 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 091 | Salt Lake City | Utah | 84132 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 100 | Salt Lake City | Utah | 84148 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 054 | Charlottesville | Virginia | 22911 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 061 | Christianburg | Virginia | 24073 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 007 | Newport News | Virginia | 23606 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 060 | Norfolk | Virginia | 23502 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 075 | Norfolk | Virginia | 23507 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 050 | Richmond | Virginia | 23294 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 049 | Bellevue | Washington | 98402 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 098 | Lakewood | Washington | 98499 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 066 | Wenatchee | Washington | 98801 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 083 | Milwaukee | Wisconsin | 53209 | United States |
| Forest Investigative Site 113 | Greater Sudbury | Ontario | P3E 1H5 | Canada |
| Forest Investigative Site 107 | Hamilton | Ontario | L8N 4A6 | Canada |
| Forest Investigative Site 112 | Newmarket | Ontario | L3Y 7V1 | Canada |
| Forest Investigative Site 106 | Ottawa | Ontario | K2C 3R2 | Canada |
| Forest Investigative Site 115 | Sarnia | Ontario | N7T 4X3 | Canada |
| Forest Investigative Site 008 | Toronto | Ontario | M3N 2V7 | Canada |
| Forest Investigative Site 116 | Toronto | Ontario | M4S 1Y2 | Canada |
| Quigley EM, Tack J, Chey WD, Rao SS, Fortea J, Falques M, Diaz C, Shiff SJ, Currie MG, Johnston JM. Randomised clinical trials: linaclotide phase 3 studies in IBS-C - a prespecified further analysis based on European Medicines Agency-specified endpoints. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2013 Jan;37(1):49-61. doi: 10.1111/apt.12123. Epub 2012 Nov 1. |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Placebo | Dose-matched placebo, oral administration, once per day. |
| BG001 | Linaclotide | Linaclotide 290µg, oral administration, once per day. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Age, Customized | Number | participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Abdominal Pain and Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (APC) Responder, 9 Out of 12 Weeks | A patient is considered to be an APC responder if, for at least 9 out of the 12 weeks of the treatment period, the patient had at least 3 CSBMs, experienced an increase of at least 1 CSBM from baseline, and experienced a decrease of at least 30 percent in their Abdominal Pain (AP) score from baseline during a particular week. The AP score assesses the worst of a patient's AP in the past 24 hours using an 11-point scale (from 0-10), where 0 represents no AP and 10 represents very severe AP. A CSBM is defined as a spontaneous bowel movement, associated with a sense of complete evacuation. | 803 patients were randomized to treatment, and 802 patients received double-blind study drug. 800 patients had at least 1 postrandomization entry of the primary efficacy assessment and were included in the Intent to Treat (ITT) Population. An observed-cases approach to missing postbaseline data was applied. | Posted | Number | Participants | Change from Baseline to Week 12 |
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | 12-Week Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (CSBM) Frequency Rate | The number of CSBMs per week. | 803 patients were randomized to treatment, and 802 patients received double-blind study drug. 800 patients had at least 1 postrandomization entry of the primary efficacy assessment and were included in the ITT Population. An observed-cases approach to missing postbaseline data was applied. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | CSBMs per Week | Change from Baseline to Week 12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (CSBM) 3+1 Responder, 9 Out of 12 Weeks | A patient is considered to be a CSBM 3+1 responder if, for at least 9 out of the 12 weeks of the treatment period, the patient had at least 3 CSBMs and experienced an increase of at least 1 CSBM from baseline during a particular week. A CSBM was defined as a Spontaneous Bowel Movement (SBM) that was associated with a sense of complete evacuation. An SBM was defined as a bowel movement (BM) that occurred in the absence of laxative, enema, or suppository use on either the calendar day of the BM or the calendar day before the BM. | 803 patients were randomized to treatment, and 802 patients received double-blind study drug. 800 patients had at least 1 postrandomization entry of the primary efficacy assessment and were included in the ITT Population. An observed-cases approach to missing postbaseline data was applied. | Posted | Number | Participant | Change from Baseline to Week 12 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Abdominal Pain Responder, 9 Out of 12 Weeks | A patient is considered to be an abdominal pain responder if, for at least 9 out of the 12 weeks of the treatment period, they experienced a decrease of at least 30 percent in the mean abdominal pain score from baseline during a particular week. The Abdominal Pain score assesses the worst of a patient's abdominal pain in the past 24 hours using an 11-point scale (from 0-10), where 0 represents no abdominal pain and 10 represents very severe abdominal pain. | 803 patients were randomized to treatment, and 802 patients received double-blind study drug. 800 patients had at least 1 postrandomization entry of the primary efficacy assessment and were included in the ITT Population. An observed-cases approach to missing postbaseline data was applied. | Posted | Number | Participants | Change from Baseline to Week 12 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Abdominal Pain and Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (APC) Responder, 6 Out of 12 Weeks. | A patient is considered an APC responder if, for at least 6 of the 12 weeks of the treatment, the patient experienced an increase of at least 1 Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (CSBM) from baseline and experienced a decrease of at least 30 percent in their Abdominal Pain (AP)score during a particular week. The AP score assesses the worst of a patient's AP in the past 24 hours using an 11-point scale (from 0-10), where 0 represents no AP and 10 represents very severe AP. A CSBM was defined as a Spontaneous Bowel Movement (SBM) that was associated with a sense of complete evacuation. | 803 patients were randomized to treatment, and 802 patients received double-blind study drug. 800 patients had at least 1 postrandomization entry of the primary efficacy assessment and were included in the ITT Population. An observed-cases approach to missing postbaseline data was applied. | Posted | Number | Participants | Change from Baseline to Week 12 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | 12-Week Spontaneous Bowl Movement (SBM) Frequency Rate | The number of Spontaneous Bowl Movements experienced per week. | 803 patients were randomized to treatment, and 802 patients received double-blind study drug. 800 patients had at least 1 postrandomization entry of the primary efficacy assessment and were included in the ITT Population. An observed-cases approach to missing postbaseline data was applied. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | SBMs per week | Change from Baseline to Week 12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | 12-Week Stool Consistency | The consistency of each BM was assessed by patients using the 7-point Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS) from 1 to 7.
| 802 randomized patients received study drug. The 800 patients in the ITT population had at least 1 postrandomization entry of the primary efficacy assessment; 107 patients with no pretreatment spontaneous bowel movements were excluded from the 12-Week Stool Consistency analysis. An observed-cases approach to missing postbaseline data was applied. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | units on a scale | Change from Baseline to Week 12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | 12-Week Severity of Straining | Straining is measured on a 5-point scale where a value of 1 is "not at all" and a value of 5 is "an extreme amount. | 802 randomized patients received study drug. The 800 patients in the ITT population had at least 1 postrandomization entry of the primary efficacy assessment; 107 patients with no pretreatment spontaneous bowel movements were excluded from the Severity of Straining analysis. An observed-cases approach to missing postbaseline data was applied. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | units on a scale | Change from Baseline to Week 12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | 12-Week Change in Abdominal Pain Score | Abdominal Pain at its worst (in the last 24 hours) is based on an 11-point scale where 0 represents no abdominal pain and 10 represents very severe abdominal pain. | 803 patients were randomized to treatment, and 802 patients received double-blind study drug. 800 patients had at least 1 postrandomization entry of the primary efficacy assessment and were included in the ITT Population. An observed-cases approach to missing postbaseline data was applied. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | units on a scale | Change from Baseline to Week 12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | 12-Week Change in Abdominal Discomfort | Abdominal Discomfort is measured on an 11-point scale where a value of 0 is "none" and a value of 10 is "very severe." | 803 patients were randomized to treatment, and 802 patients received double-blind study drug. 800 patients had at least 1 postrandomization entry of the primary efficacy assessment and were included in the ITT Population. An observed-cases approach to missing postbaseline data was applied. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | units on a scale | Change from Baseline to Week 12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | 12-Week Change in Bloating | Bloating was assessed on an 11-point scale where a value of 0 is "none" and a value of 10 is "very severe". | 803 patients were randomized to treatment, and 802 patients received double-blind study drug. 800 patients had at least 1 postrandomization entry of the primary efficacy assessment and were included in the ITT Population. An observed-cases approach to missing postbaseline data was applied. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | units on a scale | Change from Baseline to Week 12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Complete Spontaneous Bowl Movement (CSBM) Responder for 6 Weeks Out of 12 Weeks of Treatment | A patient is considered to be a CSBM responder if, for at least 6 out of the 12 weeks of the treatment period, an increase of at least 1 CSBM per week from baseline was experienced. | 803 patients were randomized to treatment, and 802 patients received double-blind study drug. 800 patients had at least 1 postrandomization entry of the primary efficacy assessment and were included in the ITT Population. An observed-cases approach to missing postbaseline data was applied. | Posted | Number | Participants | Change from Baseline to Week 12 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Abdominal Pain Responder for 6 Out of 12 Weeks | A patient is considered to be an abdominal pain responder if, for at least 6 out of the 12 weeks of the treatment period, they experienced a decrease of 30 percent or more in the abdominal pain score from baseline. The Abdominal Pain score assesses the worst of a patient's abdominal pain in the past 24 hours using an 11-point scale (from 0-10), where 0 represents no abdominal pain and 10 represents very severe abdominal pain. | 803 patients were randomized to treatment, and 802 patients received double-blind study drug. 800 patients had at least 1 postrandomization entry of the primary efficacy assessment and were included in the ITT Population. An observed-cases approach to missing postbaseline data was applied. | Posted | Number | Participants | Change from Baseline to Week 12 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | 12-Week Percent of Abdominal Pain-free (APF) Days | Abdominal pain free (APF) days are those days where the patient reported a score of '0' for abdominal pain at its worst Abdominal Pain at its worst (in the last 24 hours) is based on an 11-point scale where 0 represents no abdominal pain and 10 represents very severe abdominal pain. | 803 patients were randomized to treatment, and 802 patients received double-blind study drug. 800 patients had at least 1 postrandomization entry of the primary efficacy assessment and were included in the ITT Population. An observed-cases approach to missing postbaseline data was applied. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Percent | Change from Baseline to Week 12 |
|
|
Adverse event data for the treatment period was collected from July of 2009 to July of 2010
803 patients were randomized to treatment. A total of 802 patients received double-blind study drug and were included in the Safety Population.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Placebo - Treatment Period | Dose-matched placebo, oral administration, once per day. | 2 | 396 | 22 | 396 | ||
| EG001 | Linaclotide - Treatment Period | Linaclotide 290µg, oral administration, once per day. | 2 | 406 | 93 | 406 | ||
| EG002 | Placebo to Linaclotide - Randomized Withdrawal Period | Linaclotide 290µg, oral administration, once per day during a 4-week randomized withdrawal period. This group had previously received dose-matched placebo during the 12-week randomized treatment period. | 0 | 333 | 41 | 333 | ||
| EG003 | Linaclotide to Placebo - Randomized Withdrawal Period | Dose-matched placebo, oral administration, once per day during a 4-week randomized withdrawal period. This group had previously received linaclotide 290µg, oral administration, once per day during the 12-week treatment period. | 0 | 154 | 1 | 154 | ||
| EG004 | Linaclotide to Linaclotide - Randomized Withdrawal Period | Linaclotide 290µg, oral administration, once per day during a 4-week randomized withdrawal period | 0 | 158 | 5 | 158 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asthma | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 13.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pericardial effusion | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 13.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pericarditis | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 13.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cholecystitis chronic | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA 13.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Duodenitis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 13.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastroenteritis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 13.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hiatus hernia | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 13.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Oesophagitis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 13.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Renal cyst | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 13.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urinary tract infection | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 13.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diarrhea | General disorders | MedDRA 13.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 13.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
All data generated in this trial will be the property of Forest Research Institute, Inc. An integrated clinical and statistical report will be prepared at the completion of the trial. Publication of the results by the Investigator will be subject to mutual agreement between the Investigator and Forest Research Institute, Inc.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul F.C. Eng Ph.D Director, Clinical Development | Forest Research Institute | 201-427-8071 | Paul.Eng@frx.com |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D043183 | Irritable Bowel Syndrome |
| D003248 | Constipation |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003109 | Colonic Diseases, Functional |
| D003108 | Colonic Diseases |
| D007410 | Intestinal Diseases |
| D005767 | Gastrointestinal Diseases |
| D004066 | Digestive System Diseases |
| D012817 | Signs and Symptoms, Digestive |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
| 65 years and older |
|
| Male |
|
| Canada |
|
|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
|
| Units |
|---|
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|