Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| KUN2006-3699 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Objectives:
This is an exploratory study, consisting of two parts. In part I a dose escalation is performed and the primary objective is the safety of different doses of TLR-dendritic cell (TLR-DC). In part II TLR-DC vaccination will be compared with cytokine-matured DC vaccination and the primary objective of this part is the immunological response to TLR-DC vaccination, with toxicity and clinical efficacy being secondary objectives. These studies will provide important data on the safety and immunological effects of TLR-matured DC.
Study design:
This study is an open label prospective exploratory intervention study.
Study population:
The investigators' study population consists of HLA-A2.1 positive melanoma patients, with proven expression of melanoma associated tumor antigens gp100 and tyrosinase. Melanoma patients with regional lymph node metastasis in whom a radical lymph node dissection is planned or performed within 2 months of inclusion in this study (further referred to as stage III) and melanoma patients with measurable distant metastases (further referred to as stage IV) will be included.
Rationale
Immunotherapy applying ex vivo generated and tumor-antigen-loaded dendritic cells (DC) has now successfully been introduced in the clinic. A limited, but consistent, number of objective immunological and clinical responses have been observed. Thus far it remains unclear why some patients respond and others not, but there is a general consensus that the current protocols applied to generate DC may not result in the induction of optimal Th1 responses. We and others have demonstrated that DC maturation is one of the crucial factors, not only for effective DC migration but also to induce effective anti-tumor immune responses in cancer patients. Currently, the "golden standard" used to mature DC consists of a cocktail of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1beta, IL-6, TNFalpha) and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2). Recent mouse data demonstrated, however, that maturation of DC by solely pro-inflammatory cytokines yielded DC that supported T cell clonal expansion, but failed to efficiently direct effector T cell differentiation. Interestingly, DC matured in the presence of Toll like receptor (TLR) ligands were able to induce full T cell effector function and unleashed more potent immune responses. We recently identified vaccines against infectious diseases that contain TLR ligands and are capable of inducing DC maturation. This knowledge provides a new application for these clinical applicable agents: clinical grade DC stimulators. A clinical grade DC maturation protocol is developed in which TLR ligands (preventive vaccines) and PGE2 are combined which resulted in the generation of mature DC that secrete high levels of the key cytokine IL-12. Moreover, these TLR-ligand matured DC induced T cells secreting at least 20-fold higher levels of the effector cytokines IFNalpha and TNFalpha as compared to DC matured in the absence of TLR ligands. In conclusion, these in vitro data demonstrate that TLR-ligand matured DC are promising candidates to improve immunological and clinical responses in cancer immunotherapy.
Objectives
This is an exploratory study, consisting of two parts. In part I a dose escalation is performed and the primary objective is the safety of different doses of TLR-DC. In part II TLR-DC vaccination will be compared with cytokine-matured DC vaccination and the primary objective of this part is the immunological response to TLR-DC vaccination, with toxicity and clinical efficacy being secondary objectives. These studies will provide important data on the safety and immunological effects of TLR-matured DC.
Study design
This study is an open label prospective exploratory intervention study.
Study population
Our study population consists of HLA-A2.1 positive melanoma patients, with proven expression of melanoma associated tumor antigens gp100 and tyrosinase. Melanoma patients with regional lymph node metastasis in whom a radical lymph node dissection is planned or performed within 2 months of inclusion in this study (further referred to as stage III) and melanoma patients with measurable distant metastases (further referred to as stage IV) will be included.
Main study endpoints
The primary objectives of the study are to investigate the toxicity of TLR-DC by dose escalation of DC numbers in part I, and to investigate immunological responses upon TLR-DC vaccination in part II of the study.
Immunological responses are:
Safety and clinical efficacy are secondary objectives.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| cytokine matured DC | Active Comparator | vaccination with autologous dendritic cells matured with standard cytokine cocktail and electroporated with mRNA encoding tumor associated antigens |
|
| TLR ligand matured DC | Experimental | vaccination with autologous TLR-ligand matured dendritic cells electroporated with mRNA encoding tumor associated antigens |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| autologous dendritic cell vaccination | Biological | Autologous monocyte-derived dendritic cells electroporated with mRNA encoding gp100 and tyrosinase and matured with either cytokines or TLR ligands. Dendritic cells are vaccinated intradermal/intravenously 3 times with biweekly intervals every 6 months, if no signs of progression, for a total of 9 vaccinations. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Toxicity of TLR-matured DC (part I) and immunological response upon vaccination with TLR-matured DC (part II) | 3 years |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| vaccination related toxicity | in terms of local injection site reaction, flu-like symptoms, or otherwise related to vaccination, scored according to CTC version 3.0 | 5 years |
| clinical efficacy (progression free survival) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
All patients:
And in addition for Part I + II:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| C.J.A. Punt, prof.dr. | Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, dept of Medical Oncology | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre | Nijmegen | Gelderland | 6500HB | Netherlands |
Not provided
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| home page Department of Medical Oncology | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D008545 | Melanoma |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D018358 | Neuroendocrine Tumors |
| D017599 | Neuroectodermal Tumors |
| D009373 | Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal |
| D009370 | Neoplasms by Histologic Type |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
time to progression from date of start (apheresis) will be recorded
| 5 years |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D009380 | Neoplasms, Nerve Tissue |
| D018326 | Nevi and Melanomas |
| D012878 | Skin Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D012871 | Skin Diseases |
| D017437 | Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases |