Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Based on futility analysis, study would not meet primary endpoint.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RNYGB) is a weight loss surgery that involves the creation of a small gastric pouch and rearrangement of the small intestine. Although RNYGB has been demonstrated as an effective bariatric procedure, a significant number of patients experience weight regain that is often associated with distended gastric anatomy. Open and laparoscopic approaches for revision are associated with higher complication rates than de novo procedures. This study will evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a revisional incisionless natural orifice surgery of the gastric pouch and stoma in producing weight loss in post-RNYGB patients who have experienced weight regain.
The Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RNYGB) is the most commonly performed bariatric procedure to treat morbid obesity 1. Numerous studies have documented the effectiveness of RNYGB in promoting excess weight loss (EWL) typically in the 65-80% range after 1.5 to 2 years 1. Despite the favorable short-term outcomes of this bariatric surgical procedure, approximately 10-40% of patients do not achieve successful long-term weight loss 2. The weight regain occurs typically within 2 to 7 years after RNYGB surgery and is associated primarily with dilation of the gastric pouch or stoma 3, 4. Several open and laparoscopic bariatric revision procedures have been used in an attempt to correct these dilations, but they all have been associated with serious complications such as perforations, obstruction, staple line disruption, blind loop syndrome, stoma ulcer, and incisional hernias 2, 5, 6. Because of this high rate of morbidity associated with revisional gastric bypass surgery, less invasive endoscopic procedures may become a preferred approach for weight regain after RNYGB 7, 8.
The StomaphyX delivery system with SerosaFuse fasteners consist of an ergonomic, flexible fastener delivery device and sterile polypropylene fastener implants. The unit is provided sterile and is a single use device. The polypropylene fasteners are proprietary and function only with the StomaphyX device. The device uses vacuum to invaginate tissue through a port into a chamber and fasten it using the H shaped polypropylene fasteners. The fastener delivery subsystem is comprised of 3 elements: stylet, pusher, and internal lumens. They run the length of the device, the pusher being a hollow tube that rides over the length of the stylet, both riding in the lumen. The stylet is sharp at the distal tip to pierce tissue. The fastener is loaded by snapping it onto the stylet in the loading port of the handle. When pushed by the operator, the stylet carries the fastener down the lumen which runs from the proximal handle assembly to the distal tissue port where it will eventually be deployed into the tissue. Durability of the SerosaFuse fasteners has been demonstrated during several clinical studies utilizing the EsophyX device 9-12.
Reason for Conducting the Present Study: The goal of this study was to investigate the safety and effectiveness of the StomaphyX device for revisional natural orifice surgery of the gastric pouch and gastrojejunostomy anastomosis (stoma) in RNYGB patients to reduce regained weight.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| StomaphyX | Experimental | Post-Roux-en-Y revisional surgery using the StomaphyX device. |
|
| Sham Procedure | Sham Comparator | No intervention |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| StomaphyX | Device | Transoral incisionless fastening device that allows for GI tissue approximation and creation of full-thickness (serosa-to-serosa) plications. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Weight Loss | A clinically significant reduction in pre-RNYGB excess weight, defined by ≥15% EBL and BMI < 35. | 12 month |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Assessment of Changes to Quality of Life (QOL) Using a Validated QOL Questionnaire | Quality of life as assessed by the Impact of Weight on Quality of Life Questionnaire (IWQOL-Lite); a ≥ 10 total score improvement from baseline (screening) will represent a clinically significant improvement. | 12 months |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Anita P. Courcoulas, MD MPH FACS | University of Pittsburgh Medical Center | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Ohio State University Medical Center | Columbus | Ohio | 43210 | United States | ||
| University of Pittsburgh Medical Center |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24554030 | Derived | Eid GM, McCloskey CA, Eagleton JK, Lee LB, Courcoulas AP. StomaphyX vs a sham procedure for revisional surgery to reduce regained weight in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass patients : a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg. 2014 Apr;149(4):372-9. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.4051. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | StomaphyX | Post-Roux-en-Y revisional surgery using the StomaphyX device. StomaphyX: Revisional incisionless natural orifice surgery of gastric pouch and stoma. GI tissue approximation and creation of full-thickness (serosa-to-serosa) plications |
| FG001 | Sham Procedure | No intervention Sham procedure: False procedure |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
A total of 112 patients entered the study. 73 patients were randomized to the treatment study arm while 39 patients were randomized to the control study arm. 4 patients discontinued participation prior to receiving the study procedure. Therefore, 108 patients were eligible for follow-up.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | StomaphyX | Post-Roux-en-Y revisional surgery using the StomaphyX device. StomaphyX: Revisional incisionless natural orifice surgery of gastric pouch and stoma. GI tissue approximation and creation of full-thickness (serosa-to-serosa) plications |
| BG001 | Sham Procedure |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Weight Loss | A clinically significant reduction in pre-RNYGB excess weight, defined by ≥15% EBL and BMI < 35. | When futility analysis was performed, only 46 out of 108 patients had reached the 12 month primary endpoint. Analysis was performed on the 29 StomaphyX-treated patients to determine whether study objectives were met. Sham (control) patients were not analyzed. | Posted | Number | participants | 12 month |
|
Adverse event data were collected through the 12-month post-op visit for treatment and sham patients. The blind was broken for all patients due to premature termination of the study.
112 subjects enrolled/randomized:73 StomaphyX, 39 Sham. 108 treated:69 StomaphyX, 39 Sham. 112 patients were considered at risk for all cause mortality; 108 (69 StomaphyX, 39 Sham) considered at risk for serious/other adverse events. The 4 patients not included were in StomaphyX arm: 2 withdrawn prior to treatment at investigator discretion. Surgery was aborted on the other 2; treatment not completed as device couldn't be inserted. These 4 followed per site standard of care, outside study.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | StomaphyX | Post-Roux-en-Y revisional surgery using the StomaphyX device. StomaphyX: Revisional incisionless natural orifice surgery of gastric pouch and stoma. GI tissue approximation and creation of full-thickness (serosa-to-serosa) plications |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perforation | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (10.0) | Non-systematic Assessment | Small perforation in posterior gastrojejunostomy anastomosis. |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nausea | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Senior Director Clinical Affairs | EndoGastric Solutions | 650-823-9093 | gsahyun@endogastricsolutions.com |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009765 | Obesity |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D050177 | Overweight |
| D044343 | Overnutrition |
| D009748 | Nutrition Disorders |
| D009750 | Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Sham procedure | Procedure | False procedure |
|
|
| Pittsburgh |
| Pennsylvania |
| 15213 |
| United States |
No intervention Sham procedure: False procedure |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
No intervention
|
|
| Secondary | Assessment of Changes to Quality of Life (QOL) Using a Validated QOL Questionnaire | Quality of life as assessed by the Impact of Weight on Quality of Life Questionnaire (IWQOL-Lite); a ≥ 10 total score improvement from baseline (screening) will represent a clinically significant improvement. | Secondary endpoint was not analyzed. | Posted | 12 months |
|
|
| 0 |
| 73 |
| 3 |
| 69 |
| 18 |
| 69 |
| EG001 | Sham | No intervention | 0 | 39 | 0 | 39 | 7 | 39 |
|
| Tachycardia, Infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (10.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Vomiting | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (10.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Sore Neck | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (10.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Temporary epigastric or abdominal pain | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment | can be treated with standard pain medication |
|
| Pharyngolaryngeal pain (e.g. throat pain) | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (10.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Burps a lot after eating | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (10.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Diarrhea | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (10.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Constipation | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (10.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Headache | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (10.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Temporary dysphagia (i.e. difficulty swallowing) | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (10.0) | Non-systematic Assessment | due to swelling |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| D001835 |
| Body Weight |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |