Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Forest Laboratories | INDUSTRY |
The purpose of this study is to determine the safety and efficacy of linaclotide administered to patients with Irritable Bowel Syndrome with Constipation (IBS-C).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Placebo Comparator |
| |
| 290 μg Linaclotide | Experimental |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linaclotide or Matching Placebo | Drug | Linaclotide or Matching Placebo, administered orally, once daily, for the duration of the trial |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Abdominal Pain and Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (APC) Responder, 9 Out of 12 Weeks | A patient is considered to be a 9 out of 12 week APC responder if, for at least 9 out of the first 12 weeks of the treatment period, the patient had at least 3 CSBMs, had an increase of at least 1 CSBM from baseline, and had a decrease of at least 30 percent in their Abdominal Pain (AP) score from baseline during a particular week. The AP score assesses patient's worst AP in the past 24 hours using an 11-point scale (from 0-10), where 0 represents no AP and 10 represents very severe AP. SBM is defined as a bowel movement that occurs in the absence of laxative, enema, or suppository use on either the calendar day of the bowel movement or the calendar day before the bowel movement. CSBM is defined as an SBM associated with a sense of complete evacuation. | Change from Baseline to Week 12 |
| Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (CSBM) 3+1 Responder, 9 Out of 12 Weeks | A patient is considered to be a CSBM 3+1 responder if, for at least 9 out of the 12 weeks of the treatment period, the patient had at least 3 CSBMs and experienced an increase of at least 1 CSBM from baseline during a particular week. A CSBM was defined as a Spontaneous Bowel Movement (SBM) that was associated with a sense of complete evacuation. An SBM was defined as a bowel movement (BM) that occurred in the absence of laxative, enema, or suppository use on either the calendar day of the BM or the calendar day before the BM. | Change from Baseline to Week 12 |
| Abdominal Pain Responder, 9 Out of 12 Weeks | A patient is considered to be an abdominal pain responder if, for at least 9 out of the 12 weeks of the treatment period, they experienced a decrease of at least 30 percent in the mean abdominal pain score from baseline during a particular week. The Abdominal Pain score assesses patient's worst abdominal pain in the past 24 hours using an 11-point scale (from 0-10), where 0 represents no abdominal pain and 10 represents very severe abdominal pain. | Change from Baseline to Week 12 |
| Abdominal Pain and Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (APC) Responder, 6 Out of 12 Weeks |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| 12-Week Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (CSBM) Frequency | The change from baseline in 12-week CSBM frequency (i.e., weekly CSBM frequency over the first 12 weeks of the Treatment Period). | Change from Baseline to Week 12 |
| 12-Week Spontaneous Bowl Movement (SBM) Frequency |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey M. Johnston, MD, FACP | Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | Study Chair |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Birmingham | Alabama | 35209 | United States | ||
| Ironwood Investigational Site |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24075889 | Derived | Rao SS, Quigley EM, Shiff SJ, Lavins BJ, Kurtz CB, MacDougall JE, Currie MG, Johnston JM. Effect of linaclotide on severe abdominal symptoms in patients with irritable bowel syndrome with constipation. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Apr;12(4):616-23. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.09.022. Epub 2013 Sep 25. | |
| 23116208 | Derived |
Not provided
Not provided
Patients went through a 14 to 21 day Pretreatment Period during which the patients provided qualifying bowel habit and symptoms, and rescue medicine usage information through an interactive voice response system (IVRS). All randomized patients needed an abdominal pain score ≥ 3.
Patient recruitment occurred over a fifteen month period from July 2009 to September 2010 at 111 US study sites.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Placebo | Dose-matched placebo, oral administration, once per day. |
| FG001 | Linaclotide | Linaclotide 290μg, oral administration, once per day. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
A patient is considered to be a 6 out of 12 week APC responder if, for at least 6 out of the first 12 weeks of the treatment period, the patient had an increase of at least 1 CSBM from baseline, and had a decrease of at least 30 percent in their Abdominal Pain (AP) score from baseline during a particular week. The AP score assesses patient's worst AP in the past 24 hours using an 11-point scale (from 0-10), where 0 represents no AP and 10 represents very severe AP. SBM is defined as a bowel movement that occurs in the absence of laxative, enema, or suppository use on either the calendar day of the bowel movement or the calendar day before the bowel movement. CSBM is defined as an SBM associated with a sense of complete evacuation. |
| Change from Baseline to Week 12 |
The change from baseline in 12-week SBM frequency (i.e., weekly SBM frequency over the first 12 weeks of the Treatment Period). |
| Change from Baseline to Week 12 |
| 12-Week Change in Stool Consistency | The consistency of each BM was assessed by patients using the 7-point Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS) from 1 to 7.
| Change from Baseline to Week 12 |
| 12-Week Change in Severity of Straining | Straining is measured on a 5-point scale where a value of 1 is "not at all" and a value of 5 is "an extreme amount". | Change from Baseline to Week 12 |
| 12-Week Change in Abdominal Pain Score | Abdominal Pain at its worst (in the last 24 hours) is based on an 11-point scale where 0 represents no abdominal pain and 10 represents very severe abdominal pain. | Change from Baseline to Week 12 |
| 12-Week Change in Abdominal Discomfort | Abdominal discomfort was assessed on an 11-point scale where a value of 0 is "none" and a value of 10 is "very severe". | Change from Baseline to Week 12 |
| 12-Week Change in Bloating | Bloating was assessed on an 11-point scale where a value of 0 is "none" and a value of 10 is "very severe". | Change from Baseline to Week 12 |
| Complete Spontaneous Bowl Movement (CSBM) Responder for 6 Weeks Out of 12 Weeks of Treatment | A patient is considered to be a CSBM responder if, for at least 6 out of the 12 weeks of the treatment period, an increase of at least 1 CSBM per week from baseline was experienced. | Change from Baseline to Week 12 |
| Abdominal Pain Responder for 6 Out of 12 Weeks | A patient is considered to be an AP responder if, for at least 6 out of the first 12 weeks of the treatment period, the patient had a decrease of at least 30 percent in their Abdominal Pain score from baseline during a particular week. | Change from Baseline to Week 12 |
| 12-Week Percent of Abdominal Pain-free Days | Abdominal pain free (APF) days are those days where the patient reported a score of '0' for abdominal pain at its worst. Abdominal Pain at its worst (in the last 24 hours) is based on an 11-point scale where 0 represents no abdominal pain and 10 represents very severe abdominal pain. | Change from Baseline to Week 12 |
| Huntsville |
| Alabama |
| 35801 |
| United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Phoenix | Arizona | 85014 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Tempe | Arizona | 85282 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Tucson | Arizona | 85710 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Tucson | Arizona | 85741 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Sherwood | Arkansas | 72120 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Anaheim | California | 92801 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Chula Vista | California | 91910 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Encinitas | California | 92024 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Garden Grove | California | 92840 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Laguna Hills | California | 92653 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Orange | California | 92868 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | San Carlos | California | 94070 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | San Diego | California | 92103 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | San Diego | California | 92108 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | San Diego | California | 92123 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Colorado Springs | Colorado | 80904 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Bristol | Connecticut | 06011 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Boynton Beach | Florida | 33426 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Hollywood | Florida | 33021 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Inverness | Florida | 34452 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Jacksonville | Florida | 32205 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Jacksonville | Florida | 32207 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Lauderdale Lakes | Florida | 33319 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Miami | Florida | 33156 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Pinellas Park | Florida | 33782 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Tampa | Florida | 33607 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Newnan | Georgia | 30263 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Peoria | Illinois | 61602 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Anderson | Indiana | 46011 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Clive | Iowa | 50325 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Davenport | Iowa | 52807 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Mission | Kansas | 66202 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Overland Park | Kansas | 66215 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Topeka | Kansas | 66606 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Baton Rouge | Louisiana | 70809 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Metairie | Louisiana | 70006 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Monroe | Louisiana | 71201 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Shreveport | Louisiana | 71103 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Annapolis | Maryland | 21401 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Baltimore | Maryland | 21215 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Hollywood | Maryland | 20636 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Laurel | Maryland | 20707 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Chesterfield | Michigan | 48047 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Traverse City | Michigan | 49684 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Troy | Michigan | 48098 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Plymouth | Minnesota | 55446 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Jackson | Mississippi | 39202 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Tupelo | Mississippi | 38801 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Jefferson City | Missouri | 65109 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Marlton | New Jersey | 08053 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Albuquerque | New Mexico | 87108 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Mineola | New York | 11501 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Pittsford | New York | 14534 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Asheboro | North Carolina | 27203 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Asheville | North Carolina | 28801 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Chapel Hill | North Carolina | 27599 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Charlotte | North Carolina | 28209 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Charlotte | North Carolina | 28211 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Greensboro | North Carolina | 27401 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Greensboro | North Carolina | 27408 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Harrisburg | North Carolina | 28075 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Hickory | North Carolina | 28602 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Huntersville | North Carolina | 28078 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | New Bern | North Carolina | 28562 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Statesville | North Carolina | 28625 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Winston-Salem | North Carolina | 27103 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Beachwood | Ohio | 44122 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Cincinnati | Ohio | 45224 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Cincinnati | Ohio | 45242 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Dayton | Ohio | 45440 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Mentor | Ohio | 44060 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Sylvania | Ohio | 43560 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Wadsworth | Ohio | 44281 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Oklahoma City | Oklahoma | 73116 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Yukon | Oklahoma | 73099 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Lancaster | Pennsylvania | 17604 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Levittown | Pennsylvania | 19056 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Reading | Pennsylvania | 19606 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Sellersville | Pennsylvania | 18960 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Washington | Pennsylvania | 15301 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Anderson | South Carolina | 29621 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Charleston | South Carolina | 29414 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Simpsonville | South Carolina | 29581 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Summerville | South Carolina | 29485 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Bristol | Tennessee | 37620 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Chattanooga | Tennessee | 37404 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Germantown | Tennessee | 38183 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Kingsport | Tennessee | 37660 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Nashville | Tennessee | 37203 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Beaumont | Texas | 77701 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | El Paso | Texas | 79905 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Fort Worth | Texas | 76104 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Houston | Texas | 77024 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Irving | Texas | 75061 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Longview | Texas | 75605 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | San Antonio | Texas | 78229 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Sugarland | Texas | 77479 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Ogden | Utah | 84405 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Salt Lake City | Utah | 84107 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Chesapeake | Virginia | 23320 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Lynchburg | Virginia | 24502 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Spokane | Washington | 99208 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Vancouver | Washington | 98664 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | La Crosse | Wisconsin | 54601 | United States |
| Ironwood Investigational Site | Milwaukee | Wisconsin | 53215 | United States |
| Quigley EM, Tack J, Chey WD, Rao SS, Fortea J, Falques M, Diaz C, Shiff SJ, Currie MG, Johnston JM. Randomised clinical trials: linaclotide phase 3 studies in IBS-C - a prespecified further analysis based on European Medicines Agency-specified endpoints. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2013 Jan;37(1):49-61. doi: 10.1111/apt.12123. Epub 2012 Nov 1. |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Placebo | Dose-matched placebo, oral administration, once per day. |
| BG001 | Linaclotide | Linaclotide 290μg, oral administration, once per day. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Age, Customized | Number | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Abdominal Pain and Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (APC) Responder, 9 Out of 12 Weeks | A patient is considered to be a 9 out of 12 week APC responder if, for at least 9 out of the first 12 weeks of the treatment period, the patient had at least 3 CSBMs, had an increase of at least 1 CSBM from baseline, and had a decrease of at least 30 percent in their Abdominal Pain (AP) score from baseline during a particular week. The AP score assesses patient's worst AP in the past 24 hours using an 11-point scale (from 0-10), where 0 represents no AP and 10 represents very severe AP. SBM is defined as a bowel movement that occurs in the absence of laxative, enema, or suppository use on either the calendar day of the bowel movement or the calendar day before the bowel movement. CSBM is defined as an SBM associated with a sense of complete evacuation. | 805 patients were randomized to treatment. 804 patients had at least 1 postrandomization entry of the primary efficacy assessment and were included in the Intent to Treat (ITT) Population. An observed-cases approach to missing postbaseline data was applied. | Posted | Number | participants | Change from Baseline to Week 12 |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (CSBM) 3+1 Responder, 9 Out of 12 Weeks | A patient is considered to be a CSBM 3+1 responder if, for at least 9 out of the 12 weeks of the treatment period, the patient had at least 3 CSBMs and experienced an increase of at least 1 CSBM from baseline during a particular week. A CSBM was defined as a Spontaneous Bowel Movement (SBM) that was associated with a sense of complete evacuation. An SBM was defined as a bowel movement (BM) that occurred in the absence of laxative, enema, or suppository use on either the calendar day of the BM or the calendar day before the BM. | 805 patients were randomized to treatment. 804 patients had at least 1 postrandomization entry of the primary efficacy assessment and were included in the ITT Population. An observed-cases approach to missing postbaseline data was applied. | Posted | Number | participants | Change from Baseline to Week 12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Abdominal Pain Responder, 9 Out of 12 Weeks | A patient is considered to be an abdominal pain responder if, for at least 9 out of the 12 weeks of the treatment period, they experienced a decrease of at least 30 percent in the mean abdominal pain score from baseline during a particular week. The Abdominal Pain score assesses patient's worst abdominal pain in the past 24 hours using an 11-point scale (from 0-10), where 0 represents no abdominal pain and 10 represents very severe abdominal pain. | 805 patients were randomized to treatment. 804 patients had at least 1 postrandomization entry of the primary efficacy assessment and were included in the ITT Population. An observed-cases approach to missing postbaseline data was applied. | Posted | Number | participants | Change from Baseline to Week 12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Abdominal Pain and Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (APC) Responder, 6 Out of 12 Weeks | A patient is considered to be a 6 out of 12 week APC responder if, for at least 6 out of the first 12 weeks of the treatment period, the patient had an increase of at least 1 CSBM from baseline, and had a decrease of at least 30 percent in their Abdominal Pain (AP) score from baseline during a particular week. The AP score assesses patient's worst AP in the past 24 hours using an 11-point scale (from 0-10), where 0 represents no AP and 10 represents very severe AP. SBM is defined as a bowel movement that occurs in the absence of laxative, enema, or suppository use on either the calendar day of the bowel movement or the calendar day before the bowel movement. CSBM is defined as an SBM associated with a sense of complete evacuation. | 805 patients were randomized to treatment. 804 patients had at least 1 postrandomization entry of the primary efficacy assessment and were included in the ITT Population. An observed-cases approach to missing postbaseline data was applied. | Posted | Number | participants | Change from Baseline to Week 12 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | 12-Week Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (CSBM) Frequency | The change from baseline in 12-week CSBM frequency (i.e., weekly CSBM frequency over the first 12 weeks of the Treatment Period). | 805 patients were randomized to treatment. 804 patients had at least 1 postrandomization entry of the primary efficacy assessment and were included in the ITT Population. An observed-cases approach to missing postbaseline data was applied. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | CSBMs per Week | Change from Baseline to Week 12 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | 12-Week Spontaneous Bowl Movement (SBM) Frequency | The change from baseline in 12-week SBM frequency (i.e., weekly SBM frequency over the first 12 weeks of the Treatment Period). | 805 patients were randomized to treatment. 804 patients had at least 1 postrandomization entry of the primary efficacy assessment and were included in the ITT Population. An observed-cases approach to missing postbaseline data was applied. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | SBMs per Week | Change from Baseline to Week 12 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | 12-Week Change in Stool Consistency | The consistency of each BM was assessed by patients using the 7-point Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS) from 1 to 7.
| 805 patients were randomized to treatment; 804 patients had at least 1 postrandomization entry of the primary efficacy assessment and included in the ITT Population; 134 patients with no pretreatment spontaneous bowel movements were excluded from the Stool Consistency analysis. An observed-cases approach to missing postbaseline data was applied. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Units on a scale | Change from Baseline to Week 12 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | 12-Week Change in Severity of Straining | Straining is measured on a 5-point scale where a value of 1 is "not at all" and a value of 5 is "an extreme amount". | 805 patients were randomized to treatment; 804 patients had at least 1 postrandomization entry of the primary efficacy assessment and included in the ITT Population; 134 patients with no pretreatment spontaneous bowel movements were excluded from the Straining analysis. An observed-cases approach to missing postbaseline data was applied. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Units on a scale | Change from Baseline to Week 12 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | 12-Week Change in Abdominal Pain Score | Abdominal Pain at its worst (in the last 24 hours) is based on an 11-point scale where 0 represents no abdominal pain and 10 represents very severe abdominal pain. | 805 patients were randomized to treatment. 804 patients had at least 1 postrandomization entry of the primary efficacy assessment and were included in the ITT Population. An observed-cases approach to missing postbaseline data was applied. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Units on a scale | Change from Baseline to Week 12 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | 12-Week Change in Abdominal Discomfort | Abdominal discomfort was assessed on an 11-point scale where a value of 0 is "none" and a value of 10 is "very severe". | 805 patients were randomized to treatment. 804 patients had at least 1 postrandomization entry of the primary efficacy assessment and were included in the ITT Population. An observed-cases approach to missing postbaseline data was applied. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Units on a scale | Change from Baseline to Week 12 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | 12-Week Change in Bloating | Bloating was assessed on an 11-point scale where a value of 0 is "none" and a value of 10 is "very severe". | 805 patients were randomized to treatment. 804 patients had at least 1 postrandomization entry of the primary efficacy assessment and were included in the ITT Population. An observed-cases approach to missing postbaseline data was applied. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Units on a scale | Change from Baseline to Week 12 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Complete Spontaneous Bowl Movement (CSBM) Responder for 6 Weeks Out of 12 Weeks of Treatment | A patient is considered to be a CSBM responder if, for at least 6 out of the 12 weeks of the treatment period, an increase of at least 1 CSBM per week from baseline was experienced. | 805 patients were randomized to treatment. 804 patients had at least 1 postrandomization entry of the primary efficacy assessment and were included in the ITT Population. An observed-cases approach to missing postbaseline data was applied. | Posted | Number | participants | Change from Baseline to Week 12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Abdominal Pain Responder for 6 Out of 12 Weeks | A patient is considered to be an AP responder if, for at least 6 out of the first 12 weeks of the treatment period, the patient had a decrease of at least 30 percent in their Abdominal Pain score from baseline during a particular week. | 805 patients were randomized to treatment. 804 patients had at least 1 postrandomization entry of the primary efficacy assessment and were included in the ITT Population. An observed-cases approach to missing postbaseline data was applied. | Posted | Number | participants | Change from Baseline to Week 12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | 12-Week Percent of Abdominal Pain-free Days | Abdominal pain free (APF) days are those days where the patient reported a score of '0' for abdominal pain at its worst. Abdominal Pain at its worst (in the last 24 hours) is based on an 11-point scale where 0 represents no abdominal pain and 10 represents very severe abdominal pain. | 805 patients were randomized to treatment. 804 patients had at least 1 postrandomization entry of the primary efficacy assessment and were included in the ITT Population. An observed-cases approach to missing postbaseline data was applied. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Percent of Pain-free Days | Change from Baseline to Week 12 |
|
|
Adverse event data were collected from July of 2009 to September of 2010 (26 weeks of safety data were collected)
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Placebo | Dose-matched placebo, oral administration, once per day. | 7 | 403 | 86 | 403 | ||
| EG001 | Linaclotide | Linaclotide 290μg, oral administration, once per day. | 4 | 402 | 137 | 402 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transient ischemic attack | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Uterine leiomyoma | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Angioedema | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Bronchitis | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pneumonia viral | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Vertigo | Ear and labyrinth disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Abdominal pain lower | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Rectal cancer stage IV | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Rotator cuff syndrome | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Appendicitis | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Cystopexy | Surgical and medical procedures | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Hodgkin's disease nodular sclerosis stage IVa | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diarrhea | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Sinusitis | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Upper respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
|
The disclosure restriction on the PI is that publication cannot be made for 24 months from the date of final data lock of the study, the sponsor can review the publication prior to public release, sponsor requires a minimum 60 day review period for each publication, sponsor can request removal of confidential information of sponsor (not including results of trial), and sponsor can request an additional delay period of 60 days in order to protect potentially patentable information.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Doug Levine, MD | Ironwood Pharmaceuticals | 617.374.3906 | dlevine@ironwoodpharma.com |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C523483 | linaclotide |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| 65 years and older |
|
| Male |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|