Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Peanut allergy is known to cause severe anaphylactic reactions.The goal of this proposal is to produce a new treatment that would benefit young subjects who have recently been diagnosed with peanut allergy by lowering the risk of anaphylactic reactions (desensitization), and changing the peanut-specific immune response in subjects who have peanut allergy (tolerance).
Peanut allergy is known to cause severe anaphylactic reactions. Compared with other food allergies, it tends to be more persistent and its prevalence seems to be rising. Currently, there is no proven treatment other than strict avoidance. We are attempting to decrease the risk of anaphylaxis on accidental ingestion by desensitizing subjects to peanut using peanut mucosal immunotherapy (PMIT) more commonly called oral immunotherapy (OIT). We are also studying the effect of PMIT on the peanut-specific immune response to determine if tolerance to peanut protein will develop. Based on our preliminary work and recent studies supporting the importance of early oral exposure in tolerance induction, we propose that early treatment of peanut allergy with PMIT will be safe and effective. Children ages 9 to 36 months with peanut allergy will be randomized to receive high or low dose PMIT using peanut flour. Subjects will undergo desensitization on the first day and then increase the doses gradually to a maintenance dose. Doses will be taken daily at home except for dose increases which will be done on the research unit. Subjects will undergo a double-blinded, placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) if challenge criteria are met. Subjects passing the first challenge will stop PMIT and repeat the DBPCFC to assess tolerance. Outcome variables of interest include response to oral food challenges (OFC), skin prick testing, peanut specific serum immunoglobin E (IgE), immunoglobin G (IgG), and immunoglobin G4 (IgG4) and stool immunoglobin A (IgA), T and B cell responses, quality of life, and adverse events. As secondary and exploratory outcomes, these longitudinal results will be compared between high and low dose PMIT groups and controls using appropriate statistical analysis.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peanut oral immunotherapy | Experimental | Newly diagnosed allergic children receiving peanut flour as oral immunotherapy for the treatment of peanut allergy. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peanut oral immunotherapy | Drug | Defatted peanut in flour form to be used as treatment for peanut allergy |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Determine the Percentage of Subjects Who Demonstrate Sustained Unresponsiveness (SU) by a Negative Double-blind Placebo-controlled Food Challenge (DBPCFC). | The goal of the study is to treat peanut-allergic subjects with peanut OIT and to determine whether this protocol lowers their risk of anaphylactic reactions and causes SU. We expect to demonstrate the effectiveness of peanut OIT in inducing SU by showing that subjects will have a negative DBPCFC to 5 grams of peanut following completion of a 36-month course of peanut OIT followed by avoidance of therapy for 4 weeks. | After 36 months of OIT dosing followed by 1 month of avoidance |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Determine the Percentage of Subjects Who Demonstrate Desensitization by a Negative Double-blind Placebo-controlled Food Challenge (DBPCFC). | We expect to demonstrate the effectiveness of peanut OIT in inducing desensitization by showing that subjects will have a negative DBPCFC to 5 grams of peanut following completion of a 36-month course of peanut OIT . | After 36 months of OIT dosing |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Arvil W Burks, MD | University of North Carolina | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of North Carolina | Chapel Hill | North Carolina | 27599 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 27522159 | Result | Vickery BP, Berglund JP, Burk CM, Fine JP, Kim EH, Kim JI, Keet CA, Kulis M, Orgel KG, Guo R, Steele PH, Virkud YV, Ye P, Wright BL, Wood RA, Burks AW. Early oral immunotherapy in peanut-allergic preschool children is safe and highly effective. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017 Jan;139(1):173-181.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.05.027. Epub 2016 Aug 10. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Peanut Oral Immunotherapy | All subjects are treated with peanut oral immunotherapy for primary outcome. Patients randomized to 300mg or 3000mg for secondary dose finding outcome. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Peanut Oral Immunotherapy | All subjects who are treated with peanut OIT (300mg or 3000mg) and undergo a DBPCFC after 36 months of treatment and an additional DBPCFC after 4 weeks of treatment avoidance. Analysis was completed ITT. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Determine the Percentage of Subjects Who Demonstrate Sustained Unresponsiveness (SU) by a Negative Double-blind Placebo-controlled Food Challenge (DBPCFC). | The goal of the study is to treat peanut-allergic subjects with peanut OIT and to determine whether this protocol lowers their risk of anaphylactic reactions and causes SU. We expect to demonstrate the effectiveness of peanut OIT in inducing SU by showing that subjects will have a negative DBPCFC to 5 grams of peanut following completion of a 36-month course of peanut OIT followed by avoidance of therapy for 4 weeks. | 37 subjects considered with ITT analysis including 5 withdrawals | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | After 36 months of OIT dosing followed by 1 month of avoidance |
|
TAEs reported over the course of 36 months of peanut OIT treatment for each subject
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Peanut Oral Immunotherapy | All subjects who are treated with peanut OIT (300mg or 3000mg) and undergo a DBPCFC after 36 months of treatment and an additional DBPCFC after 4 weeks of treatment avoidance. Analysis was completed as ITT. |
Not provided
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Edwin Kim, Director of the UNC Food Allergy Initiative | University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill | 919-843-9087 | edwinkim@email.unc.edu |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Apr 8, 2013 | Apr 19, 2018 | Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Apr 8, 2013 | Apr 19, 2018 | SAP_001.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005512 | Food Hypersensitivity |
| D021183 | Peanut Hypersensitivity |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006969 | Hypersensitivity, Immediate |
| D006967 | Hypersensitivity |
| D007154 | Immune System Diseases |
| D000074924 | Nut and Peanut Hypersensitivity |
Not provided
Not provided
For the purposes of the primary outcome, all subjects will receive peanut OIT and represent a single group. For exploratory analysis, subjects will be randomized to high and low dose OIT to potentially look for a dose response.
Not provided
Not provided
For exploratory analysis, subjects will be randomized 1:1 to high (3000mg) and low dose (300mg) OIT to potentially look for a dose response. Low dose will be masked by adding oat flour to provide a dose equal to high dose with respect to flour but with lower peanut protein content
Not provided
| Determine the Frequency of Treatment-related Adverse Effects (TAE) From Peanut OIT. | In addition to studying the effectiveness of peanut OIT, we will also determine the safety of peanut OIT by reporting the average rate of TAEs per person per dose. | After 36 months of OIT dosing followed by 1 month of avoidance |
| Participants |
|
| Age, Continuous | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | months |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Peanut immunoglobin E (IgE) | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | kUA/L |
|
| Peanut skin prick test (SPT) | Epicutaneous skin prick test applied using the Greer pick and measured after 15 minutes. Cross diameters of the raised wheal skin response are averaged and reported as the average wheal size in mm. | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | mm wheal size |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Determine the Percentage of Subjects Who Demonstrate Desensitization by a Negative Double-blind Placebo-controlled Food Challenge (DBPCFC). | We expect to demonstrate the effectiveness of peanut OIT in inducing desensitization by showing that subjects will have a negative DBPCFC to 5 grams of peanut following completion of a 36-month course of peanut OIT . | 37 subjects considered with ITT analysis including 5 withdrawals | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | After 36 months of OIT dosing |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Determine the Frequency of Treatment-related Adverse Effects (TAE) From Peanut OIT. | In addition to studying the effectiveness of peanut OIT, we will also determine the safety of peanut OIT by reporting the average rate of TAEs per person per dose. | 37 subjects considered with ITT analysis including 5 withdrawals | Posted | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | AEs per person per dose | After 36 months of OIT dosing followed by 1 month of avoidance |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 37 |
| 0 |
| 37 |
| 35 |
| 37 |
| Skin/oral pruritus | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Nausea/vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Sneezing/congestion | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hives | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Rash (not hives) | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Multiple symptoms | General disorders | Systematic Assessment | Multiple symptoms included any single reaction that involved multiple systems (skin/gastrointestinal/upper respiratory/lower respiratory). This group does not overlap with the other groups that involved isolated symptoms in each specified category. |
|
Not provided
Not provided