Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| CDR0000646803 | |||
| NCI-2009-01687 | Registry Identifier | CTRP (Clinical Trial Reporting Program) |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| National Cancer Institute (NCI) | NIH |
| NRG Oncology | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
RATIONALE: Specialized radiation therapy that delivers a high dose of radiation directly to the tumor may kill more tumor cells and cause less damage to normal tissue.
PURPOSE: This randomized phase II/III trial is studying how well image-guided radiosurgery or stereotactic body radiation therapy works and compares it to external-beam radiation therapy in treating patients with localized spine metastasis.
OBJECTIVES:
Primary
Secondary
DETAILS:
This is a multicenter, phase II study followed by a randomized phase III study. Patients enrolled in the phase III portion are stratified according to the number of spine metastases to be treated (1 vs 2-3) and the type of tumor (radioresistant [including soft tissue sarcomas, melanomas, and renal cell carcinomas] vs other).
Phase II patients undergo MRI of the treated spine at baseline and at 3 months; phase III patients undergo MRI at baseline and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. Patients enrolled in the phase III portion also complete the Numerical Rating Pain Scale at baseline, at 1, 2, and 3 weeks after randomization, and at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. Patients are followed after completion of study treatment.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Radiosurgery/SBRT | Experimental |
| |
| External Beam Radiation Therapy | Active Comparator |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| External beam radiation therapy | Radiation | Single fraction dose of 8 Gy external beam radiation therapy |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Patients Receiving Radiosurgery/SBRT Per Protocol or With Minor Variation (Phase II) | Treatment delivery was centrally reviewed by the study chair and medical physics co-chair. Success was defined as having a review of "per protocol" or "minor variation". A 70% success rate was required for continuation to the phase III component.
| The day of protocol treatment |
| Percentage of Patients With Complete or Partial Pain Response at 3 Months (Phase III) | Pain is measured by the Numerical Rating Pain Scale (NRPS) a numerical 11-point scale (0-10) with 0 = no pain, 1-4 = mild, 5-6 = moderate, and 7-10 = severe with 10 the worst pain imaginable. Pain response is calculated as 3 month score - baseline score with a positive value indicating increased pain and a negative value indicating decreased pain. Patients with complete or partial pain response as defined below are considered responders. The index site is the lesion with the highest baseline (day of radiosurgery) pain score. If multiple sites have the same baseline pain score, the index site is the most cephalad lesion.
| Baseline and 3 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants With Pain Response Through Two Years (Phase III) | Pain is measured by the NRPS, a numerical 11-point scale from 0=no pain to 10=worst pain imaginable. Magnitude of pain response = post-baseline score - baseline score with a positive value indicating increased pain and a negative value indicating decreased pain. Pain response begins when a patient improves at least 3 points at the index site. (Although pain medication and pain response were part of the protocol definition of pain response, they were unable to be assessed accurately during weeks 1-3 and therefore were not included in the final definition used here.) Pain response time is defined as time from randomization to the date of pain response, last known follow-up (censored), or death (censored). Rates of participants with pain response are estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The distributions of pain response times are compared between the arms. Two-year rates are provided. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
The patient must have localized spine metastasis from the C1 to L5 levels by a screening imaging study [bone scan, positron emission tomography (PET), computerized tomography (CT), or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)] (a solitary spine metastasis; two separate spine levels; or up to 3 separate sites [e.g., C5, T5-6, and T12] are permitted.) Each of the separate sites may have a maximal involvement of 2 contiguous vertebral bodies. Patients can have other visceral metastasis, and radioresistant tumors (including soft tissue sarcomas, melanomas, and renal cell carcinomas) are eligible. See Figure 1 in Section 3.1.1. of the protocol for a depiction of eligible metastatic lesions: 1) a solitary spine metastasis; 2) two contiguous spine levels involved; or 3) a maximum of 3 separate sites. Each of the separate sites may have a maximal involvement of 2 contiguous vertebral bodies. Epidural compression (arrow) is eligible when there is a ≥ 3 mm gap between the spinal cord and the edge of the epidural lesion (see #10). A paraspinal mass ≤ 5 cm is allowed (see #11).
Zubrod Performance Status 0-2;
Age ≥ 18;
History/physical examination within 2 weeks prior to registration;
Negative serum pregnancy test within 2 weeks prior to registration for women of childbearing potential;
Women of childbearing potential and male participants who are sexually active must agree to use a medically effective means of birth control;
MRI (contrast is not required but strongly recommended) of the involved spine within 4 weeks prior to registration to determine the extent of the spine involvement; an MRI is required as it is superior to a CT scan in delineating the spinal cord as well as identifying an epidural or paraspinal soft tissue component. Note: If an MRI was done as a screening imaging study for eligibility (see Section -1), the MRI can be used as the required MRI for treatment planning.
Numerical Rating Pain Scale within 1 week prior to registration; the patient must have a score on the Scale of ≥ 5 for at least one of the planned sites for spine radiosurgery. Documentation of the patient's initial pain score is required. Patients taking medication for pain at the time of registration are eligible.
Neurological examination within 1 week prior to registration to rule out rapid neurologic decline; see Appendix III for the standardized neurological examination. Patients with mild to moderate neurological signs are eligible. These neurological signs include radiculopathy, dermatomal sensory change, and muscle strength of involved extremity 4/5 (lower extremity for ambulation or upper extremity for raising arms and/or arm function).
Patients with epidural compression are eligible provided that there is a ≥ 3 mm gap between the spinal cord and the edge of the epidural lesion.
Patients with a paraspinal mass ≤ 5 cm in the greatest dimension and that is contiguous with spine metastasis are eligible.
Patients must provide study specific informed consent prior to study entry.
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Samuel Ryu, MD | Josephine Ford Cancer Center | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Colorado Cancer Center at UC Health Sciences Center | Aurora | Colorado | 80045 | United States | ||
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24890347 | Result | Ryu S, Pugh SL, Gerszten PC, Yin FF, Timmerman RD, Hitchcock YJ, Movsas B, Kanner AA, Berk LB, Followill DS, Kachnic LA. RTOG 0631 phase 2/3 study of image guided stereotactic radiosurgery for localized (1-3) spine metastases: phase 2 results. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2014 Mar-Apr;4(2):76-81. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2013.05.001. Epub 2013 Jun 4. | |
| 37079324 |
Not provided
| ID | Type | URL | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
| NCT00922974 | Individual Participant Data Set | View IPD |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Radiosurgery/SBRT | Single fraction dose image-guided radiosurgery / stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). The phase II component uses 16 Gy. The phase III component allows 16 or 18 Gy as preferred by the treating physician. |
| FG001 | External Beam Radiation Therapy |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phase II Component |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Sep 23, 2016 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Radiosurgery/SBRT | Radiation | Single fraction dose image-guided radiosurgery / stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). The phase II component uses 16 Gy. The phase III component allows 16 or 18 Gy as preferred by the treating physician. |
|
|
| Baseline to two years. NRPS measured at baseline, 1, 2, and 3 weeks, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. |
| Percentage of Participants With Pain Relapse Through Two Years (Phase III) | Pain is measured by the NRPS, a numerical 11-point scale from 0=no pain to 10=worst pain imaginable. Amount of pain response = post-baseline score - baseline score with a positive value indicating increased pain and a negative value indicating decreased pain. Pain response begins when a patient improves at least 3 points at the index site. Pain response ends when when the pain score increases by 3 points (relapse). (Although pain medication and pain response were part of the protocol definition of pain response, they were unable to be assessed accurately during weeks 1-3 and therefore were not included in the final definition used here.) Pain relapse time is defined as time from randomization to the date of first failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death (censored). Rates of participants with pain relapse are estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The distributions of pain relapse times are compared between the arms. Two-year rates are provided. | Randomization to two years. NRPS measured at baseline, 1, 2, and 3 weeks, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. |
| Percentage of Patients With Adverse Events at 3 Months (Phase III) | Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 3.0) grades adverse event (AE) severity from 1=mild to 5=death. Summary data is provided in this outcome measure.; See Adverse Events Module for specific adverse event data. | Baseline to 3 months |
| Percentage of Participants With a Vertebral Compression Fracture Through Two Years (Phase III) | Failure is defined as a vertebral compression fracture. Failure time is defined as time from randomization to the date of first failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death without compression fracture (competing risk). Failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method. The distributions of failure times are compared between the arms. Two-year rates are provided. | From randomization to two years. |
| Percentage of Participants With Spinal Cord Damage Through Two Years | Failure is defined as spinal cord damage. Failure time is defined as time from randomization to the date of first failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death without compression fracture (competing risk). Failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method. The distributions of failure times are compared between the arms. Two-year rates are provided. | From randomization to two years |
| Change in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G) Total Score at 3 Months (Phase III) | The FACT-G is a validated 27-item measure in which a higher score represents higher quality of life (QOL). Physical, functional, social and emotional well-being subscale scores are added together to form the FACT-G total score. Responses range from 0=Not a lot to 4=Very much. Certain items must be reversed before being added, by subtracting the response from 4. Subscale items are added together, multiplied by the number of items in the subscale, then divided by the number of items answered to obtain subscale totals. Total score ranges from 0-108; physical, social and functional subscales from 0-28; emotional subscale from 0-24. Each subscale requires at least 50% of the items to be completed while the overall response rate must be greater than 80%. If items are missing the subscale scores can be prorated. Change at 3 months is calculated as 3 month score - baseline score with a positive change indicating improvement in QOL. | Baseline and 3 months |
| Change in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Worst Pain Score Through Two Years (Phase III) | The Brief Pain Inventory Worst Pain score measures self-reported worst pain in the last week. Possible scores range from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable), with higher scores indicating a worse outcome. Change is calculated as baseline score subtracted from post-baseline score with a positive change indicating more pain. | Baseline, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months |
| Change in EuroQol 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Index Score Through Two Years (Phase III) | The EQ-5D index score measures health status. Possible scores range from 0 (worst health state) to 1 (best health state), with higher scores indicating better health. Change is calculated as baseline score subtracted from post-baseline score with a positive change indicating improved health status. | Baseline, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months |
| Change in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G) Total Score Through Two Years (Phase III) | The FACT-G total score gives a combined score of the four domains of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in cancer patients: Physical, social, emotional, and functional well-being. Possible total scores range from 0 to 108 with higher scores indicating a better HRQOL. Change is calculated as baseline score subtracted from post-baseline score with a positive change indicating improvement in HRQOL. | Baseline, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months |
| Penrose Cancer Center at Penrose Hospital |
| Colorado Springs |
| Colorado |
| 80933 |
| United States |
| George Bray Cancer Center at the Hospital of Central Connecticut - New Britain Campus | New Britain | Connecticut | 06050 | United States |
| CCOP - Christiana Care Health Services | Newark | Delaware | 19713 | United States |
| Baptist Cancer Institute - Jacksonville | Jacksonville | Florida | 32207 | United States |
| Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center at Northwestern University | Chicago | Illinois | 60611-3013 | United States |
| OSF St. Francis Medical Center | Peoria | Illinois | 61637 | United States |
| Cancer Center at Ball Memorial Hospital | Muncie | Indiana | 47303-3499 | United States |
| Lucille P. Markey Cancer Center at University of Kentucky | Lexington | Kentucky | 40536-0093 | United States |
| James Graham Brown Cancer Center at University of Louisville | Louisville | Kentucky | 40202 | United States |
| St. Agnes Hospital Cancer Center | Baltimore | Maryland | 21229 | United States |
| Josephine Ford Cancer Center at Henry Ford Hospital | Detroit | Michigan | 48202 | United States |
| Butterworth Hospital at Spectrum Health | Grand Rapids | Michigan | 49503 | United States |
| William Beaumont Hospital - Royal Oak Campus | Royal Oak | Michigan | 48073 | United States |
| Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital - Saint Louis | St Louis | Missouri | 63110 | United States |
| Billings Clinic - Downtown | Billings | Montana | 59107-7000 | United States |
| Nebraska Medical Center | Omaha | Nebraska | 68198 | United States |
| Payson Center for Cancer Care at Concord Hospital | Concord | New Hampshire | 03301 | United States |
| Seacoast Cancer Center at Wentworth - Douglass Hospital | Dover | New Hampshire | 03820 | United States |
| Norris Cotton Cancer Center at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center | Lebanon | New Hampshire | 03756-0002 | United States |
| Capital Health Regional Cancer Center | Pennington | New Jersey | 08534 | United States |
| Stony Brook University Cancer Center | Stony Brook | New York | 11794-9446 | United States |
| Summa Center for Cancer Care at Akron City Hospital | Akron | Ohio | 44309-2090 | United States |
| Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute at Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center | Columbus | Ohio | 43210-1240 | United States |
| Penn State Hershey Cancer Institute at Milton S. Hershey Medical Center | Hershey | Pennsylvania | 17033-0850 | United States |
| Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University - Philadelphia | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | 19107-5541 | United States |
| UPMC - Shadyside | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania | 15213-2582 | United States |
| UPMC Cancer Center at UPMC Presbyterian | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania | 15213 | United States |
| Lankenau Cancer Center at Lankenau Hospital | Wynnewood | Pennsylvania | 19096 | United States |
| Rapid City Regional Hospital | Rapid City | South Dakota | 57701 | United States |
| Huntsman Cancer Institute at University of Utah | Salt Lake City | Utah | 84112 | United States |
| University of Wisconsin Paul P. Carbone Comprehensive Cancer Center | Madison | Wisconsin | 53792-6164 | United States |
| Medical College of Wisconsin Cancer Center | Milwaukee | Wisconsin | 53226 | United States |
| All Saints Cancer Center at Wheaton Franciscan Healthcare | Racine | Wisconsin | 53405 | United States |
| Ottawa Hospital Regional Cancer Centre - General Campus | Ottawa | Ontario | K1Y 4E9 | Canada |
| Hopital Notre-Dame du CHUM | Montreal | Quebec | H2L 4M1 | Canada |
| McGill Cancer Centre at McGill University | Montreal | Quebec | H2W 1S6 | Canada |
| Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center | Tel Aviv | 64239 | Israel |
| Ryu S, Deshmukh S, Timmerman RD, Movsas B, Gerszten P, Yin FF, Dicker A, Abraham CD, Zhong J, Shiao SL, Tuli R, Desai A, Mell LK, Iyengar P, Hitchcock YJ, Allen AM, Burton S, Brown D, Sharp HJ, Dunlap NE, Siddiqui MS, Chen TH, Pugh SL, Kachnic LA. Stereotactic Radiosurgery vs Conventional Radiotherapy for Localized Vertebral Metastases of the Spine: Phase 3 Results of NRG Oncology/RTOG 0631 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2023 Jun 1;9(6):800-807. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.0356. |
Select individual patient-level data from this trial can be requested from the NCTN/NCORP Data Archive. |
Single fraction dose of 8 Gy external beam radiation therapy |
| Eligible |
|
| Eligible and Started Treatment |
|
| Eligible, Treated, Adverse Event Data | Eligible, started protocol treatment, and has adverse event data |
|
| COMPLETED | Subjects contributing any data to analysis are considered to have completed the study |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
| Phase III Component |
|
|
Eligible registered patients
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Radiosurgery/SBRT (Phase II) | Single fraction dose image-guided radiosurgery / stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). The phase II component uses 16 Gy. |
| BG001 | Radiosurgery/SBRT (Phase III) | Single fraction dose image-guided radiosurgery / stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). The phase III component allows 16 or 18 Gy as preferred by the treating physician. |
| BG002 | External Beam Radiation Therapy | Single fraction dose of 8 Gy external beam radiation therapy |
| BG003 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Median | Full Range | years |
| ||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||
| Zubrod performance status | Measure Description: 0 - Asymptomatic; 1 - Symptomatic but completely ambulatory; 2 - Symptomatic, <50% in bed during the day; 3 - Symptomatic, >50% in bed, but not bedbound; 4 - Bedbound; 5 - Death | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||
| Baseline Numerical Rating Pain Scale (NRPS) | Eleven-point scale 0-10 with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating the worst pain imaginable. | Median | Full Range | units on a scale |
| |||||||||
| Number of Spine Metastases | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||
| Location of Index Spine Metastasis | The index site is the lesion with the highest baseline (day of radiosurgery) pain score. If multiple sites have the same baseline pain score, the index site is the most cephalad lesion. | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||
| Location of Spine Metastasis #2 | Subjects who had a second metastasis | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||
| Location of Spine Metastasis #3 | Subjects who had a third metastasis | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||
| Taking Pain Medication | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||
| Type of Tumor | This characteristic was not determined in the Phase II component. | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||
| Intended Radiosurgery/SBRT Dose | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Percentage of Patients Receiving Radiosurgery/SBRT Per Protocol or With Minor Variation (Phase II) | Treatment delivery was centrally reviewed by the study chair and medical physics co-chair. Success was defined as having a review of "per protocol" or "minor variation". A 70% success rate was required for continuation to the phase III component.
| Patients enrolled in the phase II component who were eligible and had treatment review information. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | The day of protocol treatment |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Percentage of Patients With Complete or Partial Pain Response at 3 Months (Phase III) | Pain is measured by the Numerical Rating Pain Scale (NRPS) a numerical 11-point scale (0-10) with 0 = no pain, 1-4 = mild, 5-6 = moderate, and 7-10 = severe with 10 the worst pain imaginable. Pain response is calculated as 3 month score - baseline score with a positive value indicating increased pain and a negative value indicating decreased pain. Patients with complete or partial pain response as defined below are considered responders. The index site is the lesion with the highest baseline (day of radiosurgery) pain score. If multiple sites have the same baseline pain score, the index site is the most cephalad lesion.
| Eligible participants randomized in the phase III component with both baseline and 3 month NRPS scores | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | Baseline and 3 months |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Pain Response Through Two Years (Phase III) | Pain is measured by the NRPS, a numerical 11-point scale from 0=no pain to 10=worst pain imaginable. Magnitude of pain response = post-baseline score - baseline score with a positive value indicating increased pain and a negative value indicating decreased pain. Pain response begins when a patient improves at least 3 points at the index site. (Although pain medication and pain response were part of the protocol definition of pain response, they were unable to be assessed accurately during weeks 1-3 and therefore were not included in the final definition used here.) Pain response time is defined as time from randomization to the date of pain response, last known follow-up (censored), or death (censored). Rates of participants with pain response are estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The distributions of pain response times are compared between the arms. Two-year rates are provided. | Eligible participants randomized in the phase III component with pain response data | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | Baseline to two years. NRPS measured at baseline, 1, 2, and 3 weeks, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Pain Relapse Through Two Years (Phase III) | Pain is measured by the NRPS, a numerical 11-point scale from 0=no pain to 10=worst pain imaginable. Amount of pain response = post-baseline score - baseline score with a positive value indicating increased pain and a negative value indicating decreased pain. Pain response begins when a patient improves at least 3 points at the index site. Pain response ends when when the pain score increases by 3 points (relapse). (Although pain medication and pain response were part of the protocol definition of pain response, they were unable to be assessed accurately during weeks 1-3 and therefore were not included in the final definition used here.) Pain relapse time is defined as time from randomization to the date of first failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death (censored). Rates of participants with pain relapse are estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The distributions of pain relapse times are compared between the arms. Two-year rates are provided. | Eligible participants randomized in the phase III component who experienced partial or complete pain response | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | Randomization to two years. NRPS measured at baseline, 1, 2, and 3 weeks, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Patients With Adverse Events at 3 Months (Phase III) | Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 3.0) grades adverse event (AE) severity from 1=mild to 5=death. Summary data is provided in this outcome measure.; See Adverse Events Module for specific adverse event data. | Eligible participants randomized in the phase III component with adverse event information | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | Baseline to 3 months |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With a Vertebral Compression Fracture Through Two Years (Phase III) | Failure is defined as a vertebral compression fracture. Failure time is defined as time from randomization to the date of first failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death without compression fracture (competing risk). Failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method. The distributions of failure times are compared between the arms. Two-year rates are provided. | Eligible participants randomized in the phase III component | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | From randomization to two years. |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Spinal Cord Damage Through Two Years | Failure is defined as spinal cord damage. Failure time is defined as time from randomization to the date of first failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death without compression fracture (competing risk). Failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method. The distributions of failure times are compared between the arms. Two-year rates are provided. | Eligible participants randomized in the phase III component | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | From randomization to two years |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G) Total Score at 3 Months (Phase III) | The FACT-G is a validated 27-item measure in which a higher score represents higher quality of life (QOL). Physical, functional, social and emotional well-being subscale scores are added together to form the FACT-G total score. Responses range from 0=Not a lot to 4=Very much. Certain items must be reversed before being added, by subtracting the response from 4. Subscale items are added together, multiplied by the number of items in the subscale, then divided by the number of items answered to obtain subscale totals. Total score ranges from 0-108; physical, social and functional subscales from 0-28; emotional subscale from 0-24. Each subscale requires at least 50% of the items to be completed while the overall response rate must be greater than 80%. If items are missing the subscale scores can be prorated. Change at 3 months is calculated as 3 month score - baseline score with a positive change indicating improvement in QOL. | Eligible patients randomized in the phase III component who consented to QOL having both baseline and 3 month FACT-G total score. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Baseline and 3 months |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Worst Pain Score Through Two Years (Phase III) | The Brief Pain Inventory Worst Pain score measures self-reported worst pain in the last week. Possible scores range from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable), with higher scores indicating a worse outcome. Change is calculated as baseline score subtracted from post-baseline score with a positive change indicating more pain. | Questionnaires were not completed by all eligible participants randomized in the phase III component who consented to QOL. Therefore, the number of participants reported below are the number with the relevant questions answered at baseline and the given time point on each arm. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Baseline, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change in EuroQol 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Index Score Through Two Years (Phase III) | The EQ-5D index score measures health status. Possible scores range from 0 (worst health state) to 1 (best health state), with higher scores indicating better health. Change is calculated as baseline score subtracted from post-baseline score with a positive change indicating improved health status. | Questionnaires were not completed by all eligible participants randomized in the phase III component who consented to QOL.. Therefore, the number of participants reported below are the number with the relevant questions answered at baseline and the given time point on each arm. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Baseline, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G) Total Score Through Two Years (Phase III) | The FACT-G total score gives a combined score of the four domains of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in cancer patients: Physical, social, emotional, and functional well-being. Possible total scores range from 0 to 108 with higher scores indicating a better HRQOL. Change is calculated as baseline score subtracted from post-baseline score with a positive change indicating improvement in HRQOL. | Questionnaires were not completed by all eligible participants randomized in the phase III component who consented to QOL.. Therefore, the number of participants reported below are the number with the relevant questions answered at baseline and the given time point on each arm. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Baseline, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months |
|
Collected at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months from randomization.
All-cause mortality reported for all enrolled patients. Adverse events reported for eligible patients who started protocol treatment and have adverse event data. This data was updated when 24 month secondary outcome measures were entered.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Radiosurgery/SBRT (Phase II) | Single fraction dose image-guided radiosurgery / stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). The phase II component uses 16 Gy. | 1 | 46 | 5 | 34 | 30 | 34 |
| EG001 | Radiosurgery/SBRT (Phase III) | Single fraction dose image-guided radiosurgery / stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). The phase III component allows 16 or 18 Gy as preferred by the treating physician. | 144 | 217 | 19 | 196 | 141 | 196 |
| EG002 | External Beam Radiation Therapy | Single fraction dose of 8 Gy external beam radiation therapy | 80 | 136 | 10 | 117 | 76 | 117 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blood disorder | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hemoglobin decreased | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pericardial effusion | Cardiac disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Duodenal obstruction | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Duodenal ulcer | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Mucositis oral | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Oral pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Chills | General disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Disease progression | General disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fatigue | General disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fever | General disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| General symptom | General disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Catheter related infection [with unknown ANC] | Infections and infestations | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pneumonia [with unknown ANC] | Infections and infestations | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Soft tissue infection [with unknown ANC] | Infections and infestations | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Stoma site infection [with normal or Grade 1-2 ANC] | Infections and infestations | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Alanine aminotransferase increased | Investigations | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Aspartate aminotransferase increased | Investigations | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hyperbilirubinemia | Investigations | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| INR increased | Investigations | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Lymphopenia | Investigations | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Neutrophil count decreased | Investigations | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Platelet count decreased | Investigations | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dehydration | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypercalcemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hyperglycemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypoalbuminemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypocalcemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hyponatremia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Back pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bone pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Muscle weakness | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Muscle weakness upper limb | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Neck pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pain in extremity | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cognitive disturbance | Nervous system disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ischemia cerebrovascular | Nervous system disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Confusion | Psychiatric disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urinary incontinence | Renal and urinary disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cough | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dyspnea | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pleural effusion | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Respiratory disorder | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypotension | Vascular disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hemoglobin decreased | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Constipation | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diarrhea | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dysphagia | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Chest pain | General disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Edema limbs | General disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fatigue | General disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fever | General disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| General symptom | General disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pain [NOS] | General disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pain [other] | General disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Alanine aminotransferase increased | Investigations | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Alkaline phosphatase increased | Investigations | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Aspartate aminotransferase increased | Investigations | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Creatinine increased | Investigations | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hyperbilirubinemia | Investigations | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Leukopenia | Investigations | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Lymphopenia | Investigations | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Platelet count decreased | Investigations | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Weight loss | Investigations | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Anorexia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dehydration | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hyperglycemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypoalbuminemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypocalcemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypokalemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hyponatremia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Back pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bone pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Joint pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Muscle weakness | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Muscle weakness lower limb | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Musculoskeletal disorder | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Neck pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pain in extremity | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Peripheral motor neuropathy | Nervous system disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Peripheral sensory neuropathy | Nervous system disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Anxiety | Psychiatric disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Confusion | Psychiatric disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urinary retention | Renal and urinary disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urogenital disorder | Renal and urinary disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cough | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dyspnea | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypoxia | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pleural effusion | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hand-and-foot syndrome | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pruritus | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rash desquamating | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypotension | Vascular disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Thrombosis | Vascular disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
PI's are required to abide by the sponsor's publication guidelines which require review by coauthors and subsequent review and approval by the sponsor
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wendy Seiferheld | NRG Oncology | 215-574-3208 | seiferheldw@nrgoncology.org |
| Feb 22, 2019 |
| Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009362 | Neoplasm Metastasis |
| D010146 | Pain |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009385 | Neoplastic Processes |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D016634 | Radiosurgery |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011878 | Radiotherapy |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
| D013238 | Stereotaxic Techniques |
| D019635 | Neurosurgical Procedures |
| D013514 | Surgical Procedures, Operative |
| D008919 | Investigative Techniques |
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Single fraction dose of 8 Gy external beam radiation therapy |
|
|
|
Single fraction dose of 8 Gy external beam radiation therapy
|
|
|
Single fraction dose of 8 Gy external beam radiation therapy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Single fraction dose of 8 Gy external beam radiation therapy |
|
|
|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Units |
|---|
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|