Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability... | NCT00905307 | Trialant
NCT00905307
Sponsor
Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc.
Status
Completed
Last Update Posted
Oct 20, 2015Estimated
Enrollment
459Actual
Phase
Phase 2
Conditions
Schizophrenia
Interventions
OPC-34712
Placebo
Aripiprazole
Countries
United States
Bulgaria
Croatia
India
Philippines
Romania
Russia
Serbia
Slovakia
South Korea
Taiwan
Ukraine
Protocol Section
Identification Module
NCT ID
NCT00905307
Obsolete or Duplicate NCT IDs
Not provided
Organization Study
331-07-203
Secondary IDs
Not provided
Brief Title
Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Oral OPC-34712 and Aripiprazole for Treatment of Acute Schizophrenia
Official Title
A Phase 2, 6-Week, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Oral OPC-34712 Once Daily and Aripiprazole Once Daily for Treatment of Hospitalized Adult Patients With Acute Schizophrenia
Acronym
STEP 203
Organization
Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc.INDUSTRY
Status Module
Record Verification Date
Sep 2015
Overall Recruitment Status or Expanded Access Status
Completed
Last Known Status
Not provided
Delayed Posting
Not provided
Why Stopped
Not provided
Expanded Access Info
No
Start Date
Jul 2009
Primary Completion Date
Sep 2010Actual
Completion Date
Nov 2010Actual
First Submitted Date
May 19, 2009
First Submission Date that Met QC Criteria
May 19, 2009
First Posted Date
May 20, 2009Estimated
Results Waived
Not provided
Results First Submitted Date
Aug 4, 2015
Results First Submitted that Met QC Criteria
Aug 4, 2015
Results First Posted Date
Sep 3, 2015Estimated
Certification/Extension (aka Delayed Results) First Submitted Date
May 2, 2012
Certification/Extension First Submitted that Passed QC Review
May 2, 2012
Certification/Extension First Posted Date
May 4, 2012Estimated
Last Update Submitted Date
Sep 29, 2015
Last Update Posted Date
Oct 20, 2015Estimated
Sponsor/Collaborators Module
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Lead Sponsor
Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc.INDUSTRY
Collaborators
Not provided
Oversight Module
Has Data Monitoring Committee (DMC)
Yes
Is FDA Regulated Drug
Not provided
Is FDA Regulated Device
Not provided
Is Unapproved Device
Not provided
Pediatric Postmarket Surveillance of a Device Product
Not provided
Product Exported from US
Not provided
FDAAA801 Violation
Not provided
Description Module
Brief Summary
This will be a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study designed to assess the tolerability, safety, and efficacy of OPC-34712 (0.25 to 6.0 mg) for the treatment of adult subjects hospitalized with an acute relapse of schizophrenia. Aripiprazole (10 to 20 mg) is included as a positive control to confirm the assay sensitivity of the study. A total of approximately 563 subjects will be screened at an estimated 75 sites worldwide in order to obtain approximately 450 randomized subjects.
Detailed Description
Not provided
Conditions Module
Conditions
Schizophrenia
Keywords
Schizophrenia
Relapsed
Design Module
Study Type
Interventional
Number of References to an Expanded Access Study
Not provided
Expanded Access Types
Not provided
Patient Registry
Not provided
Target Follow-Up Duration
Not provided
Phases
Phase 2
Interventional Study Design
Allocation
Biospecimen
No data available
No data is available for this block.
Enrollment
459Actual
Arms/Interventions Module
Arm Groups
Label
Type
Description
Intervention Names
1
Experimental
OPC-34712 0.25 mg arm
Drug: OPC-34712
2
Experimental
OPC-34712 low-dose arm
Drug: OPC-34712
3
Experimental
OPC-34712 mid-dose arm
Drug: OPC-34712
4
Experimental
OPC-34712 high-dose arm
Drug: OPC-34712
5
Placebo Comparator
Drug: Placebo
6
Active Comparator
Aripiprazole arm
Drug: Aripiprazole
Interventions
Name
Type
Description
Arm Group Labels
Other Names
OPC-34712
Drug
oral, once daily
1
2
3
4
Outcomes Module
Primary Outcomes
Measure
Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline to Week 6 in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score (Double Blind Phase)
The PANSS consists of three subscales containing a total of 30 symptom constructs. For each symptom construct, severity is rated on a 7-point scale, with a score of 1 indicating absence of symptoms and a score of 7 indicating extremely severe symptoms. PANSS total score is the sum of the rating scores for 7 positive scale items, 7 negative scale items and 16 general psychopathology scale items from the PANSS panel. The PANSS total score ranges from 30-210, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms.
Baseline to Week 6
Secondary Outcomes
Measure
Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline to Week 6 in PANSS Positive Subscale Score (Double Blind Phase)
The PANSS consists of three subscales containing a total of 30 symptom constructs. For each symptom construct, severity is rated on a 7-point scale, with a score of 1 indicating absence of symptoms and a score of 7 indicating extremely severe symptoms. The positive symptom constructs are delusions, conceptual disorganization, hallucinatory behavior, excitement, grandiosity, suspiciousness/persecution, and hostility. PANSS positive subscale score is the sum of the rating scores for the 7 positive scale items from the PANSS panel. The PANSS positive subscale score ranges from 7-49, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms.
Other Outcomes
Not provided
Eligibility Module
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Male or female subjects between 18 and 65 years of age, with a diagnosis of schizophrenia, as defined by DSM-IV-TR criteria
Subjects who have been recently hospitalized or who would benefit from hospitalization for an acute relapse of schizophrenia
Subjects experiencing an acute exacerbation of psychotic symptoms
Exclusion Criteria:
Females who are breast-feeding and/or who have a positive pregnancy test result prior to receiving study drug
Subjects with a current DSM-IV-TR Axis I diagnosis of:
Schizoaffective disorder
MDD
Bipolar disorder
Delirium, dementia, amnestic or other cognitive disorder
Borderline, paranoid, histrionic, schizotypal, schizoid or antisocial personality disorder
Subjects presenting with a first episode of schizophrenia
Other protocol specific inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply
Kane JM, Skuban A, Hobart M, Ouyang J, Weiller E, Weiss C, Correll CU. Overview of short- and long-term tolerability and safety of brexpiprazole in patients with schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2016 Jul;174(1-3):93-98. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2016.04.013. Epub 2016 May 14.
Citrome L. Brexpiprazole for schizophrenia and as adjunct for major depressive disorder: a systematic review of the efficacy and safety profile for this newly approved antipsychotic - what is the number needed to treat, number needed to harm and likelihood to be helped or harmed? Int J Clin Pract. 2015 Sep;69(9):978-97. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12714. Epub 2015 Aug 6.
See Also Links
Not provided
Available IPD Information
Not provided
IPD Sharing Statement Module
No data available
No data is available for this block.
Results Section
Participant Flow Module
Pre-assignment Details
Partipants were randomized in a 1:2:2:2:2:1 ratio to the following groups:
OPC-34712 0.25 mg arm, OPC-34712 low-dose, OPC-34712 mid-dose, OPC-34712 high-dose, Placebo, Aripiprazole. All other prohibited medications were discontinued at least 24 hours before the first dose of double-blind study medication.
Recruitment Details
459 participants recruited at 74 study centres in the United States, Asia and Europe.
Participants not responding adequately to treatment at Week 4 visit could continue in study and receive open-label OPC-34712 (starting dose 2.5 mg/day with option for decrease to 2 mg/day or increase to 3 mg/day) until Week 6 at study physician's discretion.
Type of Units Analyzed
Not provided
Arm/Group Information
ID
Title
Description
FG000
OPC-34712 0.25 mg
0.25 mg once daily (QD) for 6 weeks
FG001
OPC-34712 Low-dose
1.0 mg QD starting dose ± 0.5 mg. After a minimum of 2 weeks of treatment, the physician could request a dose increase, if needed for efficacy, based on clinical judgment.
Periods
Title
Milestones
Reasons Not Completed
Overall Study
Type
Comment
Milestone Data
STARTED
Baseline Characteristics Module
Baseline Analysis Population Description
Not provided
Outcome Measures Module
Outcome Measures
Adverse Events Module
Frequency Threshold
5
More Info Module
Limitations and Caveats
Not provided
Annotation Section
No data available
No data is available for this block.
Document Section
No data available
No data is available for this block.
Derived Section
Miscellaneous Info Module
Version Holder
Jul 10, 2026
Removed Countries
Not provided
Submission Tracking
No data available
No data is available for this block.
Condition Browse Module
MeSH Terms
Intervention Browse Module
MeSH Terms
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description
Not provided
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Observational Model
Not provided
Time Perspective
Not provided
Masking Info
Masking
Double
Masking Description
Not provided
Who Masked
ParticipantInvestigator
Placebo
Drug
Placebo
5
Aripiprazole
Drug
oral, once daily
6
Baseline to Week 6
Change From Baseline to Week 6 in PANSS Negative Subscale Score (Double Blind Phase)
The PANSS consists of three subscales containing a total of 30 symptom constructs. For each symptom construct, severity is rated on a 7-point scale, with a score of 1 indicating absence of symptoms and a score of 7 indicating extremely severe symptoms. The 7 negative symptom constructs: blunted affect, emotional withdrawal, poor rapport, passive/apathetic social withdrawal, difficulty in abstract thinking, lack of spontaneity and flow of conversation, stereotyped thinking. PANSS negative subscale score is the sum of the rating scores for the 7 negative scale items from the PANSS panel. The PANSS negative subscale score ranges from 7-49, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms.
Baseline to Week 6
Change From Baseline to Week 6 in Personal and Social Performance Scale (PSP) (Double Blind Phase)
The PSP is a validated clinician-rated scale that measures personal and social functioning in four domains. The rating is based on four main areas: (a) socially useful activities, including work and study; (b) personal and social relationships; (c) self-care; and (d) disturbing and aggressive behaviors. The ratings are converted to a total score based on a 100-point scale using algorithms to identify the appropriate 10-point interval, and the rater's judgment to determine the total score within the 10-point interval. Ratings from 71-100 reflect only mild difficulties. Ratings from 31-70 reflect manifest disabilities of various degrees. Ratings from 1-30 reflect functioning so poor that intensive support or supervision is needed.
Baseline to Week 6
Change From Baseline to Week 6 in Clinical Global Impression-Severity of Illness Scale (CGI-S) Score (Double Blind Phase)
The severity of illness for each participant was rated using the CGI-S. To perform this assessment, the rater or investigator answered the following question: "Considering your total clinical experience with this particular population, how mentally ill is the patient at this time?" Response choices include the following: 0=not assessed; 1=normal, not at all ill; 2=borderline mentally ill; 3=mildly ill; 4=moderately ill; 5=markedly ill; 6=severely ill; 7=among the most extremely ill patients
Baseline to Week 6
Mean Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 6
The rater or investigator rated the particpant's total improvement whether or not it was due entirely to drug treatment. All responses were compared to the participant's condition at baseline prior to the first dose of double-blind study medication. Response choices included the following: 0=not assessed; 1=very much improved; 2=much improved; 3=minimally improved; 4=no change; 5=minimally worse; 6=much worse; 7=very much worse.
Week 6
Response Rate at Week 6
Response rate was defined as a reduction of ≥ 30% from baseline in PANSS Total Score; or a CGI-I score of 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved) at Week 6
Week 6
Discontinuation Rate for Lack of Efficacy or Receipt of Open Label OPC-34712
Efficacy-related discontinuation rate was assessed
Baseline to Week 6
Escondido
California
92025
United States
Study Site
Garden Grove
California
92645
United States
Study Site
Long Beach
California
90813
United States
Study Site
Oceanside
California
92056
United States
Study Site
Pasadena
California
91107
United States
Study Site
San Diego
California
92102
United States
Study Site
San Diego
California
92123
United States
Study Site
Santa Ana
California
92701
United States
Study Site
Washington D.C.
District of Columbia
20016
United States
Study Site
Bradenton
Florida
34208
United States
Study Site
Maitland
Florida
32751
United States
Study Site
St Louis
Missouri
63118
United States
Study Site
Cedarhurst
New York
11516
United States
Study Site
Philadelphia
Pennsylvania
19139
United States
Study Site
Austin
Texas
78756
United States
Study Site
Burgas
8000
Bulgaria
Study Site
Kazanlak
6100
Bulgaria
Study Site
Pazardzhik
4400
Bulgaria
Study Site
Plovdiv
4002
Bulgaria
Study Site
Radnevo
6260
Bulgaria
Study Site
Rousse
7003
Bulgaria
Study Site
Rijeka
51000
Croatia
Study Site
Split
21000
Croatia
Study Site
Zagreb
10090
Croatia
Study Site
Vijaywada
Andh Prad
520002
India
Study Site
Visakhapatnam
Andh Prad
530017
India
Study Site
Ahmedabad
Gujarat
380015
India
Study Site
Bangalore
Karna
560010
India
Study Site
Mangalore
Karna
575001
India
Study Site
Mangalore
Karna
575018
India
Study Site
Pune
Mahara
411004
India
Study Site
Chennai
Tamil Nadu
600003
India
Study Site
Varanasi
Uttar Prad
221005
India
Study Site
Cebu City
Philippines
Study Site
Mandaluyong
Philippines
Study Site
Arad
310022
Romania
Study Site
Bucharest
010825
Romania
Study Site (1)
Bucharest
041914
Romania
Study Site (2)
Bucharest
041914
Romania
Study Site (3)
Bucharest
041914
Romania
Study Site
Cluj-Napoca
400012
Romania
Study Site
Oradea
410154
Romania
Study Site
Moscow
113152
Russia
Study Site
Moscow
115522
Russia
Study Site
Moscow Region
141371
Russia
Study Site
Saint Petersburg
190121
Russia
Study Site
Saint Petersburg
193167
Russia
Study Site
Saint Petersburg
197341
Russia
Study Site (1)
Belgrade
11000
Serbia
Study Site (2)
Belgrade
11000
Serbia
Study Site
Kragujevac
34000
Serbia
Study Site
Novi Sad
21000
Serbia
Study Site
Bojnice
92701
Slovakia
Study Site
Bratislava
82606
Slovakia
Study Site
Liptovský Mikuláš
03123
Slovakia
Study Site
Rimavská Sobota
97912
Slovakia
Study Site
Žilina
01207
Slovakia
Study Site
Busan
613-735
South Korea
Study Site
Chuncheon
200-704
South Korea
Study Site
Incheon
400-711
South Korea
Study Site
Incheon
405-760
South Korea
Study Site
Seoul
143-711
South Korea
Study Site
Hualien Town
970
Taiwan
Study Site
Taipei
249
Taiwan
Study Site
Chernihiv
14005
Ukraine
Study Site
Dnipropetrovsk
49005
Ukraine
Study Site
Kherson,Vil. Stepanivka
73488
Ukraine
Study Site
Kyiv
02660
Ukraine
Study Site
Kyiv
04080
Ukraine
Study Site
Kyiv
04655
Ukraine
Study Site
Simferopol
95006
Ukraine
Study Site
Vinnitsia
21018
Ukraine
FG002
OPC-34712 Mid-dose
2.5 mg QD starting dose ± 0.5 mg. After a minimum of 2 weeks of treatment, the physician could request a dose increase, if needed for efficacy, based on clinical judgment.
FG003
OPC-34712 High Dose
5.0 mg QD starting dose ± 0.5 mg. After a minimum of 2 weeks of treatment, the physician could request a dose increase, if needed for efficacy, based on clinical judgment.
FG004
Aripiprazole
15 mg QD starting dose ± 5 mg. After a minimum of 2 weeks of treatment, the physician could request a dose increase, if needed for efficacy, based on clinical judgment.
FG005
Placebo
Placebo QD for 6 weeks
FG00042 subjects
FG00189 subjects
FG00290 subjects
FG00393 subjects
FG00450 subjects
FG00595 subjects
COMPLETED
FG00020 subjects
FG00152 subjects
FG00253 subjects
FG00356 subjects
FG00434 subjects
FG00553 subjects
NOT COMPLETED
FG00022 subjects
FG00137 subjects
FG00237 subjects
FG00337 subjects
FG00416 subjects
FG00542 subjects
Type
Comment
Reasons
Switched to Open Label Rescue
FG0007 subjects
FG00117 subjects
FG00211 subjects
FG00311 subjects
FG0044 subjects
FG00515 subjects
Lost to Follow-up
FG0000 subjects
FG0010 subjects
FG0020 subjects
FG0030 subjects
FG004
Adverse Event
FG0003 subjects
FG0014 subjects
FG0025 subjects
FG00311 subjects
FG004
Withdrawal by Subject
FG0005 subjects
FG00113 subjects
FG00215 subjects
FG00311 subjects
FG004
Protocol Violation
FG0001 subjects
FG0010 subjects
FG0021 subjects
FG0030 subjects
FG004
Lack of Efficacy
FG0006 subjects
FG0013 subjects
FG0025 subjects
FG0034 subjects
FG004
Type of Units Analyzed
Not provided
Arm/Group Information
ID
Title
Description
BG000
OPC-34712 0.25 mg
0.25 mg QD for 6 weeks
BG001
OPC-34712 Low-dose
1.0 mg QD starting dose ± 0.5 mg. After a minimum of 2 weeks of treatment, the physician could request a dose increase, if needed for efficacy, based on clinical judgment.
BG002
OPC-34712 Mid-dose
2.5 mg QD starting dose ± 0.5 mg. After a minimum of 2 weeks of treatment, the physician could request a dose increase, if needed for efficacy, based on clinical judgment.
BG003
OPC-34712 High-dose
5.0 mg QD starting dose ± 1.0 mg. After a minimum of 2 weeks of treatment, the physician could request a dose increase, if needed for efficacy, based on clinical judgment.
BG004
Aripiprazole
15 mg QD starting dose ± 5 mg. After a minimum of 2 weeks of treatment, the physician could request a dose increase, if needed for efficacy, based on clinical judgment.
BG005
Placebo
Placebo QD for 6 weeks
BG006
Total
Total of all reporting groups
Denominators
Units
Counts
Participants
BG00042
BG00189
BG00290
BG00393
BG00450
BG00595
BG006459
Baseline Measures
Title
Description
Population Description
Parameter Type
Dispersion Type
Unit of Measure
Calculate Percentage
Denominator Units Selected
Denominators
Classes
Age, Continuous
Mean
Standard Deviation
Years
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
BG00040.4± 9.1
BG00139.2± 10.3
BG00237.4± 11.1
BG003
Sex: Female, Male
Count of Participants
Participants
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
Female
BG00015
BG00136
BG002
Type
Title
Description
Population Description
Reporting Status
Anticipated Posting Date
Parameter Type
Dispersion Type
Unit of Measure
Calculate Percentage
Time Frame
Units Analyzed
Denominator Units Selected
Arm/Group Information
Denominators
Classes
Analyses
Primary
Change From Baseline to Week 6 in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score (Double Blind Phase)
The PANSS consists of three subscales containing a total of 30 symptom constructs. For each symptom construct, severity is rated on a 7-point scale, with a score of 1 indicating absence of symptoms and a score of 7 indicating extremely severe symptoms. PANSS total score is the sum of the rating scores for 7 positive scale items, 7 negative scale items and 16 general psychopathology scale items from the PANSS panel. The PANSS total score ranges from 30-210, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms.
Consists of all participants who received at least one dose of study medication and have baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy evaluation. The last observation carried forward (LOCF) method was used to impute missing data.
Posted
Mean
Standard Deviation
Units on a scale
Baseline to Week 6
ID
Title
Description
OG000
OPC-34712 0.25 mg
0.25 mg QD for 6 weeks
OG001
OPC-34712 Low-dose
1.0 mg QD starting dose ± 0.5 mg. After a minimum of 2 weeks of treatment, the physician could request a dose increase, if needed for efficacy, based on clinical judgment
OG002
OPC-34712 Mid-dose
2.5 mg QD starting dose ± 0.5 mg. After a minimum of 2 weeks of treatment , the physician could request a dose increase, if needed for efficacy, based on clinical judgment
OG003
OPC-34712 High-dose
5.0 mg QD starting dose ± 1.0 mg. After a minimum of 2 weeks of treatment, the physician could request a dose increase, if needed for efficacy, based on clinical judgment
OG004
Aripiprazole
15 mg QD starting dose ± 5 mg. After a minimum of 2 weeks of treatment, the physician could request a dose increase, if needed for efficacy, based on clinical judgment
OG005
Placebo
Placebo QD for 6 weeks
Units
Counts
Participants
OG00041
OG00188
OG00290
OG003
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
OG000-9.76± 19.29
OG001-18.73± 20.27
OG002-16.19± 18.55
OG003
Group IDs
Group Description
Statistical Method
Statistical Comment
P-Value
P-Value Comment
Parameter Type
Parameter Value
Dispersion Type
Dispersion Value
Confidence Interval Sides
Confidence Interval %
CI Lower Limit
CI Upper Limit
CI Lower Limit Comment
CI Upper Limit Comment
Estimate Comment
Tested Non-Inferiority
Non-Inferiority Type
Non-Inferiority Comment
Other Analysis Description
OG001
OG005
Sample size was determined to achieve at least 80% power at alpha level of 0.0167 (two-sided) to detect a difference of -11.5 points in the mean change from baseline in PANSS Total Score at week 6 (LOCF) between an individual OPC-34712 treatment group (except the 0.25 mg QD fixed dose group) and placebo using a two-sided z-test.
ANCOVA
With treatment and trial center as main effects, and baseline value as covariate
0.2846
The Hochberg procedure using two-sided alpha of 0.05 was applied to control the type I error rate at 0.05 level (two-sided) due to multiple comparisons.
Treatment difference
-4.70
2-Sided
95
-10.2
0.82
No
Secondary
Change From Baseline to Week 6 in PANSS Positive Subscale Score (Double Blind Phase)
The PANSS consists of three subscales containing a total of 30 symptom constructs. For each symptom construct, severity is rated on a 7-point scale, with a score of 1 indicating absence of symptoms and a score of 7 indicating extremely severe symptoms. The positive symptom constructs are delusions, conceptual disorganization, hallucinatory behavior, excitement, grandiosity, suspiciousness/persecution, and hostility. PANSS positive subscale score is the sum of the rating scores for the 7 positive scale items from the PANSS panel. The PANSS positive subscale score ranges from 7-49, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms.
Consists of all participants who received at least one dose of study medication and have baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy evaluation. The LOCF method was used to impute missing data.
Posted
Mean
Standard Deviation
Units on a scale
Baseline to Week 6
ID
Title
Description
OG000
OPC-34712 0.25 mg
0.25 mg QD for 6 weeks
OG001
OPC-34712 Low-dose
1.0 mg QD starting dose ± 0.5 mg. After a minimum of 2 weeks of treatment, the physician could request a dose increase, if needed for efficacy, based on clinical judgment.
OG002
OPC-34712 Mid-dose
Secondary
Change From Baseline to Week 6 in PANSS Negative Subscale Score (Double Blind Phase)
The PANSS consists of three subscales containing a total of 30 symptom constructs. For each symptom construct, severity is rated on a 7-point scale, with a score of 1 indicating absence of symptoms and a score of 7 indicating extremely severe symptoms. The 7 negative symptom constructs: blunted affect, emotional withdrawal, poor rapport, passive/apathetic social withdrawal, difficulty in abstract thinking, lack of spontaneity and flow of conversation, stereotyped thinking. PANSS negative subscale score is the sum of the rating scores for the 7 negative scale items from the PANSS panel. The PANSS negative subscale score ranges from 7-49, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms.
Consists of all participants who received at least one dose of study medication and have baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy evaluation. The LOCF method was used to impute missing data.
Posted
Mean
Standard Deviation
Units on a scale
Baseline to Week 6
ID
Title
Description
OG000
OPC-34712 0.25 mg
0.25 mg QD
OG001
OPC-34712 Low-dose
1.0 mg QD starting dose ± 0.5 mg After a minimum of 2 weeks of treatment (eg, beginning at the Week 2 visit and at any subsequent visit where study medication was dispensed), the investigator could request a dose increase, if needed for efficacy, based on clinical judgment.
Secondary
Change From Baseline to Week 6 in Personal and Social Performance Scale (PSP) (Double Blind Phase)
The PSP is a validated clinician-rated scale that measures personal and social functioning in four domains. The rating is based on four main areas: (a) socially useful activities, including work and study; (b) personal and social relationships; (c) self-care; and (d) disturbing and aggressive behaviors. The ratings are converted to a total score based on a 100-point scale using algorithms to identify the appropriate 10-point interval, and the rater's judgment to determine the total score within the 10-point interval. Ratings from 71-100 reflect only mild difficulties. Ratings from 31-70 reflect manifest disabilities of various degrees. Ratings from 1-30 reflect functioning so poor that intensive support or supervision is needed.
Consists of all participants who received at least one dose of study medication and have baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy evaluation. The LOCF method was used to impute missing data.
Posted
Mean
Standard Deviation
Units on a scale
Baseline to Week 6
ID
Title
Description
OG000
OPC-34712 0.25 mg
0.25 mg QD for 6 weeks
OG001
OPC-34712 Low-dose
1.0 mg QD starting dose ± 0.5 mg. After a minimum of 2 weeks of treatment, the physician could request a dose increase, if needed for efficacy, based on clinical judgment.
Secondary
Change From Baseline to Week 6 in Clinical Global Impression-Severity of Illness Scale (CGI-S) Score (Double Blind Phase)
The severity of illness for each participant was rated using the CGI-S. To perform this assessment, the rater or investigator answered the following question: "Considering your total clinical experience with this particular population, how mentally ill is the patient at this time?" Response choices include the following: 0=not assessed; 1=normal, not at all ill; 2=borderline mentally ill; 3=mildly ill; 4=moderately ill; 5=markedly ill; 6=severely ill; 7=among the most extremely ill patients
Consists of all participants who received at least one dose of study medication and have baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy evaluation. The LOCF method was used to impute missing data.
Posted
Mean
Standard Deviation
Units on a scale
Baseline to Week 6
ID
Title
Description
OG000
OPC-34712 0.25 mg
0.25 mg QD
OG001
OPC-34712 Low-dose
1.0 mg QD starting dose ± 0.5 mg After a minimum of 2 weeks of treatment (eg, beginning at the Week 2 visit and at any subsequent visit where study medication was dispensed), the investigator could request a dose increase, if needed for efficacy, based on clinical judgment.
OG002
OPC-34712 Mid-dose
Secondary
Mean Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 6
The rater or investigator rated the particpant's total improvement whether or not it was due entirely to drug treatment. All responses were compared to the participant's condition at baseline prior to the first dose of double-blind study medication. Response choices included the following: 0=not assessed; 1=very much improved; 2=much improved; 3=minimally improved; 4=no change; 5=minimally worse; 6=much worse; 7=very much worse.
Consists of all participants who received at least one dose of study medication and have baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy evaluation. The LOCF method was used to impute missing data.
Posted
Mean
Standard Deviation
Units on a scale
Week 6
ID
Title
Description
OG000
OPC-34712 0.25 mg
0.25 mg QD for 6 weeks
OG001
OPC-34712 Low-dose
1.0 mg QD starting dose ± 0.5 mg. After a minimum of 2 weeks of treatment, the physician could request a dose increase, if needed for efficacy, based on clinical judgment.
OG002
OPC-34712 Mid-dose
2.5 mg QD starting dose ± 0.5 mg. After a minimum of 2 weeks of treatment, the physician could request a dose increase, if needed for efficacy, based on clinical judgment.
Secondary
Response Rate at Week 6
Response rate was defined as a reduction of ≥ 30% from baseline in PANSS Total Score; or a CGI-I score of 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved) at Week 6
Consists of all participants who received at least one dose of study medication and have baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy evaluation. The LOCF method was used to impuite missing data.
Posted
Number
Percentage of participants
Week 6
ID
Title
Description
OG000
OPC-34712 0.25 mg
0.25 mg QD for 6 weeks
OG001
OPC-34712 Low-dose
1.0 mg QD starting dose ± 0.5 mg. After a minimum of 2 weeks of treatment, the physician could request a dose increase, if needed for efficacy, based on clinical judgment.
OG002
OPC-34712 Mid-dose
2.5 mg QD starting dose ± 0.5 mg. After a minimum of 2 weeks of treatment, the physician could request a dose increase, if needed for efficacy, based on clinical judgment.
OG003
OPC-34712 High-dose
5.0 mg QD starting dose ± 1.0 mg. After a minimum of 2 weeks of treatment, the investigator could request a dose increase, if needed for efficacy, based on clinical judgment.
Secondary
Discontinuation Rate for Lack of Efficacy or Receipt of Open Label OPC-34712
Efficacy-related discontinuation rate was assessed
Consists of all participants who received at least one dose of study medication and have baseline and at least one post-baseline efficacy evaluation. The LOCF method was used to impute missing data.
Posted
Number
Percentage of participants
Baseline to Week 6
ID
Title
Description
OG000
OPC-34712 0.25 mg
0.25 mg QD for 6 weeks
OG001
OPC-34712 Low-dose
1.0 mg QD starting dose ± 0.5 mg. After a minimum of 2 weeks of treatment, the physicna could request a dose increase, if needed for efficacy, based on clinical judgment.
OG002
OPC-34712 Mid-dose
2.5 mg QD starting dose ± 0.5 mg. After a minimum of 2 weeks of treatment, the physician could request a dose increase, if needed for efficacy, based on clinical judgment.
OG003
OPC-34712 High-dose
5.0 mg QD starting dose ± 1.0 mg. After a minimum of 2 weeks of treatment, the physician could request a dose increase, if needed for efficacy, based on clinical judgment
Time Frame
Adverse events (AEs) were recorded from the time of signing the informed consent, during the 6-week treatment period and up to 30 days after the last dose of study medication. The AEs presented are for the double blind phase.
Description
Not provided
All-Cause Mortality Comment
Not provided
Arm/Groups
ID
Title
Description
Deaths (Affected)
Deaths (At Risk)
Serious Events (Affected)
Serious Events (At Risk)
Other Events (Affected)
Other Events (At Risk)
EG000
OPC-34712 0.25 mg
0.25 mg QD for 6 weeks
0
42
20
42
EG001
OPC-34712 Low-dose
1.0 mg QD starting dose ± 0.5 mg. After a minimum of 2 weeks of treatment, the physician could request a dose increase, if needed for efficacy, based on clinical judgment.
3
89
41
89
EG002
OPC-34712 Mid-dose
2.5 mg QD starting dose ± 0.5 mg. After a minimum of 2 weeks of treatment, the physician could request a dose increase, if needed for efficacy, based on clinical judgment.
5
90
36
90
EG003
OPC-34712 High-dose
5.0 mg QD starting dose ± 1.0 mg. After a minimum of 2 weeks of treatment, the physician could request a dose increase, if needed for efficacy, based on clinical judgment.
4
93
52
93
EG004
Aripiprazole
15 mg QD starting dose ± 5 mg. After a minimum of 2 weeks of treatment, the physician could request a dose increase, if needed for efficacy, based on clinical judgment
2
50
22
50
EG005
Placebo
Placebo QD
3
95
39
95
Serious Adverse Events
Term
Organ System
Source Vocabulary
Assessment Type
Notes
Statistical Information
Death
General disorders
MedDRA Version 11.1
Non-systematic Assessment
EG0000 affected42 at risk
EG0010 affected89 at risk
EG0020 affected90 at risk
EG0031 affected93 at risk
EG0040 affected50 at risk
EG0050 affected95 at risk
Ankle fracture
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
MedDRA Version 11.1
Non-systematic Assessment
EG0000 affected42 at risk
EG0011 affected89 at risk
EG0020 affected90 at risk
EG003
Hypoglycaemia
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
MedDRA Version 11.1
Non-systematic Assessment
EG0000 affected42 at risk
EG0010 affected89 at risk
EG0021 affected90 at risk
EG003
Rhabdomyolysis
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
MedDRA Version 11.1
Non-systematic Assessment
EG0000 affected42 at risk
EG0011 affected89 at risk
EG0021 affected90 at risk
EG003
Complex partial seizures
Nervous system disorders
MedDRA Version 11.1
Non-systematic Assessment
EG0000 affected42 at risk
EG0010 affected89 at risk
EG0020 affected90 at risk
EG003
Dizziness
Nervous system disorders
MedDRA Version 11.1
Non-systematic Assessment
EG0000 affected42 at risk
EG0010 affected89 at risk
EG0021 affected90 at risk
EG003
Anxiety
Psychiatric disorders
MedDRA Version 11.1
Non-systematic Assessment
EG0000 affected42 at risk
EG0010 affected89 at risk
EG0020 affected90 at risk
EG003
Psychotic disorder
Psychiatric disorders
MedDRA Version 11.1
Non-systematic Assessment
EG0000 affected42 at risk
EG0010 affected89 at risk
EG0020 affected90 at risk
EG003
Schizophrenia
Psychiatric disorders
MedDRA Version 11.1
Non-systematic Assessment
EG0000 affected42 at risk
EG0011 affected89 at risk
EG0021 affected90 at risk
EG003
Schizophrenia, paranoid type
Psychiatric disorders
MedDRA Version 11.1
Non-systematic Assessment
EG0000 affected42 at risk
EG0010 affected89 at risk
EG0021 affected90 at risk
EG003
Other Adverse Events
Term
Organ System
Source Vocabulary
Assessment Type
Notes
Statistical Information
Diarrhoea
Gastrointestinal disorders
MedDRA Version 11.1
Non-systematic Assessment
EG0003 affected42 at risk
EG0015 affected89 at risk
EG0021 affected90 at risk
EG0034 affected93 at risk
EG0044 affected50 at risk
EG0053 affected95 at risk
Dyspepsia
Gastrointestinal disorders
MedDRA Version 11.1
Non-systematic Assessment
EG0004 affected42 at risk
EG0014 affected89 at risk
EG0023 affected90 at risk
EG003
Nausea
Gastrointestinal disorders
MedDRA Version 11.1
Non-systematic Assessment
EG0001 affected42 at risk
EG0014 affected89 at risk
EG0027 affected90 at risk
EG003
Vomiting
Gastrointestinal disorders
MedDRA Version 11.1
Non-systematic Assessment
EG0002 affected42 at risk
EG0012 affected89 at risk
EG0026 affected90 at risk
EG003
Blood creatine phosphokinase increased
Investigations
MedDRA Version 11.1
Non-systematic Assessment
EG0001 affected42 at risk
EG0010 affected89 at risk
EG0022 affected90 at risk
EG003
Weight increased
Investigations
MedDRA Version 11.1
Non-systematic Assessment
EG0001 affected42 at risk
EG0016 affected89 at risk
EG0029 affected90 at risk
EG003
Back pain
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
MedDRA Version 11.1
Non-systematic Assessment
EG0003 affected42 at risk
EG0012 affected89 at risk
EG0023 affected90 at risk
EG003
Akathisia
Nervous system disorders
MedDRA Version 11.1
Non-systematic Assessment
EG0001 affected42 at risk
EG0016 affected89 at risk
EG0025 affected90 at risk
EG003
Dizziness
Nervous system disorders
MedDRA Version 11.1
Non-systematic Assessment
EG0000 affected42 at risk
EG0014 affected89 at risk
EG0022 affected90 at risk
EG003
Extrapyramidal disorder
Nervous system disorders
MedDRA Version 11.1
Non-systematic Assessment
EG0000 affected42 at risk
EG0013 affected89 at risk
EG0023 affected90 at risk
EG003
Headache
Nervous system disorders
MedDRA Version 11.1
Non-systematic Assessment
EG0006 affected42 at risk
EG0018 affected89 at risk
EG00213 affected90 at risk
EG003
Somnolence
Nervous system disorders
MedDRA Version 11.1
Non-systematic Assessment
EG0000 affected42 at risk
EG0013 affected89 at risk
EG0023 affected90 at risk
EG003
Agitation
Psychiatric disorders
MedDRA Version 11.1
Non-systematic Assessment
EG0004 affected42 at risk
EG0014 affected89 at risk
EG0024 affected90 at risk
EG003
Anxiety
Psychiatric disorders
MedDRA Version 11.1
Non-systematic Assessment
EG0005 affected42 at risk
EG0017 affected89 at risk
EG0026 affected90 at risk
EG003
Restlessness
Psychiatric disorders
MedDRA Version 11.1
Non-systematic Assessment
EG0000 affected42 at risk
EG0010 affected89 at risk
EG0020 affected90 at risk
EG003
Cough
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
MedDRA Version 11.1
Non-systematic Assessment
EG0003 affected42 at risk
EG0011 affected89 at risk
EG0020 affected90 at risk
EG003
Constipation
Gastrointestinal disorders
MedDRA Version 11.1
Non-systematic Assessment
EG0002 affected42 at risk
EG0014 affected89 at risk
EG0022 affected90 at risk
EG003
Insomnia
Psychiatric disorders
MedDRA Version 11.1
Non-systematic Assessment
EG0004 affected42 at risk
EG00112 affected89 at risk
EG0029 affected90 at risk
EG003
Certain Agreements
Are all PI(s) employees of the sponsor?
No
Restriction Type
Not provided
Results Disclosure Restriction on PI(s)?
No
Other Details
Not provided
Point of Contact
Title
Organization
Phone
Extension
Email
Global Medical Affairs
Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development and Commercialization, Inc.
800-562-3924
ID
Term
D012559
Schizophrenia
D012008
Recurrence
Ancestor Terms
ID
Term
D019967
Schizophrenia Spectrum and Other Psychotic Disorders
D001523
Mental Disorders
D020969
Disease Attributes
D010335
Pathologic Processes
D013568
Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms
Browse Leaves
Not provided
Browse Branches
Not provided
ID
Term
D000068180
Aripiprazole
Ancestor Terms
ID
Term
D010879
Piperazines
D006573
Heterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring
D006571
Heterocyclic Compounds
D015363
Quinolones
D011804
Quinolines
D006574
Heterocyclic Compounds, 2-Ring
D000072471
Heterocyclic Compounds, Fused-Ring
Browse Leaves
Not provided
Browse Branches
Not provided
1 subjects
FG0051 subjects
3 subjects
FG0055 subjects
4 subjects
FG00513 subjects
0 subjects
FG0050 subjects
4 subjects
FG0058 subjects
39.5
± 11.1
BG00440.8± 11
BG00538.8± 11.4
BG00639.1± 10.6
30
BG00338
BG00416
BG00537
BG006172
Male
BG00027
BG00153
BG00260
BG00355
BG00434
BG00558
BG006287
92
OG00450
OG00593
-18.25
± 20.49
OG004-17.98± 21.32
OG005-14.40± 20.13
Superiority or Other
OG002
OG005
Sample size was determined to achieve at least 80% power at alpha level of 0.0167 (two-sided) to detect a difference of -11.5 points in the mean change from baseline in PANSS Total Score at week 6 (LOCF) between an individual OPC-34712 treatment group (except the 0.25 mg QD fixed dose group) and placebo using a two-sided z-test
ANCOVA
With treatment and trial center as main effects, and baseline value as covariate
0.6066
The Hochberg procedure using two-sided alpha of 0.05 was applied to control the type I error rate at 0.05 level (two-sided) due to multiple comparisons.
Treatment difference
-1.44
2-Sided
95
-6.96
4.07
No
Superiority or Other
OG003
OG005
Sample size was determined to achieve at least 80% power at alpha level of 0.0167 (two-sided) to detect a difference of -11.5 points in the mean change from baseline in PANSS Total Score at week 6 (LOCF) between an individual OPC-34712 treatment group (except the 0.25 mg QD fixed dose group) and placebo using a two-sided z-test
ANCOVA
With treatment and trial center as main effects, and baseline value as covariate
0.3293
The Hochberg procedure using two-sided alpha of 0.05 was applied to control the type I error rate at 0.05 level (two-sided) due to multiple comparisons.
Treatment difference
-3.86
2-Sided
95
-9.32
1.59
No
Superiority or Other
OG000
OG005
Sample size was determined to achieve at least 80% power at alpha level of 0.0167 (two-sided) to detect a difference of -11.5 points in the mean change from baseline in PANSS Total Score at week 6 (LOCF) between an individual OPC-34712 treatment group (except the 0.25 mg QD fixed dose group) and placebo using a two-sided z-test
ANCOVA
With treatment and trial center as main effects, and baseline value as covariate
0.2263
Treatment difference
4.62
2-Sided
95
-2.89
12.12
No
Superiority or Other
OG004
OG005
ANCOVA
With treatment and trial center as main effects, and baseline value as covariate
0.3074
Treatment difference
-3.64
2-Sided
95
-10.7
3.38
No
Superiority or Other
2.5 mg QD starting dose ± 0.5 mg. After a minimum of 2 weeks of treatment, the physician could request a dose increase, if needed for efficacy, based on clinical judgment.
OG003
OPC-34712 High-dose
5.0 mg QD starting dose ± 1.0 mg. After a minimum of 2 weeks of treatment, the physician could request a dose increase, if needed for efficacy, based on clinical judgment.
OG004
Aripiprazole
15 mg QD starting dose ± 5 mg.After a minimum of 2 weeks of treatment, the physician could request a dose increase, if needed for efficacy, based on clinical judgment.
OG005
Placebo
Placebo QD for 6 weeks
Units
Counts
Participants
OG00041
OG00188
OG00290
OG00392
OG00450
OG00593
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
OG000-3.22± 5.26
OG001-5.97± 7.12
OG002-4.94± 6.17
OG003-5.98± 6.72
OG004-6.60± 7.16
OG005-4.82± 6.34
Group IDs
Group Description
Statistical Method
Statistical Comment
P-Value
P-Value Comment
Parameter Type
Parameter Value
Dispersion Type
Dispersion Value
Confidence Interval Sides
Confidence Interval %
CI Lower Limit
CI Upper Limit
CI Lower Limit Comment
CI Upper Limit Comment
Estimate Comment
Tested Non-Inferiority
Non-Inferiority Type
Non-Inferiority Comment
Other Analysis Description
OG000
OG005
Sample size was determined to achieve at least 80% power at alpha level of 0.0167 (two-sided) to detect a difference of -11.5 points in the mean change from baseline in PANSS positive subscale score at week 6 (LOCF) between an individual OPC-34712 treatment group (except the 0.25 mg QD fixed dose group) and placebo using a two-sided z-test.
ANCOVA
With treatment and trial center as main effects, and baseline value as covariate
0.1807
Treatment difference
1.61
2-Sided
95
-0.75
3.97
No
Superiority or Other
OG001
OG005
Sample size was determined to achieve at least 80% power at alpha level of 0.0167 (two-sided) to detect a difference of -11.5 points in the mean change from baseline in PANSS positive subscale score at week 6 (LOCF) between an individual OPC-34712 treatment group (except the 0.25 mg QD fixed dose group) and placebo using a two-sided z-test.
ANCOVA
With treatment and trial center as main effects, and baseline value as covariate
0.1313
Treatment difference
-1.41
2-Sided
95
-3.24
0.42
No
Superiority or Other
OG002
OG005
Sample size was determined to achieve at least 80% power at alpha level of 0.0167 (two-sided) to detect a difference of -11.5 points in the mean change from baseline in PANSS positive subscale score at week 6 (LOCF) between an individual OPC-34712 treatment group (except the 0.25 mg QD fixed dose group) and placebo using a two-sided z-test
ANCOVA
0.8879
Treatment difference
-0.13
2-Sided
95
-1.96
1.69
No
Superiority or Other
OG003
OG005
Sample size was determined to achieve at least 80% power at alpha level of 0.0167 (two-sided) to detect a difference of -11.5 points in the mean change from baseline in PANSS positive subscale score at week 6 (LOCF) between an individual OPC-34712 treatment group (except the 0.25 mg QD fixed dose group) and placebo using a two-sided z-test.
ANCOVA
With treatment and trial center as main effects, and baseline value as covariate
0.1764
Treatment difference
-1.24
2-Sided
95
-3.05
0.56
No
Superiority or Other
OG004
OG005
Sample size was determined to achieve at least 80% power at alpha level of 0.0167 (two-sided) to detect a difference of -11.5 points in the mean change from baseline in PANSS positive subscale score at week 6 (LOCF) between an individual OPC-34712 treatment group (except the 0.25 mg QD fixed dose group) and placebo using a two-sided z-test.
ANCOVA
With treatment and trial center as main effects, and baseline value as covariate
0.1111
Treatment difference
-1.79
2-Sided
95
-4.00
0.42
No
Superiority or Other
OG002
OPC-34712 Mid-dose
2.5 mg QD starting dose ± 0.5 mg After a minimum of 2 weeks of treatment (eg, beginning at the Week 2 visit and at any subsequent visit where study medication was dispensed), the investigator could request a dose increase, if needed for efficacy, based on clinical judgment.
OG003
OPC-34712 High-dose
5.0 mg QD starting dose ± 1.0 mg After a minimum of 2 weeks of treatment (eg, beginning at the Week 2 visit and at any subsequent visit where study medication was dispensed), the investigator could request a dose increase, if needed for efficacy, based on clinical judgment.
OG004
Aripiprazole
15 mg QD starting dose ± 5 mg After a minimum of 2 weeks of treatment (eg, beginning at the Week 2 visit and at any subsequent visit where study medication was dispensed), the investigator could request a dose increase, if needed for efficacy, based on clinical judgment.
OG005
Placebo
Placebo QD
Units
Counts
Participants
OG00042
OG00189
OG00290
OG00393
OG00450
OG00595
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
OG000-1.93± 5.24
OG001-3.61± 5.15
OG002-3.84± 5.09
OG003-3.99± 5.40
OG004-3.00± 5.74
OG005-3.17± 4.88
Group IDs
Group Description
Statistical Method
Statistical Comment
P-Value
P-Value Comment
Parameter Type
Parameter Value
Dispersion Type
Dispersion Value
Confidence Interval Sides
Confidence Interval %
CI Lower Limit
CI Upper Limit
CI Lower Limit Comment
CI Upper Limit Comment
Estimate Comment
Tested Non-Inferiority
Non-Inferiority Type
Non-Inferiority Comment
Other Analysis Description
OG000
OG005
Sample size was determined to achieve at least 80% power at alpha level of 0.0167 (two-sided) to detect a difference of -11.5 points in the mean change from baseline in PANSS negative subscale score at week 6 (LOCF) between an individual OPC-34712 treatment group (except the 0.25 mg QD fixed dose group) and placebo using a two-sided z-test.
ANCOVA
With treatment and trial center as main effects, and baseline value as covariate
0.2896
Treatment difference
1.00
2-Sided
95
-0.86
2.86
No
Superiority or Other
OG001
OG005
Sample size was determined to achieve at least 80% power at alpha level of 0.0167 (two-sided) to detect a difference of -11.5 points in the mean change from baseline in PANSS negative subscale score at week 6 (LOCF) between an individual OPC-34712 treatment group (except the 0.25 mg QD fixed dose group) and placebo using a two-sided z-test.
ANCOVA
With treatment and trial center as main effects, and baseline value as covariate
0.3701
Treatment difference
-0.61
2-Sided
95
-1.94
0.72
No
Superiority or Other
OG002
OG005
Sample size was determined to achieve at least 80% power at alpha level of 0.0167 (two-sided) to detect a difference of -11.5 points in the mean change from baseline in PANSS negative subscale score at week 6 (LOCF) between an individual OPC-34712 treatment group (except the 0.25 mg QD fixed dose group) and placebo using a two-sided z-test.
ANCOVA
With treatment and trial center as main effects, and baseline value as covariate
0.6074
Treatment difference
-0.35
2-Sided
95
-1.69
0.99
No
Superiority or Other
OG003
OG005
Sample size was determined to achieve at least 80% power at alpha level of 0.0167 (two-sided) to detect a difference of -11.5 points in the mean change from baseline in PANSS negative subscale score at week 6 (LOCF) between an individual OPC-34712 treatment group (except the 0.25 mg QD fixed dose group) and placebo using a two-sided z-test
ANCOVA
With treatment and trial center as main effects, and baseline value as covariate
0.2777
Treatment difference
-0.73
2-Sided
95
-2.05
0.59
No
Superiority or Other
OG004
OG005
Sample size was determined to achieve at least 80% power at alpha level of 0.0167 (two-sided) to detect a difference of -11.5 points in the mean change from baseline in PANSS negative subscale score at week 6 (LOCF) between an individual OPC-34712 treatment group (except the 0.25 mg QD fixed dose group) and placebo using a two-sided z-test.
ANCOVA
With treatment and trial center as main effects, and baseline value as covariate
0.8611
Treatment difference
-0.15
2-Sided
95
-1.90
1.59
No
Superiority or Other
OG002
OPC-34712 Mid-dose
2.5 mg QD starting dose ± 0.5 mg. After a minimum of 2 weeks of treatment, the physician could request a dose increase, if needed for efficacy, based on clinical judgment.
OG003
OPC-34712 High-dose
5.0 mg QD starting dose ± 1.0 mg After a minimum of 2 weeks of treatment (eg, beginning at the Week 2 visit and at any subsequent visit where study medication was dispensed), the investigator could request a dose increase, if needed for efficacy, based on clinical judgment.
OG004
Aripiprazole
15 mg QD starting dose ± 5 mg. After a minimum of 2 weeks of treatment, the physician could request a dose increase, if needed for efficacy, based on clinical judgment.
OG005
Placebo
Placebo QD for 6 weeks
Units
Counts
Participants
OG00039
OG00186
OG00284
OG00390
OG00450
OG00590
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
OG0004.54± 13.25
OG00111.36± 14.84
OG00210.67± 15.21
OG00312.17± 14.72
OG00410.66± 13.13
OG0057.56± 14.90
Group IDs
Group Description
Statistical Method
Statistical Comment
P-Value
P-Value Comment
Parameter Type
Parameter Value
Dispersion Type
Dispersion Value
Confidence Interval Sides
Confidence Interval %
CI Lower Limit
CI Upper Limit
CI Lower Limit Comment
CI Upper Limit Comment
Estimate Comment
Tested Non-Inferiority
Non-Inferiority Type
Non-Inferiority Comment
Other Analysis Description
OG000
OG005
Sample size was determined to achieve at least 80% power at alpha level of 0.0167 (two-sided) to detect a difference of -11.5 points in the mean change from baseline in PSP score at week 6 (LOCF) between an individual OPC-34712 treatment group (except the 0.25 mg QD fixed dose group) and placebo using a two-sided z-test.
ANCOVA
With treatment and trial center as main effects, and baseline value as covariate
0.3726
Treatment difference
-2.36
2-Sided
95
-7.57
2.85
No
Superiority or Other
OG001
OG005
Sample size was determined to achieve at least 80% power at alpha level of 0.0167 (two-sided) to detect a difference of -11.5 points in the mean change from baseline in PSP score at week 6 (LOCF) between an individual OPC-34712 treatment group (except the 0.25 mg QD fixed dose group) and placebo using a two-sided z-test.
ANCOVA
With treatment and trial center as main effects, and baseline value as covariate
0.0664
Treatment difference
3.80
2-Sided
95
-0.26
7.85
No
Superiority or Other
OG002
OG005
Sample size was determined to achieve at least 80% power at alpha level of 0.0167 (two-sided) to detect a difference of -11.5 points in the mean change from baseline in PANSS Total Score at week 6 (LOCF) between an individual OPC-34712 treatment group (except the 0.25 mg QD fixed dose group) and placebo using a two-sided z-test
ANCOVA
With treatment and trial center as main effects, and baseline value as covariate
0.2944
Treatment difference
2.20
2-Sided
95
-1.92
6.32
No
Superiority or Other
OG003
OG005
Sample size was determined to achieve at least 80% power at alpha level of 0.0167 (two-sided) to detect a difference of -11.5 points in the mean change from baseline in PANSS Total Score at week 6 (LOCF) between an individual OPC-34712 treatment group (except the 0.25 mg QD fixed dose group) and placebo using a two-sided z-test
ANCOVA
With treatment and trial center as main effects, and baseline value as covariate
0.0596
Treatment difference
3.86
2-Sided
95
-0.16
7.89
No
Superiority or Other
OG004
OG005
Sample size was determined to achieve at least 80% power at alpha level of 0.0167 (two-sided) to detect a difference of -11.5 points in the mean change from baseline in PANSS Total Score at week 6 (LOCF) between an individual OPC-34712 treatment group (except the 0.25 mg QD fixed dose group) and placebo using a two-sided z-test
ANCOVA
With treatment and trial center as main effects, and baseline value as covariate
0.1819
Treatment difference
3.25
2-Sided
95
-1.53
8.03
No
Superiority or Other
2.5 mg QD starting dose ± 0.5 mg After a minimum of 2 weeks of treatment (eg, beginning at the Week 2 visit and at any subsequent visit where study medication was dispensed), the investigator could request a dose increase, if needed for efficacy, based on clinical judgment.
OG003
OPC-34712 High-dose
5.0 mg QD starting dose ± 1.0 mg After a minimum of 2 weeks of treatment (eg, beginning at the Week 2 visit and at any subsequent visit where study medication was dispensed), the investigator could request a dose increase, if needed for efficacy, based on clinical judgment.
OG004
Aripiprazole
15 mg QD starting dose ± 5 mg After a minimum of 2 weeks of treatment (eg, beginning at the Week 2 visit and at any subsequent visit where study medication was dispensed), the investigator could request a dose increase, if needed for efficacy, based on clinical judgment.
OG005
Placebo
Placebo QD
Units
Counts
Participants
OG00041
OG00188
OG00290
OG00392
OG00450
OG00593
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
OG000-0.39± 0.86
OG001-0.99± 1.29
OG002-0.87± 1.11
OG003-1.10± 1.24
OG004-1.00± 1.21
OG005-0.82± 1.16
Group IDs
Group Description
Statistical Method
Statistical Comment
P-Value
P-Value Comment
Parameter Type
Parameter Value
Dispersion Type
Dispersion Value
Confidence Interval Sides
Confidence Interval %
CI Lower Limit
CI Upper Limit
CI Lower Limit Comment
CI Upper Limit Comment
Estimate Comment
Tested Non-Inferiority
Non-Inferiority Type
Non-Inferiority Comment
Other Analysis Description
OG000
OG005
Sample size was determined to achieve at least 80% power at alpha level of 0.0167 (two-sided) to detect a difference of -11.5 points in the mean change from baseline in CGI-S score at week 6 (LOCF) between an individual OPC-34712 treatment group (except the 0.25 mg QD fixed dose group) and placebo using a two-sided z-test
ANCOVA
With treatment and trial center as main effects, and baseline value as covariate
0.0685
Treatment difference
0.38
2-Sided
95
-0.03
0.79
No
Superiority or Other
OG001
OG005
Sample size was determined to achieve at least 80% power at alpha level of 0.0167 (two-sided) to detect a difference of -11.5 points in the mean change from baseline in PANSS Total Score at week 6 (LOCF) between an individual OPC-34712 treatment group (except the 0.25 mg QD fixed dose group) and placebo using a two-sided z-test
ANCOVA
With treatment and trial center as main effects, and baseline value as covariate
0.0989
Treatment difference
-0.28
2-Sided
95
-0.60
0.05
No
Superiority or Other
OG002
OG005
Sample size was determined to achieve at least 80% power at alpha level of 0.0167 (two-sided) to detect a difference of -11.5 points in the mean change from baseline in PANSS Total Score at week 6 (LOCF) between an individual OPC-34712 treatment group (except the 0.25 mg QD fixed dose group) and placebo using a two-sided z-test.
ANCOVA
With treatment and trial center as main effects, and baseline value as covariate
0.8006
Treatment difference
-0.04
2-Sided
95
-0.37
0.28
No
Superiority or Other
OG003
OG005
Sample size was determined to achieve at least 80% power at alpha level of 0.0167 (two-sided) to detect a difference of -11.5 points in the mean change from baseline in PANSS Total Score at week 6 (LOCF) between an individual OPC-34712 treatment group (except the 0.25 mg QD fixed dose group) and placebo using a two-sided z-test
ANCOVA
With treatment and trial center as main effects, and baseline value as covariate
0.0898
Treatment difference
-0.28
2-Sided
95
-0.60
0.04
No
Superiority or Other
OG004
OG005
Sample size was determined to achieve at least 80% power at alpha level of 0.0167 (two-sided) to detect a difference of -11.5 points in the mean change from baseline in PANSS Total Score at week 6 (LOCF) between an individual OPC-34712 treatment group (except the 0.25 mg QD fixed dose group) and placebo using a two-sided z-test
ANCOVA
With treatment and trial center as main effects, and baseline value as covariate
0.2851
Treatment difference
-0.21
2-Sided
95
-0.59
0.18
No
Superiority or Other
OG003
OPC-34712 High-dose
5.0 mg QD starting dose ± 1.0 mg. After a minimum of 2 weeks of treatment, the physician could request a dose increase, if needed for efficacy, based on clinical judgment.
OG004
Aripiprazole
15 mg QD starting dose ± 5 mg. After a minimum of 2 weeks of treatment, the physician could request a dose increase, if needed for efficacy, based on clinical judgment.
OG005
Placebo
Placebo QD for 6 weeks
Units
Counts
Participants
OG00041
OG00188
OG00290
OG00392
OG00450
OG00593
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
OG0003.66± 1.48
OG0013.08± 1.58
OG0023.17± 1.45
OG0033.04± 1.50
OG0043.04± 1.52
OG0053.34± 1.54
Group IDs
Group Description
Statistical Method
Statistical Comment
P-Value
P-Value Comment
Parameter Type
Parameter Value
Dispersion Type
Dispersion Value
Confidence Interval Sides
Confidence Interval %
CI Lower Limit
CI Upper Limit
CI Lower Limit Comment
CI Upper Limit Comment
Estimate Comment
Tested Non-Inferiority
Non-Inferiority Type
Non-Inferiority Comment
Other Analysis Description
OG000
OG005
Sample size was determined to achieve at least 80% power at alpha level of 0.0167 (two-sided) to detect a difference of -11.5 points in the mean change from baseline in PANSS Total Score at week 6 (LOCF) between an individual OPC-34712 treatment group (except the 0.25 mg QD fixed dose group) and placebo using a two-sided z-test
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
The Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) row mean scores differ test controlling for study center was applied to mean CGI-I score
0.4008
No
Superiority or Other
OG001
OG005
Sample size was determined to achieve at least 80% power at alpha level of 0.0167 (two-sided) to detect a difference of -11.5 points in the mean change from baseline in PANSS Total Score at week 6 (LOCF) between an individual OPC-34712 treatment group (except the 0.25 mg QD fixed dose group) and placebo using a two-sided z-test
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
The CMH row mean scores differ test controlling for study center was applied to mean CGI-I score
0.1117
No
Superiority or Other
OG002
OG005
Sample size was determined to achieve at least 80% power at alpha level of 0.0167 (two-sided) to detect a difference of -11.5 points in the mean change from baseline in PANSS Total Score at week 6 (LOCF) between an individual OPC-34712 treatment group (except the 0.25 mg QD fixed dose group) and placebo using a two-sided z-test.
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
The CMH row mean scores differ test controlling for study center was applied to mean CGI-I score
0.2739
No
Superiority or Other
OG003
OG005
Sample size was determined to achieve at least 80% power at alpha level of 0.0167 (two-sided) to detect a difference of -11.5 points in the mean change from baseline in PANSS Total Score at week 6 (LOCF) between an individual OPC-34712 treatment group (except the 0.25 mg QD fixed dose group) and placebo using a two-sided z-test.
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
The CMH row mean scores differ test controlling for study center was applied to mean CGI-I score
0.1045
No
Superiority or Other
OG004
OG005
Sample size was determined to achieve at least 80% power at alpha level of 0.0167 (two-sided) to detect a difference of -11.5 points in the mean change from baseline in PANSS Total Score at week 6 (LOCF) between an individual OPC-34712 treatment group (except the 0.25 mg QD fixed dose group) and placebo using a two-sided z-test.
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
The CMH row mean scores differ test controlling for study center was applied to mean CGI-I score
0.1149
No
Superiority or Other
OG004
Aripiprazole
15 mg QD starting dose ± 5 mg. After a minimum of 2 weeks of treatment, the physician could request a dose increase, if needed for efficacy, based on clinical judgment.
OG005
Placebo
Placebo QD for 6 weeks
Units
Counts
Participants
OG00042
OG00189
OG00290
OG00393
OG00450
OG00595
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
OG00040.5
OG00157.3
OG00246.7
OG00351.6
OG00460.0
OG00549.5
Group IDs
Group Description
Statistical Method
Statistical Comment
P-Value
P-Value Comment
Parameter Type
Parameter Value
Dispersion Type
Dispersion Value
Confidence Interval Sides
Confidence Interval %
CI Lower Limit
CI Upper Limit
CI Lower Limit Comment
CI Upper Limit Comment
Estimate Comment
Tested Non-Inferiority
Non-Inferiority Type
Non-Inferiority Comment
Other Analysis Description
OG000
OG005
Sample size was determined to achieve at least 80% power at alpha level of 0.0167 (two-sided) to detect a difference of -11.5 points in the mean change from baseline in PANSS Total Score at week 6 (LOCF) between an individual OPC-34712 treatment group (except the 0.25 mg QD fixed dose group) and placebo using a two-sided z-test.
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
CMH general association test controlling for study center will be applied to the analysis of response rate
0.6200
Relative Risk
0.89
2-Sided
95
0.57
1.40
No
Superiority or Other
OG001
OG005
Sample size was determined to achieve at least 80% power at alpha level of 0.0167 (two-sided) to detect a difference of -11.5 points in the mean change from baseline in PANSS Total Score at week 6 (LOCF) between an individual OPC-34712 treatment group (except the 0.25 mg QD fixed dose group) and placebo using a two-sided z-test.
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
CMH general association test controlling for study center will be applied to the analysis of response rate
0.1501
Relative Risk
1.19
2-Sided
95
0.95
1.48
No
Superiority or Other
OG002
OG005
Sample size was determined to achieve at least 80% power at alpha level of 0.0167 (two-sided) to detect a difference of -11.5 points in the mean change from baseline in PANSS Total Score at week 6 (LOCF) between an individual OPC-34712 treatment group (except the 0.25 mg QD fixed dose group) and placebo using a two-sided z-test.
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
CMH general association test controlling for study center will be applied to the analysis of response rate
0.5271
Relative Risk
0.91
2-Sided
95
0.66
1.25
No
Superiority or Other
OG003
OG005
Sample size was determined to achieve at least 80% power at alpha level of 0.0167 (two-sided) to detect a difference of -11.5 points in the mean change from baseline in PANSS Total Score at week 6 (LOCF) between an individual OPC-34712 treatment group (except the 0.25 mg QD fixed dose group) and placebo using a two-sided z-test
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
CMH general association test controlling for study center will be applied to the analysis of response rate
0.8670
Relative Risk
1.02
2-Sided
95
0.78
1.34
No
Superiority or Other
OG004
OG005
Sample size was determined to achieve at least 80% power at alpha level of 0.0167 (two-sided) to detect a difference of -11.5 points in the mean change from baseline in PANSS Total Score at week 6 (LOCF) between an individual OPC-34712 treatment group (except the 0.25 mg QD fixed dose group) and placebo using a two-sided z-test.
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
CMH general association test controlling for study center will be applied to the analysis of response rate
0.3892
Relative Risk
1.15
2-Sided
95
0.85
1.56
No
Superiority or Other
OG004
Aripiprazole
15 mg QD starting dose ± 5 mg. After a minimum of 2 weeks of treatment, the physician could request a dose increase, if needed for efficacy, based on clinical judgment.
OG005
Placebo
Placebo QD
Units
Counts
Participants
OG00042
OG00189
OG00290
OG00393
OG00450
OG00595
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
OG00031
OG00122.5
OG00217.8
OG00316.1
OG00416.0
OG00524.2
Group IDs
Group Description
Statistical Method
Statistical Comment
P-Value
P-Value Comment
Parameter Type
Parameter Value
Dispersion Type
Dispersion Value
Confidence Interval Sides
Confidence Interval %
CI Lower Limit
CI Upper Limit
CI Lower Limit Comment
CI Upper Limit Comment
Estimate Comment
Tested Non-Inferiority
Non-Inferiority Type
Non-Inferiority Comment
Other Analysis Description
OG000
OG005
Sample size was determined to achieve at least 80% power at alpha level of 0.0167 (two-sided) to detect a difference of -11.5 points in the mean change from baseline in PANSS Total Score at week 6 (LOCF) between an individual OPC-34712 treatment group (except the 0.25 mg QD fixed dose group) and placebo using a two-sided z-test.
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
0.8540
Derived using CMH test stratified by trial center.
Relative risk
1.06
2-Sided
95
0.59
1.88
No
Superiority or Other
OG001
OG005
Sample size was determined to achieve at least 80% power at alpha level of 0.0167 (two-sided) to detect a difference of -11.5 points in the mean change from baseline in PANSS Total Score at week 6 (LOCF) between an individual OPC-34712 treatment group (except the 0.25 mg QD fixed dose group) and placebo using a two-sided z-test
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
0.4492
Derived using CMH test stratified by trial center.
Relative Risk
0.82
2-Sided
95
0.49
1.38
No
Superiority or Other
OG002
OG005
Sample size was determined to achieve at least 80% power at alpha level of 0.0167 (two-sided) to detect a difference of -11.5 points in the mean change from baseline in PANSS Total Score at week 6 (LOCF) between an individual OPC-34712 treatment group (except the 0.25 mg QD fixed dose group) and placebo using a two-sided z-test.
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
0.1854
Derived using CMH test stratified by trial center.
Relative Risk
0.67
2-Sided
95
0.36
1.23
No
Superiority or Other
OG003
OG005
Sample size was determined to achieve at least 80% power at alpha level of 0.0167 (two-sided) to detect a difference of -11.5 points in the mean change from baseline in PANSS Total Score at week 6 (LOCF) between an individual OPC-34712 treatment group (except the 0.25 mg QD fixed dose group) and placebo using a two-sided z-test.
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
0.0946
Derived using CMH test stratified by trial center.
Relative Risk
0.61
2-Sided
95
0.33
1.10
No
Superiority or Other
OG004
OG005
Sample size was determined to achieve at least 80% power at alpha level of 0.0167 (two-sided) to detect a difference of -11.5 points in the mean change from baseline in PANSS Total Score at week 6 (LOCF) between an individual OPC-34712 treatment group (except the 0.25 mg QD fixed dose group) and placebo using a two-sided z-test.
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
0.2133
Derived using CMH test stratified by trial center.