Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Patients with moderate to severe chronic Low Back Pain (LBP) despite current analgesic treatment participated in a Phase IV clinical trial to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of the lidocaine patch 5% compared to placebo in treating moderate to severe chronic LBP.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1- Lidoderm® | Experimental | Lidoderm (lidocaine patch 5%), up to three patches applied topically once daily (q24h) to the area of maximal peripheral pain |
|
| 2-Placebo | Placebo Comparator | Matching placebo, up to three patches applied topically once daily (q24h) to the area of maximal peripheral pain |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lidoderm® | Drug | Eligible patients were randomized equally to one of two groups: lidocaine patch 5% or matching placebo patch. During the 6-week treatment period, patients used up to three patches daily applied q24h. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Mean change in average daily pain intensity (BPI Question 5) from baseline week to the final week of treatment (primary endpoint) | Visit - V2 (Day 0), V3 (Day 7), V4 (Day 14), V5 (Day 28), V6/EOS (Day 42) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Mean change from baseline to Week 2 and Week6/EOS in average daily pain intensity (BPI Question 5) | ||
| Pain relief (BPI Question 8) | ||
| Mean change from baseline to Week 2 and Week 6 in Pain Quality Assessment Scale (PQAS) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Sr. Director | Endo USA Inc., a Keenova Therapeutics Company | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Birmingham | Alabama | United States | ||||
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C511998 | Lidoderm |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Lidoderm® | Drug | Eligible patients were randomized equally to one of two groups: lidocaine patch 5% or matching placebo patch. During the 6-week treatment period, patients used up to three patches daily applied q24h. |
|
|
| Patient and Investigator Global Impression of Pain Relief at Week 6 |
| QoL: Change from baseline to Week 6 in pain interference with QoL (BPI Question 9) and Profile of Mood States (POMS) |
| Safety assessments included AEs, discontinuations as a result of AEs, clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, physical examination, plasma lidocaine levels, dermal assessments and sking sensory testing |
| Hueytown |
| Alabama |
| United States |
| Phoenix | Arizona | United States |
| Mill Valley | California | United States |
| Allentown | Pennsylvania | United States |
| Salt Lake City | Utah | United States |