Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Hyperglycaemia is commonly found in critically ill patients. Clinical studies demonstrated that tight blood glucose control in medical and surgical ICU patients results in a significant better outcome for the patients. Based on this emerging clinical evidence, there are increasing efforts worldwide to maintain strict glycaemic control in critically ill patients. However, achieving this goal requires extensive nursing efforts, including frequent bedside glucose monitoring and the implementation of complex intensive insulin infusion protocols. A fully automated algorithm may help to overcome some of these limitations by excluding intuitive interventions and integrating relevant clinical data in the decision-making process. This study will investigate the performance of an eMPC algorithm adjusted to target the range 4.4 - 8.3 mmol/L in line with the Surviving Sepsis guidelines.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| eMPC | Experimental | improved model predictive control algorithm (eMPC) for glycaemic control in ICU patients |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| enhanced model predictive control algorithm (eMPC) | Other | eMPC (software on a bedside computer) advised insulin titration to establish tight glycaemic control |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| percentage of time within the predefined glucose target range of 80-150 mg/dL | from start of treatment to the last glucose measurement under treatment |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Hypoglycemias | from start of treatment to the last glucose measurement under treatment | |
| Usability parameters like convenience of alarming function; workload; blood sampling frequency | from start of treatment to the last glucose measurement under treatment |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Jeremy Cordingley, Dr. | Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Royal Brompton Hospital and Harefield NHS Trust | London | United Kingdom |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18661120 | Background | Cordingley JJ, Vlasselaers D, Dormand NC, Wouters PJ, Squire SD, Chassin LJ, Wilinska ME, Morgan CJ, Hovorka R, Van den Berghe G. Intensive insulin therapy: enhanced Model Predictive Control algorithm versus standard care. Intensive Care Med. 2009 Jan;35(1):123-8. doi: 10.1007/s00134-008-1236-z. Epub 2008 Jul 26. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Concomitant medication including insulin infusion rate, parenteral/enteral nutrition | from start of treatment to the last glucose measurement under treatment |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D016638 | Critical Illness |
| D007333 | Insulin Resistance |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020969 | Disease Attributes |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D006946 | Hyperinsulinism |
| D044882 | Glucose Metabolism Disorders |
| D008659 | Metabolic Diseases |
| D009750 | Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided